The pro-Palestinian propagandists are in full retreat! Well, the view of
an opponent's back is a very familiar sight to me. On another note, the
Million Mom March Revival at meetup.com seems to be scrambling to find a
new hole to hide in for some reason...
--Bill
http://www.omdurman.org/ism.html JUSTICE FOR RACHEL CORRIE NOW!
http://www.omdurman.org/leaflets/ism_ter.html ISM's founders explain, in
their own words, the Palestinians' need for a combined strategy of
violence and nonviolence. I've added a picture to clarify their
position. (Warning, graphic cartoon violence.)
Such a beautiful, educated young lady.
Aren't you the least bit curious, want to know,
if you would just admit it to yourself,
about the immediate circumstances leading to her death?
Why would the Israeli government allow the
very bulldozer used to kill her to parade
at her memorial in Israel?
Doesn't that cause you ANY concern,
cause you to pause, ask questions?
Well??!!
"William A. Levinson" <wlev...@ix.NOSPAM4MEnetcom.com> wrote in message
news:bhdrop$ps2$1...@slb0.atl.mindspring.net...
torresD wrote:
> William, Aren't you the least bit sorry that
> Rachel Corrie died?
I've said many times that, if I could bring her back to life, I would.
Only God has that power and (per Christian theology only) He's chosen to
exercise it only twice (Lazarus and Jesus).
> Such a beautiful, educated young lady.
But her inexperience with the real world made her easy prey for the
people who sent her to her death, as I've described.
http://www.omdurman.org/ism.html (And now note the links of ISM's
founders to terror.)
> Aren't you the least bit curious, want to know,
> if you would just admit it to yourself,
> about the immediate circumstances leading to her death?
>
> Why would the Israeli government allow the
> very bulldozer used to kill her to parade
> at her memorial in Israel?
How do you know it was the same bulldozer? And who uses bulldozers in a
military parade, anyway?
>
> Doesn't that cause you ANY concern,
> cause you to pause, ask questions?
I did ask questions (prompted, in fact, by some of JoeBoy's messages)
and I found answers that would-be ISM volunteers won't like.
>
> Well??!!
http://www.omdurman.org/leaflets/ism_ter.html (warning, graphic cartoon
violence). Well??!! (The quote is from a pro-Palestinian site so I am
obviously not making it up.)
> torresD wrote:
> William, Aren't you the least bit sorry that
> Rachel Corrie died?
> I've said many times that, if I could bring her back to life, I would.
I believe you. I think if you had been present,
you would have found a way to stop that bulldozer.
> Only God has that power and (per Christian theology only) He's chosen to
Is there a God an invisible man in the sky?
I don't know.
> exercise it only twice (Lazarus and Jesus).
Well maybe.
> Such a beautiful, educated young lady.
> But her inexperience with the real world made her easy prey for the
> people who sent her to her death, as I've described.
> http://www.omdurman.org/ism.html (And now note the links of ISM's
> founders to terror.)
>
> > Aren't you the least bit curious, want to know,
> > if you would just admit it to yourself,
> > about the immediate circumstances leading to her death?
> >
> > Why would the Israeli government allow the
> > very bulldozer used to kill her to parade
> > at her memorial in Israel?
>
> How do you know it was the same bulldozer? And who uses bulldozers in a
> military parade, anyway?
I did post the Guardian article on that very subject,
the bulldozer was identified by the serial numbers.
> >
> > Doesn't that cause you ANY concern,
> > cause you to pause, ask questions?
>
> I did ask questions (prompted, in fact, by some of JoeBoy's messages)
> and I found answers that would-be ISM volunteers won't like.
>
> >
> > Well??!!
Somewhere in the middle, lies the truth.
Someone posting here said that it had the same ID number.
My guess is that the IDF is telling foreign interlopers that Israel is to be
governed by Israelis, clueless jackasses need not attempt to interfere.
Either that or their short on bulldozers & had to use very available one.
Susan
Yeah, well, now it looks as if torresDumbass has a new mangled
body to parade around - or, make that an old-new mangled body,
because now torres is parading Jesus around as a victim of the
Evil Jooooz.
And the blood libels jest keep on comin.....
