Death of the Theory of the Evolution of Man
Ed Conrad
Conrad) wrote:
>
>
>For years, pseudos, scumbags and sleazeballs in talk.origins
>-- loyal members of the disgraceful Scientific Establishment --
>have been denying the physical evidence that man is as old as coal.
>
>In my persistent defense of truth, I have had my character
>assassinated more than anyone I have ever known.
>
>I have been called every despicable name in the book but none
>has come from honest scientists -- certainly not from honest
>anthropologists because, quite frankly, none are alive today.
>
>The character assassination has been set in motion by dishonest
>scientists who have fraudulenty examined or tested some of my key
>specimens -- ala, the Smithsonian Institution; the University of
>California at Berkeley; Andrew MacRae, then at the University of
>Calgary; the Departments of Anthropology, Paleontology and Entomology
>at Penn State Univesity; Kurt Wise, then at Harvard University; Alan
>Walker, then at Johns Hopkins University; the Paleontology Research
>Institute in Ithaca, N.Y.; Paul Myers, then at Temple University and
>now at the University of Minnesota; and the disgraceful parade sadly
>goes on and on.
>
>On talk.origins and in the other cesspool evolution-loving news groups
>such as sci.anthropology and sci.anthropology.paleo, the attack on my
>reputation has come from birds of a vested-interest feather who have
>*never* seen, *never* examined and *never* tested any of my specimens.
>
>Their character assassination is based strictly on hearsay -- and the
>sayers, who have been the ringleaders of the conspiracy against truth,
>are dead wrong.
>
>For example, Wilton Krogrman. one of the world's foremost human
>anatomists, had spent time studying some of my specimens and came
>to the conclusion that I indeed have discovered portions of petrified
>human remains between coal seams.
>
>Jeremy Dahl, then a bone expert when at Yerkes Primate Research Center
>in Atlanta, confirmed a specimen he had examined and tested is
>petrified B-O-N-E.
>
>Favorable results were obtained during state-of-the- art scientific
>testing such as infrared scans, CATscans and Calculus Analysis by
>Crystallography; from the scanning electronic microscope, and from
>American Medical Laboritories -- one of the nation's most prestigious
>-- which identified dried blood and protein on about a half-dozen
>of my key specimens, including human remains.
====================================================
Excuse the interruption...
Here is the American Medical Laboratories' test report on the
specimen that Wilton M. Krogman, author of "The Human Skeleton
in Forensic Medicine," identified as a portion of a human calvarium,
a skull with the eye sockets broken off.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-024S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-025S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-026S.JPG
======================================================
>
>Sad to say, I have made only one attempt to have DNA testing
>done on the dried blood found by American Medical Laboratories --
>but this testing result was a complete fraud, since its administrators
>undoubtedly were fearful of being truthful, dreading the wrath of the
>scientific establishment.
>
>I was told DNA couldn't be done because no traces of blood could be
>found. But when I questioned its written report which stated that
>"reddish brown powder" had been identified on three of the specimens
>-- the one Krogman identified as a human calvarium; the complete human
>cranium protuding from the boulder (which Krogman never saw) and the
>portion of the tibia -- I specifically inquired about the "reddish
>brown powder" that the lab stated it discovered.
>
>"To me, reddish brown powder adds up to B-L-O-O-D," I told the DNA
>expert. Rather amazingly, he replied: "I agree!"
>
>For years, I have accused the Scientific Establishment, its members
>and its hangers-on of engaging in a conspiracy of mistruth against
>mankind. I have charged them with conducting a campaign of deceit,
>decepetion, collusion and conspiracy in their attempt to protect their
>monumental fraud, the facetious theory of the evolution of man.
>
>Homo sapiens, in almost our precent form, DID exist during the
>Carbonifeorus Period -- at least 280 million years ago. The only
>remaining question is how and why he was there -- and, of course, how
>he came to be torn limb from limb, along with large land animals, and
>left buried between what later would become veins of anthracite coal.
>
>I can only guess it was the result of an incredible catastrophe,
>the kind Immanuel Velikovsky had described so eloquently in his books.
>But then, more than a half-century ago, established science utilized
>character assassination to discredit him in the eyes of John Q.
>Public, much the same as they are doing today.
>
>But, the fact is, man DID inhabit the earth back then,
>multi-multi-millions of years before the most distant age of Homo
>sapeins' emergency on earth via Darwin's and the evolutionists'
>theory. It is fact, NOT fantasy, and makes us realize how much we
>really don't know about the earth, about the universe, about the human
>race.
>
>In the New Year -- 2003 -- time finally will run out for honest,
>uprighteous investigation of these discoveries of petrified bones,
>teeth and soft organs (some human) between anthracite
>veins by members of this nation's unscrupulous scientific institutions
>and universities.
