Nusrat Rizvi is a Shia
Seeker
about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
vmi...@yahoo.com
> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only talks
> about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
Sorry. He is not. In his own words "mayN musalman kam aur sunni zyAda
hUN".
Viqar Ahmed
--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service New Rate! $9.95/Month 50GB
Seeker
news:20021207003307.646$o...@newsreader.com...
> "Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote:
> > I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only talks
> > about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
>
> Sorry. He is not. In his own words "mayN musalman kam aur sunni zyAda
> hUN".
>
> Viqar Ahmed
Thanks for clarification, but I had some research done in Karachi, and all
indications are NR is shia. NR is what people call a "Munafiq" when it comes
to his own religion.
Nusrat Rizvi
>"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote:
>> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only talks
>> about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
Who pray tell were your reliable sources?
>Sorry. He is not. In his own words "mayN musalman kam aur sunni zyAda
>hUN".
>Viqar Ahmed
Why should my religion be of interest to anyone is beyond me. As
regards the Shia religion where people still sob and cry for events
that happened 1400 hundred years ago is far too stupid for comments.
BTW, my forfathers were Shias when they came to India in the early
1600 hundreds. The new Emperor Aurengzeb let it be known only Sunnis
will have his ears, there was such a rush to converstion the Mullahs
started charging time and half for all comers seeking Sunni rites.
Seeker
"Nusrat Rizvi" <rizv...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:pcl3vugc1tmsruqv8...@4ax.com...
> On 07 Dec 2002 05:33:07 GMT, vmi...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote:
> >> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only
talks
> >> about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
>
> Who pray tell were your reliable sources?
>
> >hUN".
Wow! He actually said this. I guess he speaks the truth.
> >Viqar Ahmed
>
> Why should my religion be of interest to anyone is beyond me.
Simple. Because everyone else's religion is of interest to you.
> As
> regards the Shia religion where people still sob and cry for events
> that happened 1400 hundred years ago is far too stupid for comments.
So why do you do it.
> BTW, my forfathers were Shias when they came to India in the early
> 1600 hundreds. The new Emperor Aurengzeb let it be known only Sunnis
> will have his ears, there was such a rush to converstion the Mullahs
> started charging time and half for all comers seeking Sunni rites.
I doubt any of your ancestors ever had aurangzeb's ear. Aurangzeb was
neither a londay baz nor a whore monger. So this leaves no reason for him to
talk to your ancestors.
Anand Vibhav
> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only talks
> about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
Can you explain, why does a shia want to nuke Mecca?
Blue2000
"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote in message
news:rUeI9.3348$r4.1...@news1.west.cox.net...
Seeker
"Blue2000" <Blue...@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:astl45$h55$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
Nusrat Rizvi
wrote:
Because this is the one and only way to end the faith of Islam which
was invented by a deranged and blood thristy psychopath.
Nusrat Rizvi
wrote:
And why should they be sacrosanct?
Nusrat Rizvi
<4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote:
>"Nusrat Rizvi" <rizv...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:pcl3vugc1tmsruqv8...@4ax.com...
>> On 07 Dec 2002 05:33:07 GMT, vmi...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> >"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote:
>> >> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only
>talks about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
>>
>> Who pray tell were your reliable sources?
>>
>> >Sorry. He is not. In his own words "mayN musalman kam aur harami zyAda
>> >hUN".
>
>Wow! He actually said this. I guess he speaks the truth.
I always speak the truth, its pimps like you who need a Burqua to
spread lies and when caught come back with a new disguise.
>> >Viqar Ahmed
>>
>> Why should my religion be of interest to anyone is beyond me.
>
>Simple. Because everyone else's religion is of interest to you.
I dont care which branch of Sikhism or half Sikhism you beloing to.
>> As
>> regards the Shia religion where people still sob and cry for events
>> that happened 1400 hundred years ago is far too stupid for comments.
>
>So why do you do it.
I didn't, did I?
>> BTW, my forfathers were Shias when they came to India in the early
>> 1600 hundreds. The new Emperor Aurengzeb let it be known only Sunnis
>> will have his ears, there was such a rush to converstion the Mullahs
>> started charging time and half for all comers seeking Sunni rites.
