9/11 for Dummies (For Susan Cohen... Another (Conservative article) For Susan Cohen.....

[The Department of Defense]

(When are we gonna see good stuff from Liberal cites?????) Patiently
waiting......

"Why is it," wondered my faculty friend, "that after 9/11, and after the
start of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, all of a sudden professors
without professional experience or expertise in the subject became 'experts'
on the Middle East, Radical Islam, terrorism, U.S. foreign policy and the
like?" These instant experts were eager to teach students, colleagues --
and anyone they could get to listen -- about these subjects. They were
especially anxious to ensure that everyone would adopt their politically
correct viewpoints and have an arsenal of facts to support their views.

"We both know," I said, "that this is propagandizing, not educating, and it
is an abuse of the true mission of universities, which is the pursuit of
knowledge, not political ideology. We see how this undermines academic
discipline and standards essential for the pursuit of knowledge. You know
what I mean: thorough knowledge of the primary sources and the main
scholarship for one's field; critical and rational analysis of many
different approaches and complex explanations for the key questions and
problems in one's field; a total commitment to accuracy and honesty, even if
this means sacrificing one's pet theories; and above all, making sure that
our students learn the importance of these standards. They have to embrace
them fully. Without these, the pursuit of knowledge leads to the dead end of
propaganda and distorted theories, not truth. We see how vulnerable students
are to the seductive attractions that instant "experts" offer with their
simplistic instant explanations and ideology. This makes insisting on
upholding our professional academic standards all the m ore important, don't
you think?"

"Sure," said the professor, "but there's been a problem here ever since 9/11
and even before that. Instant "experts" and their low standards are
spreading everywhere nowadays."

I know that this is true, and this is my subject here. The information I am
about to present comes from my own experience at the university where I
teach, from my teaching assistants and students, from colleagues at other
universities, from professional journals such as The Chronicle of Higher
Education and Academe, the Journal of the American Association of University
Professors, and from newspapers such as The New York Times and The
Washington Post.

The 9/11 Emergency and Instant Experts

Thus radical professors sought to use their newly asserted expertise to
indoctrinate and radicalize as many students and faculty as they could;
especially students. [1] Students were "too conservative," said some; the
tragic demise of the ideals of 60's radicalism was at hand, thought others.
This crisis called for action.

In one department at a large public university a professor of American
business history took it upon himself to organize a "teach-in" with some
other professors--most of whom had no particular knowledge or expertise that
made them logical choices for this. Meanwhile, faculty members who did have
such knowledge, including specialists on foreign affairs, Islamic history,
political theory, and military and diplomatic history, were not asked to
participate; they were expected to attend and be indoctrinated like everyone
else. This event was well- advertised throughout the university, thus
insulting genuine experts who should have been in charge of the whole thing,
given their qualifications and knowledge. The qualification for leadership
here was leftist ideology, not substantive knowledge of the issues and
relevant fields.

Another example: a professor of 17th c. British history organized a panel on
American foreign policy and Afghanistan. He was no expert on the subject,
but considered himself qualified to organize and choose a panel of speakers
who all belonged to the "No Blood for Oil" antiwar school of thought. Their
analysis of the crisis of radical Islamists, terrorism, Osama bin Laden,
Afghanistan and the Middle East etc. revolved around one idea: that our
involvement in these problems was entirely and exclusively aimed at gaining
control of oil pipeline territories and oil. Not only was the political and
cultural analysis beyond poor, even the economics were wrong! (there was and
is now no oil pipeline in Afghanistan). Most of the audience, faculty and
some graduate students from the history and government and politics
department, sat quietly nodding in agreement. Only a few courageous souls
dared to question this analysis and its purported factual basis, and in so
doing risked getting the disapproval and contempt of the rest of the
audience. Social pressure to accept the teachings of the pseudo-experts as
much as real experts was evident. Challenging them was "not cool."

A third example: a U.S. History professor began offering an upper-division
course on international terrorism. He had never taught this subject before,
and had no professional training or experience with the material. What
qualified him to teach such a course? He knew the correct political approach
to the material. He had been an anti-Vietnam war protester in the 60's, and
knew the importance of indoctrinating students, lest they become naively
complacent in U.S. imperialism and capitalism, not to mention the
exploitation of the underprivileged all over the world. The course reading
list was one-sided (left) and predictably anti-American. With no other
points of view included. He continued to give the course, which was very
popular.

One of the most controversial cases involving an instant expert occurred at
UC Berkeley. [2] A graduate student in English was assigned to teach a
Freshman English course on reading and writing skills. He decided to turn it
into a course on the Palestinian Resistance, from a strictly pro-Palestinian
and anti-Israeli perspective, as he announced in his course description.
Conservatives were explicitly warned in writing in the description to stay
away from the course. Was this really a Freshman English writing course? Was
the grad student in English really well-prepared without knowledge of Arabic
to teach Middle-Eastern political affairs, much less literature? Was he even
qualified to teach "Basic Intifada for Dummies"? And what do you suppose
would have happened if a grad student in English decided to turn Freshman
Reading and Writing R1A into a course on the Israeli cause, strictly
pro-Israeli and anti-Palestinian? What if the instructor warned leftist
students who might disagree to stay away from the course? He'd probably be
driven from the department by "diversity police" as some sort of Zionist
bigot who was unfit to teach. This instructor would never, ever, have
received the support of the Faculty Senate, and the Chair of the English
Department, who all came to the defense of the pro-Palestinian course and
the instructor's "academic freedom". Yes, they made him tone down the course
description a bit, and arranged for extra supervision and for the
prospective students to be assured that they were "free to dissent from the
instructor's views without fear," but they did not require him to change
the reading list or balance out the one-sided focus. And they never
questioned his fitness to teach such a course.

To the question about why this sort of thing happened, what entitled
professors without various qualifications to claim and act upon their
"expertise," my answer was this. We saw the same thing happen in the 60's in
connection with the crisis of anti-Vietnam war protests and strikes and
disruption of many campuses. In such an atmosphere of chaos and emergency,
with classes cancelled and universities on strike, many radicals and their
supporters believed that it was absolutely crucial to provide guidance and
information to students they presumed would be "lost" and confused,
traumatized by the disruptions and conflicts, and unable to respond
appropriately without the leadership of those who did know "the real truth."
The need to mobilize opposition to the war and the military-industrial
complex supporting it seemed urgent. Crisis and urgency made any radical
with a bullhorn and a vague grasp of basic Marxist-Leninist principles an
expert.

More recently the attacks of 9/11 presented a similar emergency. All across
the country leftists on campuses became experts overnight, and began
offering teach-ins, lectures, forums, panels, discussions, using any venue
where they could enlighten the lost and confused to the truth and
politically correct positions based on those truths. [3] Comparisons with
the leftist activism of the 60's were natural, with some faculty radicals
consciously trying to renew the spirit and antiwar movement of the 60's.
Some of these professors had been student protesters and activists in the 60's;
this experience was perhaps enough to support their claim of qualified
expertise. This rush to educate and organize was widely regarded as a noble
and humane pedagogical undertaking which would help the students to weather
the frightening international crisis. How else would they be able to grasp
what had happened, what it meant for them, and what they should do? There
was a call for clear, simple explanations, mostly focused on "our" role and
responsibility for what had happened. "Experts" issued straightforward and
specific directives:

1. Promote Sensitivity to Others, Especially Muslims

Prevent any harassment or attacks on Muslims and people of Middle Eastern
and South Asian background; promote "sensitivity to Others" and diversity.
As the Association of American Colleges and Universities' official Statement
on Higher Education's Role in the Wake of the National Tragedy of September
11 said:

"Valuing diversity and enabling constructive intergroup learning have become
hallmarks of the contemporary academy. As we face the current crisis, we
must redouble our efforts to build broad understanding of the diversity that
is a wellspring both of our democracy and of our intellectual vitality."

