@@ Pearl Harbor in the Middle East @@
Arash
February 18, 2005
Remember Pearl Harbor
By Christopher Manion
The war in Iraq has not gone well for neoconservatives. In the recent
elections, Iraqis defied a "secular" candidate backed by tens of thousands
of U.S. government troops and hundreds of millions of American taxpayer
dollars, electing instead an anti-American Shi'ite coalition.
The Bush administration was dead set against that outcome, but then,
supporters of the war have found that reality has trumped them repeatedly in
Iraq.
Instead of facing that reality with an abject apology and returning to the
sane and constitutional government promised by candidate George Bush in the
2000 campaign, the Bush administration is now desperately seeking a crisis
of sufficient magnitude to distract Americans from Bush's Iraq failure.
The magnitude of that failure is hard to exaggerate. Even CIA director
Porter Goss now admits what critics of the war have pointed out for two
years: the U.S. invasion has created a recruiting and training ground that
has produced tens of thousands of new, hardened, experienced terrorists bent
on the destruction of America.
Nine billion dollars in U.S. taxpayer funds is unaccounted for in Iraq. The
world now knows that U.S. government personnel have tortured hundreds of
prisoners and killed tens of thousands of innocent civilians.
The Pentagon has instituted a backdoor draft because it is virtually out of
troops. In the meantime, the war has lost America the support of virtually
the entire international community.
Should Americans address these issues squarely in debate? Not on your life.
Nobody in this administration wants to go down that road.
Frankly, no administration ever has. History amply demonstrates that
politicians bent on war must lie to the American people even as the
government secretly manipulates events to manufacture a "crisis" that turns
America's peace-loving world upside down. A year after he was reelected as
the "peace candidate," Woodrow Wilson lied us into World War One. A year
after FDR promised "again, and again, and again" that he would not send
American sons to foreign wars, he maneuvered the country into World War Two.
Supporters of expanding Bush's war to the rest of the Middle East are not
unaware of the results for Wilson and Roosevelt of their malevolence. Today,
they are heroes of America's civil religion. Their lies have been buried by
sweet-sounding myths like "the war to end all wars" and "the greatest
generation." And America has swallowed them whole.
http://swaramuslim.net/images/uploads/laknatullah/sharon-bush.jpg
Inspired by this legacy, neoconservative advocates of conflagration and
revolution throughout the Middle East are looking to FDR as they desperately
seek a pretext – any pretext – for a quick expansion of the U.S. war in Iraq
to Syria and Iran – and then beyond.
They know that most Americans would consider such a bald move tantamount to
insanity or treason, but the neocons really have no choice. If peace returns
and the cards are laid face up on the table, they are finished. It is no
accident that the revolutionary consciousness the neocons share with their
Jacobin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobin) and Trotskyite
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trotskyite) intellectual forebears requires
constant war – "permanent revolution", as Lenin called it.
http://www.amphitheatro.gr/pics/arthra/ebraioi/jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif
But neoconservatives know that Americans will hardly rally to the battle cry
of "Remember Lenin!" Instead, they have decided on another course of
action – and another slogan that was very successful in its day:
"Remember Pearl Harbor".
In the past few days, events have revealed just how earnestly neocons seek a
Pearl Harbor in the Middle East.
Just a few days ago, Americans were surprised to learn that U.S. government
military aircraft have been violating Iranian airspace for over a year. If
the Iranians adopted Bush's theory of "preemption", they could logically
call the intrusions an act of war.
http://www.nellis.af.mil/gallery/PublicAffairs/pages/UAV-Hellfire-Missile.htm
UAV carrying Hellfire Missile
Nonetheless, the revelation of this sustained and bellicose action has not
outraged the American public – and the neocons knew it wouldn't. After all,
our national political consciousness has long been unmoored from the twin
anchors of rational prudence and the Constitution. Now, with passions at the
fore, there's little that appeals more to "feelings" and "self-esteem" than
a fine war against barbaric evildoers.
Do the neocons care if we wind up in a few more "cakewalks"? Evidently,
quite the contrary. They long to goad the Iranians into a military
response – and they expect one.
After all, if Iraqi drones had been flying over New York and Los Angeles,
few Americans would have objected to Bush's Iraq invasion.
It is a distant memory, but we should recall the 2001 collision of a U.S.
spy plane with a jet fighter off the Chinese coast. The Chinese pilot was
killed, and the damaged U.S. plane was forced to land at a Chinese military
airfield. Such provocations can quickly mushroom into flashpoints of war,
and even the bellicose Bush knew better than to push his luck. He knew he
didn't have a leg to stand on, so, after eleven days of bluster, he
apologized to the Chinese and agreed to pay them compensation (the exact
amount was long the subject of dispute).
That incident is instructive in two ways:
First, it tells us that Bush did not want a war with China.
