If you mean Enrique Iglesias and Julio Jose Jr. are part-Filipino because their
mother was born and raised in the Philippines - even if her parentage, physical
appearance and demeanor is full Spanish - then so be it. What is the big
problem here? I worked at Elizalde Company in Manila where Isabel's father was
a treasurer.
Not because a person was born, raised and has acquired Filipino citizenship,
he/she is full-blooded Filipino. How about tracing the Preysler family tree
and see if there is Filipino blood in them. Filipino citizens, maybe yes, but
true blooded Filipino????? I DOUBT IT!!! There are a lot of Spaniards and
Chinese in the Philippines who are Filipino citizens, claiming they are
Filipinos, but their country of origin is not the Philippines nor does it mean
that they have any Filipino blood. The same thing with Filipinos who were born
and raised in the US and acquired American citizenship. It does not mean that
they are Americans. Their country of origin is still the Philippines. That
holds true with Isabel Preysler.
>
>This was posted yesterday on Yahoo! by ejose1
>
>If you mean Enrique Iglesias and Julio Jose Jr. are part-Filipino because
>their
>mother was born and raised in the Philippines - even if her parentage,
>physical
>appearance and demeanor is full Spanish - then so be it. What is the big
>problem here? I worked at Elizalde Company in Manila where Isabel's father
>was
>a treasurer.
So who is the real Filipinos then?
>
>Not because a person was born, raised and has acquired Filipino citizenship,
>he/she is full-blooded Filipino. How about tracing the Preysler family tree
>and see if there is Filipino blood in them. Filipino citizens, maybe yes, but
>true blooded Filipino????? I DOUBT IT!!!
I understand that they have Malayan blood on the maternal side of the Preysler.
There are a lot of Spaniards and
>Chinese in the Philippines who are Filipino citizens, claiming they are
>Filipinos, but their country of origin is not the Philippines nor does it
>mean
>that they have any Filipino blood.
I think you are confused of what is a Filipino/na. Your concept of genealogy
sounds racist and real to me.
The same thing with Filipinos who were
>born
>and raised in the US and acquired American citizenship. It does not mean
>that
>they are Americans.
So again, who is the real American?
Their country of origin is still the Philippines. That
>holds true with Isabel Preysler.
>
>ejo...@yahoo.com
Ah, I know what you mean. You don't like to attach Enrique to Filipinos but to
Latinos for that is where the big market for him. Who cares Enrique, I don't
buy any of his music....asshole.
I've seen Isabel Preysler's picture and she doesn't look Spaniard (or white) to
me... Check out this website:
http://www.redkbs.com/club/personales/jiglesias/Biography.htm and see for
yourself...
>
>Not because a person was born, raised and has acquired Filipino citizenship,
>he/she is full-blooded Filipino. How about tracing the Preysler family tree
>and see if there is Filipino blood in them. Filipino citizens, maybe yes, but
>true blooded Filipino????? I DOUBT IT!!!
What is her family's country of origin then?
all this fuss about a 20th century courtesan who was an ex-mestiza de
entresuelo!!!
tulisan
Americans I understand. But to me Isabel looks like a Filipina to me,
although not like a typical one I might add. You seem to know her tree
fairly well. Can you enlighten us on exactly what her genealogy is?
I've been doing mine for a decade so I'd like to see what you have to
offer us.
Guess what!!! I don't give a !!!! Filll it in there.
Yes, they are, according to U.S. law. Filipinos, or for that matter any
nationality, born in the U.S. of parents who have a legitimate reason to
be in the U.S. at the time of birth do not have to be raised in the U.S.
to acquire American citizenship. They are natural-born Americans and
U.S. citizenship was acquired at birth.
I think you're having problems with language, but that's the way I
understood that part of your post quoted above.
> Their country of origin is still the Philippines. That
> holds true with Isabel Preysler.
Test your theory: I was born in Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A., of immigrant
Filipino parents PRIOR to their naturalization as U.S. citizens. What
is my country of origin? What is my citizenship? Who became a U.S.
citizen first: mama pig, daddy pig or their dirty sick piglet?
In a nation whose population is mostly white, it is nice to
know who is like you that made it, this is a normal reaction
among minorities. It is not identity crisis. But then again,
I have nothing against Enrique, but I don't have any of his
music, so I don't really care.
While it is true that Isabel Preysler grew up in the Philippines, she is not a
Filipina. Both her parents are pure Spanish from Spain. I forgot the first
name of her father but he was the Treasurer of Elizalde & Company whose office
was in Ayala Avenue in Makati. I used to work with Elizalde when I was still
in the Philippines and I used to meet them there. Although I am not sure
whether Isabel eventually became a Filipino citizen.
Hope this answers the question.
> Yes, they are, according to U.S. law. Filipinos, or for that matter any
> nationality, born in the U.S. of paren8ts who have a legitimate reason to
> be in the U.S. at the time of birth do not have to be raised in the U.S.
> to acquire American citizenship. They are natural-born Americans and
> U.S. citizenship was acquired at birth.
> I think you're having problems with language, but that's the way I
> understood that part of your post quoted above.
>> Their country of origin is still the Philippines. That
>> holds true with Isabel Preysler.
> Test your theory: I was born in Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A., of immigrant
> Filipino parents PRIOR to their naturalization as U.S. citizens. What
> is my country of origin? What is my citizenship? Who became a U.S.
> citizen first: mama pig, daddy pig or their dirty sick piglet?
The piglet? : )
- Dominic
p.s. Chip were you born at Lake Forest?
--
Copyright © 2000 C5GP All Rights Reserved
In Consistent Pursuit of ISO 9006 Compliance
&
<http://www.egroups.com/group/soc_culture_filipino/info.html>
Nope... I've seen Isabel Preysler's picture and she doesn't look Spaniard (or
Nope, at Illinois Masonic Hospital (inside the Chicago city limits).
That makes me a natural born windbag from the Windy City. I'm now a
naturalized Tejano that can sing Conjunto while munching on Serranos in
the shade of a Saguaro behind the Alamo.
Damn, right now I would kill for a gyro from Elston Avenue. And fried
breaded shrimp and frog legs from North and Halsted.
Tales? Enumerate those mainstream magazines and their corresponding dates.
Gene and Jodi Anotado wrote:
>
> If my racial makeup determines what i am suppose to be, I would be a
> man without a nationality.
> What is a Filipino? If you were born in the islands called the
> Philippines, you would be one.
> The original inhabitants of the phillipine islands were not the
> majority of the people living there today. So, who are you to tell
> people who they are.
I can't agree w/ that entirely. Especially w/ The Phils. We're talking
about a country where even the inhabitants where defined (Primarily of
Malay stock) who have been in the archipelago for centuries before the
Europeans even set foot there. And it's not like a slew of Europeans
went there and mixed w/ every single existing native there. And this
happened more than 300 years ago which lasted up to ???? What, late
1800's?