At most universities administrators issued warnings such as the one at The
University of Southern California:

"Our goal was to prevent harassment of students who shared a common heritage
or religion with those responsible for these crimes." And to that end the
president "communicate[d] to all faculty, staff, and students via e-mail
that, while he condemned the attacks, he also condemned the harassment of
Muslim students, faculty, and staff. At the same time, student affairs staff
contacted Arab and Muslim student leaders to reassure them of the university's
support;" and in meetings offered reassurance to Arab and Muslim students
"that we did not want anyone unfairly attacked or questioned about their
status in our educational community."[4]

2. Protest! Oppose War, Capitalism, Imperialism, Globalism

Oppose war, first in Afghanistan and then in Iraq; oppose President Bush and
his war-mongering advisers and their policies; oppose U.S. imperialism and
supporting of vile dictators and oppressors; oppose capitalism and
globalism; and above all, express this opposition in public protests and
demonstrations. [5] A classic statement came from Eric Foner, one of this
country's most prominent historians, DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at
Columbia University, and a past president of both the Organization of
American Historians and the American Historical Association:

"I'm not sure which is more frightening: the horror that engulfed New York
City or the apocalyptic rhetoric emanating daily from the White House. 'We
will rid the world of evil-doers,' President Bush announces as he embarks on
an open-ended 'crusade' (does he understand the historical freight this word
carries?) against people who 'hate us because we are free'. "

Howard Zinn, professor emeritus of political science at Boston University
and the author of one of the most widely assigned U.S. History textbooks,
expressed similar reactions to the horrors of 9/11:

"Then our political leaders came on television, and I was horrified and
sickened again. They spoke of retaliation, of vengeance, of punishment. We
are at war, they said. And I thought: They have learned nothing...from the
history of the 20th Century, from a hundred years of retaliation,
vengeance, war, a hundred years of terrorism and counterterrorism, of
violence met with violence in an unending cycle of stupidity. [....] We need
to think about the resentment all over the world felt by people who have
been the victims of American military action."

At universities all over the country a new anti-war movement mobilized,
inspired by these sentiments. Organizers argued that imperialism, capitalism
("its cause") and racism were to blame for what Catherine Lutz, an
anthropologist of the American military at the University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill, calls our "permanent state of war since the late 1930s."
Noting that "this war has now come home to roost" [sound familiar, followers
of Ward Churchill?] she attributes it to anticommunism and capitalism:

"it has been carried on in the name of stability for any regime that would
don an anticommunist mantle and allow American business access, hiding a
rotten core of systematic terrorism against its own people, often with our
weapons....the long reign of nuclear terror by the Soviet Union and the
United States-who together took aim at millions of people in skyscrapers and
hovels-was called defense, or even peace."

Traditional leftist criticisms about the U.S. and its bullying imperialism
became a litany repeated continually. The favored Leninist paradigms were
invoked to explain everything in a vague way (Hello! Imperialism the Highest
Stage of Capitalism!). Faculty and students were exhorted to organize and
attend teach-ins and forums to criticize the American policies that "brought
this just revenge upon us" and to blame America first. An early example was
the teach-in at the City University of New York, described in a New York
Post article as a stupid "peacefest." Academe reported that the Post writer:

"complained that the forum was dominated by speakers who looked to the
history of capitalism, colonialism, religious conflict, and class divisions
for answers about why the terrorists crashed planes into the World Trade
Center and the Pentagon on September 11, and that it included speakers who
opposed U.S. military action in Afghanistan."

3. Protect Academic Freedom and Free Speech (Think "Critically")

Not surprisingly, many objected to these criticisms and the blaming of
America for the attacks. These objections in turn alerted the protesters to
understand that academic freedom was in danger, and this produced
instructions to exercise academic freedom and freedom of speech to the
utmost, and test their limits, while discouraging patriotic displays and
flag-waving. The American Association of University Professors expressed
intense concerns about perceived threats to academic freedom, especially
after the CUNY "peacefest" was denounced by the school's chancellor and some
of its trustees. "The teach-in was organized in order to give students an
opportunity to learn about the crisis," lamented the professor who moderated
the event. Right: an opportunity to "learn" by being indoctrinated with
recycled propaganda from the 60's. But this raised grave concerns about an
atmosphere seen as "chilling to academic freedom and free speech." [6] And
this near-hysteria resulted in many universities echoing the AAUP's orders
to assert and protect academic freedom. At USC a typical proclamation was
issued by the administration "focused on ensuring that those who dissent
from the prosecution of a war on terrorism in Afghanistan and elsewhere can
share their views in a setting of academic freedom." [7] Many universities
issued similar statements. On the whole, though, there was less concern
about the academic freedom of conservatives (more below).

There were some universities where students, faculty, and staff were even
forbidden to display the American flag for fear of offending "Others" and to
avoid crude "jingoism."

The message given to students was that patriotism was offensive and that it
was "best" to blame and criticize the U.S. for the tragedy and its
underlying causes. [8] Small wonder that besides organizations for the
defense of free speech, also the American Council of Trustees and Alumni
(ACTA) condemned academia's "blame America first" response and said that
after 9/11 "College and university faculty have been the weak link in
America's response to the attack," with "public messages [that] were short
on patriotism and long on self-flagellation." [9] When it came to blaming
America first, it was hard to beat the Arabic and Islamic studies professor
who bitterly complained:

"Little, indeed, is said about the disastrous effects of an American
foreign policy that has supported many twisted dictatorships in the Muslim
world and helped thwart democratic reforms, or about the American-Saudi
partnership that turned the country [Afghanistan] into a breeding ground for
misery and monstrosity. [....]While the September 11 acts were criminal, the
grievances that fed and inspired them were real... The list of grievances is
long, but it invariably boils down to the obscene indifference to the loss
of human lives that do not appear on American television screens..."

4. Organize Rituals, Promote Comfort and Community Spirit

Having encouraged students to avoid seeking comfort and collective
solidarity with the American majority in support of what they portrayed as
an unacceptable patriotic national response to the crisis of 9/11, there
remained the problem of finding appropriate sources of comfort and emotional
release. Universities and colleges demonstrated care for students' welfare
and development (and heeded the importance of good university publicity)
through organized rituals of mourning, candlelight peace vigils, prayer
services, planting "peace gardens," and writing messages on huge sheets of
paper for public display. They congratulated themselves on the moving spirit
of community (and diversity!) these rituals displayed. At the University of
Virginia a teach-in on September 13 ended with a religious studies professor's
observation that with the deeply moving closeness of the university
community at this event he had "never seen UVA as beautiful as it was...You
and I have the opportunity to continue to turn negative energy and use it to
produce more human awareness among our citizens." Thus:

"Students took this opportunity to educate themselves at a moment when the
world seemed incomprehensible. Disillusioned by the media and disheartened
by many reactions of their fellow Americans, the University of Virginia, in
an evening, provided its students with the familial comfort for which they
all so desperately longed. The lines between students and faculty
were blurred as both shared honestly and sincerely. Despite their grief,
they were left with the tangible sense that, as a group, they would be able
to face the world as one." [10]

At the University of Maryland the vice-president of student affairs "urged
administrators to press faculty members to lead teach-ins, pay special
attention to the concerns of Muslim students, and recognize the desire for
public grieving." This produced, in addition to many teach-ins, a ceremonial
placing of roses in a fountain and later burying the flowers in a mound of
soil that would be tended by students. As the vice president emphasized, "It's
really important to the grieving process. ...This is, I think, the defining
moment for this generation of college students." [11] Universities awarded
themselves high scores for all kinds of "sensitivity" and took full
advantage of all opportunities to get rid of negative energy and guide
students towards proper self-actualization. It seemed as though many of the
"instant experts" could also serve as "instant grief counselors."

