Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Republicans vote against medals to Capitol Police Who Shoot Unarmed Women

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Crowder

unread,
Feb 7, 2022, 2:20:02 AM2/7/22
to
In article <stq5q1$1oo0g$1...@news.mixmin.net>
Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 22:13:32 -0700, Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >>>> Really? No trial or anything? Jawohl!
> >>>
> >>> So if you're being attacked by someone you beg them for a trial, do
> >>> ya?
> >>>
> >>> ROFLMAO
> >>>
> >>> That's correct, dumb shit. No trial. You have a problem with that?
> >>>
> >>> Then STAY HOME and don't loot and burn and attack people.
> >
> >> "that guy needed shooting" - courts and juries decide these things.
> >
> > Well, no, they don't.
>
> Yes they do, kamerad.

Cite a case.

Crowder

unread,
Feb 7, 2022, 2:45:02 AM2/7/22
to
In article <stq6ca$1oqbl$1...@news.mixmin.net>
Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 22:01:55 -0700, Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Scout wrote:
> >
> >>> Well since he didn't shoot wildly, but placed each shot with great
> >>> precision...
> >>
> >> "precision" HAHAHHAH
> >
> > Correct. No innocent people got hurt.
> >
>
> Courts decide that in America, kamerad.

No they don't, the shooter does. Courts decide afterwards.

gronk fails again.

Crowder

unread,
Feb 7, 2022, 2:45:02 AM2/7/22
to
In article <stq6lf$1oqbl$3...@news.mixmin.net>
Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 22:22:38 -0700, Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:29:40 -0700, Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 13:54:31 -0700, Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> bigdog wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Friday, December 3, 2021 at 12:43:53 AM UTC-5, Gronk wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:02:22 -0700, Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> bigdog wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> The kid did nothing more than act in self defense against three
> >>>>>> people who were attempting to kill him or do great bodily harm. If he
> >>>>>> hadn't done what he did, he might very well be dead. But those facts don't
> >>>>>> matter to the left wing mob, the MSM, or the politically motivated DA's
> >>>>>> office in Kenosha. They want their pound of flesh and if they can't get it
> >>>>>> in the courtroom, they will resort to a virtual lynching of Kyle
> >>>>>> Rittenhouse on TV and in print. These people are vile.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> He crosses state lines, is underage, someone gets a gun for him, his mom
> >>>>>>>>>> didn't know where he was, he wandered around waving his bang bang, and
> >>>>>>>>>> he's a victim?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> HOLY SHIT!!!!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> HIS MOM DIDN'T KNOW WHERE HE WAS?!?!?!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [chuckle]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> He was underage, crossing state lines with a gun and kills people. Poor
> >>>>>>>> parenting.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Being underage is not a crime.
> >>>>>>> Crossing state lines is not a crime.
> >>>>>>> Carrying a long gun is not a crime.
> >>>>>>> Killing people in self defense is not a crime.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Gronk just went 0 for 4.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Militia Boy brought this all about by wanting to play militia and run down
> >>>>>> the streets with
> >>>>>> a bang bang. He had no sense or business doing any of this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The cool thing is YOU don't get to decide that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> LOL
> >>>>
> >>>> "that guy needed shooting" - your words LOL
> >>>
> >>> They did.
> >>>
> >>
> >> No trial or courts need, eh kamerad?
> >
> > Correct.
>
> Incorrect, kamerad.

Yes, you are incorrect.

Crowder

unread,
Feb 7, 2022, 3:25:02 AM2/7/22
to
In article <stq6he$1oqbl$2...@news.mixmin.net>
Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> bigdog wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 12:26:41 AM UTC-5, Gronk wrote:
> >> Scout wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Gronk" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> >>> news:ssdij0$251v8$1...@news.mixmin.net...
> >>>> Scout wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Gronk" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> >>>>> news:sri8vl$3rmm5$4...@news.mixmin.net...
> >>>>>> Scout wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Gronk" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> >>>>>>> news:sr2cdt$25i2s$1...@news.mixmin.net...
> >>>>>>>> Scout wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "Gronk" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>> news:spmgpf$1n4pf$8...@news.mixmin.net...
> >>>>>>>>> Not illegal.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A dangerous situation and his panic fire proves this. It's a wonder
> >>>>>>>> more weren't killed by him.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If that was panic fire, I would love to see how good he is when he
> >>>>>>> takes his time....
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> He didn't need to fire at all.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The jury felt otherwise, as do most rational people.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> He paniced.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If that's panic, I would hate to see what he's capable of when cool and
> >>>>> collected.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> He could have use his bang bang
> >>>>>> in other ways
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Such as? Oh, and make sure your answers are legal options.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here, it's in Russian, just your style:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afhtMYkbKL0
> >>>>
> >>>> "Hand to Hand Combat With Assault Rifle"
> >>>>
> >>>> Training anyone?
> >>>
> >>> It's far easier to simply pull the trigger, and just as legal....
> >> Not if alternatives exist, and they did - if one was trained...
> >
> > Ask Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber how well trained Kyle was. Oh, wait. You can't.
> > Never mind.
>
> Militia Boy needed multiple rounds and could easily have run away instead...

Run away while armed and be attacked from behind?

Would you do that?

If you answer yes you're a pussy.

0 new messages