>
>I doubt any of your ancestors ever had aurangzeb's ear. Aurangzeb was
>neither a londay baz nor a whore monger. So this leaves no reason for him to
>talk to your ancestors.
Perhaps your half Sikh brain was not able to grasp what I said. The
emperor was only interested in promoting Sunni Islam, hence the mass
conversion.
Now tell us all the glorious detail of your forefathers in building
the worlds biggest whorehouse. How many ladies did the contribute
in improving family fortunes.
Don't feel embarrassed by the knowledge that you have risen from
low class of pimps, every other paindoo is in the same boat.
Seeker
> On Sat, 07 Dec 2002 11:42:58 GMT, "Seeker"
> <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote:
>
> >"Nusrat Rizvi" <rizv...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> >news:pcl3vugc1tmsruqv8...@4ax.com...
> >> On 07 Dec 2002 05:33:07 GMT, vmi...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >>
> >> >"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote:
> >> >> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only
> >talks about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
> >>
> >> Who pray tell were your reliable sources?
> >>
> >> >Sorry. He is not. In his own words "mayN musalman kam aur harami zyAda
> >> >hUN".
> >
> >Wow! He actually said this. I guess he speaks the truth.
>
> I always speak the truth, its pimps like you who need a Burqua to
> spread lies and when caught come back with a new disguise.
>
> >> >Viqar Ahmed
> >>
> >> Why should my religion be of interest to anyone is beyond me.
> >
> >Simple. Because everyone else's religion is of interest to you.
>
> I dont care which branch of Sikhism or half Sikhism you beloing to.
On the contrary you live, sleep, breath, and eat this stuff. You can totally
fixated with Half Sikhism and Full Sikhism. Whatever the former is.
>
> >> As
> >> regards the Shia religion where people still sob and cry for events
> >> that happened 1400 hundred years ago is far too stupid for comments.
> >
> >So why do you do it.
>
> I didn't, did I?
Well, you just did it four lines above. Besides even if you didn't than you
just prove my point that you are Shia and a munafiq Sunni.
>
> >> BTW, my forfathers were Shias when they came to India in the early
> >> 1600 hundreds. The new Emperor Aurengzeb let it be known only Sunnis
> >> will have his ears, there was such a rush to converstion the Mullahs
> >> started charging time and half for all comers seeking Sunni rites.
> >
> >I doubt any of your ancestors ever had aurangzeb's ear. Aurangzeb was
> >neither a londay baz nor a whore monger. So this leaves no reason for him
to
> >talk to your ancestors.
>
> Perhaps your half Sikh brain was not able to grasp what I said. The
> emperor was only interested in promoting Sunni Islam, hence the mass
> conversion.
But your full Sikh brain didn't understand what I said. The emperor couldn't
care less what belief your ancestors followed since his interest didn't lie
in your family business: that is, he was neither a londay baz nor a whore
monger -- these are your families claim to fame, so please explain why the
emperor was interested in your ancestors beliefs. Logic, try it for a day.
Everything will make sense.
> Now tell us all the glorious detail of your forefathers in building
> the worlds biggest whorehouse. How many ladies did the contribute
> in improving family fortunes.
> Don't feel embarrassed by the knowledge that you have risen from
> low class of pimps, every other paindoo is in the same boat.
Now you claim that I have risen from the low class of pimps, just a few
hours ago you told me that I was still part of the low class pimps. Can you
get your story right. You view everyone in your category, but I have to
disappoint you and tell you that I happen to be a very distinguished member
of the society. My blood line is far too high class for you to even
comprehend.
Sauron M
"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote in message
Nusrat Rizvi
<4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote:
>> >> >"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote:
>> >> >> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only
>> >talks about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
>> >>
>> >> Who pray tell were your reliable sources?
>> >>
>> >> >Sorry. He is not. In his own words "mayN musalman kam aur harami zyAda
>> >> >hUN".
>> >
>> >Wow! He actually said this. I guess he speaks the truth.
>>
>> I always speak the truth, its pimps like you who need a Burqua to
>> spread lies and when caught come back with a new disguise.
>>
>> >> >Viqar Ahmed
>> >>
>> >> Why should my religion be of interest to anyone is beyond me.
>> >
>> >Simple. Because everyone else's religion is of interest to you.
