Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Water Crisis

3 views
Skip to first unread message

His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

unread,
May 17, 2013, 1:05:43 PM5/17/13
to
On May 16, 9:19 pm, Neolibertarian <cognac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <85820538-9182-42d5-93ad-ab42000db...@r3g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
> "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
>
> <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Did you know that there are fewer hungry people on earth today than
> > > there were when there were only 3 billion of us?
>
> > > Did you know there are over three times more trees in the US than there
> > > were in 1918?
>
> > > In other words: What overpopulation? What deforestation?
>
> > Oh wait, you are not going to do like the Christians, right? Burying
> > your head in the sand won't help.
>
> Ever hear of the Simon-Ehrlich Wager? No, I didn't think so.
>
> Consider this:
>
> In 1968 there were about 3.5 billion humans on earth. About 900 million
> were malnourished or starving. Everyone else was well-fed.
>
> In 2013, there are about 7 billion humans on earth. About 900 million
> are malnourished or starving. Everyone else is more well-fed than at any
> time in man's history. Obesity has actually become an ailment of the
> /poor/, for crying out loud.
>
> It turns out that Paul Ehrlich is the hysterical lunatic who has his
> head in the sand--not Julian Simon.
>
> There's no data supporting the dark visions you hold as fact. I know you
> believe there is, but you couldn't go fetch it, even were you actually
> interested enough to make the effort. It doesn't exist.
>
> In the end, you're merely repeating something you thought you heard. A
> dreary fantasy you use to excuse yourself from judgement.
>
> You think resources /should/ be running out; that the earth is
> dangerously overcrowded and mankind is doomed to disaster, so it
> therefore /must/ be so.
>
> Okay, I'm game. My fantasies aren't hardened. I'm willing to learn. Show
> me your proof.

OK, I shall proceed to provide proof while trimming this long post for
the benefit of the reader. Yes, it's all for the reader. That's not
the average idiot who watches the Fox news. It's a discerning,
cultured, unbiased, enlightened being who can say I'm right.

Anyway here are the facts:

15 Depressing Facts About The Coming Water Crisis

"America must spend $255 billion in the next five years to prevent
deterioration of water infrastructure. We plan to spend half that
amount."

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/15-facts-about-the-coming-water-crisis-2010-3?op=1#ixzz2TZMI7guv

Oh gee, we are deep shit! They are rather pouring money down the drain
in "beautifying cities" with wild grass. It took a lot of labor and
inconvenience to create those corner triangles where the grass grows
wild and the water gets stuck and breeds mosquitoes.

But water, there's little plan for clean water. I bet you the average
Christian hasn't even heard about "water crisis." They just endorse
the Africans having as many kids as they can. It's all in Bible,
"multiply and conquer." Why should you worry about the future. God got
everything under control.

Water scarcity may be good for PREDATORY CAPITALISM (those who sell
bottled water, etc), but not for the Wise Man with unbiased and
enlightened opinion.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

http://webspawner.com/users/DONQUJOTE1

His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

unread,
May 18, 2013, 11:46:07 AM5/18/13
to
On May 17, 7:44 pm, Neolibertarian <cognac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <e8275c5d-0692-49fe-b26c-40fe8cd80...@s18g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
> "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > In the end, you're merely repeating something you thought you heard. A
> > > dreary fantasy you use to excuse yourself from judgement.
>
> > > You think resources /should/ be running out; that the earth is
> > > dangerously overcrowded and mankind is doomed to disaster, so it
> > > therefore /must/ be so.
>
> > > Okay, I'm game. My fantasies aren't hardened. I'm willing to learn. Show
> > > me your proof.
>
> > OK, I shall proceed to provide proof while trimming this long post for
> > the benefit of the reader. Yes, it's all for the reader. That's not
> > the average idiot who watches the Fox news. It's a discerning,
> > cultured, unbiased, enlightenedbeingwho can say I'm right.
>
> > Anyway here are the facts:
>
> > 15 Depressing Facts About The Coming Water Crisis
>
> > "America must spend $255 billion in the next five years to prevent
> > deterioration of water infrastructure. We plan to spend half that
> > amount."
>
> > Read more:
> >http://www.businessinsider.com/15-facts-about-the-coming-water-crisis...
> > p=1#ixzz2TZMI7guv
>
> This article is three years old, so actual links to the facts don't
> exist anymore. Sorry. This may come as a surprise to you, but proof
> requires data and facts.
>
> Of the data which still exists, it appears that by 2050 or so there are
> relatively few populations which will have physical shortages of water.
> Some might.
>
> Clearly there's no crisis coming to the Northern Hemisphere.

