I am following the arguments on Bhanumati. I simply agree with Mr. Ramabhadra
Dokka. Mr. Suryadeva is using all objectionable words in his message.
It is good that Mr. Dokka has not lost his patience for the other person's
bad words.
What are the GREAT EDITORS ( Mr. Seethamraju and Mr. K. Narayan ) doing when
such type of obsene words are used in the messages like a?s and f??k!!
I really feel helpless to read such words. Why one should curse another person
directly with bad words on the net?
Write some nonsense about somebody and say it is joke! As, Kamala Anupindi said,
those people need some help. It, really, is an art to joke at others!
Why do not we do something? When Mr. Suryadevara used bad words for Mr. Dokka,
what anybody can do? I, very strongly, object such bad usage.
Hello Other Friends on the net! Give your comments also. Please do not keep
quite. Contradict whichever is bad! Is Mr. Dokka telling everybody to use
proper expressions -- is bad or using obsene words is bad!! Write your
opinions to stop bad language! Don't be lethargic ( sorry for the spelling
mistakes!).
I had a lot of hopes on Editors. Now I do not hesitate to loose it.
--- Swaroop
Some times I do feel that the quality of digests has gone down.
But then, it is not always possible to keep to high quality. It
takes a lot of effort to keep things going. There was a small tiff
on aspects of Bhaanumati. Those things could have been edited out
from the digests. I hope Seetam looks at the contents of posts
more closely.
Secondly, just because some one has used bad phrases does not mean
that the person has no samskaaram etc. Many a time in Raayalaseema
obscene words are commonly used. This cuts across the village folk,
educated people, and many more. With the use of obscene words in
the language, they don't mean obscenity in the way the words mean.
So try to cool tempers, and let us proceed to write on topics that
educate us. Let us avoid where possible politics which divides us.
...kt
>In article <1993080208...@hcla.hcla.com> swa...@hcla.hcla.com (Anand Swaroop) writes:
>>
>>Hi Friends,
>>
>>I am following the arguments on Bhanumati. I simply agree with Mr. Ramabhadra
>> Dokka. Mr. Suryadeva is using all objectionable words in his message.
>>
>>It is good that Mr. Dokka has not lost his patience for the other person's
>>bad words.
>>
Thanks Anand Swaroop and other friends for getting me right !!
>Mr.Dokka has said that people who oppose Bhanumathi do not have ingitha ~aanam.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am sorry to say that U have misunderstood me completely.
I never said that "people who oppose bhaanumati DO NOT HAVE ingita
j~aanam.
I just said that people who don't follow the proper way of putting
their opinions into right words have no ingitam. Pl. understand that.
>Mr.Dokka ki Bhanumathi 'dhevatha' ayyi vunda vaccu, andhuku andharoo
>ekibhavincha valasina avasaram ledhu.adhi Mr.Dokka artham chesukunte
>manchidhi.
I have been saying the same thing again and again.
People can have variuos views and may express in various forms,
but before that they should mind their words.
ika naaku bhaanumati "dEvatha" anna comment vishayaaniki vastE,
even if it had been some "pullayya" whom I don't know ( leave
alone liking and disliking ) in that position, my response would
have been the same. After all, it is the question of giving due
respect to individuals as fellow human beings.
Pl. read my postings carefully, and I repeat the same thing again..
People may have different views but there is definitely a better
way of putting them into words.
> I also think that Mr.Dokka's language was equally abusive.
Regarding my usage of bad language, I have not used bad words or
bootulu in my postings. As far as I know, all the words I used are
supposed to be the words used for mandalinchaDam and nowhere considered
as bad and abusive words.
The only bad(may be) word I used was CRAP. Pl. read..
The deleted portion of Mr. Ravi's posting goes as...
>> Enjoy a ......... of ........ or a ..... of .......
>> whichever is applicable etc...
What do U call all that (apart from his language I already referred) ??
I am very sorry that my limited vocabulary didn't help me to find
a better word for all that.
Hurting people !! yeah !! people should understand this well before
they do this to others.
I completely agree with U ion Ur views regarding gouravam sampaadi
nchaDam and nila beTTu kOvaDam.
Hope that helps...
As pointed out by one of our netters about renaming the group
to soc.culture.indian.telugu.puritarians etc....,
Sir !! It is always better to add a little bit of PURITY to
our writings before they get PUTREFIED.
Thanks for understanding that (st)r(a)ight !!
mI..
RAM. ( Ramabhadra R. Dokka ) ( rrdo...@starbase.spd.louisville.edu )
EXCUSE MEEEE!!! For as STUPID a thread as "The Genius" of Bhanumathi,
Mr.Dokka has said that people who oppose Bhanumathi do not have ingitha ~aanam.
This was entirely uncalled for and unnecessary on the part of Mr.Dokka.
gauravam isthunnaru kadha ani ishtam vachchinattu matladithe evvaroo
oorukoru. inko vishayam, gauravam sampadhinchatam entha kashtamo adhi nilupu
kovatam anthakante chaala kashtam.
Though I do not support Mr.Suryadeva's abusive language, I also think
that Mr.Dokka's language was equally abusive. To hurt people you don't need to
use bad words. Mr.Dokka is doing the same. Clever huh!
Mr.Dokka ki Bhanumathi 'dhevatha' ayyi vunda vaccu, andhuku andharoo
ekibhavincha valasina avasaram ledhu.adhi Mr.Dokka artham chesukunte manchidhi.
>
>I had a lot of hopes on Editors. Now I do not hesitate to loose it.
>
>--- Swaroop
You are only losing hope, I am losing respect towards some people I
used to admire for their informative and no-nonsense articles.
--
_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/