Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@nz.invalid> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> The ICJ gets no say what so ever on the application of Israeli law.
> But it does, because Israel agreed to that whenit signed the Charter
> that says exactly this.
The UN charter actually says the exact opposite, fuckwit.
>> They have no jurisdiction what so ever with regard to Israeliterritory
>> and the UN charter says that very explicitly indeed.
> Strange.
Nope, dope.
> I thought you said Israel paid no attention to the UN charter.
No I did not, Pinocchio.
> Now you are trying to make an argument (false,but never mind) by
> appealing to the UN charter?
I am rubbing your stupid nose in the FACT that
the UN charter says very explicitly indeed that
the UN has no jurisdiction what so ever over the
internal affairs of a UN member state, fuckwit.
>>>> which Netanyahu has been denying.
>>>> Bullshit.
>>> Now you’re saying he has admitted there was a humanitarian crisis.
>> Nope, Pinocchio.
> So he has denied there was a humanitarian crisis?
Nope, Pinocchio.
> He either admitted it or denied it, it has to be one or the other.
Wrong, as always.
> Which is it?
See above.
>>>> Just because some fool journo uses a particular word in a url...
>>> The court used that word, too.
>> Just because some fuckwit stuffed shirtsflagrantly misuse the
>> language...
> Legal language,
The word genocide is NOT legal language, fuckwit.
> which they are qualified to use and you and I are not.
The ICJ does NOT get to define what genocide is, fuckwit.
> It’s their job to decide whether the word is applicable ornot, based
> on a very clearly laid out legal definition, aslaid out in the
> Convention Against Genocide.
Just because some fuckwit stuffed shirts
flagrantly misuse the language...
>>> And it says Israel has a case to answer.
>> In an area where they have no jurisdiction what so ever.
> But Israel has signed the charter saying they have.
The charter actually says the exact opposite, fuckwit.
>> Pity that other articles say that the UN has no jurisdiction\
>> what so ever on internal matters within a UN member.
> If this was an “internal matter”,
Of course it is given what Hamas did on Oct 7
> then that means those Palestinian territoriesare not “occupied
> territories”,
It wasnt that before Oct 7, fuckwit.
> but part of Israel. Which means the peoplewho live there have to be
> accepted as citizens.
Wrong, as always, with illegals.
> After all, no country that prides itself on observing “freedom” and
> “democracy” and “rule of law” would want to exterminate or evict an
> entire people
Israel is doing nothing of the sort, you silly little pathological liar.
> just to steal their land, would they?
Israel is doing nothing of the sort, you silly little pathological liar.
> And by the way, genocide is one of those cases wherethings can no
> longer be considered an “internal matter”,
There is no genocide, fuckwit.
> where the UN can, indeed is obliged to, intervene.
Like hell it is, even if there was genocide, and there isnt.
>>> Why would it choose to join an organization it hates so much?
>> It doesnt hate it given that that what established it, fuckwit.
> You haven’t heard the vitriol that Netanyahu and hisGovernment have
> been regularly pouring on the UN?
No such animal.
> Do you think those are just some kind of eccentricApartheid-Zionist
> expressions of endearment, or something?
You are pathetic.