Anyone know about this?
--
Aloha pumehana,
Brian and Mary
"Brian Bigler" <naal...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:1222049...@news.lava.net...
Some links here with relevant info:
http://hawaiihumpbackwhale.noaa.gov/heritage/cultural_history.html
http://www.bluecoast.org/nonprofit/kanaloa/k24.html
I'm also sure that whales might have been excluded from
killing because the ancients might have had a lot of
religious ideas about the whales that came to calf near
our islands. It would have been impractical
because the meat would rapidly rot in our tropical
weather. Such cold weather of the north makes for
assurance that the meat can be eaten or dried before it
rots. If you cut the meat-- even fish-- in thin enough
strips, then it can dry before it will rot. If you use
smoke, then you can dry even bigger chunks of meat.
Thus I can see how such a practice can get started in
the cold of winter and then be continued as a tradition
when the Indians moved further south. Hawaiians who
were used to consuming all that they caught in measured
ammount would probably not want to be so wastefull.
Finally, ancient Hawaiians were mostly agrarian
people-- even farming some fish species-- and were not
the heavy meat consumers that the eskimos are.
Two questions:
1) Did monk seals fall into the same kapu category as whales?
2) What other species fell under this kapu?
--
Aloha pumehana,
Brian and Mary
"Alvin E. Toda" <a...@lava.net> wrote in message
news:1222199...@news.lava.net...