>
>They have had their golden opportunity to seek truth and they
>have blown it.
>
>And now the question of my integrity will be answered in other
>places in the world in 2003, from honest scientists and honest
>scientific institutions in foreign lands to whom scientific integrity
>remains sacred. Some groundwork already has been laid, and
>it has been greeted with great enthusiasm.
>
>Those who scoff at what can -- and will be -- accomplished in
>the new year need only reflect on my track record, one of
>incredible accomplishment against what, I agree, have been
>unsurmountable odds.
>
>That said, I assure you that proper testing results will confirm,
>beyond any shadow of a doubt, that ALL character assassination on
>my integirity has been the result of dishonest scientists' devious
>disrespect for physical evidence in order to suit their own personal
>ambitions -- done out of fear to protect their vested interests
>despite a factless paradigm long gone berserk.
>
>These pseudoscientists, scumbags and sleazeballs will regret that
>they have been willing and enthusiastic participants in this colossal
>hoax aimed at denying mankind the knowledge and reality of our true
>origin and ancestry.
>
>And the best part will be further revelation of more deceit,
>deception, collusion and conspiracy -- more horror stories in the
>assault against truth -- to which I personally have borne witness and,
>thus far, have only revealed the tip of the iceberg.
>
>
>================================================
>
>> ~~ MAN AS OLD AS COAL ~~
>> (And a Lot of Other Creatures, Too)
>
> ================================================
>
>> ALL SPECIMENS FOUND BETWEEN
>> PENNSYLVANIA'S ANTHRACITE VEINS
>
>> (Strata geologically dated at a minimum of 280 million years)
>
>This specimen was identified as a petrified human cranium,
>a skull with the eyesockets broken off, by the late Dr. Wilton
>Krogman, one of the world's leading human anatomists and author
>of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine." He is shown
>examining it in the second photo. Moments after the photo was taken,
>a medical doctor walked into the room at the Cooper Clinic in
>Lancaster, Pa., and Krogman invited him over to see "the oldest human
>skull ever found."
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/krogwskull.jpg
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-006S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-007S.JPG
>
>A CATscan of the above specimen revealed a second protrusion
>that isn't visible to the naked eye. It showed it is located precisely
>where it would be expected to be found in a human cranium.
>That report follows:
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg
>
>This specimen also had tested positive for the presence of Haversian
>canals under microscopic scrutiny. Additionally, American Medical
>Laboratories in Chantilly, Va., performed testing of calculus analysis
>by crystallography and revealed that it contains "a composition of
>dried blood intermingled with a few small crystals resembling calcium
>oxalate dihydrate."
>
>That report follows:
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-012S.JPG
>
>=============================================
>
>Another petrified human skull -- this one embedded in a boulder
>that weights some 3,000 pounds. It was found within 100 feet of the
>previous skull and a year later, also having come from between
>anthracite veins in Schuylkill County, Pa
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skulla.jpg
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skullb.jpg
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/other1.jpg
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z2_2.jpg
>
>A microcopic photo of granules removed from the specimen
>reveal the presence of Haversian canals. This is the same
>specimen that was emphatically denied as being bone by
>the Smithsonian Institution. It earlier had stated that
>microscopic examination of the cell structure is required,
>then ignored that test completely and responded by saying
>it had performed "x-ray analysis" which, it deceitfully claimed,
>confirmed that the specimen is not bone. The fact is, "x-ray analysis"
>is not an appropriate test to determine whether an object is bone.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/proof1.jpg
>
>====================================================
>
>A petrified human femur still in shale, a near-cousin to coal, which
>also had been removed from between anthracite veins. Portions of
>the bulb ends have broken off.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z8femur.jpg
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z6femur.jpg
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/z7femur.jpg
>
>=====================================================
>
>This specimen was identified as a portion of a tibia by Wilton
>Krogman. It contains Haversian canals, the telltale sign of bone,
>embarrassing Andrew Macrae, then of Calgary University, who had
>performed fraudulent testing for cellular structure. For his test
>results, he had used a meticulously prepared ground section that had
>been prepared from a rock or concretion.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/newtibia.jpg
>
>A scanning electronic microscope (SEM) was used to examine
>the inner surface features of this specimen to compare it with
>cadaver bone at the same power magnification. Here are the
>SEM photos at 2,000X.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/bones.jpg
>
>This is the same specimen that Andrew Macrae played fraudulent games
>with. He then posted photos of ground sections on his web page,
>claiming they were views of the cellular structure of the specimen and
>insisting it wasn't bone because no circles (Haversian canals) could
>be found. However, the photo beneath it taken later shows it DOES
>contain circles -- Haversian canals --- and, therefore, IS petrified
>bone. It was just one of several fraudulent scientific and/or
>deceiving tests conducted on some of these specimens by members
>of the Scientifiic Establishment. The photo on the left in the
>following URL is what Macrae posted. The next two show what
>a ground section really looks like.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/ts_compare1.jpg
>> http://edconrad.com/canals/slide1.jpg
>> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/0505160x.jpg
>
>Additionally, American Medical Laboratories had performed calculus
>analysis by crystallography on this particular specimen and reported
>that it "consisted predominately of dried blood and protein."
