Bush is a wonderful man
American Christian Patriot
it is G-d who puts people in the presidency not us. I do realize we do
not always understand why He chooses the ones He does but He does. For
instance Clinton, I have not figured that one out and probably never
will. I must admit he did do some good except for turning the White
House into his own pleasure pad.I believe G-d has placed a man that
knows Him in this position. He has answered our prayers that we want G-
d to be back at the center of this country. And no, that is not popular
opionon. But, when have the things of G-d ever been. Not to say Mr.Gore
would not have done any good for our country. I just don't thing he had
the sincerity of Mr. Bush.
This is a new day for America and I am thankful it has finally come.I
also believe a new day for Israel. Mr. Bush being a Christian knows
that Jerusalem should not be given up at any cost. Not one more inch
should be lost to palestinian control. God gave it to the Jews and they
should fight for her with all they have.G-d will fight with them I have
no doubt and we as the United States should back them completely.
Hopefully this will teach terroist that we will not be bullied anymore.
If not then Jeus will come again and we will live in peace forever
more. From what I understand, and I,m no scholar, we are living Ezekial
38 right before our eyes.
I will continue to pray for Jerusalem without ceasing untill that day
comes. Believe it or not we Christians do really care.
S_O_G
--
Be Christian, Be Zionist, be Local Hero, be Cool
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
Albert Reingewirtz
<good_ch...@jesusanswers.com> wrote:
All I can say is this: IMPEACH THE THIEF!
Howard Aubrey
Albert Reingewirtz wrote:
Do you mean Neyanyahu who was caught red handed stealing??? He hasn't even
been elected yet, please be patient..
HJA
People's Pizza
American Christian Patriot <good_ch...@jesusanswers.com> wrote in
message news:91r44t$jon$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
Duke Nukem
totally believes that god really cares about Bush! Why is this kind of
talk so popular amongst republicans? Are they as dumb as they seem to
be?
Albert Reingewirtz
<ha...@erols.com> wrote:
No, I meant Di Dubya A, the one who stole an election.
smiley
> Yet another brainwashed faithful all American christian man, who
CORRECTION this IDIOT is NOT American, he is Canadian!
He used to call himself solder of god
> totally believes that god really cares about Bush! Why is this kind of
> talk so popular amongst republicans? Are they as dumb as they seem to
> be?
--
:-)
James Dusek
says...
> All I can say is this: IMPEACH THE THIEF!
No need to be nasty, CLinton will be leave office very soon,
no need to impeach him again.
James Dusek
efkent
recession. Are these American citizens being brainwashed? Clinton is yet in
office, but his cronies are now claiming that it's Bush's fault that the
economy is now in decline.
Do I see yet another Democratic smoke screen in pointing the finger to
divert the admittance that it was their decisions for 8 years that caused
this deflating of a over-inflated economy.
When you borrow, you pay. Now we pay, not because of Bush but because of
Clinton and Greenspan's, (or however his name is spelled), economic
policies.
Eugene Kent. A Labor Voice from Ohio. Support the Palestine Intafadah.
Boycott israel and jewish businesses.
Duke Nukem <pat...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:91sa0v$hr0$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
Susan Cohen
American Christian Patriot wrote:
> Bush is a wonderful man
Gla you think so. I'm sure his family does, as well.
> and a G-d fearing man as well.
If so, it's only been as of late that he's shown it.
Between the cocaine use, drunk driving & that abortion
he got his girlfriend (in the 60's?), I'd have to doubt it.
> We all know that
> it is G-d who puts people in the presidency not us. I do realize we do
> not always understand why He chooses the ones He does but He does. For
> instance Clinton, I have not figured that one out and probably never
> will.
I guess it had something to do with his being a good president,
however weak an individual he is in his personal life.
> I must admit he did do some good except for turning the White
> House into his own pleasure pad.I believe G-d has placed a man that
> knows Him in this position. He has answered our prayers that we want G-
> d to be back at the center of this country. And no, that is not popular
> opionon. But, when have the things of G-d ever been. Not to say Mr.Gore
> would not have done any good for our country. I just don't thing he had
> the sincerity of Mr. Bush.