So there you have it: if you could master these concepts, it was easy to
become an "expert" faculty leader or a student activist leader. These
instructions made things quick and simple for the followers, especially
apolitical students with little knowledge of the relevant issues. The clever
and empowering principle of blaming America was easy to grasp and placed
control of the situation in our hands.

"Expert" Advice: Blame America First

Everyone assumed that amidst the chaos and mourning students would be unable
to concentrate on the courses they were taking, and would prefer their
professors and teaching assistants to devote class time to informing them on
the political struggles of the moment. The main guideline presented was that
in the face of a vicious terrorist attack which precipitated international
crisis and war, the proper response was deep questions: what did WE do
wrong? Why do they hate US? Why did WE deserve this? The narcissism of this
is striking. It offers a simple explanation for what went wrong, points to
"remedies" that lie mainly in our control, requires little or no
understanding of other cultures and peoples except as victims of our
exploitation and political oppression, and spares us from having to expect
of the "Others" any sort of cooperation , comprehension, or toleration, much
less self-criticism such as ours. This seems to provide for us reassurance
and hope, although it infantilizes and disempowers our terrorist enemies
("our victims") by stripping them of responsibility for minimally civilized
behavior and improvement through critical self-reflection and reform. It is,
in a word, condescending.

In the days and weeks (and eventually semesters) after 9/11 many faculty
members responded to the need for decisive measures to attend to shocked,
frightened students. These students were of a post-Vietnam, post-draft,
post-Cold War generation with no experience of fears of attacks on our soil,
war, and international crisis. To be fair, much of the faculty's concern was
well-intentioned. Moreover, it was encouraged by college and university
administrators who cherished the image of the benevolent "caring" university
nurturing its young and proclaiming its political and social awareness. One
university public relations official couldn't contain his excitement in a
meeting of deans and department chairs about "how we can use this to improve
the university's image!". This explains why many university presidents and
administrators not only allowed but encouraged "instant experts" to do their
thing.

However not all university presidents were in a position to be as thrilled
with this. As mentioned earlier, a teach-in at CUNY went over the edge of
decency in the faculty's merciless bashing of the U.S., bringing shameful
publicity and disgrace to the university. [12] And who can forget how poseur
professor of ethnic studies Ward Churchill, with his "instant expert" rants
against U.S. imperialism and tyranny, has polluted the reputation of the
University of Colorado? But for some instructors this was also a golden
opportunity to recruit and indoctrinate converts for the left, and to expand
its influence and the effectiveness of its criticism and protest; an
irresistible golden opportunity which could be presented attractively as the
humane duty of concerned educators in a crisis.

Apart from the concerns of college administrators, for much of the faculty
the traditions of the 60's antiwar movement were reborn, teach-ins and all.
And as in the past, it was the perceived need to provide politically correct
guidance and knowledge to help students comprehend the crisis and face the
future that made "instant experts" out of faculty members and teaching
assistants. This is what qualified them to begin teaching about Islam and
radical Islamists, about U.S. foreign policy (a.k.a. imperialism and bigoted
hatred of "Others") and about terrorism and how to respond to it. What
students most need in an international crisis, they felt, is guidance
towards the truly politically correct, moral, humanitarian, leftist
doctrines, and if possible, organized activism. In a crisis, those who can
provide this guidance are therefore suitable experts. Radicals with
new-found "expertise" and "truth" about foreign and domestic affairs strove
to minimize potentially confusing disagreement, dissent, contrary
information and ideas, confident that they knew what was best for everyone.
In addition, they used this authority to instill leftist ideology in their
students in order to safeguard the survival of radicalism in future
generations.

"Threats" to Academic Freedom?

Three great fears seemed to trouble academics: concern about heightened
patriotism, which they saw as a potential moral threat to human rights and
their own core beliefs such as multiculturalism and the evils of American
capitalism; the problem of properly grasping terrorism, especially because
of their claim that we brought this upon ourselves and were getting, in the
attacks of 9/11, what we deserved; and grave worry about academic freedom
and free speech, which they claimed were threatened. [13] No one, however,
expressed concerns about protecting academic standards and the quality of
teaching.

Instead, educators on both sides of the political divide complained about
constraints on academic freedom, and violations were recorded and reported
by defenders of free speech. But administrators and professors on the left
usually significantly outnumbered conservatives, and thus the shrillest
outcries about suppression of academic freedom came from professors on the
left, even as their freedom to criticize and blame America was continually
asserted. Rather, more often it was expressions of patriotism, even
displaying the flag, and criticism of the left's anti-Americanism that were
silenced, along with conservatives whose speeches were protested and
disrupted. (No academic freedom for them!). Radicals interpreted any
criticism of their views as suppression of their academic freedom, using
this claim to fight back and silence their critics. Campus radicals had
little respect for their opponents and critics, whom they mocked, attacked,
and accused of trying to destroy academic freedom. [14] They portrayed
themselves as victims of right-wing repression, a posture which strengthened
their bonds to "Other victims" of American tyranny and increased their
credibility as radical experts on oppression.

But the academic freedom of the highly qualified was largely neglected in
the frenzy to snatch up young minds for enlightening to leftist doctrine.
Instant experts were more numerous and vociferous, usually more stylish and
hip-and appealingly rebellious against traditional authority. They
proclaimed their complete freedom to teach almost anything (from rap music
to comic books and erotica) and expect it to be accepted as legitimate
college course material, and their teaching was relatively simple, with
light workloads and easy grading. Against these advantages real experts and
traditionalists with heavy reading lists and course requirements, and
complex ideas and dissent didn't have much of a fighting chance.
http://ww.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=19096

[El Conquistador]

"The Department of Defense" <the...@ss.mil> wrote in message
news:6WBLe.6862$32....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...

> (When are we gonna see good stuff from Liberal cites?????) Patiently
> waiting......
>
>
> "Why is it," wondered my faculty friend, "that after 9/11, and after the
> start of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, all of a sudden professors
> without professional experience or expertise in the subject became
> 'experts' on the Middle East, Radical Islam, terrorism, U.S. foreign
> policy and the like?" These instant experts were eager to teach students,
> colleagues -- and anyone they could get to listen -- about these
> subjects. They were especially anxious to ensure that everyone would adopt
> their politically correct viewpoints and have an arsenal of facts to
> support their views.
>
> "We both know," I said, "that this is propagandizing, not educating, and
> it is an abuse of the true mission of universities, which is the pursuit
> of knowledge, not political ideology. We see how this undermines academic
> discipline and standards essential for the pursuit of knowledge.

FUCK YOUR POLEMICS! STOP BRUTALIZING THE PEOPLE OF IRAQ AND GET THE FUCK OUT
OF IRAQ, THAT IS ALL IRAQIS ASK!

[Bernardz]

In article <ntGLe.12951$XM3....@bignews5.bellsouth.net>,
ser...@bellsouth.net says...