Second, it tells us he does want one with Iran.
http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/Images/Cartoons/bush-big.gif
While neocon revolutionary theory embraces the proactive provocation of
crisis, such as the brazen U.S. violations of Iranian airspace, the neocons
also follow Mao and celebrate "seizing the contradictions" presented by
crisis and disaster.
Thus they have translated another recent event, the assassination in Beirut
of Rafik Hariri, the former prime minister of Lebanon, into a virtual act of
war by Syria against the United States. Freshly minted Secretary of State
Rice pulled our ambassador from Damascus, a provocative gesture hardly
designed to quell violence.
In fact, every aspect of the U.S. government policies in the Middle East
appears to be designed to foment conflict, not peace. Clearly, this is also
the goal of Osama bin Laden. Knowing this, why would Bush, of all people,
foment in the Middle East the very conflagration that he desperately tried
to avoid with China in 2001?
Remember Pearl Harbor.
The neocons recognize that American troop strength is stretched beyond
capacities. Yet they publicly and shamelessly advocate a much larger Army
capable of fighting a war throughout the Middle East. The only means to
achieve their end is to reinstitute the draft, but they know Congress is
dead set against it – and so are the American people.
What to do? In coming days, events in the Middle East will take many
mysterious turns, some of them violent ones. While most American
policy-makers study history in order to avoid past mistakes, neocon
revolutionaries want to repeat those very mistakes. Every spark of violence
that rational people want to quench is for the revolutionaries an open
invitation to fan the flames.
What future event will present the neocons with their justification for
all-out war in the Middle East? Well, as diplomatic historian Charles Burton
Marshall said many years ago, there is no such thing as the foreseeable
future. But the ingredients inviting broadened conflict are already there.
During the inauguration, Dick Cheney blithely encouraged the Israelis to
bomb Iran's multiple nuclear research sites, asserting with a shrug that
such an act of war would leave only a "diplomatic mess" that the U.S. would
have to "clean up."
http://www.biggreenhits.com/images/sharon-bushSmiles.jpg
Softer words were never spoken. But now Israel says that Iran's bomb is only
six months away and "a threat to the world." Thus the stage is set for
bombing Iran.
Ah, but what happens if the Iranians respond to such an act of war with a
missile strike on Haifa and Tel Aviv?
http://www.patriot.dk/bush-vu.jpg
Most Americans would be surprised to hear that our politicians agree with
Benjamin Netanyahu, who told Rush Limbaugh's audience the day after 9/11
that "Israel is an outpost of America".
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/roach.gif
For years, American politicians have referred to Israel as "America's
unsinkable aircraft carrier".
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/images/egypt_3.jpg
Israel's bombing of Iran would never be carried out without American
government consent, and Cheney's supposedly offhand remark signals that the
Bush administration has given it.
Dick Cheney is hardly a flippant man. His casual asides are studied and
determined. He inaugurated Bush's second term with a provocation that is
almost a prediction. However smug, dismissive, and cavalier, he is calling
the shots. But wait. If an attack on Israel is an attack on America, then an
attack by Israel is also an attack by America. With this, Cheney has
virtually charted the course for World War Three.
There are a hundred other scenarios that offer the neocons grist for their
malevolent mill. But make no mistake: every turn of events that is violent
for us is for them an opportunity. Their policies are designed to create
more enemies of our country, then provoke them into violent acts against us.
CIA director Goss confirms this when he reports that the war in Iraq is
creating more anti-American terrorists by the thousands.
Bush's supporters of wider war are longing for a violent event that they can
translate into a Pearl Harbor magnitude "attack on America," however it is
provoked, whatever its true ingredients. As Solzhenitsyn observed, lies
always bring violence in their wake – and the neocons want ever more
violence. And they have proved it by lying to us incessantly.
Someday soon, expect to hear that America has been attacked – in the Middle
East, in some other faraway land, or perhaps on our own soil. At that point,
George Bush will gravely stride to the podium and announce that, while "9/11
changed everything," everything has changed yet again. America must adopt a
"new realism", he will announce, and adopt a "true war footing" to address
the world war we are in.
Taxes will skyrocket, government powers will mushroom, and the draft will be
brought back with a vengeance. And, like my father and his companions in
America First before World War Two, opponents of this war will be expected
to retire to the bleachers and cheer, wondering all the while how their
drafted sons and daughters are faring out there in some distant desert far
from home.
To ordinary Americans, this scenario might appear to be a nightmare. But it
is the neocon dream. Ideas have consequences, said Richard Weaver, and the
neocons are sowing ideas brimming with violent consequences, gleefully
strewing minefields across America's future.
Plato said that a tyrant is one who acts out his nightmares when he is
awake.
The neocons want you wake up one morning to their nightmare. If you rub your
eyes and see violence on all sides, and your family starts getting draft
notices in the mail, you might wonder how it all happened.
Well, here's the answer:
Remember Pearl Harbor.
http://www.amphitheatro.gr/pics/arthra/ebraioi/jew.gif
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/manion.php?articleid=4875