Which only goes to show you how perception differ.
I thought Gore was not only more sincere than Bush,
but far more dedicated, even burning, to make this
country everything that it should be.
Bush seemed to be there because he was a Bush.
> This is a new day for America and I am thankful it has finally come.I
> also believe a new day for Israel. Mr. Bush being a Christian knows
> that Jerusalem should not be given up at any cost.
Hopefully he'll treat her better than his father did.
Susan
Susan Cohen
James Dusek wrote:
Do prove where Clinton ever stole anything.
Susan
Hail to the THIEF, "President" Bush
American Christian Patriot
smiley <thest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> In article <91sa0v$hr0$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Duke Nukem <patucha@my-
deja.com> wrote:
>
> > Yet another brainwashed faithful all American christian man, who
>
> CORRECTION this IDIOT is NOT American, he is Canadian!
> He used to call himself solder of god
I am American citizen and vote for republicans. Are you?
S_O_G
>
> > totally believes that god really cares about Bush! Why is this
kind of
> > talk so popular amongst republicans? Are they as dumb as they seem
to
> > be?
>
> --
> :-)
>
--
Be Christian, Be Zionist, be Local Hero, be Cool
Rich Loether
>In article <91r44t$jon$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, American Christian Patriot
><good_ch...@jesusanswers.com> wrote:
>> Bush is a wonderful man and a G-d fearing man as well. We all know that
>> it is G-d who puts people in the presidency not us. [snip]
>All I can say is this: IMPEACH THE THIEF!
The House did that. Then the Senate refused to even hold a trial.
BTW/ what does this have to do with Bush?
--
In Liberty,
Rich
Guns save lives - maybe yours.
--------------------
Rich Loether Snail Mail: University of Pittsburgh
EMail: r...@pitt.edu Network Services
Voice: (412) 624-6429 600 Epsilon Drive
FAX: (412) 624-6436 Pittsburgh, PA 15238
Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207
finger for PGP 2.6.2 public key
Key Fingerprint 53 76 0B 73 DF 5C D9 14 D0 C3 68 20 DE 4F 60 C0
eggma...@my-deja.com
deja.com> wrote:
>
> > Yet another brainwashed faithful all American christian man, who
>
> CORRECTION this IDIOT is NOT American, he is Canadian!
> He used to call himself solder of god
>
name. I never knew god was such a handyman.
Beezlebub
Susan Cohen <fla...@his.com> wrote in message
news:3A42428C...@his.com...
American Christian Patriot
Ambro is for good people
S_O_G
--
Be Christian, Be Zionist, be Local Hero, be Cool
American Christian Patriot
fla...@his.com wrote:
>
>
> American Christian Patriot wrote:
>
> > Bush is a wonderful man
>
> Gla you think so. I'm sure his family does, as well.
>
> > and a G-d fearing man as well.
>
> If so, it's only been as of late that he's shown it.
> Between the cocaine use, drunk driving & that abortion
> he got his girlfriend (in the 60's?), I'd have to doubt it.
>
do you really think you will never change from your 20 y.o.? I guess,
you will. Therefore, you can ask for forgivness.
eggma...@my-deja.com
> Ambro is for good people
> S_O_G
> --
> Be Christian, Be Zionist, be Local Hero, be Cool
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
Anyone have a clue what solder is saying here? Cause I sure don't.
Albert Reingewirtz
Albert Reingewirtz
<good_chri...@my-deja.com> wrote:
We are all waiting for someone to sue the thief in another case better
suited for him: a paternity suit!
Susan Cohen
American Christian Patriot wrote:
> In article <3A42428C...@his.com>,
> fla...@his.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > American Christian Patriot wrote:
> >
> > > Bush is a wonderful man
> >
> > Gla you think so. I'm sure his family does, as well.
