Jews' Extortion Never Ends
Boris Dynin
by the honest Jew, Norman Finkelstein, who is now
being criticised by all the filthy parasites living off
the HOLOHOAX payments!!
On 26 Feb 2003 03:57:33 -0000, J Roberts
<Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>http://www.rense.com/general33/zionh.htm
>
>Holocaust Industry And Zionism
>The Holocaust Shakedown
>
>Imagine that a robber walks into a bank, points a pistol at a teller,
>hands her a bag, and demands that she put all the money from her cash
>drawer in it. At first she protests, but then, after he threatens to
>shoot, she fills the robber's bag with cash. And then imagine that, as
>the robber walks out of the bank with his bag of loot, the bank guard
>opens the door for him, smiles at him, offers to hail a cab for him,
>and tells him to come again soon. After that it's not difficult to
>imagine that he probably will.
>
>That's about the way it's been with the Zionists recently. Two years
>ago they put a gun to the head of the Swiss people collectively and
>demanded billions of dollars in reparations for Swiss bank accounts
>they claimed had been owned by Zionists who disappeared during the
>Second World War. The Swiss initially protested that unclaimed Zionist
>bank accounts from the 1930s and 1940s amounted at most to a few
>million dollars, not to billions, and besides the war ended more than
>50 years ago and claims should have been filed long ago. The Zionists
>threatened to shoot, figuratively speaking, by having their bought
>politicians in the United States prevent Swiss banks from doing
>business in America. Eventually they walked away with $1.25 billion in
>loot, with the Swiss apologizing for not having coughed it up sooner.
>
>After that sort of success with the Swiss one could hardly expect the
>Zionists to give up extortion and go straight. So anyway, they were
>back again soon, with demands against the Volkswagen Company for
>having used Zionist workers during the Second World War and providing
>them only with room and board but not paying them union-scale wages.
>
>One might think that these Zionist workers would be grateful to
>Volkswagen for keeping them alive during the war, feeding them, and
>giving them a roof over their heads, when so many German civilians had
>only bombed-out ruins to live in. Well, if you thought that, you just
>don't understand Zionists. The Zionists told the Volkswagen Company
>that if it ever wanted to sell any more cars in America, it had better
>cough up -- soon. And the bought politicians and the media bosses in
>America began rattling their sabers and talking loudly about sanctions
>of various sorts against Volkswagen.
>
>And so, like the Swiss banks, Volkswagen coughed up the money.
>
>Then the feeding frenzy started, just as I told you it would two years
>ago, when I predicted that after the Zionists had cleaned out the
>Swiss they would go after other victims in a long list. Volkswagen
>wasn't the only company which had used involuntary labor during the
>war. The Zionists went after Daimler-Benz and BMW and Siemens.
>
>And Switzerland wasn't the only country where Zionists could claim
>that Uncle Abe had stashed some of his loot sixty years ago, before
>the war. So they sued banks in France and in Britain and began moaning
>and whining in the media that the banks were being "insensitive" to
>poor, deserving "Holocaust survivors," who suddenly had remembered
>Uncle Abe's millions and needed it -- now. And then they remembered
>the insurance companies in Italy and Switzerland and Britain and
>elsewhere from whom they could claim that Uncle Abe once had had a
>life-insurance policy. Then they remembered that the Swedes owed them
>gold, and the Danes and the Norwegians. Even the Poles, whom the
>Zionists had ruled as Bolshevik commissars for nearly 50 years after
>the war, owed them, they claimed.
>
>The racket has worked the same in every case: pay us, or we will have
>our bought Gentile politicians pass laws making it impossible for you
>to continue doing business, and our people in the media will paint you
>as monsters who want to hang onto the profit you made when poor Uncle
>Abe and Aunt Sara were crammed into gas chambers, and then the
>gullible Gentile lemmings won't buy your products. If you give us any
>trouble or resist our demands we'll make an example of you, the way we
>did with the Swiss banks. Just pay us the few hundred million dollars
>we're demanding now, and we'll leave you alone. Otherwise, it'll end
>up costing you a lot more.