So you now say that 9/11 had something to do with Iraq. Why have you
changed your mind in the last few hours?

--
Ask yourself, what would God think of your ideals, religion and beliefs?

Observations of Bernard - No 83

[El Conquistador]

"Bernardz" <bern...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:1124022189.5f552d69741880a655a80e9409e1ab24@bubbanews...

Only a complete madman could deduce that from what I said. There is not a
shred of evidence that any muslim participated in the organizing of 911.
That was a jewish deed!

[Susan Cohen]

"The Department of Defense" <the...@ss.mil> wrote in message
news:6WBLe.6862$32....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...

> (When are we gonna see good stuff from Liberal cites?????) Patiently
> waiting......

Please don't entitled a thread "for dummies" & then stick my name after it
if you want me to answer you in good humor :-)

Susan

[The Department of Defense]

"Susan Cohen" <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:oLLLe.9176$Rp5.512@trnddc03...

>
> "The Department of Defense" <the...@ss.mil> wrote in message
> news:6WBLe.6862$32....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>> (When are we gonna see good stuff from Liberal cites?????) Patiently
>> waiting......
>
> Please don't entitled a thread "for dummies" & then stick my name after it
> if you want me to answer you in good humor :-)

OOOPSSSS!!!!! I really didn't realize that till you pointed that out...
Sowwwy my dear...... :o(

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

That would be the first time all the muslims all over the world were
celebrating a "jewish deed".

--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8...@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.

The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

in Message-ID: <rjise19nrclufrgjg...@4ax.com>
Mark "Woody" Ferguson shows his mastery of the English language:
"With patients and practice you could be nominated next time around..."

in Message-MID: <k1kte1hu59khhkt4m...@4ax.com>
Mark "The illiterate" Ferguson astonishes everybody saying:
"Oh, for fucks sake, Gary no matter how angery he thinks he makes there
are lines I will not cross unless I believe what I say is the true, I
know more then you."

in Message-ID: <lhic01pc5svudk22n...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Tequila Titsz" Cameron explains world religions:
"The jews roots are islamic."

in Message-ID: <j1b5c1l2629tc6afu...@4ax.com>
Alexa "dumbass" Cameron shows her knowledge of history:
"WRONGO. There was NO Bible before King James had it written."

in Message-ID: <5g89d15kbjd3cd7i6...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Word Salad" Cameron shows her knowledge of science:
"Einstein never found the double superimposed doubl 'equilateral' triangle."

in Message-ID: <1rfee1d5iuhq3piii...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Kook of the year 2004" Cameron uses words she doesn't understand again:
"Why is the Pentagon killing American citizens with non-lethal technology?"

in Message-ID: <2mrge1phgk68ourdt...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Imnotalexadammit" Cameron has problems with that extra finger
on her hand:
"Why do the Jews use the Star of David as symbolic of the Pentagon, or
Pentagram?"

[Gary Renzetti]

nstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...

"*All* the Muslims all over the world"?
What a contemptable lie!!!!!!!!!!!
(This is *not* my echo or my fight, and I'm *not* a Muslim. I am replying to
a cross-posting idiot).
GR

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

You will burn in hell, Kafir!!!!!!

[Gary Renzetti]

Huh? I don't have a *fucking clue* what Kafir means, (or what the hell
you're babbling about) and don't want to. You slurred close to a *billion*
human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

Hi Torrl!

[Susan Cohen]

"Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message

news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:43:57 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:
>
>> You slurred close to a *billion*
>> human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
>> Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!

Thanks for helping to expose Renzetti's incredible hypocrisy.

Susan

[Susan Cohen]

"The Department of Defense" <the...@ss.mil> wrote in message

news:o5MLe.7328$32....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...

I figured :-)

Susan
>
>

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

I don't take him seriously, he's just an attention craving little wannabe
troll that even can't trim sigs properly!

[Gary Renzetti]

nstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:22:27 +0000, Susan Cohen wrote:
>
>>
>> "Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:43:57 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:
>>>
>>>> You slurred close to a *billion*
>>>> human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
>>>> Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!
>>
>> Thanks for helping to expose Renzetti's incredible hypocrisy.
>>

>> Sowsan

>
> I don't take him seriously, he's just an attention craving little wannabe
> troll that even can't trim sigs properly!
>

My dear dipshit, *you* posted your racist claptrap to *me*, not vice-versa.
Now, please fuck off and die, slowly and painfully if the Gods will it.

[Ed]

"Gary Renzetti" <liz...@connection.com> wrote in message
news:92b57$42ffc4c4$d8fea135$19...@PRIMUS.CA...

> nstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:22:27 +0000, Susan Cohen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:43:57 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You slurred close to a *billion*
>>>>> human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
>>>>> Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!
>>>
>>> Thanks for helping to expose Renzetti's incredible hypocrisy.
>>>
>>> Sowsan
>>
>> I don't take him seriously, he's just an attention craving little wannabe
>> troll that even can't trim sigs properly!

Not only that, but a glutton for punishment as well, as evidence by his
response to you below. The cretin just keeps coming back for more.

He claims he stopped replying to my posts. I consider that a badge of honor
:-)

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:25:07 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:

> nstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:22:27 +0000, Susan Cohen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:43:57 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You slurred close to a *billion*
>>>>> human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
>>>>> Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!
>>>
>>> Thanks for helping to expose Renzetti's incredible hypocrisy.
>>>
>>> Sowsan
>>
>> I don't take him seriously, he's just an attention craving little wannabe
>> troll that even can't trim sigs properly!
>>
> My dear dipshit,

Talking to yourself, delusional little wannabe troll?

> *you* posted your racist claptrap to *me*,

The set of mentally challenged people on earth is not exacly what one
could call a race, and the fact you belong to is, how sad that must be
for you, is not necessarily a reason to blame me.

> not vice-versa.

Exactly! I'm not to blame for your shortcomings.

> Now, please fuck off and die, slowly and painfully if the Gods will it.

See what I meant about those who were mentally challenged?

I'm sorry but I'm not allowed to give medical help on Usenet, but I'm sure
you can get professional help in your neighbourhood.

HTH
HAND

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:57:58 -0400, Ed wrote:

>
> "Gary Renzetti" <liz...@connection.com> wrote in message
> news:92b57$42ffc4c4$d8fea135$19...@PRIMUS.CA...
>> nstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:22:27 +0000, Susan Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>>>> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>>>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:43:57 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You slurred close to a *billion*
>>>>>> human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
>>>>>> Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for helping to expose Renzetti's incredible hypocrisy.
>>>>
>>>> Sowsan
>>>
>>> I don't take him seriously, he's just an attention craving little wannabe
>>> troll that even can't trim sigs properly!
>
> Not only that, but a glutton for punishment as well, as evidence by his
> response to you below. The cretin just keeps coming back for more.
>
> He claims he stopped replying to my posts. I consider that a badge of honor
> :-)
>

That indeed is a kooky sign. Maybe you could nominate him for one of these
much coveted kook awards on alt.usenet.kooks?

http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/faq.html#q9

The only problem with him is that he has to prove for the AUK audience he is
really more than a wannabe troll, i.e. his entainment value has to exceed
the value of a trivial troll who everybody killfiles within an instance.

[The ##Revd]

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:25:05 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:

>On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:22:27 +0000, Susan Cohen wrote:
>
>>
>> "Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:43:57 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:
>>>
>>>> You slurred close to a *billion*
>>>> human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
>>>> Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!
>>
>> Thanks for helping to expose Renzetti's incredible hypocrisy.
>>
>> Susan
>
>I don't take him seriously, he's just an attention craving little wannabe
>troll that even can't trim sigs properly!