> >
> > > and a G-d fearing man as well.
> >
> > If so, it's only been as of late that he's shown it.
> > Between the cocaine use, drunk driving & that abortion
> > he got his girlfriend (in the 60's?), I'd have to doubt it.
> >
> Dear Susan,
> do you really think you will never change from your 20 y.o.?
I wasn't nearly as bad as he when I was twenty - and I openly
admit to whatever mistakes I made back then. He doesn't.
(Oh, and I forgot the being AWOL, too)
And the drunkenness was when he was in his thirties -
hardly a child.
> I guess,
> you will. Therefore, you can ask for forgivness.
If he would ask forgiveness - which alse means taking his
punishment, I would be a lot happier. He has done neither.
Susan
Joseph Hertzlinger
wrote:
>> In article <3A42428C...@his.com>,
>> fla...@his.com wrote:
>> > If so, it's only been as of late that he's shown it.
>> > Between the cocaine use, drunk driving & that abortion
>> > he got his girlfriend (in the 60's?), I'd have to doubt it.
I read about that last claim in July. I've been waiting for the other
shoe to drop. So far, the shoe has been hanging in midair.
Allegro
> totally believes that god really cares about Bush! Why is this kind of
> talk so popular amongst republicans? Are they as dumb as they seem to
> be?
They are products of that remarkable American educational system that
promotes losers because of their advanced age and not scholarship. The
fundamentalists like him have been indoctrinated by their parents and
community to be intolerant of differing viewpoints and suspicious of anyone
who has graduated high school on merits alone ("a damn liberal, no doubt!").
Allegro
their agenda. For the love of God, I have not found rational explanation for
these people, except possible infection with "Mad Cow Disease"?!
"Susan Cohen" <fla...@his.com> wrote in message
news:3A4242CE...@his.com...
Allegro
"Rich Loether" <r...@pitt.edu> wrote in message
news:91til9$eoq$2...@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu...
> In article <201220001246172219%alb...@nethere.com>, alb...@nethere.com
says...
>
> >In article <91r44t$jon$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, American Christian Patriot
> ><good_ch...@jesusanswers.com> wrote:
>
> >> Bush is a wonderful man and a G-d fearing man as well. We all know that
> >> it is G-d who puts people in the presidency not us. [snip]
>
> >All I can say is this: IMPEACH THE THIEF!
>
> The House did that. Then the Senate refused to even hold a trial.
> BTW/ what does this have to do with Bush?
1.Know your facts, before you publish your opinion.
2. Bush stole the election.
3. That's all, folks!
Susan Cohen
Joseph Hertzlinger wrote:
Any claims that the media is liberal has foundered on the
rock of Bush coverage: thin & light.
Susan
Albert Reingewirtz
Rich Loether
An interesting comment for someone who makes an unsubstantiated
claim as we have here.
>2. Bush stole the election.
That's a pretty serious charge, but then liberals tend to
fly off the handle when things don't go their way.
Bush didn't steal anything. If you're referring to the
ballots without votes for president, they didn't have any
vote for president on them. Anyone who says they did IS
trying to steal the election.
>3. That's all, folks!
Then I suppose this is all we'll hear from you.
American Christian Patriot
fla...@his.com wrote:
>
>
> American Christian Patriot wrote:
>
> > In article <3A42428C...@his.com>,
> > fla...@his.com wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > American Christian Patriot wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bush is a wonderful man
> > >
> > > Gla you think so. I'm sure his family does, as well.
> > >
> > > > and a G-d fearing man as well.
> > >
> > > If so, it's only been as of late that he's shown it.
> > > Between the cocaine use, drunk driving & that abortion
> > > he got his girlfriend (in the 60's?), I'd have to doubt it.
> > >
> > Dear Susan,
> > do you really think you will never change from your 20 y.o.?
>
> I wasn't nearly as bad as he when I was twenty
Well, so you never spend time with close friends on student's parties.
Hmm, you lost something very memorable.
