Op 2013-06-17, Walt Hampton schreef <
walt.h...@att.net>:
> There are indeed other things that have been
> happening in the world that does not concern
> the Middle East.... The economic situation all
> over the globe is continuing to crumble. It is
> bad enough that the European Union is in
> tatters and that most European nations are
> now indeed totally bankrupt thanks to
> Jewish criminality.
Thanks to every nation their reactionaries and failing economic
understanding. The role of the Jewish people in this, is 'only'
that they failed to provide a better example of a functioning
economy thanks to the 'criminality' of the modern Rabbis who now
have kept Israel destroyed for more then 2 millenia since Hillel
the Elder and his prosbul capitalism. The criminality of the Jewish
people is versus the Torah, not versus the laws of the nations.
Example: it is a Dutch law that one may not insult a 'friendly
foreign head of state.' I have probably broken that law when
talking about American ruling gangs (who I don't see as friends
though.) Does that make me a criminal in a country that does not
have this law ? In that sense there is Jewish criminality, in
another sense there is no general Jewish criminality (I would even
say on the contrary, most Jewish people favor peace and justice,
even though they have destroyed the means by which these can be
achieved for themselves.)
>
http://www.northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2013/06/northerntruthseeker-rant-for-sunday_16.html
>
> But half a world away in Japan, there is rising
> fears that the Japanese economy is now in
> total failure, with the same fears rising of
> "austerity" measures to be imposed on the
> Japanese people. It is bad enough for the
> Japanese that they have to endure the
> ravages of the Fukushima nuclear disaster,
> but this economic disaster could spell the
> end of their economy, and leave Japan in ruins.
>
> "Only one solution...the Brazen Bull!"
Killing the jewish people is not going to help you, because all
you are doing is placing the blame for your own ignorance about
economics (perhaps, seemingly) on the apparent (prosbul!) ignorance
of another people. What you should do instead is think about how
economics ought to function, and then make it so in your nation
despite the best efforts of your criminals (and/or your criminality)
to prevent that from happening. There is in fact a source that is
well known who could help you, but there are also others. The
two main sources for proper economomics (known to me):
- The Torah (but NOT how the Rabbis falsely interpret it, just read
it and forget about their lies it should be obvious enough.)
- The Russian Obschinah system.
Then there are forms of cooperative companies, replacing dictatorship
within companies with democracy. The Torah and Russian Obshinah have
laws about land, slavery and money. The Lakotah indians also seem to
do interesting things, though it seems they do not see the danger of
for profit investment; on the other hand they seem to promote a more
democratic way of running businesses.
Another thing you could do is just implement what undersigned put
together here:
http://www.law4.org; which you could see as a combination
of the known methods of how to distribute power.
By the way, the Jewish prophets have already said that the Jewish people
will not return to the Torah until they are nearly destroyed and that
has still to happen. I also think that the time has passed for an
easy redemption, as they call it. They have let that chance slip out
already, it may not even matter anymore what they do after this point.
The strategic situation seems to be such at the moment that whatever
anyone does the enemy will retain enough of the upper hand in control
that they can cause WW3 to rage to its full extend, and that the economy
will potentially collapse as well. Though that later thing probably
couldn't be prevented anymore anyway, I think there was still a chance
around 2008 to stop WW3, but now it seems to be too late. The power
of Government should have been used to stop the banks. That was unlikely
to occur because the political parties are owned by the banks, and
ideologically confused. However it might have been possible with an
extreme amount of effort and luck from certain ruling cliques to get
some more truth in Government and new political parties. That could
have taken 10 years to do, from 2008 until 2018. I don't know if that
is even realistic, probably it is not; but it was a shot worth taking.
Now we are 5 years down the line, WW3 is increasingly on a hair trigger,
and the public is being conditioned to accept and expect war already.
