@@ Jew wants Iran decimated soon, no more excuses! @@
Arash
March 8, 2006
Straussian Shock and Awe Plan Against Iran Heats Up
By Kurt Nimmo
Once again, Israeli Defense (Offense) Minister Shaul Mofaz [1] has rattled his saber
at Iran. Mofaz and the Israelis are upset because the United States has yet to shock
and awe Iran and really the Jabotinskyites [2], well accustomed to invading and
provoking their Muslim neighbors, have no patience for the Security Council and the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), currently meeting in Vienna—they want Iran
decimated now, no more excuses. [3] “The Israeli approach is that the U.S. and the
European countries should lead the issue of the Iranian nuclear programme to the
table of the UN Security Council (UNSC), asking for sanctions. And I hope the
sanctions will be effective”, Mofaz is quoted by Reuters. [4]
In other words, sanctions will not be good enough for Mofaz and the Israelis—nothing
short of mass murder will suffice.
As usual, the proposed sanctions against Iran are “aimed at the regime and its
nuclear and missile programmes, not the Iranian people”, as Nicholas Burns,
under-secretary of state, explained, according to the Financial Times. [5]
In much the same way, we are told, the United States and the United Nations imposed
sanctions against Iraq and the result was Saddam lived in palaces, sold oil under the
table, and 1.5 million Iraqis, 500,000 of them infants and children, died in the
process, an outcome well worth the effort, according to [Jew] Madeline Albright. [6]
Infants and children invariably pay for sanctions imposed against governments and
Nicholas Burns knows it [7]. Of course, as with the sanctions imposed against Iraq,
Iran’s oil will not be taken off the market because this would be “unthinkable at a
time of high energy prices”, or windfall profits for multinational oil corporations.
Naturally, sanctions come first, and then military action. “Military action against
Iran is neither inevitable, nor, at this stage, likely”, a USA Today op-ed would have
us believe. “But if the Iraq war provides one lesson, it is this: The best way to
address a foreign threat—and Iran’s illegal effort to build nuclear weapons is
certainly that—is through coordinated international action, difficult as that is to
achieve”. [8]
Of course it is likely, not that we should expect the scriveners at Gannett Co. Inc.
[9] to do five minutes of research on the Straussian neocons, who keep telling us
they will take out Iran and all the other “rogue nations” on the “evil empire”
roster.
Recall their surprise when Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq—and also later their
lame attempts to deflect blame for acting as propaganda organs. [10]
Same thing this time around, although most Americans have the memory capacity of an
earth worm after a late spring frost.
Like actors following a well-drafted script—drafted some time ago by the Straussian
neocons and their Jabotinsky co-conspirators—Shaul Mofaz has issued his warning
Israel will act on its own (an empty threat, since only the United States has the
capacity to inflict significant harm on Iran, unless Israel plans to nuke Iran), and
Donald Rumsfeld accused Iran of dispatching elements of its Revolutionary Guard to
stir trouble inside Iraq, as usual uncorroborated, while John Bolton told everybody
there is a “a sense of urgency about Tehran’s defiance of the world community”, as
the BBC put it. [11]
Indeed, Iran is back on the front burner again after a short hiatus. Soon the
Security Council will determine Iran’s illusory nukes are real and threatening,
sanctions will be forthcoming, but these of course will not be good enough for the
Straussian neocons, a cabal of criminals that fully intend to shock and awe the
country, kill thousands, and seriously disrupt Iranian society and culture.
Iran has threatened a world of hurt—and it has the ability to do it by sinking a
couple oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, the most strategically important sea
route in the world. Doing so will stop dead oil deliveries from Kuwait, Iraq, Saudi
Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, as well as most of United Arab Emirates. Add to this
Venezuela leader Hugo Chavez’ warning that he will shut down oil imports to the
United States if Bush goes “over the line” and attempts to overthrow his government,
as the CIA failed to do in 2002.
As it now stands, we are but a few weeks away from total disaster—that is unless the
devious plans of the Straussian neocons can be derailed and sanity returns to the
White House and the Pentagon. I’m not counting on it, however, for it now appears the
Security Council will do a repeat of late 2002 and early 2003.