S_O_G
- and I openly
> admit to whatever mistakes I made back then. He doesn't.
> (Oh, and I forgot the being AWOL, too)
> And the drunkenness was when he was in his thirties -
> hardly a child.
>
> > I guess,
> > you will. Therefore, you can ask for forgivness.
>
> If he would ask forgiveness - which alse means taking his
> punishment, I would be a lot happier. He has done neither.
>
> Susan
>
>
--
Susan Cohen
Rich Loether wrote:
> In article <LqD06.3760$xU2.2...@news1.atl>, dub...@bellsouth.net says...
>
> >1.Know your facts, before you publish your opinion.
>
> An interesting comment for someone who makes an unsubstantiated
> claim as we have here.
Yes, the business about "the thief already being impeached"
was certainly unsubstantiated, at best. But he didn;t make that
claim. He was speaking of factual events.
> >2. Bush stole the election.
>
> That's a pretty serious charge, but then liberals tend to
> fly off the handle when things don't go their way.
Say the Republicans, who tried their damnedest to overturn a legal
election with a string of stupid charges against the sitting President.
Say the Republicans, who went into a litigionous frenzy whenever
someone actually tried to - G-d forbid! - *count votes*!
> Bush didn't steal anything. If you're referring to the
> ballots without votes for president, they didn't have any
> vote for president on them. Anyone who says they did IS
> trying to steal the election.
No, we're referring to the voters intimidated away from the polls,
the ones deliberately fed false information about voting from
out-of-state Republicans, the votes thrown away for spurious
reaons while the votes that could just as well be thrown away -
but were for *Bush* were *kept*.
Things like that.
Susan
Hail to the THIEF!
Susan Cohen
American Christian Patriot wrote:
> In article <3A42F82B...@his.com>,
> fla...@his.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > American Christian Patriot wrote:
> >
> > > In article <3A42428C...@his.com>,
> > > fla...@his.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > American Christian Patriot wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Bush is a wonderful man
> > > >
> > > > Gla you think so. I'm sure his family does, as well.
> > > >
> > > > > and a G-d fearing man as well.
> > > >
> > > > If so, it's only been as of late that he's shown it.
> > > > Between the cocaine use, drunk driving & that abortion
> > > > he got his girlfriend (in the 60's?), I'd have to doubt it.
> > > >
> > > Dear Susan,
> > > do you really think you will never change from your 20 y.o.?
> >
> > I wasn't nearly as bad as he when I was twenty
>
> Well, so you never spend time with close friends on student's parties.
> Hmm, you lost something very memorable.
Considering what we're talking about, I find drug use, drunk driving
and abortion to be memorable things I am glad to have missed.
Susan
Rich Loether
>Rich Loether wrote:
>> >2. Bush stole the election.
>> That's a pretty serious charge, but then liberals tend to
>> fly off the handle when things don't go their way.
>Say the Republicans, who tried their damnedest to overturn a legal
>election with a string of stupid charges against the sitting President.
>Say the Republicans, who went into a litigionous frenzy whenever
>someone actually tried to - G-d forbid! - *count votes*!
The votes got counted several times. The two groups in
dispute being military absentee ballots which the Gore
folks didn't want counted and the punch cards with no
vote for president on them at all. It was the Gore folks
who wanted to claim that what was essentaially a vote for
"none of the above" was really a vote for Gore. Fie.
>> Bush didn't steal anything. If you're referring to the
>> ballots without votes for president, they didn't have any
>> vote for president on them. Anyone who says they did IS
>> trying to steal the election.
>No, we're referring to the voters intimidated away from the polls,
There have been charges raised about this, but no evidence has
surfaced. Curiously, it was in the very Democrat controlled
counties that the "chad wars" were going on where people were
supposed to have been intimidated. Of course, the people who
would have had the power to intimidate others were the Democrats
running those counties.
>the ones deliberately fed false information about voting from
>out-of-state Republicans, the votes thrown away for spurious
>reaons while the votes that could just as well be thrown away -
>but were for *Bush* were *kept*.