I understand, fuck the South. The problem is the South will emigrate
to the North as the shortages and war ravage the land. The North
already has a crisis with immigration so you go and figure.

Perhaps you'll agree with me that a REVOLUTION is necessary for the
South. Nothing like Chavez, just something smart that uses PREVENTION
as the first strategy. Actually we may use some of the water
technologies put in place by Israel. They collect the rain and make
the kibbutz bloom in the desert. Or is it something you only want for
yourself?

>
> The largest groups to be effected (mostly sometime in the future) are
> comprised of the basket-case dictators and central planners (Central
> Africa, Southern Asia, Peru and Bolivia) which threaten to further
> damage their internal economies to the point they can no longer afford
> water infrastructures necessary to sustain their citizenry.
>
> Water isn't free, nor has it generally been free throughout much of
> man's history.

Brazil is not a dictatorship and it accounts for the most
deforestation in the world. If America is falling short in planning
imagine the South.

>
> These projected shortages aren't really so much a function of population
> as tragic incompetence.

And CORRUPTION, such as here in Miami Beach. That's even more sad than
incompetence. Everybody trying to make a buck without concern for the
world. The predator only cares about himself and his family. They
steal a few million bucks in Brazil and then come here. Then they mix
with the Jews, the Cubans, the Venezuelans, and everybody else, and
make this fortress called Millionaire's Row their first row
accommodation to look at the ocean. Waiting, for the next big
hurricane to hit the area. Yes, it's coming.

>
> Physical water shortages in places like North Africa and the Middle East
> can come as no surprise to anyone, since water shortages have been
> occurring there since the days of Alexander the Great.
>
> As stated in an earlier post: bringing the fruits of industrialism (such
> as sophisticated medical care, disease prevention and cheap food) to
> unindustrialized cultures and societies is a recipe for disaster.

I think bringing Western Culture to Africa is a disaster as a whole.
They are OK without Jesus and cars.

>
> But a necessary disaster, if things are ever going to get better.

Yeah, a necessary disaster. Was the Holocaust necessary?

Perhaps it was for the birth of the State of Israel. Everything has a
positive side. In a twist of fate, they owe a lot to Hitler.
>
>
>
> > Oh gee, we are deep shit! They are rather pouring money down the drain
> > in "beautifying cities" with wild grass. It took a lot of labor and
> > inconvenience to create those corner triangles where the grass grows
> > wild and the water gets stuck and breeds mosquitoes.
>
> Waa?
>
>
>
> > But water, there's little plan for clean water.
>
> Why would you claim that? The article you linked to paints a decidedly
> different picture. There is much planning for improving water supplies
> and infrastructure evident. $Billions and $billions arebeingspent all
> over the world, according to your source. These organizations, providing
> the information and data for the article, just don't think it's /enough/.
>
> Different.

You must have missed this:

"A shortage of water resources could spell increased conflicts in the
future. Population growth will make the problem worse. So will climate
change. As the global economy grows, so will its thirst. Many more
conflicts lie just over the horizon." -- Ban Ki-Moon

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/15-facts-about-the-coming-water-crisis-2010-3?op=1#ixzz2TeuXGoGG

His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

unread,
May 18, 2013, 2:08:23 PM5/18/13
to
On May 17, 1:58 pm, Wet Paper Bag <ultimate.henchman....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 17 May, 11:11, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "America must spend $255 billion in the next five years to prevent
> > deterioration of water infrastructure. We plan to spend half that
> > amount."
>
> bullshit. how can an ignorant death worshiping culture possibly be
> concerned with preservation of resources... what about prevenative
> measures... stop toxifying your air and water... shut it down... or
> chase the problem which means what a waste... it will never get solved
> that way.