>That report follows:
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-006S.JPG
>
>==============================================
>
>An assorment of miscellaneous specimens, primarily portions of
>petrified mandibles (jaw bones), found between the same coal veins:
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-001S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-002S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-005S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-007S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-008S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-009S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG
>
>==============================================
>
>A human lung, petrified:
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-015S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-016S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-017S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-018S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-019S.JPG
>
>============================================
>
>A pair of petrified fetuses. The large one, which has been transformed
>to a coal-like substance, measures 6 1/2 inches in length.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-010S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-011S.JPG
>
>=============================================
>
>A petrified gall bladder, with a CATscan later revealling the
>presence of a gall stone inside.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z5gall.jpg
>
>This is one of the specimens that was tested by American
>Medical Laboratories via calculus analysis by crystallography.
>It revealed the specimen "consists of a few small pieces of dried
>blood," adding that "none of the constituents normally found
>in urinary calculi are present." (which comes as no surprise since
>the specimen it tested is petrified).
>That report follows:
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-010S.JPG
>
>=============================================
>
>Portion of dinosaur foot embedded in anthracite-bearing shale:
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-012S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-013S.JPG
>
>============================================
>
>This was the very first discovery of petrified bone in coal-bearing
>Carboniferous strata in June 1981. It resembled a giant skull and
>the Smithsonian expressd an interest in examining
>it personally. However, its experts dismissed it as a rock or
>concretion without any testing whatsoever, not even revealing that
>a microscopic study of cell structure would accurately identify
>whether it is bone. Later, a pair of petrified teeth -- a premolar and
>a canine -- were found inside the jaw area. One was subjected to an
>infrared scan which revealed its origin is that of a bone or a tooth.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/first.jpg
>
>The premolar that was found inside the jaw area:
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-014S.JPG
>
>============================================
>
>A petrified handcrafted wooden handle, which has been transformed
>to anthracite, found between coal veins.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-001S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-002S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-004S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG
>
>============================================
>
>A portion of petrified bone still in slate (or shale), near cousin of
>coa, that confirms the bone is older than the material in which
>it is embedded:
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-016S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-017S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG
>
>============================================
>
>A giant canine tooth, found between the same coal veins:
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-009S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-007S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-008S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-006S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-010S.JPG
>
>These specimens and the honest testing results prove, beyond
>the shadow of a doubt, that man and large land animals existed
>while coal was being formed.
>
>This is NOT theory and rhetoric, which is what the pseudoscientists
>have used to brainwash the common man. It is physical evidence,
>which is what science is supposed to be all about.
>
>==================================================
>
>> PORTION OF A GIANT PREHISTORIC SCORPION
>> (Petrified)
>> Discovered Between Anthracite Veins
>
>This is a portion of a giant prehistoric scorpion that was
>identified as such by none other than the late Wilton M.
>Krogman, one of the world's foremost authorities on anatomy
>-- human and non-human -- and author of "The Human
>Skeleton in Forensic Medicine."
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-022S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-021S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-016S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-017S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-019S.JPG
>
>Krogman explained that he was able to identify it because he
>had done extensive research disecting insects, especially scorpions,
>during his career, therefore was *absolutely certain* what it is.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-002S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-003S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-004S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-005S.JPG
>
>This specimen originiated from between anthracite veins
>in Pennsylvania's hard coal region -- in Schuylkill County --
>and was found more than 20 years ago in two separate pieces
>which fit together perfectly.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-006S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-007S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-008S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-009S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG
>
>It must be emphasized that this particular specimen was the
>subject of another cover-up by members of the Scientific
>Establishment -- at one of America's most prestigious universities
>-- but we'll save this latest horror story of deceit, deception,
>collusion and conspiracy for another day.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-011S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-012S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-013S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-014S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-015S.JPG
>
>The discovery of the physical evidence of giant scorpions inhabiting
>the earth during the time that anthracite was being formed -- along
>with discoveries of petrified bones, teeth and even soft organs, some
>human -- as well as a dinosaur foot embedded in shale in the same
>strata means that men, giant scorpions and dinosaurs undoubtedly
>existed together at one point multi-multi-millions of years ago.
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-018S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-023S.JPG
>
>Ed Conrad
>> http://www.edconrad.com
>
>MAN AS OLD AS COAL
>