Cites?
>Susan
Twig
>
> Bush is a wonderful man and a G-d fearing man as well. We all know that
> not always understand why He chooses the ones He does but He does. For
> instance Clinton, I have not figured that one out and probably never
> will.
Because the Americans deserve nothing better.
By-and-large, they have become a despicable people, a filthy people, and
an abominable people. (And it isn't hard to see...it's only a matter of
looking around, and being honest with yourself.)
Fornication and adultery--the source and cause of many *many* miseries
and
social woes--has long been normalized by the Americans. "Two consenting
adults", right? And by now, many of them actually believe that adultery
makes a man innocent of purgery, and even sodomy "is only a matter of
personal choice." Amazing.
> I must admit he did do some good except for turning the White
> House into his own pleasure pad.
ROTFL!
(There are a lot of very gullible people around...)
Benedict Clinton transferred cognizance of U.S. ballistic missile
technology
from the Department of Defense, to the Department of Commerce. From
there,
the Chinese purchased, *purchased*--by legal means--many of our ICBM
secrets.
If the Soviet Union were still around, he would have sold it to them
instead.
At any rate, we have no idea who the Chinese will give our technology
to.
We *know* that the Chinese have sold Silkworm surface-to-surface
missiles
to such tourist paradises as: Iran, Iraq, and so on.
Clinton has been nothing short of an enemy to the Constitution of the
United
States.
> I believe G-d has placed a man that
> knows Him in this position. He has answered our prayers that we want G-
> d to be back at the center of this country.
Whose prayers?
The Americans are divided, more-or-less 50/50, between the Satanic Left,
and
the (whatever you want to call them) Right. For at least the next two
years,
the Senate is split 50/50 (I think) between Left and Right. In the
House, the
Right maintains a narrow--**narrow** simple majority over the Left.
If you recall, during 1993-94, when the Marxist-Left was trying to push
socalized
medicine on the American people, the Right (the minority party at that
time) was
able to filibuster. Though evil Left is now the minority party, they
too will
be able to filibuster *everything* that the Right will try to do.
There will probably be little other than "gridlock" for the next two
years.
Duke Nukem
there, from the way he writes is either retarded or an idiot, just like
his "dubyo" friend.
> Considering what we're talking about, I find drug use, drunk driving
> and abortion to be memorable things I am glad to have missed.
Kill the Spam
> It is clear that our "faithful Christian friend" here is really not all
> there, from the way he writes is either retarded or an idiot, just like
> his "dubyo" friend.
>
Are you talking about his ideas or his grammar. Frankly, I admire him for
attempting to learn a second language. Anyone who has accomplished it can
tell you that it is not an easy task.
elti...@my-deja.com
American Christian Patriot <good_ch...@jesusanswers.com> wrote:
> Bush is a wonderful man and a G-d fearing man as well. We all know
that
> it is G-d who puts people in the presidency not us.
Oya, Soldier of God ( S.O.G.) please do'nt come on with this Christian crap
because we all know you are no Christian. Let me remind you that only an
idiot would think G-d put Bush in the presidency, it's us (the voters) who
put him there . In meantime thank you for kissing Bush's ass.
Susan Cohen
Rich Loether wrote:
> In article <3A43B337...@his.com>, fla...@his.com says...
>
> >Rich Loether wrote:
>
> >> >2. Bush stole the election.
>
> >> That's a pretty serious charge, but then liberals tend to
> >> fly off the handle when things don't go their way.
>
> >Say the Republicans, who tried their damnedest to overturn a legal
> >election with a string of stupid charges against the sitting President.
> >Say the Republicans, who went into a litigionous frenzy whenever
> >someone actually tried to - G-d forbid! - *count votes*!
>
> The votes got counted several times. The two groups in
> dispute being military absentee ballots which the Gore
> folks didn't want counted
The only ones they wanted disqualified were the ones
that had not come in on time - usually, these ballots
would have been thrown out. But Bush's people were
sure they would be for him.