It'll probably be sorted out by some future generation. We are idiots,
greedy ones, compared to those new kids growing up now.

>
> > Oh gee, we are deep shit! They are rather pouring money down the drain
> > in "beautifying cities" with wild grass. It took a lot of labor and
> > inconvenience to create those corner triangles where the grass grows
> > wild and the water gets stuck and breeds mosquitoes.
>
> keeps the masses tranquil... keeps the sheep asleep...
>

Hey, hey, let's talk about "gay rights" to keep people entertained.
That sure is a subject for debate.

>
> too much potash... but look at all the new beaches!
>
> > But water, there's little plan for clean water. I bet you the average
> > Christian hasn't even heard about "water crisis." They just endorse
> > the Africans having as many kids as they can. It's all in Bible,
> > "multiply and conquer." Why should you worry about the future. God got
> > everything under control.
>
> that is exactly the reason why they worry... they have drawn a line
> and pushed me over it... wanted to know what i was going to do and as
> of this date, everything i have done does not include them...
>
> > Water scarcity may be good for PREDATORY CAPITALISM (those who sell
> > bottled water, etc), but not for the Wise Man with unbiased and
> > enlightened opinion.
>
> the story goes... a tribe is thristy... a Jew finds a spring... rather
> than share.. he hoards it to himself... at first no one notices.. but
> then he starts to appear a little more energetic, a little too
> plump... so one day a fellow tribe member follows this "god" to see
> his secret... seeing... you do not want to be that guy...
>
> Lucifer

Are you saying they control the secret of the water?

"One day, long ago in Africa, a lion sat by the waterhole and waited
for all the animals to come to him. It was the end of hunting as we
know it. The lion didn't need to chase the prey."

Whoever bottles the water controls the world. Let the other water go
bad so I can profit.

His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

unread,
May 19, 2013, 12:26:05 PM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 4:40 am, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 10:48:00 -0700, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Most Humble Philosopher wrote:
> > On May 17, 3:02 am, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 17 May 2013 08:13:35 +0200, liaM wrote:
> >> > Le 17/05/2013 02:54, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> >> > Philosopher a écrit :
> >> >> On May 16, 7:41 pm, liaM<cud...@mindless.com> wrote:
> >> >>> Le 5/17/2013 1:01 AM, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most
> >> >>> Humble Philosopher a crit :
>
> >> >>>> "They are not brethren, they are not underlings; they are other
> >> >>>> nations, caught like ourselves in the net of life and time, fellow
> >> >>>> prisoners of the splendor and travail of the Earth."
>
> >> >>>> -- Henry Beston
>
> >> >>>>http://www.exploratorium.edu/ifi/resources/lifescienceinquiry/
> >> doesawo...
>
> >> >>>> Beautiful, just beautiful. Words to inspire the philosophers and
> >> >>>> poets alike. Oh worms, creatures who bury themselves in the
> >> >>>> ground, looking for happiness and meaning in life. They know
> >> >>>> nothing of our deceiving world. They know nothing of Republican
> >> >>>> and Democrat, Rich and Poor.
> >> >>>> They don't know about the 1%. Lucky them.
>
> >> >>>> And then it closes with these motivational words:
>
> >> >>>> "I think the point of this avenue of inquiry is to get people to
> >> >>>> appreciate the lives of other living things with which we share
> >> >>>> this Earth."
>
> >> >>>> Yes, you may have your own views but nothing approaches the wisdom
> >> >>>> of the worm.
>
> >> >>>> "I think we consider too much the good luck of the early bird and
> >> >>>> not enough the bad luck of the early worm."
>
> >> >>>> -Franklin D. Roosevelt
>
> >> >>>>http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/worm.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> -
>
> >> >>>>http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> >> >>> Raising worms for protein results in something like one-fifth the
> >> >>> release of methane to the atmosphere, a good reason to switch to
> >> >>> cooking wormburgers and worm-tofu dishes. Worm farms may be a good
> >> >>> place to invest. The worm farm near where I live is looking for
> >> >>> just such investment, having proved its systems with the harvest of
> >> >>> 15 tons of food grade worms this year. There are a growing number
> >> >>> of french chefs who are offering worm and insect creations at their
> >> >>> restaurants,
> >> >>> so the future is rosy for worms resulting in a cleaner, more
> >> >>> ecologically balanced world. Someone should tell J. Robbins about
> >> >>> this !
>
> >> >>> liaM (potential investors write me..)
>
> >> >> That proposal has been adopted by the Revolutionary Committee in
> >> >> Exile.
> >> >> Where are our creative leaders? Why is Africa waiting to join the
> >> >> revolution? Why worms are not in the menu?
>
> >> > Africa is waiting in the wings. Zimbabwe farmers are cultivating
> >> > worms reaching 20 feet at maturity yet just melt in the mouth raw and
> >> > sliced thin. Worm tartar is sure to be a world changer.
>
> >> if paris says it's hot maybe it will be.
>
> > Oh yes, Paris, London, New York always set the trend.
>
> > Funny, they all share a Bike Sharing Program now. Hope the rest of the
> > world catches up before it's too late.
>
> for a tour de world we need more bridges...