In fact, this time around, it appears at least three of the five permanent
members—the United States, Britain, and France—are chomping at the bit to invade
Iran. Last time around, France opposed the invasion of Iraq—and endured scorching
criticism from the United States and millions of brainwashed Americans—but on this
round France believes Iran’s nuclear program (Iran ratified the Nuclear
Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1970, and since February 1992 has allowed the IAEA
to inspect its nuclear facilities) is “a cover for clandestine military activity”, as
Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy declared last month. [12]
In other words, it will be smooth sailing for the Straussian neocons this time
around.
Brace yourself for six dollar a gallon gasoline and “harm and pain”, as promised by
Iran. “Tehran’s most overt menaces to date were repeated several times at the meeting
of the governing board of the International Atomic Energy Agency”, the UK Telegraph
reports this evening. “Iranian officials declined to spell out precisely what Iran
would do…. But experts say Iran’s options include driving up oil prices, blocking the
passage of tankers through the Persian Gulf, stirring more chaos in Iraq, fomenting
violence against Israel or promoting terrorist attacks against the West”. [13]
All perfectly normal responses for a nation after it is invaded by a far superior
military force determined to bounce the rubble and kill hundreds of thousands of
people.
Notes:
--------
[1] Shaul Mofaz
http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2003/2/Shaul%20Mofaz
[2] Zeev Jabotinsky and Revisionist Zionism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revisionist_Zionism
"Nile to Euphrates" territorial ambitions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Israel#Claims_of_.22Nile_to_Euphrates.22_territorial_ambitions
[3] Israel does not look at regimes but rather on capabilities. Iran's capabilities
and power has risen, and the Israelis are very concerned about this since Iran's
new-won power can constitute a threat to Israel. A modification in Iranian behavior
is not a strong enough guarantee, because it is not full proof. But if Iran is
weakened, Iran's intentions and policies become irrelevant. Even if Iran wanted to
threaten Israel, it would not be able to because it would lack the power to do so.
http://www.mehrnews.ir/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=300275
[4] Israel will have to act on Iran if UN can't
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L08205988.htm
Iran is a serious menace for Israel, says General Shaul Mofaz (June 2002)
http://www.iran-press-service.com/articles_2002/Jun_2002/mofaz_interview_4602.htm
[5] U.S. plan seeks allies for sanctions on Iran
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/e9283b20-af11-11da-b04a-0000779e2340.html
[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madeleine_Albright
[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._Nicholas_Burns
[8] Iran's 'harm and pain' threat requires unified response
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-03-08-iran-edit_x.htm
[9] A scrivener (or scribe) was traditionally a person who could read and write. This
usually indicated secretarial and administrative duties such as dictation and keeping
business, judicial, and history records for kings, nobility, temples, and cities.
Scriveners later developed into public servants, accountants, lawyers and petition
writers, etc. The Worshipful Company of Scriveners of the City of London is one of
the Livery (trade) associations based in the City of London, each known as the
Worshipful Company. It is also known as the Mysterie of Writers of the Court Letter.
The Company had been responsible for setting qualifications and regulations for
scrivener notaries since its foundation in 1373.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worshipful_Company_of_Scriveners
[10] 2003 Invasion of Iraq
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_Invasion_of_Iraq
Judith Miller
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Miller_%28journalist%29
Yellowcake Forgery
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_forgery
Aluminum tubes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminum_tubes
Downing Street memo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_Street_memo
[11] U.S. seeks further pressure on Iran
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4788250.stm
[12] France: Iran nuke program a military cover
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185068,00.html
[13] Tehran threatens to inflict 'harm and pain' on U.S. over nuclear row
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/03/09/wiran09.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/03/09/ixportal.html
KANGAROOISTAN
I DONT THINK ANYBODY IS SILLY ENOUGH TO ATTACK IRAN
I REMEMBER THE YANKS THREATENING TO ATTACK RUSSIA WITH NUKES FOR
DECADES
THEY DID NOT COS THEY KNEW RUSSIA WOULD HIT BACK
SAME IN IRAN
THE YANKS AND EVERYBODY WHO HAS ANY INSIGHT KNOWS THE WEST CAN NOT
AFFORD TO ATTACK IRAN
AS THE WEST WOULD LOSE
AFTER THE FIRST FEW DECADES
YOU WAIT AND SEE THE YANKS WILL BACK DOWN AS THEY ARE LOSING IN IRAQ
AND AFGHANISTAN
THEY WOULD HAVE NO HOPE OF EVER ATTACKING IRAN AND LIVING TO TELL ABOUT
IT
RBRK
I am very jealous.
I have a pet Boz. But you have a pet Kangaroo ;-)