>>
>> I dont care which branch of Sikhism or half Sikhism you beloing to.
>
>On the contrary you live, sleep, breath, and eat this stuff. You can totally
>fixated with Half Sikhism and Full Sikhism. Whatever the former is.
Like you dont know?
>>
>> >> As
>> >> regards the Shia religion where people still sob and cry for events
>> >> that happened 1400 hundred years ago is far too stupid for comments.
>> >
>> >So why do you do it.
>>
>> I didn't, did I?
>
>Well, you just did it four lines above. Besides even if you didn't than you
>just prove my point that you are Shia and a munafiq Sunni.
Too stupid for comment.
>>
>> >> BTW, my forfathers were Shias when they came to India in the early
>> >> 1600 hundreds. The new Emperor Aurengzeb let it be known only Sunnis
>> >> will have his ears, there was such a rush to converstion the Mullahs
>> >> started charging time and half for all comers seeking Sunni rites.
>> >
>> >I doubt any of your ancestors ever had aurangzeb's ear. Aurangzeb was
>> >neither a londay baz nor a whore monger. So this leaves no reason for him
>to talk to your ancestors.
>>
>> Perhaps your half Sikh brain was not able to grasp what I said. The
>> emperor was only interested in promoting Sunni Islam, hence the mass
>> conversion.
>
>But your full Sikh brain didn't understand what I said. The emperor couldn't
>care less what belief your ancestors followed since his interest didn't lie
>in your family business: that is, he was neither a londay baz nor a whore
>monger -- these are your families claim to fame, so please explain why the
>emperor was interested in your ancestors beliefs. Logic, try it for a day.
>Everything will make sense.
We have seen Paindoo logic in action far too often, it invariably
leads to Banya Chappals or have you forgotten that too.
>> Now tell us all the glorious detail of your forefathers in building
>> the worlds biggest whorehouse. How many ladies did the contribute
>> in improving family fortunes.
>> Don't feel embarrassed by the knowledge that you have risen from
>> low class of pimps, every other paindoo is in the same boat.
>
>Now you claim that I have risen from the low class of pimps, just a few
>hours ago you told me that I was still part of the low class pimps. Can you
>get your story right. You view everyone in your category, but I have to
>disappoint you and tell you that I happen to be a very distinguished member
>of the society. My blood line is far too high class for you to even
>comprehend.
I have never heard of any member of a distinguished family wearing a
Burqua but what passes for home of a distinguished family in Punjab is
known as brothel in the rest of the world.
You have every right to be proud of your bloodlines, not many even
in Amritsir have such preponderance of Ranjeet Singhs genes as your
family does on account of your inter- cousin marriages.
Blue2000
"Nusrat Rizvi" <rizv...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:6b05vu80i86n2qhd6...@4ax.com...
Seeker
Or simply put, you are speechless. Your lack of response is duly noted.
> >>
> >> >> BTW, my forfathers were Shias when they came to India in the early
> >> >> 1600 hundreds. The new Emperor Aurengzeb let it be known only Sunnis
> >> >> will have his ears, there was such a rush to converstion the Mullahs
> >> >> started charging time and half for all comers seeking Sunni rites.
> >> >
> >> >I doubt any of your ancestors ever had aurangzeb's ear. Aurangzeb was
> >> >neither a londay baz nor a whore monger. So this leaves no reason for
him
> >to talk to your ancestors.
> >>
> >> Perhaps your half Sikh brain was not able to grasp what I said. The
> >> emperor was only interested in promoting Sunni Islam, hence the mass
> >> conversion.
> >
> >But your full Sikh brain didn't understand what I said. The emperor
couldn't
> >care less what belief your ancestors followed since his interest didn't
lie
> >in your family business: that is, he was neither a londay baz nor a whore
> >monger -- these are your families claim to fame, so please explain why
the
> >emperor was interested in your ancestors beliefs. Logic, try it for a
day.
> >Everything will make sense.
>
> We have seen Paindoo logic in action far too often, it invariably
> leads to Banya Chappals or have you forgotten that too.
It never happened. I don't forget that. I do know that the business end of
the Pakistani chappal has done a number on you.