>
>And it has worked every time. Not one banker or businessman has stood
>up to them and flatly refused to pay. Not one president or prime
>minister has said to them, "All right, Zionist boys! You try a boycott
>against my country, and we'll organize a boycott against Israel. We'll
>round up all the Zionists in our country and send them packing." Not
>one has called the Zionists' bluff. They've all calculated that it is
>cheaper to pay the gangsters than to fight them, and so they pay.
>Honor means nothing to these businessmen and politicians. Principles
>mean nothing to them. All they care about is continuing to make money,
>continuing to stay in office.
>
>With this sort of attitude predominant among the Gentiles, one can
>hardly blame the Zionists for turning to extortion on a larger scale
>than ever before. They are successful at it; therefore they continue
>to do it. And they don't limit themselves to Europe or to those who
>allegedly cooperated with the Germans in their demand for reparations.
>A few months ago they filed a claim against Britain for $600 million
>they claim the British government confiscated from Zionists between
>1940 and 1942 when the British governed Palestine. Remember, the
>Zionists were waging a guerrilla war against the British prior to
>1948, when the British finally gave up and pulled out, letting the
>Zionists slaughter the Palestinians and establish the Zionist state of
>Israel on Palestinian land. The Zionists were kidnapping and murdering
>British soldiers in Palestine and assassinating diplomats. In 1946 the
>Zionists used a terrorist bomb to blow up the King David Hotel in
>Jerusalem, which was the British government headquarters. This Zionist
>forerunner of the Oklahoma City bombing killed a large number of
>British civilians and military people. And now the Zionists are
>demanding $600 million in reparations from the British!
>
>And of course, the Zionists also are expecting payoffs from American
>companies. Both Ford and General Motors had subsidiaries working in
>Germany when the Second World War began. The Ford plant in Germany
>made military vehicles for the Germans throughout the war, and the
>General Motors subsidiary, Opel, did the same. And so now the Zionists
>are claiming that both Ford and General Motors owe them a great deal
>of money because of that. The Zionists already have filed a class-
>action suit against Ford in a Federal court in New Jersey, seeking
>hundreds of millions of dollars in wages plus interest for Zionists
>who worked in Ford's German plant during the war. And because the
>businessmen who run Ford and General Motors today are the same sort as
>those who run the Volkswagen Company, they undoubtedly will pay off
>the Zionists rather than risk having the media portray them as
>"insensitive" types who profited from the so-called "Holocaust" and
>now refuse to share their loot with the poor, deserving Zionist
>"survivors."
>
>Two hundred years ago the American motto was, "Millions for defense,
>but not one cent for tribute." But in those days Americans were made
>of sterner stuff -- and I assume that our people in Europe were, too.
>
>Cash isn't the only thing the Zionists are going after. They have
>decided that a substantial portion of the art treasures of Europe
>really belonged to Uncle Abe too 60 years ago and ought to be returned
>to the Zionists now. It is true, of course, that during the war the
>German government had a keen interest in bringing as much Germanic art
>as possible back under German protection. They bought all the Vermeers
>and Rembrandts and Holbeins and Dürers and Halses and other Germanic
>art works as they could from owners in the conquered countries and
>brought them back to Germany. And when the works the Germans were
>interested in were in the hands of Zionists, they often brought
>pressure to bear and obtained the works at low prices. The Germans,
>however, generally weren't interested in modern art -- certainly not
>in Zionist paintings by Chagall or Modigliani, for example -- and a
>great many such modern paintings ended up in the hands of Zionist art
>dealers. In fact, the Germans often had agreements with Zionist art
>dealers, swapping the modern paintings they weren't interested in for
>the Germanic paintings they were interested in.
>
>The biggest of these Zionist dealers, Georges Wildenstein, was in
>Paris, and he acquired an enormous number of modern paintings during
>the war. After the war he brought them to New York and later sold
>hundreds of them to museums and private collectors around the world.
>The Zionists currently are engaged in a huge treasure hunt for those
>paintings now in Gentile hands which formerly belonged to Zionists.