Deborah
>The pro-Palestinian propagandists are in full retreat! Well, the view of
>an opponent's back is a very familiar sight to me. On another note, the
>Million Mom March Revival at meetup.com seems to be scrambling to find a
>new hole to hide in for some reason...
>--Bill
>http://www.omdurman.org/ism.html JUSTICE FOR RACHEL CORRIE NOW!
>
>http://www.omdurman.org/leaflets/ism_ter.html ISM's founders explain, in
>their own words, the Palestinians' need for a combined strategy of
>violence and nonviolence. I've added a picture to clarify their
>position. (Warning, graphic cartoon violence.)
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
Deborah Sharavi wrote:
> "William A. Levinson" <wlev...@ix.NOSPAM4MEnetcom.com> wrote:
>
>>TorresD and everyone else who was parading Rachel Corrie's mangled body
>>around these newsgroups seem to have given up. I do owe them a huge debt
>>of gratitude, though, for leading me to new methods of attack on the
>>International Solidarity Movement and the Electronic Intifada.
>
>
> Yeah, well, now it looks as if torresDumbass has a new mangled
> body to parade around - or, make that an old-new mangled body,
> because now torres is parading Jesus around as a victim of the
> Evil Jooooz.
>
> And the blood libels jest keep on comin.....
>
> Deborah
I've no problem at all with that one. The Pallies will be sorry they
ever went near the "Jews are Christ killers" blood libel per
http://www.omdurman.org/crucify.html and
http://www.omdurman.org/leaflets/c_killer.html
Alternately, if they will stop lying about us we will stop telling the
truth about them. No, on second thought, let them keep lying about us
and we will keep telling the truth about them, because any battle in
which you can cut the enemy up like sheep is a good one.
--Bill
torresD wrote:
> "William A. Levinson" <wlev...@ix.NOSPAM4MEnetcom.com
>
>
>>torresD wrote:
>
>
> > William, Aren't you the least bit sorry that
> > Rachel Corrie died?
>
>
>>I've said many times that, if I could bring her back to life, I would.
>
>
> I believe you. I think if you had been present,
> you would have found a way to stop that bulldozer.
No, but I hope I would have sensed the danger she was in and gotten to
her in time to pull her out of its way, by force if necessary.
>>Only God has that power and (per Christian theology only) He's chosen to
>
>
> Is there a God an invisible man in the sky?
> I don't know.
>
>
>>exercise it only twice (Lazarus and Jesus).
>
> Well maybe.
It's not part of my belief system.
> > Such a beautiful, educated young lady.
>
>
>>But her inexperience with the real world made her easy prey for the
>>people who sent her to her death, as I've described.
>>http://www.omdurman.org/ism.html (And now note the links of ISM's
>>founders to terror.)
>>
>>
>>>Aren't you the least bit curious, want to know,
>>>if you would just admit it to yourself,
>>>about the immediate circumstances leading to her death?
>>>
>>>Why would the Israeli government allow the
>>>very bulldozer used to kill her to parade
>>>at her memorial in Israel?
>>
>>How do you know it was the same bulldozer? And who uses bulldozers in a
>>military parade, anyway?
>
>
> I did post the Guardian article on that very subject,
> the bulldozer was identified by the serial numbers.
A brief Google search didn't find this. What is the link?
Yes, I would have been an activist for the bulldozer the way the ISM are
activists for terrorist houses.
Susan
Who parades bulldozers in memorials?
>"William A. Levinson" <wlev...@ix.NOSPAM4MEnetcom.com> wrote:
>>How do you know it was the same bulldozer? And who uses
>>bulldozers in a military parade, anyway?
My question.
"Susan Cohen" <fla...@his.com> wrote:
>Someone posting here said that it had the same ID number.
>My guess is that the IDF is telling foreign interlopers that Israel is to be
>governed by Israelis, clueless jackasses need not attempt to interfere.
Same question again: who, if anyone (except the former USSR),
uses bulldozers in a parade? Or a memorial?
Deborah
bar Kochba
I think the USSR paraded tractors; they were in love with them. Not that
they learned anything else from Henry Ford on how to run an economy.
They also paraded huge missiles, presumably to intimidate the United States.
--Bill
Exactly how many thousands of miles away from 'Israel' do you choose
to live, Levinstein? Shit, you're probably the only jew in Wilkes
Barre, PA. Whassa matter - don't like the company of your own race?