>
>
> >> Now tell us all the glorious detail of your forefathers in building
> >> the worlds biggest whorehouse. How many ladies did the contribute
> >> in improving family fortunes.
> >> Don't feel embarrassed by the knowledge that you have risen from
> >> low class of pimps, every other paindoo is in the same boat.
> >
> >Now you claim that I have risen from the low class of pimps, just a few
> >hours ago you told me that I was still part of the low class pimps. Can
you
> >get your story right. You view everyone in your category, but I have to
> >disappoint you and tell you that I happen to be a very distinguished
member
> >of the society. My blood line is far too high class for you to even
> >comprehend.
>
> I have never heard of any member of a distinguished family wearing a
Have you ever known any member of any distinguished family. I guess not.
> Burqua but what passes for home of a distinguished family in Punjab is
> known as brothel in the rest of the world.
> You have every right to be proud of your bloodlines, not many even
> in Amritsir have such preponderance of Ranjeet Singhs genes as your
> family does on account of your inter- cousin marriages.
Hahaha. Marrying a cousin spells lovin' in Lucknow, but for the rest of the
world it is not a normal practice. BTW, have you ever heard of a quadratic
equation? If you have, then you will certainly understand why your statement
is so idiotic as usual.
Romanise
> about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
Arent Bush's planes first going to bomb Karbala? Mecca may come on
next Americam president's agenda.
Seeker
news:dcef526a.02120...@posting.google.com...
Hahaha. Good one!
Anand Vibhav
My question is directed to seeker who said you are for nuking mecca
because you are a shia.
Nusrat Rizvi
wrote:
>> >"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote in message news:<rUeI9.3348$r4.1...@news1.west.cox.net>...
>> >> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only talks
>> >> about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
>> >
>> >Can you explain, why does a shia want to nuke Mecca?
>>
>> Because this is the one and only way to end the faith of Islam which
>> was invented by a deranged and blood thristy psychopath.
>
>My question is directed to seeker who said you are for nuking mecca
>because you are a shia.
You are wasting your time if you think this Seeker guy will ever have
anything worthwhile to any about anything.
Seeker
> On 11 Dec 2002 08:57:14 -0800, anand...@mail.com (Anand Vibhav)
> wrote:
>
> >> >"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote in
message news:<rUeI9.3348$r4.1...@news1.west.cox.net>...
> >> >> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only
talks
> >> >> about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
> >> >
> >> >Can you explain, why does a shia want to nuke Mecca?
> >>
> >> Because this is the one and only way to end the faith of Islam which
> >> was invented by a deranged and blood thristy psychopath.
> >
> >My question is directed to seeker who said you are for nuking mecca
> >because you are a shia.
Anand, it is my understanding that Nusrat Rizvi is what we call a "Muafiq"
fella. He says one thing but he has a different agenda. He wants to nuke
Mecca, but he adopts a shia name (nothing against shias, they have my
respect). He does this to start sunnis and shias fighting with each other.
For 10 years he has failed miserably. Of course, ten years ago we all
thought he was going through a menopause.
>
> You are wasting your time if you think this Seeker guy will ever have
> anything worthwhile to any about anything.
Every time, I go to Pakistan. If a Sindhi looking beggar approaches me, I
always tell them that I will only give them money if they are Hindus. I
believe, Pakistanis need to protect the Hindus.
Nusrat Rizvi
<4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote:
>> >> >"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote in
>message news:<rUeI9.3348$r4.1...@news1.west.cox.net>...
>> >> >> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only
>talks about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
>> >> >
>> >> >Can you explain, why does a shia want to nuke Mecca?
>> >>
>> >> Because this is the one and only way to end the faith of Islam which
>> >> was invented by a deranged and blood thristy psychopath.
>> >
>> >My question is directed to seeker who said you are for nuking mecca
>> >because you are a shia.
>
>Anand, it is my understanding that Nusrat Rizvi is what we call a "Muafiq"
>fella. He says one thing but he has a different agenda. He wants to nuke
>Mecca, but he adopts a shia name (nothing against shias, they have my
>respect). He does this to start sunnis and shias fighting with each other.
>For 10 years he has failed miserably. Of course, ten years ago we all
>thought he was going through a menopause.
Never heard of anyone choosing his name but why bother this mental
case
with such obvious flaws in his thinking.
