‘Defund the Police’ Is Dead. Now What?

[Michael Ejercito]

https://archive.ph/ssYe4


‘Defund the Police’ Is Dead. Now What?
Aug. 31, 2022
Protesters in Richmond, Va., in 2020.
Protesters in Richmond, Va., in 2020.Credit...Eze Amos/Getty Images

Give this article

463
Charles M. Blow
By Charles M. Blow
Opinion Columnist
Some said it was dumb.
Some thought it was politically disastrous.
Some thought it was being unfairly demonized and mischaracterized.
But whatever the case, Defund the Police, both the slogan and the
substance of the issue, appears to be dead. Its opponents beat it to
death, not that it was ever wildly popular.
A poll published by the Pew Research Center in October found that
support for reducing spending on the police had fallen significantly,
from 25 percent in 2020 to just 15 percent in 2021. The numbers have
always been low.
That poll also found a racial differential, but no race with a majority
in support: 23 percent of Black people supported decreasing police
funding, while only 13 percent of white people and 16 percent of
Hispanics did.
According to a Pew analysis published this week, there was surprise
uniformity among Black Democrats and Black Republicans.
According to Pew:
Four-in-ten each of Black Democrats and Black Republicans say funding
for police departments in their communities should remain the same,
while around a third of each partisan coalition (36 percent and 37
percent, respectively) says funding should increase. Only about
one-in-four Black Democrats (24 percent) and one-in-five Black
Republicans (21 percent) say funding for police departments in their
communities should decrease.
When Democrats underperformed in 2020, party leaders placed part of the
blame on the movement to defund the police. The Democratic strategist
James Carville called Defund the Police “the three worst words ever in
the English language, maybe.” Representative Jim Clyburn blamed some
Democratic losses directly on the Defund the Police movement and
suggested that the slogan actually hurt the Black Lives Matter movement,
saying: “It had the possibilities of doing to the Black Lives Matter
movement and current movements across the country what ‘burn, baby,
burn’ did to us” in the 1960s.
Activists have pushed back on whether the defund slogan harmed Democrats
or to what degree, but it is clear that Republicans believe it harms
Democrats and that Democrats are running scared from the slogan.
As some categories of violent crime began to rise, there was less public
appetite for doing anything that might reduce a community’s police presence.
Fast forward to this week and the speech President Biden gave in
Pennsylvania touting his “Safer America Plan.” It was the capstone in
the crusade against the defund movement, and possibly the gravestone of
the movement itself.
In it, Biden said of his plan: “It’s based on a simple notion: When it
comes to public safety in this nation, the answer is not ‘defund the
police,’ it’s ‘fund the police.’ ”
This echoes what Biden said during his State of the Union address, in
which he also said, “We should all agree that the answer is not to
defund the police, it’s to fund the police.”
I believe that redirecting some of the money police departments receive
toward other services is a good idea. I believe that continuing to pour
money into a system that is on many levels broken is a bad idea.
But I am also enough of a realist to understand when my position is not
one that caught on broadly enough. I register the fact that the movement
to defund the police hit a wall.
But I have another question, particularly for liberals who rail against
the movement: If not redistributing funding, then what?
The issue that launched the push to defund the police — police shootings
— has not changed. According to The Washington Post, about 1,000 people
have been shot and killed by the police every year since 2015, when the
paper started tracking the data. Last year set a record with around
1,054 killings, and 2022 is on pace to be in that range.
Furthermore, according to The Post:
“Although half of the people shot and killed by police are white, Black
Americans are shot at a disproportionate rate. They account for less
than 13 percent of the U.S. population, but are killed by police at more
than twice the rate of white Americans. Hispanic Americans are also
killed by police at a disproportionate rate.”
What do we do about this? Have we simply become inured to these horrific
numbers? Do these lives no longer matter?
I am genuinely, intensely interested in the answer to those questions. I
suspected that the summer of protest was fueled in part by cabin fever
with Covid lockdowns. I wanted so badly to be wrong about that. But the
further we get from those protests the more reversals of passions and
policies I see.
Do police killings only upset us when there are fewer killings by civilians?
I fear that the signal we are sending to all the people who truly
believed that there would finally be real change in policing and the
possibility of more equity in our criminal justice system is that racial
equity is a tertiary issue, that it is lower than people want to admit
on the social hierarchy of policy priorities. We will regret that.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

[Ed Debevic]

On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 08:27:18 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:

>https://archive.ph/ssYe4
>
>
>‘Defund the Police’ Is Dead. Now What?
>Aug. 31, 2022
>Protesters in Richmond, Va., in 2020.
>Protesters in Richmond, Va., in 2020.Credit...Eze Amos/Getty Images
>
>Give this article
>
>463
>Charles M. Blow
>By Charles M. Blow
>Opinion Columnist

> < FLUSH NIGGER IDIOCY>


Do you get all of your opinions from uppity apes?

