They're pushing this as far as it will go.
Special Care
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225633/Chocolate-face-girl-6-branded-racist.html
Could your child be branded a racist next? It beggars belief that
thousands of primary school children are being reported by the
authorities
By Adrian Hart
Last updated at 2:16 AM on 05th November 2009
Accused: Children are being told they are racist but do they
understand what they have said wrong?
A six-year-old child cowers tearfully in her school's office. She
knows she is in serious trouble for uttering a 'bad' word. Her fear is
compounded by confusion.
She has been accused of racism but is far too young to understand the
gravity of the charge or grasp its dire implications.
But she knows her transgression is a dreadful one: a phone call has
been made to her parents; official forms have been filled in; the
adults around her wear dutifully censorious expressions.
The little girl is in tumult. She has to be reassured that the police
will not come and take her away.
What heinous crime has she committed? During the course of a
playground game, she has called another child 'blacky'.
The 'victim' has neither complained about, nor even noticed, the
remark. But a playground supervisor has.
Diligently - and observing the Government procedures requiring all our
schools to report 'racist incidents' - she has frog-marched the
culprit to the office. In due course the little girl's 'crime' is
logged on local authority files.
From there it becomes an official Government statistic.
The incident is not an isolated one. Similar scenes are enacted in
primary and even nursery schools every day, all over Britain.
Local government race officials now urge schools to operate a zero-
tolerance approach to anyone - even infants and toddlers - who could
be construed as racist. As a result, children's playground spats are
elevated into full-blown dramas.
A nine-year-old child calls another a 'chocolate bar'. The culprit's
parents and head teacher are duly informed; the child is reprimanded
and denied play-time.
During a boisterous game of football, a girl calls a boy 'white
trash'. The heavy machinery cranks into motion again: she, too,
becomes one of the estimated tens of thousands of children deemed
guilty of racism since the Government's racist incident reporting
policy was implemented in 2002.
A recent survey reported 5,000 'racist' incidents in Yorkshire schools
alone, between 2006 and 2007.
In Essex 1,566 cases were noted in the three years up to 2005. Spurred
on by a notion that even two-year-olds are capable of prejudice, Kent
kindergartens have finalised a project to train staff in challenging
racist statements from toddlers.
Battalions of diversity officers and ethnic minority coordinators the
length and breadth of the country are doubtless applauding Kent's
brave initiative, while pursuing, with messianic zeal, their mission
to unmask legions of name-calling infants as incipient racists.
• The Myth Of Racist Kids by Adrian Hart is published by Manifesto
Club, www.manifestoclub.com.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225083/Could-child-branded-racist-next.html#ixzz0WBOiLpTK
[End of newspaper extract.]
===================================
===================================
===================================
First of all, anyone who grew up in 1950s Ireland instantly recognises
what is going on here.
A new religion, imposed via toxic shame, just like the old one back
then.
Children being made to feel that old familiar fake guilt/shame for
alleged 'transgressions' of meaningless 'commandments' that have no
grounding in logic or ethics.
Political corrrectness is straight out of 1950s Ireland. Only the list
of fake doctrines and meaningless 'commandments' has changed.
It's not 'political correctness gone mad.'
It's a deliberate agenda to destroy the degree of democratic freedoms
we had up until the 1970s, and to 'soften us up' for reversion to full-
scale dictatorship worldwide in the near future.
William Lind correctly analysed political correctness as a plot to
destroy 'western civilisation.' His historical analysis is non-
essential, but his depiction of the slow-motion destruction of freedom
in our time is accurate [link below].
The level of democracy and civil rights we had attained by the 1970s
was imperfect, but not to be derided. In the words of Michael Collins
half a century earlier, it comprised 'a stepping stone to freedom' /
'the freedom to achieve freedom,' and as such those democratic rights
should have been guarded with care. Now, they are almost gone.
Who gains?
Who gains from terrorising children with a new religion and imbuing
them with toxic shame for transgressing meaningless 'commandments'
just as in 1950s Ireland?
Our children are now being conditioned from an early age to be
terrified of stating what their senses perceive, conditioned to look
nervously around for an officially sanctioned authority structure to
grant them permission to think and say anything.
A priest, in other words.
Straight out of 1950s Ireland, but just with a different script.
Who gains?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William Lind on political corrrectness:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8630135369495797236&ei=rrg6SrvZHZzq-QabnLCrCg&q=bill+lind&hl=en#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And why are we letting them do this to us, with hardly a whimper of
protest?
It's not difficult to analyse and understand.
It's basic psychology: collective amnesia generating collective
repetition compulsion.
http://www.knowledge.co.uk/velikovsky/mankind.htm
johannes
Special Care wrote:
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225083/Could-child-branded-racist-next.html
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225633/Chocolate-face-girl-6-branded-racist.html
Sounds very much like a phantom story. Of course you can't name the child, but
no naming of the school or the town or the officials involved!
allanbonnetracy
Only another six or so months to go and we will get the voucher system
for schools and an end to the state monopoly.
Then all this bollocks will go straight out of the window, as the LEAs
become superfluous and those Guardian readers, with made up degrees,
currently working within them realise they’re now unemployable.
Special Care
> Special Care wrote:
>
> >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225083/Could-child-branded-r...
>
> >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225633/Chocolate-face-girl-6...
>
> Sounds very much like a phantom story. Of course you can't name the child, but
> no naming of the school or the town or the officials involved!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Phantom stories are a possibility, but this is a real phenomenon.
In the second story ('Chocolate on your face") the child is named as
Sharona Gower, with her mother Michelle Gower,
the location being St Pauls School, Rusthall, Tunbridge Wells, Kent..
Special Care
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225083/Could-child-branded-r...
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225633/Chocolate-face-girl-6...
>
> playground game, she has called another child 'blacky'.