>> You are wasting your time if you think this Seeker guy will ever have
>> anything worthwhile to any about anything.
>
>Every time, I go to Pakistan. If a Sindhi looking beggar approaches me, I
>always tell them that I will only give them money if they are Hindus. I
>believe, Pakistanis need to protect the Hindus.
You have every right to be careful with your mothers hard earned
money.
Seeker
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 02:24:28 GMT, "Seeker"
> <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote:
>
> >> >> >"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote in
> >message news:<rUeI9.3348$r4.1...@news1.west.cox.net>...
> >> >> >> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he
only
> >talks about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Can you explain, why does a shia want to nuke Mecca?
> >> >>
> >> >> Because this is the one and only way to end the faith of Islam which
> >> >> was invented by a deranged and blood thristy psychopath.
> >> >
> >> >My question is directed to seeker who said you are for nuking mecca
> >> >because you are a shia.
> >
> >Anand, it is my understanding that Nusrat Rizvi is what we call a
"Muafiq"
> >fella. He says one thing but he has a different agenda. He wants to nuke
> >Mecca, but he adopts a shia name (nothing against shias, they have my
> >respect). He does this to start sunnis and shias fighting with each
other.
> >For 10 years he has failed miserably. Of course, ten years ago we all
> >thought he was going through a menopause.
>
> Never heard of anyone choosing his name but why bother this mental
> case
> with such obvious flaws in his thinking.
Look, I told you to take Geritol, but you have been ignoring my
instructions. Once you take these vitamins designed for senior citizens,
your brain will become sharp enough to understand what I write. In the mean,
find comfort in the fact that the world is a very complicated place though
it never did make sense to you.
>
> >> You are wasting your time if you think this Seeker guy will ever have
> >> anything worthwhile to any about anything.
> >
> >Every time, I go to Pakistan. If a Sindhi looking beggar approaches me, I
> >always tell them that I will only give them money if they are Hindus. I
> >believe, Pakistanis need to protect the Hindus.
>
> You have every right to be careful with your mothers hard earned
> money.
There you go again with a reference to other people's mothers. Noticed how I
never make any references to your mother. Do you know why? Because it is low
class, but I don't expect a "munafiq" fella to understand such an obvious
point.
Anand Vibhav
> "Nusrat Rizvi" <rizv...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:ic2fvu4skgtf4r7ik...@4ax.com...
> > On 11 Dec 2002 08:57:14 -0800, anand...@mail.com (Anand Vibhav)
> > wrote:
> >
> > >> >"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_t...@dont.reply> wrote in
> message news:<rUeI9.3348$r4.1...@news1.west.cox.net>...
> > >> >> I learned this through reliable sources. This explains why he only
> talks
> > >> >> about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala.
> > >> >
> > >> >Can you explain, why does a shia want to nuke Mecca?
> > >>
> > >> Because this is the one and only way to end the faith of Islam which
> > >> was invented by a deranged and blood thristy psychopath.
> > >
> > >My question is directed to seeker who said you are for nuking mecca
> > >because you are a shia.
>
> Anand, it is my understanding that Nusrat Rizvi is what we call a "Muafiq"
> fella. He says one thing but he has a different agenda. He wants to nuke
> Mecca, but he adopts a shia name (nothing against shias, they have my
> respect). He does this to start sunnis and shias fighting with each other.
> For 10 years he has failed miserably. Of course, ten years ago we all
> thought he was going through a menopause.
But, thats not what you said. Here is the exact quote:
"Nusrat Rizvi is a Shia. I learned this through reliable sources. This
explains why he only talks about nuking Meccah but not Kerbala."
You implied ALL shias wish to get rid of Mecca. I still didnt get an
answer for that.
>
> >
> > You are wasting your time if you think this Seeker guy will ever have
> > anything worthwhile to any about anything.
>
> Every time, I go to Pakistan. If a Sindhi looking beggar approaches me, I
> always tell them that I will only give them money if they are Hindus. I
> believe, Pakistanis need to protect the Hindus.
Sounds like a noble deed on the surface, but really it is not. Why
dont you give money to Sindhi sufi beggers?
Right here, in the post, I see contempt for Shias and Sufis. Isnt that
a prevelant problem in Pakistan?