[Ed Debevic]

National Socialist Leader Michael Kuhnen explains: it is OK to be GAY

*********************************************************************

"While in jail, Kuhnen came out as gay. In response to critics
within the neo-Nazi movement, he argued that his lack of a family
meant he had more time to devote to militancy, and he pointed out
that Ernst Rohm was also a gay Nazi."

Also!

One American journalist later wrote, "Roehm's chiefs, men of the
rank of Gruppenfuehrer or Obergruppenfuehrer, commanding units
of several hundred thousand Storm Troopers, were almost without
exception homosexuals."

[Detroit Zoo]

In article <l413hhlrflk8bndes...@4ax.com>

Only if fem and they suck cocks. Like Kamala Harris.

[Peeler]

On Fri, 02 Sep 22 04:25:10 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married gay
neo-nazitard, now FORGING as Ed Debevic, whined again:

>
> Do you get all of your opinions from uppity apes?

Asks the gay nazitard who gets all his "opinons" from other gay nazitards!
LOL

--
Anti-virus firm AVG <a...@avg.com> addressing Loose Sphincter on Usenet:

"Hello from AVG.

Please stop advertising us. We don't want to be associated with neo-Nazi
scum like you and RichA, no matter whether you use our product or not.

And fix your fucking sig separator!

Sincerely, AVG."

[Michael Ejercito]

Mangina, there is nothing ape abput Charles M. Blow.

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a
consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.


Michael

[Michael Ejercito]

And your mom.


Michael

[Ed Debevic]

On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:27:08 -0700, Michael Ejercito

<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:

>Ed Debevic wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 08:27:18 -0700, Michael Ejercito
>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://archive.ph/ssYe4
>>>
>>>
>>> ‘Defund the Police’ Is Dead. Now What?
>>> Aug. 31, 2022
>>> Protesters in Richmond, Va., in 2020.
>>> Protesters in Richmond, Va., in 2020.Credit...Eze Amos/Getty Images
>>>
>>> Give this article
>>>
>>> 463
>>> Charles M. Blow
>>> By Charles M. Blow
>>> Opinion Columnist
>>
>>
>>> < FLUSH NIGGER IDIOCY>
>>
>>
>> Do you get all of your opinions from uppity apes?
>>
> Mangina, there is nothing ape abput Charles M. Blow.

Have you seen his photo? That is the face of a simian.

>
> You are a Nazi.
>
> As a Nazi, you are, above all else

You are a gook

As a gook, you are below all else (but equal to a nigger)

>
> That is what you are,

And that is what you are.


>
> Michael

[Michael Ejercito]

Ed Debevic wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:27:08 -0700, Michael Ejercito
> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ed Debevic wrote:
>>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 08:27:18 -0700, Michael Ejercito
>>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://archive.ph/ssYe4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ‘Defund the Police’ Is Dead. Now What?
>>>> Aug. 31, 2022
>>>> Protesters in Richmond, Va., in 2020.
>>>> Protesters in Richmond, Va., in 2020.Credit...Eze Amos/Getty Images
>>>>
>>>> Give this article
>>>>
>>>> 463
>>>> Charles M. Blow
>>>> By Charles M. Blow
>>>> Opinion Columnist
>>>
>>>
>>>> < FLUSH NIGGER IDIOCY>
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you get all of your opinions from uppity apes?
>>>
>> Mangina, there is nothing ape abput Charles M. Blow.
>
>
> Have you seen his photo? That is the face of a simian.

No, that is clearly the face of a HUMAN.

>
>
>>
>> You are a Nazi.
>>
>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> You are a gook
>
> As a gook, you are below all else (but equal to a nigger)

That would be better than being a Nazi.

The people whom you call gooks all outearn you, outwit you, outsex
you, and outclass you.

You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

[Michael Ejercito]

Peeler wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Sep 22 04:25:10 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married gay
> neo-nazitard, now FORGING as Ed Debevic, whined again:
>
>>
>> Do you get all of your opinions from uppity apes?
>
> Asks the gay nazitard who gets all his "opinons" from other gay nazitards!
> LOL
>

He keeps denying the humanity of some people!


Michael