You just replied to a wannabe jew! LOL

[Ben Cramer]

"Susan Cohen" <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:nCOLe.3796$H_4.2165@trnddc07...

Christ, you're a deluded cunt. What hypocrisy you fucking idiot?

[Ben Cramer]

"Susan Cohen" <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:oLLLe.9176$Rp5.512@trnddc03...

>
> "The Department of Defense" <the...@ss.mil> wrote in message
> news:6WBLe.6862$32....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>> (When are we gonna see good stuff from Liberal cites?????) Patiently
>> waiting......
>
> Please don't entitled a thread "for dummies" & then stick my name after it
> if you want me to answer you in good humor :-)

Can you try that again. English would be good.

[The Department of Defense]

"The ##Revd" <reneg##de@anglic##n.org> wrote in message
news:4300270b...@news.onetel.net.uk...

This coming from a wannabe Eurpean! LOL

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

You just replied to a kufir, jihadboi! LOL

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

The hypochrisy of a lamer that whines about cutting the ng line and
doesn't himself. Are there other poly syllable words you have problems
with?

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

Any person, besides an illiterate like you, would have understood that
"entitled" was a misspelling for "entitle".

HTH
HAND

[El Bleacho]

Dr. Flonkenstein wrote:
> Any person, besides an illiterate like you, would have understood that
> "entitled" was a misspelling for "entitle".

Oh look - the court jester of AUK has come back to leg hump Susan.
Negative attention is better than no attention at all, eh Flonky?

--
_____________________
I am hung like Einstein;
and as smart as a horse!

[bob wood]

babbling about typing errors is a sure sign you have no real facts to
contribute to the discussion what a fucking waste of time. Its not an
idication of literacy.

Typing is a skil lthe recquires dexterity. Some dont type as well as others
it doesnt mean they are illiterate or stupid, on the contrary complaing
about it the place of a logical argument indicates your stupidity and
inablity to argue the logic and facts of the discussion.

[El Conquistador]

"Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...

YOU ARE ONE FUCK OF A ZIONAZI LIAR!

[ריעין ברתון‎/Riain Barton‎]

You are a sure sign that you have no real facts to contribute...

"bob wood" <w...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ofbMe.8484$32....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
: babbling about typing errors is a sure sign you have no real facts to

:
:

[Susan Cohen]

"Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message

news:pan.2005.08.15....@localhost.localdomain...

> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:37:31 +1000, Ben Cramer wrote:
>
>>
>> "Susan Cohen" <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:oLLLe.9176$Rp5.512@trnddc03...
>>>
>>> "The Department of Defense" <the...@ss.mil> wrote in message
>>> news:6WBLe.6862$32....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>>>> (When are we gonna see good stuff from Liberal cites?????) Patiently
>>>> waiting......
>>>
>>> Please don't entitled a thread "for dummies" & then stick my name after
>>> it
>>> if you want me to answer you in good humor :-)
>>
>> Can you try that again. English would be good.
>
> Any person, besides an illiterate like you, would have understood that
> "entitled" was a misspelling for "entitle".

No, it was a typo, d being right under the e on the keyboard.

Susan

[Susan Cohen]

"El Bleacho" <ElBl...@Clorox.gov> wrote in message
news:73aMe.1400$Z%6.1...@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...

> Dr. Flonkenstein wrote:
>> Any person, besides an illiterate like you, would have understood that
>> "entitled" was a misspelling for "entitle".
>
> Oh look - the court jester of AUK has come back to leg hump Susan.
> Negative attention is better than no attention at all, eh Flonky?

Um, actually, he's been going after cramer.

Susan

[Susan Cohen]

"ריעין ברתון‎/Riain Barton" <ri...@zion.org.il> wrote in message
news:fUbMe.16415$XM3....@bignews5.bellsouth.net...

> You are a sure sign that you have no real facts to contribute...

Normally, I'd have to agree with you - but he's got cramer's number hard &
fast!!

Susan

[Susan Cohen]

"Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message

news:pan.2005.08.15....@localhost.localdomain...

> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 05:24:51 +0000, The ##Revd wrote:
>
>>
>> You just replied to a wannabe jew! LOL

Says the lying Jew-hater! LOL

> You just replied to a kufir, jihadboi! LOL

Please - he aspires to kaffir-hood.

Susan

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

Hey, wanne see the monkey you came from?

http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_mandate_grand_mufti.php

BTW: I heard T.Blair will order all muslims in the UK to wear a yellow
schwastika. HhehheHHhehhe, how about that!

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:03:15 +0000, El Bleacho wrote:

> Dr. Flonkenstein wrote:
>> Any person, besides an illiterate like you, would have understood that
>> "entitled" was a misspelling for "entitle".
>
> Oh look - the court jester of AUK has come back to leg hump Susan.
> Negative attention is better than no attention at all, eh Flonky?

Takes one to know one, wannabe troll.

btw: How do you feel to have your first attention from me, fanboi?

[The ##Revd]

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:55:18 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 05:24:51 +0000, The ##Revd wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:25:05 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
>> <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:22:27 +0000, Susan Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>>>> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>>>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:43:57 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You slurred close to a *billion*
>>>>>> human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
>>>>>> Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for helping to expose Renzetti's incredible hypocrisy.
>>>>
>>>> Susan
>>>
>>>I don't take him seriously, he's just an attention craving little wannabe
>>>troll that even can't trim sigs properly!
>>
>> You just replied to a wannabe jew! LOL
>You just replied to a kufir, jihadboi! LOL

Is that a new word for a jewlover, jewlover?

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:41:44 GMT, "Suzy the foul-mouthed convert"
<flav...@verizon.net> wrote:

>
>"Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>news:pan.2005.08.15....@localhost.localdomain...
>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 05:24:51 +0000, The ##Revd wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You just replied to a wannabe jew! LOL
>
>Says the lying Jew-hater! LOL

Jew-hating doesn't apply to you, you thick Irish cunt.

>> You just replied to a kufir, jihadboi! LOL
>
>Please - he aspires to kaffir-hood.
>

>Suzy

Please - you aspire to being a jew. Fuck knows why, tho'.

[The ##Revd]

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:57:02 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:36:13 +1000, Ben Cramer wrote:
>
>>
>> "Susan Cohen" <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:nCOLe.3796$H_4.2165@trnddc07...
>>>
>>> "Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:43:57 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You slurred close to a *billion*
>>>>> human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
>>>>> Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!
>>>
>>> Thanks for helping to expose Renzetti's incredible hypocrisy.
>>
>> Christ, you're a deluded cunt. What hypocrisy you fucking idiot?
>
>The hypochrisy of a lamer that whines about cutting the ng line and
>doesn't himself. Are there other poly syllable words you have problems
>with?

The word is "polysyllabic", you illiterate asshole.

HTH
HAND
BIOYSGA

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:24:02 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:03:15 +0000, El Bleacho wrote:
>
>> Dr. Flonkenstein wrote:
>>> Any person, besides an illiterate like you, would have understood that
>>> "entitled" was a misspelling for "entitle".
>>
>> Oh look - the court jester of AUK has come back to leg hump Susan.
>> Negative attention is better than no attention at all, eh Flonky?
>
>Takes one to know one, wannabe troll.
>
>btw: How do you feel to have your first attention from me, fanboi?

Don't be dissing a real jew, jewlover.