Well, our bridges don't accommodate bikes and pedestrians. We need to
change that.

Perhaps our engineers are dumb or perhaps they are corrupt. It's not
the kind of engineering we want to take to Africa.

His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

unread,
May 19, 2013, 3:22:00 PM5/19/13
to
On May 17, 7:44 pm, Neolibertarian <cognac...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I bet you the average
> > Christian hasn't even heard about "water crisis."
>
> That's because there is no "water crisis." Not yet, and there likely
> won't be one in the future unless we monkeys do something stupid.

I see, so all those warnings are meaningless. Bottle water has become
a big industry for no reason. Perhaps some water is better than other.

I think you live in the make believe world already.

>
> Did you and I read the same article?
>
> > They just endorse
> > the Africans having as many kids as they can.
>
> Nothing wrong with having babies. Babies are fun.

Wow, yes babies are fun and dogs are fun. Is that a reason to have a
large family?

I thought it was established that Haiti was overpopulated. Now think
of Israel, what would happen if all the Jews had to cram into that
place? They are already claiming foreign territories as their own.
Imagine what would happen.


>
> > It's all in Bible,
> > "multiply and conquer."
>
> It works, evidently. For instance, Lebanon in the 1960s was composed of
> mostly Maronites, Christians, Druze and Sunnis. The Shia were
> downtrodden and suppressed. Now the Shia dominate Lebanon because of
> decades of encouraging higher birthrates in their communities.
>
> You may be shocked, but the Westernized Christians in Lebanon maintained
> low birthrates--similar to Westernized Christians in the United States,
> for instance. One morning they woke up, went down to breakfast, and
> found that the Shia had already eaten it all up.
>
> The same is working for Hispanic populations in California, Nevada,
> Arizona and Texas. These states are all on the verge of becoming
> dominated by their ever-growing hispanic populations.
>
> Dominance is probably a function of virility...and believing babies are
> fun.

Virility and stupidity rhyme. PREVENT OR DIE. It's a law of nature.

His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

unread,
May 19, 2013, 3:39:45 PM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 12:08 am, Neolibertarian <cognac...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > "A shortage of water resources could spell increased conflicts in the
> > future. Population growth will make the problem worse. So will climate
> > change. As the global economy grows, so will its thirst. Many more
> > conflicts lie just over the horizon." -- Ban Ki-Moon
>
> Ban Ki-Moon is a bureaucrat. He's been a bureaucrat his whole life. He's
> not an expert in natural resource exploitation, nor anything else.
>
> A bureaucrat isn't expert at anything except protecting his own job.
>
> From what I've seen, I'm not sure he could find his way to the UN
> building in the morning without a driver and assistants.
>
> Bureaucrats only know three things: how to create crises, pretend
> they're managing them, and then how to perpetuate them into infinity.

So who would rely on to save the world, the rabbi? I think we rely on
bureaucrats AND scientists because they give a better picture of the
world.

Who's the president of a bureaucracy in a country if not the president
or the prime minister. Are you proposing some kind of anarchism? Once
we remove presidents and bureaucrats we are left with anarchism.