> and the punch cards with no
> vote for president on them at all. It was the Gore folks
> who wanted to claim that what was essentaially a vote for
> "none of the above" was really a vote for Gore. Fie.
No. It was the ones that were partially punched, or
"dimpled' - i.e., the vote could not be properly punched
due to outdated equipment - that they wanted counted -
because it was *clear* these people *wanted* to vote
for Gore.
> >> Bush didn't steal anything. If you're referring to the
> >> ballots without votes for president, they didn't have any
> >> vote for president on them. Anyone who says they did IS
> >> trying to steal the election.
>
> >No, we're referring to the voters intimidated away from the polls,
>
> There have been charges raised about this, but no evidence has
> surfaced.
Or, rather, no one's bothered to investigate it.
> Curiously, it was in the very Democrat controlled
> counties that the "chad wars" were going on where people were
> supposed to have been intimidated.
That's because "curiously" these "Democratic controlled counties"
were FULL OF DEMOCRATS! DUH! Who *else* would Jeb
have sent his troopers out to harass?
> Of course, the people who
> would have had the power to intimidate others were the Democrats
> running those counties.
Wrong. And a poor try at that. These were State Troopers,
not county police.
> >the ones deliberately fed false information about voting from
> >out-of-state Republicans, the votes thrown away for spurious
> >reaons while the votes that could just as well be thrown away -
> >but were for *Bush* were *kept*.
>
> Cites?
See above. If the Republicans had thought that the overseas
absentee ballots would have been for Gore, they would have
screamed about the postmarks.
Susan
Joseph Hertzlinger
wrote:
>Any claims that the media is liberal has foundered on the rock of
>Bush coverage: thin & light.
The media retain some shreds of professional pride.
BTW, does the Supreme Court decision on the election imply that it
isn't infallible? What does that imply about any argument that
abortion is a Constitutional right just because the Court said so?
Albert Reingewirtz
And you are kissing dead Saddam's ass?
Albert Reingewirtz
<jher...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
It is obvious that you are on that side of the abortion issue because
you will never need one. Man who are against women's right to control
their own bodies must hate their mothers, sisters, aunts. They are a
sorry bunch!
Kill the Spam
>
>
> Rich Loether wrote:
>
> > In article <3A43B337...@his.com>, fla...@his.com says...
> >
> > >Rich Loether wrote:
> >
> > >> >2. Bush stole the election.
> >
> > >> That's a pretty serious charge, but then liberals tend to
> > >> fly off the handle when things don't go their way.
> >
> > >Say the Republicans, who tried their damnedest to overturn a legal
> > >election with a string of stupid charges against the sitting President.
> > >Say the Republicans, who went into a litigionous frenzy whenever
> > >someone actually tried to - G-d forbid! - *count votes*!
> >
> > The votes got counted several times. The two groups in
> > dispute being military absentee ballots which the Gore
> > folks didn't want counted
>
> The only ones they wanted disqualified were the ones
> that had not come in on time - usually, these ballots
> would have been thrown out. But Bush's people were
> sure they would be for him.
>
Oh please. The vast majority of them did come in on time, but they claimed
this could not be proven for lack of a postmark. A few witnesses could have
easily solved the matter.
> > and the punch cards with no
> > vote for president on them at all. It was the Gore folks
> > who wanted to claim that what was essentaially a vote for
> > "none of the above" was really a vote for Gore. Fie.
>
> No. It was the ones that were partially punched, or
> "dimpled' - i.e., the vote could not be properly punched
> due to outdated equipment - that they wanted counted -
> because it was *clear* these people *wanted* to vote
> for Gore.
That equipment wasn't outdated. The only thing that was wrong with those
machines was that they hadn't been cleaned out in eight years. You would
think a bunch of democrats, running a poling place in a democratic county,
where Gore was sure to gain a lot of votes would have done a better job at
maintenance, no?