[The ##Revd]

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:58:47 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:37:31 +1000, Ben Cramer wrote:
>
>>
>> "Susan Cohen" <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:oLLLe.9176$Rp5.512@trnddc03...
>>>
>>> "The Department of Defense" <the...@ss.mil> wrote in message
>>> news:6WBLe.6862$32....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>>>> (When are we gonna see good stuff from Liberal cites?????) Patiently
>>>> waiting......
>>>
>>> Please don't entitled a thread "for dummies" & then stick my name after it
>>> if you want me to answer you in good humor :-)
>>
>> Can you try that again. English would be good.
>
>Any person, besides an illiterate like you, would have understood that
>"entitled" was a misspelling for "entitle".

Right. Now what about "poly syllable", jewlover?

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

You just look fine with that orange Guantanomo uniform, islamlover!

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

Classic evasion of the question as expected from an emtpy headed muslim
lover parroting his masters.

> HTH
> HAND
> BIOYSGA

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

http://www.alexian.org/progserv/babies/7to9m/milestones9m.html
especially this one, muslimtard:
http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~jhf/kiss23.htm
http://phplens.com/phpeverywhere/phpe-fav.htm
http://66.249.93.104/search?q=cache:TVuak2oyF-UJ:www.dailykos.com/story/2005/5/3/93226/20566+%22poly+syllable%22&hl=nl
http://www.flashcardexchange.com/flashcards/view/225478

Want more?

Poor little reverend is now

O)))) O)) O))O))) O))O))))))))O)))))
O)) O)) O)) O))O) O)) O))O)) O)) O))
O)) O))O)) O) O))O)) O)) O))O)) O)) O))
O)) O))O)) O)) O))O)) O)) O))O)))))) O)) O))
O)) O))O)) O) O)) O))O)) O) O))O)) O)) O))
O)) O)) O) O) O))))O)) O) ))O)) O)) O))
O)))) O)) O))O)) O))O))))))))O)))))

Smile, you have been trolled!

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

> Don't be<SLPAT>

Request denied, islamofascist.

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

Why should you justify to a semi-literate preteen children loving senile
pervert?

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:52:56 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:17:14 +0000, The ##Revd wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:57:02 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
>> <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:36:13 +1000, Ben Cramer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Susan Cohen" <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:nCOLe.3796$H_4.2165@trnddc07...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>>>>> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:43:57 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You slurred close to a *billion*
>>>>>>> human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
>>>>>>> Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for helping to expose Renzetti's incredible hypocrisy.
>>>>
>>>> Christ, you're a deluded cunt. What hypocrisy you fucking idiot?
>>>
>>>The hypochrisy of a lamer that whines about cutting the ng line and
>>>doesn't himself. Are there other poly syllable words you have problems
>>>with?
>>
>> The word is "polysyllabic", you illiterate asshole.
>>
>Classic evasion of the question as expected from an emtpy headed muslim
>lover parroting his masters.

Classic hypocrisy from an asshole who has just referred to someone
else as "illiterate". LOL

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:49:24 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:14:36 +0000, The ##Revd wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:55:18 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
>> <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 05:24:51 +0000, The ##Revd wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:25:05 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
>>>> <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:22:27 +0000, Susan Cohen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:43:57 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You slurred close to a *billion*
>>>>>>>> human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
>>>>>>>> Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for helping to expose Renzetti's incredible hypocrisy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Susan
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't take him seriously, he's just an attention craving little wannabe
>>>>>troll that even can't trim sigs properly!
>>>>
>>>> You just replied to a wannabe jew! LOL
>>>You just replied to a kufir, jihadboi! LOL
>>
>> Is that a new word for a jewlover, jewlover?
>
>You just look fine with that orange Guantanomo uniform, islamlover!

Wait till World War III kicks off, jewlover. All the jews in America
will be rounded up and sent to Gitmo. Whose ass are you going to lick
then?

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:11:20 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:18:19 +0000, The ##Revd wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:58:47 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
>> <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:37:31 +1000, Ben Cramer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Susan Cohen" <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:oLLLe.9176$Rp5.512@trnddc03...
>>>>>
>>>>> "The Department of Defense" <the...@ss.mil> wrote in message
>>>>> news:6WBLe.6862$32....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>>>>>> (When are we gonna see good stuff from Liberal cites?????) Patiently
>>>>>> waiting......
>>>>>
>>>>> Please don't entitled a thread "for dummies" & then stick my name after it
>>>>> if you want me to answer you in good humor :-)
>>>>
>>>> Can you try that again. English would be good.
>>>
>>>Any person, besides an illiterate like you, would have understood that
>>>"entitled" was a misspelling for "entitle".
>>
>> Right. Now what about "poly syllable", jewlover?
>
>http://www.alexian.org/progserv/babies/7to9m/milestones9m.html
>especially this one, muslimtard:
>http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~jhf/kiss23.htm
>http://phplens.com/phpeverywhere/phpe-fav.htm
>http://66.249.93.104/search?q=cache:TVuak2oyF-UJ:www.dailykos.com/story/2005/5/3/93226/20566+%22poly+syllable%22&hl=nl
>http://www.flashcardexchange.com/flashcards/view/225478

I don't look at unsolicited cites, jewlover.

>Want more?
>
>Poor little reverend is now

Piss off, you silly little cunt.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:18:55 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:19:30 +0000, The ##Revd wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:24:02 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
>> <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:03:15 +0000, El Bleacho wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dr. Flonkenstein wrote:
>>>>> Any person, besides an illiterate like you, would have understood that
>>>>> "entitled" was a misspelling for "entitle".
>>>>
>>>> Oh look - the court jester of AUK has come back to leg hump Susan.
>>>> Negative attention is better than no attention at all, eh Flonky?
>>>
>>>Takes one to know one, wannabe troll.
>>>
>>>btw: How do you feel to have your first attention from me, fanboi?
>>
>> Don't be<SLPAT>
>
>Request denied, islamofascist.

Blow it out your jewloving ass, you illiterate cunt.

[Ben Cramer]

"Susan Cohen" <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:0fdMe.4374$%K4.3125@trnddc09...

>
> "ריעין ברתון‎/Riain Barton" <ri...@zion.org.il> wrote in message
> news:fUbMe.16415$XM3....@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>> You are a sure sign that you have no real facts to contribute...
>
> Normally, I'd have to agree with you - but he's got cramer's number hard &
> fast!!

What are you blathering about now, you thick Irish cunt? Where was Cramer
mentioned anywhere?

More lies and delusion from cohen.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:18:47 -0500, Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:50:26 GMT, reneg##de@anglic##n.org (The ##Revd)

>Hurt your feelings, did he?

I don't have any. But thanks for playing, asshole.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:46:48 -0500, Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:32:59 GMT, reneg##de@anglic##n.org (The ##Revd)

>Obviously, that's why you responded.

I always respond. It's a reflex action.

>> But thanks for playing, asshole.
>

>Admission of hurt feelings noted.

Delusions noted.

Again, thanks for playing, asshole.
Now piss orf.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:35:59 -0500, Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:26:33 GMT, reneg##de@anglic##n.org (The ##Revd)

>Request denied, Mr Moderator.

It wasn't a request, fuckface.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:16:49 -0500, Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:05:07 GMT, reneg##de@anglic##n.org (The ##Revd)

>You mean, it was an order, Jew hating kook?

No, it was a command, jewloving asshole.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:04:37 -0500, Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:53:05 GMT, reneg##de@anglic##n.org (The ##Revd)

>And if I don't, you'll huff and puff impotently?