--
"I have often been called a Nazi, and although it is unfair, I
don't let it bother me. I don't let it bother me for one simple
reason. No one has _ever_ had a fantasy about being tied to a
bed and sexually ravished by someone dressed as a liberal."
- P.J. O'Rourke (American author)
"Bulldozer Bitch" is more apt.
--
"That would be hilarious if Bush won the popular vote but lost the
Electoral College.
"That would be fuunnnnnnnnnnay!"
Tim "Skidmark" Brown
ban...@iglou.com
Boycott France. Boycott Turkey.
"Thank you, Mr. Bush!"
> No, but I hope I would have sensed the danger she was in and gotten to
> her in time to pull her out of its way, by force if necessary.
That is what I meant, I didn't express it correctly.
William Mullin wrote:
> In article <b10b3f91.03081...@posting.google.com>,
> SuleimanX <Sulei...@arabia.com> wrote:
>
>>"torresD" <torr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:<bIv_a.2980$Bn4....@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>...
>>
>>>William, Aren't you the least bit sorry that
>>>Rachel Corrie died?
>>
>> Torres, are you sorry for the inquisition done by your fellow Spanish
>> Well, Rachel was a foreign interloper going where she had no business to be
>> probably an anti-semite just like you. Call her RACHEL THE pANCAKE.
>
>
> "Bulldozer Bitch" is more apt.
No, she was an innocent girl with more idealism than maturity (like many
people in their early twenties). This made her an easy victim for
manipulators who may well have wanted to get her killed so they could
make propaganda.
Daniel Bernard wrote:
> "The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe" <reni...@anglicam.org> wrote in message
> news:3f3b09f5...@news.onetel.net.uk...
>
>>Exactly how many thousands of miles away from 'Israel' do you choose
>>to live, Levinstein? Shit, you're probably the only jew in Wilkes
>>Barre, PA. Whassa matter - don't like the company of your own race?
Stay away from Wilkes-Barre, Fformby-Smythe. There is only ONE cattle
farm in these parts and I'm sure as hell not going to tell you where it
is. Take your sexual preference to Texas, cowpoker, I mean, cowpoke.
-------------------------------
Remember this one, "Cowboy?"
Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
> Anyone who finds sexual diversity "disgusting and distasteful" is a
> bigot by his own admission. QED. You are a hypocrite and a bigot.
> Liberals such as myself fully embrace sexual diversity and revel in
> its glorious mosaic of multiculturalism (with thanks to former NYC
> mayor David Dinkins for the phrase).
>
>>Since it constitutes animal abuse, I have a major problem with it, and I
>>don't think it should be legal.
>
> Why do you think it constitutes animal abuse? If you or I tried to
> fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It should not
> only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative lifestyle.
>
> The fact is that animals are incapable of giving or refusing consent.
> To imagine otherwise is a ridiculous anthropomorphism (look it up,
> Levinstein). Do we ask animals for their consent before we kill them
> and eat them? By comparison, getting fucked is a minor inconvenience
MOOOOOOOOOO!
------------------------------
> Once again Rev, you have hit the nail right on the head with a succinct and
> so correct post. Anyway, can you blame the jew if he dislikes the company of
> his own tribe. Now he knows how the rest of the world feels.
Of what "tribe" are you a member, Daniel? Is it subhuman as a whole or
do you simply carry all its recessive genes?
I don't know if all that or any of it is true,
Levinson.
It sounds really horrendous that anyone would
do that to a young girl.
I think that Rachel Corrie was innocent,
but to say that anyone manipulated her
with the goal of getting her killed,
well that is just too much.
I wasn't personally responsible for the Spanish Inquisition.
However, it does no harm to read about that period
and understand how horrific it is, when the church
and state act as one.
People were tortured, died because they didn't
say the "right thing" they didn't think like the church.
The church in this case, being the Catholic church.
That period has been accurately called the 'Dark Period'.
Anyone who refuted the Catholics was fodder for the
fires.
Wasn't it Machiavelli who said
"The Church was appropriated God for its own ends".
I agree with those that say,
Man invented God, God did not invent Man.
How were human beings going to explain,
thunder, fire, volcanos, earthquakes, if not to
invent a God.
God was invented, the Spirits were invented
by man to provide an explanation for events
like the ones I described and others.