>
> > >> Bush didn't steal anything. If you're referring to the
> > >> ballots without votes for president, they didn't have any
> > >> vote for president on them. Anyone who says they did IS
> > >> trying to steal the election.
> >
> > >No, we're referring to the voters intimidated away from the polls,
> >
> > There have been charges raised about this, but no evidence has
> > surfaced.
>
> Or, rather, no one's bothered to investigate it.
So the press has *not* put this whole incident under a microscope for the
past month and a half?
> > Curiously, it was in the very Democrat controlled
> > counties that the "chad wars" were going on where people were
> > supposed to have been intimidated.
>
> That's because "curiously" these "Democratic controlled counties"
> were FULL OF DEMOCRATS! DUH! Who *else* would Jeb
> have sent his troopers out to harass?
>
Again, no proof... Not even proof drudged up by a liberal-biased media.
> > Of course, the people who
> > would have had the power to intimidate others were the Democrats
> > running those counties.
>
> Wrong. And a poor try at that. These were State Troopers,
> not county police.
In my state, we have an elections judge who has nothing to do all election
day but handle cases involving voting problems. Does this not occur in
Florida? You would think people who were so used to litigation would have
availed themselves of the courts when being intimated at the polls. Or do
you want us to believe we're still living in the 50's?
> > >the ones deliberately fed false information about voting from
> > >out-of-state Republicans, the votes thrown away for spurious
> > >reaons while the votes that could just as well be thrown away -
> > >but were for *Bush* were *kept*.
> >
> > Cites?
>
> See above. If the Republicans had thought that the overseas
> absentee ballots would have been for Gore, they would have
> screamed about the postmarks.
Maybe... Maybe not... How does this justify Gore's actions?
>
> Susan
>
>
elti...@my-deja.com
and thank you also for kissing Bush's ass. Go do your blasphemy in Israel.
However, if you and SOG wannabe Christians , you'll have to expunge your
hearts of all evil first.
In article <241220000320419347%alb...@nethere.com>,
Albert Reingewirtz
>
> In article <241220000320419347%alb...@nethere.com>,
> Albert Reingewirtz <alb...@nethere.com> wrote:
> > In article <923p4d$50f$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, <elti...@my-deja.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <91r44t$jon$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> > > American Christian Patriot <good_ch...@jesusanswers.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Bush is a wonderful man and a G-d fearing man as well. We all
> know
> > > that
> > > > it is G-d who puts people in the presidency not us.
> > >
> > >
> > > Oya, Soldier of God ( S.O.G.) please do'nt come on with this Christian
> crap
> > > because we all know you are no Christian. Let me remind you that
> only an
> > > idiot would think G-d put Bush in the presidency, it's us (the voters)
> who
> > > put him there . In meantime thank you for kissing Bush's ass.
> > >
> >
> > And you are kissing dead Saddam's ass?
> Oya Hebejebe, I did'nt want you to feel left out. You're no Christian either
> and thank you also for kissing Bush's ass. Go do your blasphemy in Israel.
> However, if you and SOG wannabe Christians , you'll have to expunge your
> hearts of all evil first.
>
Not shit Ya Tikriti! I am Jewish ya chmar.
Joseph Hertzlinger
<alb...@nethere.com> wrote:
>It is obvious that you are on that side of the abortion issue because
>you will never need one. Man who are against women's right to control
>their own bodies must hate their mothers, sisters, aunts. They are a
>sorry bunch!
It is equally obvious you will never be aborted.
elti...@my-deja.com
> > In article <241220000320419347%alb...@nethere.com>,
> > Albert Reingewirtz <alb...@nethere.com> wrote:
Oya, I respect your faith, but please do tell your compadre SOG that we
expect him to be respectful of all faiths. And by the way ya chmar, your
cooperation is appreciated.
Be cool now and run along !
Albert Reingewirtz
I appreciate so elchas Bush's tiz.
elti...@my-deja.com
Albert Reingewirtz
That is the first truth you spoke so elchas tizi then!