Wait and see, jewloving asswipe.

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "has fantasies about
love and affection; may have a brain somewhere", incited:

> Wait and see, jewloving asswipe.

I'm Jewish. You got a problem with that, shpikh?

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "uses food items
during sex; has an aggravating personality; can't pull, will pay for women",
disgorged:

> No, it was a command, jewloving asshole.

So, what have you got against Jews, kfotz?

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "not easily
tolerated; has four deformed children; tends to lose his temper in public",
suspired:

> I always respond.

Do you really? You always respond? Without fail, ever?

> It's a reflex action.

It's because Jupiter was lined up with Florida.

> Delusions noted.

I say blood red is the colour for you.

> IF YOU’RE GOING TO GO TO MY FUNERAL AND CRY FOR ME AFTER I DIE, HAVE
> ENOUGH GUTS TO PAY ATTENTION TO ME WHILE I’M ALIVE!

There's always suicide, ##Revd.

> Again, thanks for playing, asshole.

Thanks. For a while there, I was afraid my career was in a stall like yours.

> Now piss orf.

Now I'm beginning to lose faith in you.

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "naughty back-door
burglar; laughs like a hyena; uses food items during sex; pisses on his feet
in the shower; It helps with the athlete's foot", popped out:

> Jew-hating doesn't apply to you, you thick Irish cunt.

Care for some cybersex?

> Please - you aspire to being a jew.

Im hayu samim et hamo'ach shelcha b'tarnegol, hu haya ratz yashar l'shochet.

> Fuck knows why, tho'.

Hey, I remember you when you had only one stomach.

[ריעין ברתון‎/Riain Barton‎]

Doesn't matter they are both Jew-hating scumbags.

"Susan Cohen" <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:0fdMe.4374$%K4.3125@trnddc09...
:
: "ריעין ברתון‎/Riain Barton" <ri...@zion.org.il> wrote in message
: news:fUbMe.16415$XM3....@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
: > You are a sure sign that you have no real facts to contribute...
:
: Normally, I'd have to agree with you - but he's got cramer's number
hard &
: fast!!

:
: Susan

: > :
: >
: >
:
:

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:45:06 MDT, "Fred" <"fred"@alt.sex.spanking>
wrote:

Where do you want me to start, jew?

[The ##Revd]

Well, yes actually, asshole.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:54:48 MDT, "Fred"
<"fred"@alt.binaries.fetish.loose.labia> wrote:

>The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "not easily
>tolerated; has four deformed children; tends to lose his temper in public",
>suspired:
>
>> I always respond.
>
>Do you really? You always respond? Without fail, ever?

I try to, jew.

>> It's a reflex action.
>
>It's because Jupiter was lined up with Florida.

If you say so, jew.

>> Delusions noted.
>
>I say blood red is the colour for you.

One colour is as good as any other, jew. Except black, of course.

>> IF YOU’RE GOING TO GO TO MY FUNERAL AND CRY FOR ME AFTER I DIE, HAVE
>> ENOUGH GUTS TO PAY ATTENTION TO ME WHILE I’M ALIVE!
>
>There's always suicide, ##Revd.
>
>> Again, thanks for playing, asshole.
>
>Thanks. For a while there, I was afraid my career was in a stall like yours.

You have a career, jew?

>> Now piss orf.
>
>Now I'm beginning to lose faith in you.

Who cares, jew?

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:06:43 -0500, Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:34:40 GMT, reneg##de@anglic##n.org (The ##Revd)

>Sure.

Like I said, cunt, wait and see.

>I suspect you are related to Chuck Lysaght.

I suspect your family tree only has one branch. If that.

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "paunchy gay-stud;
devious; smells of sewers; can’t get a girlfriend", spluttered:

> Well, yes actually, asshole.

MISTER Arsehole, to you.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:55:43 MDT, "Fred"
<"fred"@alt.sex.ads.female.masturbation> wrote:

>The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "naughty back-door
>burglar; laughs like a hyena; uses food items during sex; pisses on his feet
>in the shower; It helps with the athlete's foot", popped out:
>
>> Jew-hating doesn't apply to you, you thick Irish cunt.
>
>Care for some cybersex?

Not with you, jew.

>> Please - you aspire to being a jew.
>
>Im hayu samim et hamo'ach shelcha b'tarnegol, hu haya ratz yashar l'shochet.

Such a yiddish already!

>> Fuck knows why, tho'.
>
>Hey, I remember you when you had only one stomach.

Why would I remember you? You're just a jew.

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "took an IQ test and
the results were negative; has warts", groused:

> Where do you want me to start, jew?

Lech Hapes Mi Yena'ane'a Otcha.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:07:22 +0300, "ריעין ברתון‎/Riain Barton"
<ri...@zion.org.il> wrote:

>Doesn't matter they are both Jew-hating scumbags.

Jew-hating doesn't apply either to you or to the thick Irish cunt
you're replying to.

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "makes simple tasks
seem like brain surgery; likes to autograph bed pans; has sex with barbie
dolls legs", purred:

> I try to, jew.

You gave up too easily.

> If you say so, jew.

If I get hungry, I'll eat.

> One colour is as good as any other, jew.

Good.

> Except black, of course.

Read that back as if it were being said to you. 'Except black, of course'.
You used the subjunctive. Why?

> You have a career, jew?

I stand corrected.

> Who cares, jew?

Who says so?

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "smokes fifty a day;
lives in a trailer park", grieved:

> Like I said, cunt, wait and see.

Oh! I thought you said cunt.

> I suspect your family tree only has one branch.

All the branches of your family tree intersect, at one point; your mother.

> If that.

If you want, I could make you an extra in the Mayfire commercial.

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "says, 'Yes, dear,'
irrespective of the question; transvestite merchant banker", ejaculated:

> Not with you, jew.

I don't think I want to know you anymore. All you do is make me feel bad
about myself.

> Such a yiddish already!

Lech tiezdayen.

> Why would I remember you?

You should work harder to improve your memory.

> You're just a jew.

I'm using it for something else.

[Heinrich]

"Fred" <"fred"@news.admin.pantyhose> schreef in bericht
news:d306f3d2c202440b...@news.admin.amateur.female...

your master aka G-d

[Fred]

Heinrich, <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.se>, whose name means "has right wing Nazi
tendencies; stupid as hell", cheeped:

> your master aka G-d.

I am a monk.

[The ##Revd]

In yiddish you want to babble?

[The ##Revd]

That's exactly what I told the jew.

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "unpopular; all
mouth and flirting, no action in the bedroom", eructated:

> In yiddish you want to babble?

Who wants to babble?

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:25:25 -0500, Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:19:02 GMT, reneg##de@anglic##n.org (The ##Revd)

>Yep, more impotent huffing and puffing. Typical.

The fun has just begun, jewlover.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:29:16 MDT, "Fred" <"fred"@news.admin.pantyhose>
wrote:

>The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "makes simple tasks
>seem like brain surgery; likes to autograph bed pans; has sex with barbie
>dolls legs", purred:
>
>> I try to, jew.
>
>You gave up too easily.

Not yet, jew.

>> If you say so, jew.
>
>If I get hungry, I'll eat.

Eat shit, jew.

>> One colour is as good as any other, jew.
>
>Good.

Mazeltov!

>> Except black, of course.
>
>Read that back as if it were being said to you. 'Except black, of course'.
>You used the subjunctive. Why?

There is no subjunctive. This is English not yiddish, jew.

>> You have a career, jew?
>
>I stand corrected.