>
> The 'victim' has neither complained about, nor even noticed, the
> remark. But a playground supervisor has.
>
> Diligently - and observing the Government procedures requiring all our
> schools to report 'racist incidents' - she has frog-marched the
> culprit to the office.
=============================================
It is a feature of the grammatical structure of the English language
to add the letter 'y' to the end of an adjective to form a descriptive
or proper noun.
The girl who called that young boy 'Blacky' was developing her
linguistic skills in a natural way.
She should have been applauded for her grasp of an important feature
of linguistics.
To laughingly call a black boy 'Blacky' while at play seems like an
affectionate and friendly appellation, as well as showing a growing
awareness of the mechanics of the language.
As reported, the boy in question never noticed that he had supposedly
been "offended" and "abused."
The only agenda here is not to protect anyone from racial abuse, which
does exist.......
...the only agenda here is to crush our children's sense of self by
communicating to vulnerable, developing children that their
perceptions of what is in front of their faces and their innate
ethical sense are invalid, and that they must look around nervously
for a priest to tell them what is really in front of their eyes and
what is really ethical and unethical.
This is ***SOUL MURDER*** of our children, black, brown, red, white
and yellow..... the intention being to soften them up for the coming
full-scale dictatorship by destroying their self esteem with this new
fake religion, straight out of 1950s Ireland, with the wording
changed.
Special Care
remark. But a playground supervisor has."
---------------------------
Therein lies part of the problem.
What is a "playground supervisor."
For a start, a playground supervisor would appear to be a person who
needs plenty of supervision herself.
What that child will percieve now, and correctly, is:
"THE ADULTS ARE INSANE, BUT THERE ARE TOO MANY OF THEM, SO I CAN'T
CORRECT THE ADULTS' MISTAKES."
Try to imagine how terrifying that realisation is to a small child.
Her mother can try to compensate, by reassuring the child that she did
nothing wrong and that the government and the teachers have gone
insane.... not using those exact words, although that is the real
situation.
What we really need is a comprehensive solution, addressing the real
root of the problem.
Special Care
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've seen numerous such paragraphs in news reports, meaning what might
be "phantom" incidents.
It might be kinder to call them "composites."
It's a common tool in journalism - to report an incident without any
persons or exact places being named, and although not an actual
incident, it's real in the sense that it represents and depicts the
real situation...a bit like acceptable composite scenes in a
'docudrama' or biography in tv or cinema.
As such, it is not necessarily false or corrupt to include such
"phantom" or composite paragraphs in a report.
Big Les Wade
>
>
>Special Care wrote:
>>
>>
>>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225083/Could-child-branded-rac
>>ist-next.html
>>
>>
>>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225633/Chocolate-face-girl-6-b
>>randed-racist.html
>
>Sounds very much like a phantom story. Of course you can't name the child, but
>no naming of the school or the town or the officials involved!
"Now Mrs Gower and her husband Nick, 45, believe the incident at St
Paul's School, in Rusthall, near Tunbridge Wells, Kent, was not properly
investigated ... Mrs Gower ... said she complained to the school's head,
Carolyn Cohen... "
--
Les
If creating a police state saves just one child, then it will all have been
worthwhile.
Seamus McDermott
They tried that in the USA. It turned out to be a giveaway to the
extreme christian right-wing, who believe their kids are being
brainwashed in public schools. Now their kids are being brainwashed by
their pastors. They believe the earth is 6,000 years old, that dinosaurs
co-existed with humans, that evolution is a "theory".
So be careful predicting the future. You really don't know what the fuck
is going to happen.
ineedhonnerz
>
> The little girl is in tumult. She has to be reassured that the police
> will not come and take her away.
The Tumult police force are not to be messed with !!!!
Augustus O'Muircheartaigh
> On 7 Nov, 14:46, Special Care <special.car...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225083/Could-child-branded-r...
>
> >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225633/Chocolate-face-girl-6...
>
> > What heinous crime has she committed? During the course of a
> > playground game, she has called another child 'blacky'.
>
> > The 'victim' has neither complained about, nor even noticed, the
> > remark. But a playground supervisor has.
>
> > Diligently - and observing the Government procedures requiring all our
> > schools to report 'racist incidents' - she has frog-marched the
> > culprit to the office.
>
> =============================================
>
> It is a feature of the grammatical structure of the English language
> to add the letter 'y' to the end of an adjective to form a descriptive
> or proper noun.
>
> The girl who called that young boy 'Blacky' was developing her
> linguistic skills in a natural way.
>
You are a loony!!!!
Ishtar
====
---------------------------------
Whitey on the Moon
---------------------------------
A rat done bit my sister Nell.
(with Whitey on the moon)
Her face and arms began to swell.
(and Whitey's on the moon)
I can't pay no doctor bill.
(but Whitey's on the moon)
Ten years from now I'll be payin' still.
(while Whitey's on the moon)
The man jus' upped my rent las' night.
('cause Whitey's on the moon)
No hot water, no toilets, no lights.
(but Whitey's on the moon)
I wonder why he's uppin' me?
('cause Whitey's on the moon?)
I wuz already payin' 'im fifty a week.
(with Whitey on the moon)
Taxes takin' my whole damn check,
Junkies makin' me a nervous wreck,
The price of food is goin' up,
An' as if all that shit wuzn't enough:
A rat done bit my sister Nell.
(with Whitey on the moon)
Her face an' arm began to swell.
(but Whitey's on the moon)
With all that money I made las' year
(for Whitey on the moon?)
How come there ain't no money here?
(Hmm! Whitey's on the moon)
Y'know I jus' 'bout had my fill
(of Whitey on the moon)
I think I'll sen' these doctor bills,
Airmail special
(to Whitey on the moon)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLndLjMibyM