On Nov 16, 2023, Jos Boersema wrote on soc.culture.jewish
(in article <uj4fta$25rka$
1...@dont-email.me>):
> On 2023-11-16, David Dalton<
dal...@nfld.com> wrote:
> > November 16, 2023 is World Philosophy Day.
> >
> > From google :
> >
> > The theme for World Philosophy Day 2023 is “Philosophical
> > Reflection in a Multicultural World”. This theme highlights the
> > importance of philosophy in promoting understanding and
> > dialogue between different cultures and perspectives.
>
> Here is your philosophical understanding in a multi-cultural world, if
> you like some dialogue. It is a necessity for a culture and people to be
> able to express themselves as they wish, without too much interference
> from other cultures, within some general and reasonable limits which all
> half decent people can naturally agree with. For this expression they
> need to be Sovereign in their lands. If they make a mistake, they can
> learn from it. If they see another Nation doing better, they can choose
> to adopt the example in a way which suits them.
>
> There being many Sovereign Nations brings with it a cultural wealth,
> which is more interesting to experience if one wishes to do so (on a
> trip for example), and creates a greater wealth of also political
> experiences, which can help Governments on all levels to gain good ideas
> by example, and to also learn things to avoid from bad examples.
>
> Some general limits would for example be a culture where they would
> torture their own children to death for their own amuzement. Another
> limit could be warfare and conquest against other Nations, or great
> damage to the natural environment which is also affecting other
> Nations. Methods to deal with these problems could be ranging from
> friendly diplomacy to a war of annihilation against the enemy.
>
> The point is: there is no Empire hanging over everyone, suffocating the
> life out of people, wanting everyone to do the same thing on the same
> day, so that the incomprehensibly large Empire becomes easier to rule.
> The people who want such a uni-cultural world by mixing everything
> together and creating a new culture to their liking, simply need to find
> themselves a land and people, and they can have the culture they seem to
> want there. It isn't necessarily a problem if someone believes the whole
> world should be ruled by google for example, so long as it is nothing
> more than a belief.
>
> Empires have come and gone. There was often great wealth in the
> heartlands of the Empire, and it may have lead to a lessening of smaller
> wars in the heartlands of the Empire. On the other hand, the Empire
> waged war on a larger scale, including their wars of conquest and later
> their wars of succession - which in modern times could be called civil
> wars or Revolutionary wars. When the Empire became a Tyranny, it was so
> much more powerful a repression than smaller Nations would likely have
> been capable off. The Tyranny affected a larger area, making fleeing and
> defeat of the Tyrants more difficult. The eventual collapse of the
> Empire was also more destructive. In other words: a larger Empire merely
> seems to bring out certain factors which happen in smaller Nations also,
> and bring them out in a more forceful way. Both to the positive and the
> negative. In the end, you are not necessarily any better.
>
> If you add that an Empire is typically conquered by war, an Empire is
> in many ways little more than the people of one city dominating all
> other people. This act of ultimately violent domination does not bode
> well for what is to come in an Empire. This violence also happens on
> smaller scales, from small villages going to war on each other, to large
> Nations and entire Empires. All this war is a result of the anti-social
> attitude of ordinary people toward each other.
>
> A global Empire will not stop the warfare, because a large part of the
> warfare is the war between the rich and the poor. In an Empire, this
> difference often ends up much greater than in a smaller Sovereign area.
> Here again, the larger area and people merely results in a more extreme
> version of what happens in a smaller area. It isn't better, it just has
> more potential to be extreme.
>
> An example is the USA, who have now more or less conquered the whole world.
> They want everyone to follow their culture, while pretending to respect
> and absorb other cultures. It all sounds so nice and peaceful, like
> their proposal to have a "World Philosophy day" to think about the
> greatness of the American global Empire. It is a day of worship for the
> Empire, worship and obedience. At the same time, in the real world, the
> USA is busy creating the worst World War the world has ever seen, to
> deal with the uncontrollable looting of their ruling class against their
> own currency (which means, against their own people). The other Nations
> all do the same thing, even down to insane "Corona" policies, and they
> all sit in the same Parliament (the "United Nations"), which "by
> accident?" is in New York City..
>
> A global Empire will not help, it will only make the extreme even much
> more extreme, because now there really is no way out. A global
> monoculture is a monoculture like no other before it. There is no
> balance against it. It will likely become the greatest monstrosity
> humanity has ever created.
>
> THe fact that humanity cannot figure out a good way to live (yet), does
> not help, but rather makes all this worse. If humanity could manage to
> finally live correctly as a human being, without war and crime, as good
> people, it is conceivable that a global Government of sorts might be a
> possibility. It would likely still have downsides and risk the dangers
> associated with a monoculture.
>
> For example, if it was decided to make all traffic laws the same over
> the whole world, while that might seem to make being on the road simpler
> if you travel a lot, you loose the experience with different sets of
> traffic laws and solution. You loose cultural wealth. It would already
> be possible for all traffic laws to become the same if that was the best
> thing to do (say), if every Nation slowly adopted traffic laws which
> seem to be the best ones, using examples from other Nations and their
> own. There would be a natural and dynamic convergence, it would be a
> process based on many political decisions and debates over a long period
> of time. It would likely actually come out at the best set of laws. This
> could be called a betterment of the cultures.
>
> If a global Empire had some bureaucrat, being bored with an difficult to
> understand Empire because it was different in different places, just
> choose some whatever set of traffic laws or even had a research
> department choosing the best set, and they then enforced a reasonably
> good choice over the whole world, it wouldn't likely be as good. It
> would just be what they think is good, but the whole experience with all
> these traffic laws and each Nation tweaking them step by step, this
> would not have happened. Their choice of global traffic law would be
> similar to one Nation making up their traffic laws. They also try to
> make good laws. Therefore a global Empire creates global cultural
> poverty and stagnation.
>
> It is also much harder to change big things, than it is to change small
> things. The global Empire will therefore become exceedingly stagnant.
>
> It should be noted that the things which are negatives for ordinary
> people, such as repression and poverty, are seen as positive by the
> criminals behind these Empires. They want a global Empire, because they
> want there to be no escape. They want there not to be a counter balance
> or different example to learn from. They want the wealth gap between the
> working poor and lazing super rich to be as big as possible, etc. They
> create these Empires because they are after these ill gains for
> themselves.
>
> Thus a thing like "global Philosophy day" can be understood to be part
> of the cultural warfare conducted by the Imperial ruling class. Why
> don't you tell us about some interesting local holiday in your Nation
> instead. We don't need a "global Philosophy day" to worship the USA, and
> to show our obedience to their wicked ruling class.
On my Salmon on the Thorns webpage, in my essential messages
I lobby for minimum global standards but beyond that lots of
loving diversity, many petals on the rose. I also am trying to
provide some glue for the global mosaic and demonstrate
commonality but maintaining diversity. (When I first posted
on Commonality and Diversity to soc.religion.paganism
in 1997, shortly after that Pope John Paul II preached
on Commonality and Togetherness, so I wonder if
his speech writer had seen my post.)
Also in those essential messages I say
"Instead [nations] would contribute to a decentralized, in how it
is controlled, by strings from elected representatives from all
over the world, weak world government responsible for global
policing, international space program, global standards negotiation,
and maybe a few other things but with most duties left to the still
existing national, first nations, provincial/state/territory and
municipal governments. The world government global policing
force when not needed for policing could do environmental and
humanitarian work. This would save all the countries trillions of
US dollars, collectively and over time. Some of that could go to
an international space program, other to environmental and
humanitarian work. Also arms dealing to anyone other than
official police forces and hunters should be banned. Also
there should be a global monetary unit and global budget
balancing."