There were no scientist at that time.
But then the God thing turned into a money maker.
ENOUGH!
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 19:00:57 GMT, "torresD" <torr...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>> No, she was an innocent girl with more idealism than maturity (like many
>> people in their early twenties). This made her an easy victim for
>> manipulators who may well have wanted to get her killed so they could
>> make propaganda.
>>
>> --Bill
--
Joel M. Eichen, .
Philadelphia PA
STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
<You fill it in>
torresD wrote:
> "William A. Levinson" >
>
>>No, she was an innocent girl with more idealism than maturity (like many
>>people in their early twenties). This made her an easy victim for
>>manipulators who may well have wanted to get her killed so they could
>>make propaganda.
>>
>>--Bill
>
>
>
> I don't know if all that or any of it is true,
> Levinson.
> It sounds really horrendous that anyone would
> do that to a young girl.
>
> I think that Rachel Corrie was innocent,
> but to say that anyone manipulated her
> with the goal of getting her killed,
> well that is just too much.
See my Web page, http://www.omdurman.org/ism.html
Far worse has been done. We have to recognize the depths of evil of
which people and governments are capable.
Our own country's Yellow Press invented Spanish atrocity propaganda
(although some atrocities were real) to whip up hatred of Spain. When
the U.S.S. "Maine" blew up in Havana, probably due to an internal
explosion (accident), the newspapers immediately accused Spain of the
evil dead. Hence the Spanish-American War. I suppose it was a "splendid
little war" because, at least on our side, it was fought primarily by
adventure-seeking volunteers (e.g. Theodore Roosevelt) and not draftees.
And we did liberate the Cubans and Filipinos from oppression.
Do you really think terrorists who think nothing of blasting women and
children to bits with nails that are tipped with rat poison wouldn't
hesitate to set up an innocent young American woman to be killed,
ostensibly by Israel? I'm sure they didn't single Rachel Corrie out; any
of her friends would have done as well.
> I wasn't personally responsible for the Spanish Inquisition.
>
> However, it does no harm to read about that period
> and understand how horrific it is, when the church
> and state act as one.
Yes-- any church and any state. Christians have fortunately outgrown
that sort of thing, with isolated exceptions like Serbia and Northern
Ireland. Among militant "Islam" it's still a matter of policy.
"Adulterous" women are tortured to death by stoning because that's
Sharia, "Islamic" law. As far as I am concerned, any civilized nation
has the moral right (but not duty, because it involves placing our
soldiers at risk) to end such a regime with bullet and bayonet.
> People were tortured, died because they didn't
> say the "right thing" they didn't think like the church.
> The church in this case, being the Catholic church.
>
> That period has been accurately called the 'Dark Period'.
>
> Anyone who refuted the Catholics was fodder for the
> fires.
The Captain, played by Michael Caine in "The Last Valley," (a story of
the Thirty Years War) summed it up by denouncing the Catholics as
rotten, corrupt, vicious, and hypocritical-- "And the other side is just
as rotten."
What's interesting about the story, though, is that the Captain's
mercenaries-- robbers, rapists, murderers, and arsonists of any village
they came across-- had a rule that any man who started a fight over
religion had to be slain immediately. "Let that rule be broken once and
we'll all be dead by nightfall."
--Bill
:>torresD wrote:
:>> William, Aren't you the least bit sorry that
:>> Rachel Corrie died?
:>I've said many times that, if I could bring her back to life, I would.
Why would you?
Her choice to be a human shield for the ISM supported cowardly arab moslem
terrorists would only lead to the risk of Jewish deaths or her death again.
Why bother?
[ snipped ]
--
Binyamin Dissen <bdi...@dissensoftware.com>
http://www.dissensoftware.com
"William A. Levinson" <wlev...@ix.NOSPAM4MEnetcom.com> wrote:
>I think the USSR paraded tractors; they were in love with them.
They were proud of them, anyway.
>Not that they learned anything else from Henry Ford on how
>to run an economy.
Henry Ford knew how to run an entire economy? I thought
he simply knew how to make money off the backs of assembly
line workers.
>They also paraded huge missiles, presumably to intimidate
>the United States.