Look at the evidence coming from Arab nations, something Israel should
be worrying about...

https://groups.google.com/group/alt.california/browse_thread/thread/c2559a8b307d806/d2e4d145e9c85d8e?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=the+water+crisis#d2e4d145e9c85d8e

His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

unread,
May 20, 2013, 10:58:23 AM5/20/13
to
On May 19, 4:37 pm, BeamMeUpScotty
<ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> On 5/19/2013 3:38 PM, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher wrote:
> > On May 19, 12:08 am, Neolibertarian <cognac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> "A shortage of water resources could spell increased conflicts in the
> >>> future. Population growth will make the problem worse. So will climate
> >>> change. As the global economy grows, so will its thirst. Many more
> >>> conflicts lie just over the horizon." -- Ban Ki-Moon
>
> >> Ban Ki-Moon is a bureaucrat. He's been a bureaucrat his whole life. He's
> >> not an expert in natural resource exploitation, nor anything else.
>
> >> A bureaucrat isn't expert at anything except protecting his own job.
>
> >> From what I've seen, I'm not sure he could find his way to the UN
> >> building in the morning without a driver and assistants.
>
> >> Bureaucrats only know three things: how to create crises, pretend
> >> they're managing them, and then how to perpetuate them into infinity.
>
> > So who would rely on to save the world, the rabbi?
>
> Bureaucrats screw up the peace..... and never win a war.

So the scientists do say MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE IS A REALITY. Who's
supposed to stir the population into action?

They are OUR leaders, elected representatives who are looking out for
us...

Or are you saying that the democratic process doesn't produce
politicians and bureaucrats that work for us? Are they a bunch of self-
serving individuals instead of the trusted public servants the
Republic was supposed to create?

Oh wait, democratic and Republican ways are technically different.
Maybe it would work if we had some sort of real democracy. My
community is full of shit and nobody gives a shit. Is someone
responsible for anything?

His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

unread,
May 21, 2013, 2:23:28 PM5/21/13
to
On May 21, 9:06 am, BeamMeUpScotty
<ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> On 5/20/2013 2:19 PM, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher wrote:
> > On May 20, 1:09 pm, BeamMeUpScotty
> > <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> >> On 5/20/2013 10:54 AM, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> >> Philosopher wrote:
> >>> On May 19, 4:37 pm, BeamMeUpScotty
> >>> <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 5/19/2013 3:38 PM, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> >>>> Philosopher wrote:
> >>>>> On May 19, 12:08 am, Neolibertarian <cognac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> "A shortage of water resources could spell increased conflicts in the
> >>>>>>> future. Population growth will make the problem worse. So will climate
> >>>>>>> change. As the global economy grows, so will its thirst. Many more
> >>>>>>> conflicts lie just over the horizon." -- Ban Ki-Moon
>
> >>>>>> Ban Ki-Moon is a bureaucrat. He's been a bureaucrat his whole life. He's
> >>>>>> not an expert in natural resource exploitation, nor anything else.
>
> >>>>>> A bureaucrat isn't expert at anything except protecting his own job.
>
> >>>>>> From what I've seen, I'm not sure he could find his way to the UN
> >>>>>> building in the morning without a driver and assistants.
>
> >>>>>> Bureaucrats only know three things: how to create crises, pretend
> >>>>>> they're managing them, and then how to perpetuate them into infinity.
>
> >>>>> So who would rely on to save the world, the rabbi?
>
> >>>> Bureaucrats screw up the peace.....    and never win a war.
>
> >>> So the scientists do say MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE IS A REALITY. Who's
> >>> supposed to stir the population into action?
>
> >> What action, can you change the Weather?
>
> >> Human Co2 is a trace amount "of what is a trace gas" in the atmosphere....
>
> >> If the earth were so fragile, then every volcanic eruption above or
> >> under the ocean that released as much or more Co2 as Humans do, would
> >> have already push the planet into another Global Warming year after year.
>
> >> Are you saying there were NO volcanoes at all leading up to and during
> >> ice ages?
>
> >> Wouldn't someone notice that every warming period in history coincides
> >> to be within 100 years of a major volcanic eruption?
>
> >> And that ice ages are devoid of volcanic eruption?
>
> >> If humans added Co2, then the atmosphere must have expanded.....
> >> correct, or the atmosphere would have to increase in pressure according
> >> to the laws of physics.
>
> >> No study confirms either one.... so where is all that extra gas we added
> >> to the atmosphere.
>
> >> Explain that.....
>
> > You may have to argue with the scientists who confirm man made climate
> > change. They are not hard to find. The overwhelming majority do.
>
> > I can't possibly explain why smoking give you lung cancer but it does.
> > CAUSE & EFFECT, you know.
>
> If smoking causes cancer why doesn't every person that smokes have cancer?
>
> The way I hear it, smoking increases the risk of you having cancer mybe
> someday.....  NOT that Smoking its self caused cancer.
>
> The doctors can't tell you that you are smoking, so you have cancer.
>
> There may be a connection to smoking and some cancer in some people.
>
> But to flatly say smoking causes cancer is NOT the truth.
>
> The same as you are NOT going to die in a car accident because you don't
> have a seat belt on..... the truth is that many/most people don't die by
> not wearing a seat belt, in fact only 40,000 people die in cars and they
> may be killed by actually wearing the seat belt, as easily as those NOT
> wearing one, depending on the thousands of variables.
>
> All the government and the doctors are doing is "playing the odds"  and
> using the odds as an excuse to steal my individual RIGHTS, it violates
> the constitution and my freedom.
>
> --
>
>               *Rumination*
> #3.0.1 - Liberals seem to think "the only gun owners" with any rights
> are the criminals.....