You could say that it only takes one fake terrorist attack by the
Obama regime, for instance murdering 400 children in Syria with war
gasses, to be an ideological spark that the western people will suck
up. The Americans and NATO could then go in to conquer Syria for
their Empire, and if Russia tries to stop them Russia will be painted
in the minds of all these millions of ignorant western people as the
cullprit; the one who sides with 'the terrorists.' That doesn't mean
that Russia is good either, but they're not the currently most agressive
conquering Empire and not the one starting WW3 (which the Americans
more or less already have started; they've encircled Iran which is an
act of war, a unilateral aggression for the sake of conquest of power.)
Russia and America are notably already fighting in Syria, the public
seems to be kept unaware of this. The Russian have a naval base in
Syria that they are defending against American atempt to conquest that
and Syria. The Americans want to conquer Syria because they want to
conquer Iran. They want to dominate the whole region for the sake of
oil and simply for power, to have an army that is needed, all kinds
of internal political and economic reasons they have to want these
wars.
When Iran falls, China and Russia face a new strategic situation
because while before the middle east could be said to be chaotic and
it still is; when it all falls to the western crimelords of money then
it might develop itself into a spearhead against China and Russia.
This is particularly dangerous because after Russia and China fall
militarily, then the western crimegangs have seemingly achieved world
domination. That means that a big war against Russia and China may
be too enticing for the Americans to resist, just because it seems to
be the two last legs to achieve military world domination. You could
say they already have world-domination but it's more economic and
maffia style infiltration probably, then 'hard military control.'
It should be noted that once America conquers a place, they often stay
there permanently. They don't currently seem to have fixed large
military bases in Russia and China. This is something they may want.
China and Russia presumably also see this, that if America gains more
power in the middle east that they face a weakness there (where a
lot of oil is located.) That means that China and Russia may want to
prevent America from gaining more land in the middle east. If Russia
draws the line, and the western crimegangs both can't accept that,
and want a big war anyway because they're destroying the economy and
need something 'fun' for their serfs to do, then this could become
a flashpoint for WW3. The Americans want WW3. WW3 is only a spectre
in the minds of ordinary people but for crimegangs it can be a great
opportunity to enhance power, to evade scruteny, make money etc.
Unfortunately it's not the ordinary people who rule, but bankers and
their bribed politicians together with the naive and synical people
The point was that the western terrorism within Syria is only fairly
recent, of the last year or so. In 2008 Lybia wasn't yet destroyed
by the west either. Even if they had gone on to do these great crimes,
if we had mounted some political power we could have used their crimes
against them and gain more power (these new political parties that is).
Perhaps it would have been possible to stop WW3, but since currently
these political and economic powers still have to get off the ground,
the time to when the western crime gangs are going to trigger WW3 seems
too short to stop them. Even if you could gain control of parliament
tomorrow, the armies can still create war, the bankers can create
economic chaos, and you stil have to reach millions of people and
explain things to them. That explaining is something that usually takes
generations, because people simply refuse to change their minds no
matter how wrong they are.
If you would say that in 2008 it was already certain that we would have
WW3, I would agree; still you need to do what's right and take every
chance however small. In any case, war or no war, we now need to try
to control the aftermath of this war with what is left standing. Their
chaos works against them also, it's an opportunity that has to be taken
immediately. What they want is to point to the war they created, and
claim that to stop that they need even more power. What we should claim
is that these people need to be brought to trial, their economy has
to be unwinded and so their ideology (wether that be capitalism or
plan-economics) and something better put into operation instead. This
new system will then become a platform of power that will prosecute all
these people who are now causing WW3. They may still have their war,
but then once we can we will have to try to catch them and put them in
forced labor camps for life if convicted.
That WW3 can't be stopped anymore is only more reason to work even
harder. The key point of interest is chaos, which we can deal with
using the o-4 scheme, together with land distribution to immediately use
the situation to push through certain difficult reforms that people
better understand when there is chaos and they are 'faced with reality'
(namely where food comes from, what power is). We will use the war and
the aftermath against those who caused it, and that may then be their
last historical stance because in the new economic and Government system
their chances could be reduced (depending on how many nations want to
use this, or are able to use it.)
--
www.law4.org