@@12 RUHI arrests in Iran@@

[Abraxas]

http://wahidazal.blogspot.com/

12 RUHI arrests in Iran

Hot off the press.

Six individuals in Shiraz and six in Tehran were arrested on May 25th
by IR authorities for coordinating and running Ruhi Institutes in Iran.
The IR authorities have deemed these activities to be illegal and have
moved against then accordingly. However there is more to the story than
just RUHI and obviously this reinforces the truth behind the whole
"Missionary Deportations" fiasco in January and the subsequent uhj
resignations shortly thereafter. How the baha'i spin-doctors are going
to explain themselves out of this one, is anyone's guess.

[Sufi Bahá'í]

Another "un-named" missionaries story I see. More violations of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the bandits who run the
"government" in Tehran...

[sma...@jam.rr.com]

Dear Sufi,

It is true that those leading Ruhi Study Circles in Teheran and Shiraz
have been arrested but only someone as paranoid as Nima would imagine
that those innoculous catechisms have any thing to do with the
retirement of a couple of House of Justice members. As for it being
tied to Iran's bogus claim of having deported western Baha'i
missionaries, well the only tie is in the nature of the government
itself.

warmest, Susan

[Abraxas]

Amazing sleight of hand. What are RUHI Institutes being run in Iran in
the first place? They are illegal. I thought you cultists claimed to be
obedient to the laws of a given country? This is definitely tied to the
expelled missionaries, not to mention the two resignations.

W

[avicenn...@yahoo.com]

Indeed most amazing.

Baha'ism claims **full unconditional obedience** to the government---
"on papers".

But in reality, Bahaism demonstrate as in the example of Ruhi in Iran-
**full unconditional disobedience** to the government.

This is going to hurt the fast decline of Baha'ism to museum curiosity.

Abdul'Baha even stated that "tabliq" will not be important after 200
years- that is 2044 perhaps?

Indeed, 2044 may even mark the end of Baha'ism. No more "golden age"-
no more "Lesser Peace"- NO more "Greater Peace".

Just a lot a buildings on Mount Carmel to be actioned off at Sotherbys.

Amen, Henry

[sma...@jam.rr.com]

avicenn...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Indeed most amazing.
>
> Baha'ism claims **full unconditional obedience** to the government---
> "on papers".
>
> But in reality, Bahaism demonstrate as in the example of Ruhi in Iran-
> **full unconditional disobedience** to the government.

Belinda,

Perhaps you can show me the statue in Iranian law which prohibits Ruhi
Study Circles?

>
> Abdul'Baha even stated that "tabliq" will not be important after 200
> years- that is 2044 perhaps?

You just can't help misquoting people, can you Belinda? What
Abdu'l-Baha said is that tabligh must have priority over all us for the
next 200 years. He said nothing about whether or not it would be
important thereafter.

[mash_ghasem]

Suzi liver;

There is a life beside regligion you know ;-) BTW, why only 200 years?

[avicenn...@yahoo.com]

Good point- 200 years of "tabliq"- then where will the attention be
placed?

Perhaps, the Ruhi Institute will provide a way out of the "spiritual"
doldrums of the Baha'i Faith meetings?

By 2044, there will be a need to concentrate on other activities.

Could highly ranked Dr. Maneck provide us with the plan for the next
800 years?

Be-linda and He-nry

[sma...@jam.rr.com]

mash_ghasem wrote:
> Suzi liver;
>
> There is a life beside regligion you know ;-) BTW, why only 200 years?

I presume by that time there will be enough Baha'is to pursue other
goals effectively. It might be, for instance, that social and economic
development will take precedence over tabligh.

But that is speculation.

[mash_ghasem]

I might disagree with them on many( all) issues but I will defend
their
right to express them.

[avicenn...@yahoo.com]

Suzie Q-liver:

No speculation, SUZIE, no speculation!

I need real evidence, SUZIE, real evidence.

Be-linda and He-nry

[sma...@jam.rr.com]

avicenn...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Suzie Q-liver:
>
> No speculation, SUZIE, no speculation!
>
> I need real evidence, SUZIE, real evidence.

How would I have evidence of what we are going to be doing after 2044?

I am neither a prophet nor the son of a prophet.

Not even a lesser one.

Do you like lesser prophets, Henry?

[avicenn...@yahoo.com]

Well then you could write the UHJ and then kindly provide us with their
response.

You could send your question by E-mail -in order to speed up the
process.

I think that all of us are waiting for an answer from you.

Henry and De-linda

[sma...@jam.rr.com]

avicenn...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Well then you could write the UHJ and then kindly provide us with their
> response.
>
> You could send your question by E-mail -in order to speed up the
> process.

Ask your own questions of the House of Justice.

[avicenn...@yahoo.com]

I am not allowed since I am considered a CB- thanks to your kind
letters to the UHJ.

Perhaps, you could do me the honor of reporting **again** to UHJ my
question?

Henry

[BElieNDA_90210]

avicenn...@yahoo.com wrote:

Whose name should she use, in reporting you, Tad, Henry, Avicenna,
ALIEvine, or BeLIEnda's? What last name?

- All Bad

[avicenn...@yahoo.com]

Hey Koss Khor Baha'i Kohli:

Maneck knows me very well.

Henry

[BElieNDA_90210]

avicenn...@yahoo.com wrote:

> Hey Koss Khor Baha'i Kohli:
>
> Maneck knows me very well.
>

No. She does not know you well. She seems oblivious to the FACT that
you lie regularly.

- All Bad

[avicenn...@yahoo.com]

Mersi-

"Mordeh shoor roteo Beram- Pat Jan"- Iranian proverb

Henry