Missiles & tanks, sure. But torres claims Israel "paraded"
the Corrie DC9 at her memorial. Come on! A dozer isn't
exactly something you drive down Van Nuys Blvd. In fact,
you don't "drive" a dozer anywhere. And this was a heavily
armoured dozer to boot - which torres claims Israel had
on "parade" at the Corrie memorial. Come on!
"torresD" <torr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bIv_a.2980$Bn4....@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
Like Rabin's membership in the "Stern Gang"?
>I wasn't personally responsible for the Spanish Inquisition.
>However, it does no harm to read about that period
>and understand how horrific it is, when the church
>and state act as one.
>People were tortured, died because they didn't
>say the "right thing" they didn't think like the church.
Happens all the time in Arab/Muslim lands.
>The church in this case, being the Catholic church.
>That period has been accurately called the 'Dark Period'.
The Spanish Inquisition occurred in the Renaissance,
not the so-called "Dark Ages".
She won't. The committee refuses to consider her.
Susan
Deborah Sharavi wrote:
>>>Same question again: who, if anyone (except the former USSR),
>>>uses bulldozers in a parade? Or a memorial?
>
>
> "William A. Levinson" <wlev...@ix.NOSPAM4MEnetcom.com> wrote:
>
>>I think the USSR paraded tractors; they were in love with them.
>
>
> They were proud of them, anyway.
>
>
>>Not that they learned anything else from Henry Ford on how
>>to run an economy.
>
>
> Henry Ford knew how to run an entire economy? I thought
> he simply knew how to make money off the backs of assembly
> line workers.
Ford actually gave his workers very high wages, and raised them as his
profits increased. Other employers called him a Socialist! ("If you pay
your men $5/day, OUR workers are going to want that kind of money!")
Ford's industries were actually responsible for making the U.S. the
wealthiest and most powerful nation on earth.
Germany, like Russia, didn't pay much attention to his methods (even
though there were Ford plants in Germany). Otherwise we'd have been up
to our necks in Tiger tanks, but the Germans were never able to build
many of these monsters.
>>They also paraded huge missiles, presumably to intimidate
>>the United States.
>
>
> Missiles & tanks, sure. But torres claims Israel "paraded"
> the Corrie DC9 at her memorial. Come on! A dozer isn't
> exactly something you drive down Van Nuys Blvd. In fact,
> you don't "drive" a dozer anywhere. And this was a heavily
> armoured dozer to boot - which torres claims Israel had
> on "parade" at the Corrie memorial. Come on!
>
> Deborah
Doesn't sound reasonable to me.
--Bill
That was the torres claim, that "the Israeli government
allow[ed] the very bulldozer used to kill her to parade
at her memorial in Israel". [Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:46:31
GMT] Torres claimed [Wed, 13 Aug 2003 19:35:28 GMT] "I
did post the Guardian article on that very subject,
the bulldozer was identified by the serial numbers."
So, who parades bulldozers at anything (outside a
bulldozer dealers' convention), and how the hell did
these guys get close enough to an armoured (military,
I assume) dozer to read the serial numbers?
Just another load from the ole Pallibull fertilizer
factory, I guess. They want all the mileage they can
get from the Corrie incident.
>
>
>Daniel Bernard wrote:
>
>> "The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe" <reni...@anglicam.org> wrote in message
>> news:3f3b09f5...@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>
>>>Exactly how many thousands of miles away from 'Israel' do you choose
>>>to live, Levinstein? Shit, you're probably the only jew in Wilkes
>>>Barre, PA. Whassa matter - don't like the company of your own race?
>
>Stay away from Wilkes-Barre, Fformby-Smythe. There is only ONE cattle
>farm in these parts
How far is it to the nearest jew? Philadelphia?
>and I'm sure as hell not going to tell you where it
>is. Take your sexual preference to Texas, cowpoker, I mean, cowpoke.
You seem to have a problem with bestiality, Levinstein. What exactly
is it? Are you (gasp) a bigot?
>-------------------------------
>Remember this one, "Cowboy?"
Yes indeed.
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22fformby-smythe%22+%22fuck+a+cow%22&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&as_qdr=all&selm=3f1e225c.5150933%40news.tiscali.co.uk&rnum=1
>
>Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>
>> Anyone who finds sexual diversity "disgusting and distasteful" is a
>> bigot by his own admission. QED. You are a hypocrite and a bigot.
>> Liberals such as myself fully embrace sexual diversity and revel in
>> its glorious mosaic of multiculturalism (with thanks to former NYC
>> mayor David Dinkins for the phrase).
>>
>
>>>Since it constitutes animal abuse, I have a major problem with it, and I
>>>don't think it should be legal.
>>
>> Why do you think it constitutes animal abuse? If you or I tried to
>> fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It should not
>> only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative lifestyle.
>>
>> The fact is that animals are incapable of giving or refusing consent.
>> To imagine otherwise is a ridiculous anthropomorphism (look it up,
>> Levinstein). Do we ask animals for their consent before we kill them
>> and eat them? By comparison, getting fucked is a minor inconvenience
>
>MOOOOOOOOOO!
You do see that advertising your failure to embrace sexual diversity
identifies you as a bigot and a weirdo, don't you, Levinstein?
Levinstein is a known bigot who has failed to embrace the glorious
rainbow of sexual diversity. Even his fellow jews disown him. He has
been banished from New York City (jew Central) to Wilkes-Barre, PA.
The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:13:04 +0000 (UTC), "Daniel Bernard"
> <adorab...@dot.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>"The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe" <reni...@anglicam.org> wrote in message
>>news:3f3b09f5...@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>
>>>Exactly how many thousands of miles away from 'Israel' do you choose
>>>to live, Levinstein? Shit, you're probably the only jew in Wilkes
>>>Barre, PA. Whassa matter - don't like the company of your own race?
>>>
>>
>>Once again Rev, you have hit the nail right on the head with a succinct and
>>so correct post. Anyway, can you blame the jew if he dislikes the company of
>>his own tribe. Now he knows how the rest of the world feels.
>
>
> Levinstein is a known bigot who has failed to embrace the glorious
> rainbow of sexual diversity.
This is what "Cowboy" Fformby-Smythe means by "sexual diversity." He is
not in danger of AIDS. His problems are anthrax and Mad Cow (and not by
handling letters from terrorists or eating tainted beef, either).
-------------------------------
Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
> Anyone who finds sexual diversity "disgusting and distasteful" is a
> bigot by his own admission. QED. You are a hypocrite and a bigot.
> Liberals such as myself fully embrace sexual diversity and revel in
> its glorious mosaic of multiculturalism (with thanks to former NYC
> mayor David Dinkins for the phrase).
>
>> Since it constitutes animal abuse, I have a major problem with it,
and I don't think it should be legal.
>
>
> Why do you think it constitutes animal abuse? If you or I tried to
> fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It should not
> only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative lifestyle.
>
> The fact is that animals are incapable of giving or refusing consent.
> To imagine otherwise is a ridiculous anthropomorphism (look it up,
> Levinstein). Do we ask animals for their consent before we kill them
> and eat them? By comparison, getting fucked is a minor inconvenience
MOOOOOOOOOO!
In your case, by the way, a hamster wouldn't notice, but it's still
technically animal abuse.
No cows in these parts, Cowpoker, so move on...
--Bill
http://www.omdurman.org/ism.html JUSTICE FOR RACHEL CORRIE NOW!
http://www.omdurman.org/leaflets/ism_ter.html ISM's founders explain, in
Being poor has it's drawbacks it seems.
>Why do you think it constitutes animal abuse? If you or I tried to
>> > fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It should not
>> > only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative lifestyle.
>> >
>> > The fact is that animals are incapable of giving or refusing consent.
>> > To imagine otherwise is a ridiculous anthropomorphism (look it up,
>> > Levinstein).
>
>aha, now i know why you like to fuck cows...
>
>women resist too much!
>
>why don't you go to a whorehouse then?
Whorehouses, cowhouses, they all come under the glorious umbrella of
sexual diversity which we are commanded to embrace and revel in.
Well, I take back a good chunk of what I said; he's obviously not *too*
stupid.
Then again, his observations are too obvious to miss.
>
> Being poor has it's drawbacks it seems.
Hatred of women does as well.
Susan
You can't manage a "drawback", Alpertzheimer. Half of your dick was
removed when you were eight days old.
>Suzy
I suppose you think of yourself as a "woman", Suzy? In reality you're
an ageing Irish fishwife who may be biologically female but about as
far from being a "woman" as one could imagine.