James Dusek
> 2. Bush stole the election.
> 3. That's all, folks!
Seems like you've only got 2 out of three right.
1.) FACT, Bush got more votes than Gore in Florida.
2.) Bush had nothing to do withthe election results, if
Democrats voted for Bucannon by mistake, that's THEIR problem.
3.) The only thing you got right.
James Dusek
> It is clear that our "faithful Christian friend" here is really not all
> there, from the way he writes is either retarded or an idiot, just like
> his "dubyo" friend.
Gee, it's soo easy to insult, I guess it's too hard for you to
think. I'll give you a clue, not all Christian's are English speaking.
James Dusek
James Dusek
> >
> > That's a pretty serious charge, but then liberals tend to
> > fly off the handle when things don't go their way.
>
> Say the Republicans, who tried their damnedest to overturn a legal
> election with a string of stupid charges against the sitting President.
> Say the Republicans, who went into a litigionous frenzy whenever
> someone actually tried to - G-d forbid! - *count votes*!
The Republicans didn't try to overturn a legal election. They
tried to punish a man WHO BROKE THE LAW. You call them stupid charges,
but the PRESIDENT of the United States is the caretaker of the country,
and IT'S LAWS. When that person abuses their power, they should be
removed from office. Clinton is just as guilty as Nixon was, at least
Nixon had some class and resigned before he put the country through
a messy impeachemnt.
>
> > Bush didn't steal anything. If you're referring to the
> > ballots without votes for president, they didn't have any
> > vote for president on them. Anyone who says they did IS
> > trying to steal the election.
>
> No, we're referring to the voters intimidated away from the polls,
> the ones deliberately fed false information about voting from
> out-of-state Republicans, the votes thrown away for spurious
> reaons while the votes that could just as well be thrown away -
> but were for *Bush* were *kept*.
>
> Things like that.
Man, you are ignorant of the truth.
No voter was initmidated away from the polls, no "out-of-state"
Republicans were hanging around the polls feeding mis-information, and
only Republican Military votes were thrown out for spurious reasons,
while DEMOCRATIC vote counters mined all that they could for Gore.
> Hail to the THIEF!
Only until Jan 20th, when he leaves office.
James Dusek
James Dusek
> Rich Loether wrote:
> The only ones they wanted disqualified were the ones
> that had not come in on time - usually, these ballots
> would have been thrown out. But Bush's people were
> sure they would be for him.
The big lie.
Many of the Military ballots that were thrown out were tossed
becasue they were overseas ballots lacking a forign postmark. Many had
postmarks from within the USA, but becasue they were overseas ballots,
these were tossed, because of democratic protests to them. The democratic
lawyers even protested the ballots postmarked in Queens, NY and
Jacksonville, FL. These are the sites that the D.O.D. and USN send all
their overseas mail to be processed. The D.O.D. and USN does NOT postmark
mail until it arrives in the USA. So despite these facts, these ballots
were protested and thrown out by the democratic lawyers.
Don't kid yourself, this election was not about counting every
vote, it was about throwing out as many votes as possible, as least from
the democrat's side.
James Dusek
Albert Reingewirtz
<du...@cscsunfl2.corp.mot.com> wrote:
Republicans fought as if their very life depended on preventing count
just like in any other banana Republic junta Republicans love to
support.
Albert Reingewirtz
<du...@cscsunfl2.corp.mot.com> wrote:
He meant pt type "Di Dubya A."
James Dusek
says...
> Republicans fought as if their very life depended on preventing count
> just like in any other banana Republic junta Republicans love to
> support.
They fought the democrats creating votes where there were none.
They were counting ballots were the Gore chad was ripped out and taped
into the hole for Bush, these were Bush votes tampered with, at the most
these should have been disqualifyed, but they were counted for Gore.
James Dusek
Albert Reingewirtz
<du...@cscsunfl2.corp.mot.com> wrote:
Yada! yada! yada! The votes are being counted right now and the truth
should set Bush free.