You stand rejected, jew.

>> Who cares, jew?
>
>Who says so?

G-d says so.

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "mostly goes without
underwear; no use to society; likes small-breasted women and pornography",
catechised:

> Not yet, jew.

Not everyone is clever; not everyone is smart.

> Eat shit, jew.

I should not have skipped lunch.

> Mazeltov!

What do you do to get a nice girlfriend like that?

> There is no subjunctive.

No sale, not today.

> This is English not yiddish, jew.

Not to be hypercritical, but...

> You stand rejected, jew.

I don't appreciate that. I really don't.

> G-d says so.

I think I shall start my own cult.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:33:31 MDT, "Fred"
<"fred"@rec.arts.sheep.baaa.baaa.baaa.moo> wrote:

>The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "smokes fifty a day;
>lives in a trailer park", grieved:
>
>> Like I said, cunt, wait and see.
>
>Oh! I thought you said cunt.

I thought so too, jew.

>> I suspect your family tree only has one branch.
>
>All the branches of your family tree intersect, at one point; your mother.

Yours intersect at one point too: your pig.

>> If that.
>
>If you want, I could make you an extra in the Mayfire commercial.

If you want, you can blow it out your fat jew ass.

[The ##Revd]

Make that "jew asshole".

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "is quite
comfortable wearing the same underwear three or four times without washing
them; has four deformed children; bondage freak - likes getting spanked",
hectored:

> That's exactly what I told the jew.

What do you do if you are in school and you peed your pants?

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "chubby boychick;
shows up to costume parties without a costume; limited intelligence; only
sleeps with other men", squawked:

> The fun has just begun, jewlover.

So, what have you got against Jews, kfotz?

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "limp-wristed
man-pussy; still hasn't worked out what an orgasm is; cna tpye 300w rods per
mniuet#!; small dick, fat arse", jawed:

> I thought so too, jew.

What you think is irrelevant.

> Yours intersect at one point too: your pig.

People tend to be afraid of what they don't understand.

> If you want, you can blow it out your fat jew ass.

Who in their right mind would want to do that, ##Revd?

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "needs to be naked
at all times; like an Italian breakfast bread roll, hollow on the inside",
penned:

> Make that "jew asshole".

That isn't the real me. You do it.

[The ##Revd]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:34:14 MDT, "Fred"
<"fred"@alt.binaries.erotica.dominion.hide-the-ferret> wrote:

>The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "says, 'Yes, dear,'
>irrespective of the question; transvestite merchant banker", ejaculated:
>
>> Not with you, jew.
>
>I don't think I want to know you anymore. All you do is make me feel bad
>about myself.

So you should. You're a jew after all.

>> Such a yiddish already!
>
>Lech tiezdayen.

Oy gevalt!

>> Why would I remember you?
>
>You should work harder to improve your memory.

Fuggedabout it.

>> You're just a jew.
>
>I'm using it for something else.

What can you use a jew for?

[Fred]

The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "likes wearing
crotchless jeans and arseless swimming trunks; loud-mouthed", tinkled:

> So you should.

What possible benefit is there if I should, ##Revd?

> You're a jew after all.

Yes, after. Quite some time after.

> Oy gevalt!

I have an announcement. The children are coming to our house every
Christmas.

> Fuggedabout it.

It's an emergency.

> What can you use a jew for?

Can I borrow some money?

[Ben Cramer]

"ריעין ברתון‎/Riain Barton" <ri...@zion.org.il> wrote in message

news:9JjMe.18122$Rm3....@bignews4.bellsouth.net...

> Doesn't matter they are both Jew-hating scumbags.

Not at all.

Although I must confess I'm none too fond of zionazi, poofter, Irish,
converts.

[Ben Cramer]

"The ##Revd" <reneg##de@anglic##n.org> wrote in message
news:4301ca9e...@news.onetel.net.uk...
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:42:22 MDT, "Fred"
> <"fred"@alt.sex.wanted.venereal.disease> wrote:
>
>>The ##Revd, <reneg##de@anglic##n.org>, whose name means "has fantasies
>>about
>>love and affection; may have a brain somewhere", incited:

>>
>>> Wait and see, jewloving asswipe.
>>

>>I'm Jewish. You got a problem with that, shpikh?
>
> Well, yes actually, asshole.

And I, if I may be so bold.

[Dr. Flonkenstein]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:44:00 +0000, The ##Revd wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:49:24 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
> <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:14:36 +0000, The ##Revd wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:55:18 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
>>> <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 05:24:51 +0000, The ##Revd wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:25:05 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
>>>>> <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:22:27 +0000, Susan Cohen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Dr. Flonkenstein" <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:pan.2005.08.14....@localhost.localdomain...
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:43:57 -0400, Gary Renzetti wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You slurred close to a *billion*
>>>>>>>>> human beings for some idiotic "logic" that's known to yourself!
>>>>>>>>> Now, *please* FUCK OFF AND TRIM YOUR GROUPS!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for helping to expose Renzetti's incredible hypocrisy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Susan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't take him seriously, he's just an attention craving little wannabe
>>>>>>troll that even can't trim sigs properly!
>>>>>
>>>>> You just replied to a wannabe jew! LOL
>>>>You just replied to a kufir, jihadboi! LOL
>>>
>>> Is that a new word for a jewlover, jewlover?
>>
>>You just look fine with that orange Guantanomo uniform, islamlover!
>
> Wait till World War III kicks off, jewlover. All the jews in America
> will be rounded up and sent to Gitmo. Whose ass are you going to lick
> then?

Whose ass are you licking now, islamnazi?

--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8...@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.

The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

in Message-ID: <rjise19nrclufrgjg...@4ax.com>
Mark "Woody" Ferguson shows his mastery of the English language:
"With patients and practice you could be nominated next time around..."

in Message-MID: <k1kte1hu59khhkt4m...@4ax.com>
Mark "The illiterate" Ferguson astonishes everybody saying:
"Oh, for fucks sake, Gary no matter how angery he thinks he makes there
are lines I will not cross unless I believe what I say is the true, I
know more then you."

in Message-ID: <lhic01pc5svudk22n...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Tequila Titsz" Cameron explains world religions:
"The jews roots are islamic."

in Message-ID: <j1b5c1l2629tc6afu...@4ax.com>
Alexa "dumbass" Cameron shows her knowledge of history:
"WRONGO. There was NO Bible before King James had it written."

in Message-ID: <5g89d15kbjd3cd7i6...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Word Salad" Cameron shows her knowledge of science:
"Einstein never found the double superimposed doubl 'equilateral' triangle."

in Message-ID: <1rfee1d5iuhq3piii...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Kook of the year 2004" Cameron uses words she doesn't understand again:
"Why is the Pentagon killing American citizens with non-lethal technology?"

in Message-ID: <2mrge1phgk68ourdt...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Imnotalexadammit" Cameron has problems with that extra finger
on her hand:
"Why do the Jews use the Star of David as symbolic of the Pentagon, or
Pentagram?"

[Heinrich]

"Fred" <"fred"@alabama.kakpipe.cosmonauts> schreef in bericht
news:6acc6de401eb4e1e...@rec.arts.celebrities.nude...

you know what your problem is ? you ask to many questions .

[Heinrich]

"The ##Revd" <reneg##de@anglic##n.org> schreef in bericht
news:4301de0a...@news.onetel.net.uk...

iam afraid to tell you that i am getting a little bit upset about the
stupidity of those people , and they seem to appear from everywhere
nowadays.