Hey, where's my freedom to ride a bicycle or a Neighborhood Electric
Vehicle? Why the big ones are favored over the little ones, which, by
the way, fall outside the "grid" that feeds the large corporations?
Where's my freedom to be off the grid?

As for tobacco, the Tobacco Free Florida grosses me out with
commercials that portray patients dying of cancer (but never the
dangers portrayed by SUVs):

http://www.tobaccofreeflorida.com/?lang=en&gclid=COqSlqrmp7cCFZJj7Aodf3kAoQ

His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

unread,
May 22, 2013, 6:46:22 PM5/22/13
to
On May 22, 1:12 pm, Wet Paper Bag <ultimate.henchman....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 22 May, 09:38, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Many people do leave their vehicles recklessly, among them the police
> > and security guards. There's a guard blocking the access to this
> > marina and he keeps the motor running, probably for his A/C.
>
> > When you think about it, they are polluting the Earth's lungs, from
> > where we breathe.
>
> hahaha... monkey... same old song and dance eh?... i think you are
> funny. the idea here is that you believe that what you do here is some
> how effective. why not rally a protest? why not be a rebel and open up
> those evil polluters cars and turn them off? please. enlighten me.
> enlighten us. why is this wise... why is this humble?
>
> Black Bugs

Well, Jesus started on foot, talking some kind of nonsense, and he
gathered 12 disciples!

I think I can count that many by now. And I'm talking serious business
here. This is the very survival of the species, and the coming of
another... the roaches.

At some point you may have to keep going alone and write the story of
the jungle. Just search YouTube for "Serengeti."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAHrkjKGY9A

How those sheep herders even compare.

His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

unread,
May 23, 2013, 5:32:24 PM5/23/13
to
On May 22, 3:14 pm, Phil W Lee <p...@lee-family.me.uk> wrote:
> "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
> <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> considered Tue, 21 May 2013 11:25:06
> >http://www.tobaccofreeflorida.com/?lang=en&gclid=COqSlqrmp7cCFZJj7Aod...
>
> It would certainly be reasonable (given the deaths and injuries they
> cause) for all motor vehicle to be made carry similar types of
> explicit imagery at point of sale (but obviously of the relevant types
> of death and injury, rather than tumours and dissected lungs).

That's what I always say.

Sadly our vehicles are our sacred cows. In reality they pollute the
Planet's lungs, the very air we all --men, women and children--
inhale. I wished they could try turning on their engine in a closed
garage and see what happens.

0 new messages