>The facts that most of these paintings were acquired by their present
>owners from Zionist dealers such as the Wildensteins and that many of
>them were legally purchased from their Zionist owners during the war
>are glossed over. All of these paintings are characterized by the
>Zionists as "art stolen from victims of the Holocaust by the Nazis,"
>and they want it all back now.
>
>There's an interesting double standard here. A messy divorce in the
>Wildenstein family attracted public attention last year to the Zionist
>family's business dealings in Paris during the war, and another
>Zionist family claimed that the Wildensteins have artworks that
>actually should be returned to them, because they were forced to sell
>them at fire-sale prices during the war. The Wildensteins told them to
>buzz off: the statute of limitations for such claims expired long ago,
>the Wildensteins asserted. Of course, no Gentile owner dares make such
>an assertion. But in fact, there are statutes of limitations for most
>claims. Dormant bank accounts typically become the property of the
>government after being unclaimed for 20 years or so, but when the
>Swiss brought up that legality two years ago, the Zionists went into
>their "persecuted victim" act, feigning outrage that the Swiss should
>try to let a mere law stand between the Zionists and what they were
>claiming in reparations.
>
>Whenever the Zionists, in order to remind the world for the six-
>millionth time of their "victim" status, have accused some elderly
>German or Pole or Ukrainian or Lithuanian of having mistreated
>Zionists 55 years ago during the war, there is no question of a
>statute of limitations. If anyone mentions that legality, Zionist
>shrieking in all of their media quickly drowns him out. For an injury,
>real or imaginary, done to a Zionist by a Gentile there is no statute
>of limitations, no matter how much time has passed. The Zionists still
>celebrate every year in their Purim festival the revenge their
>ancestors took on the ancient Persians 2,500 years ago through their
>control of a corrupt king.
>
>Yet when the Polish government asked the government of Israel a few
>months ago to extradite a Zionist mass murderer, Solomon Morel, so
>that he could be tried in Poland for genocide, the Zionists refused.
>"There's a statute of limitations for extradition," the Israelis told
>the Poles, "and you're too late." Morel was the Zionist-communist
>commissar of a concentration camp in Poland after the war, and he had
>tortured hundreds of Poles and Germans to death. When he saw the
>possibility of retribution looming, Morel, like thousands of other
>Zionist criminals before him, fled to Israel. The horrifying
>atrocities committed by Solomon Morel have been described in the 1993
>book An Eye for an Eye by John Sack.
>
>This same double standard applies to every sort of interaction between
>Zionists and non-Zionists. It is a fact that in wars people suffer
>losses. Usually, within a few years after the wars are over, people
>try to get on with their lives, and they consider what is past to be
>past. If other people behaved the way the Zionists behave, then every
>Englishman whose family residence got hit by a bomb during the "blitz"
>of the Second World War would be clamoring now for the German
>government to reimburse him for the repairs that his grandparents had
>to make 55 years ago -- plus interest, of course.
>
>And if it's all right to go back 55 years for claims, why not go back
>135 years and let all of the Americans whose ancestors' homes and
>farms in Georgia were burned by General Sherman collect damages from
>the U.S. government now -- plus interest, of course? Or why not go
>back 220 years and demand that Tony Blair's government pay reparations
>to all of those Americans whose ancestors suffered property loss from
>the Redcoats during the First American Revolution -- plus interest, of
>course? I mean, if the Zionists are allowed to keep score, without
>regard for time, why shouldn't everyone else? Why not set up some sort
>of World Court for Reparations? I imagine that there are a lot of
>Palestinians who would like to file claims against the state of
>Israel.
>
>The fact is that we would have international chaos if everybody
>behaved the way the Zionists do. So this raises two interesting
>questions: Why do the Zionists behave the way they do? And why do we
>let them get away with it? Well, I've already given an answer of a
>sort to the first question: the Zionists behave the way they do
>because we let them behave that way; it's just like the case of the
>bank robber, who will keep coming back until the bank guard stops
>being nice and shoots the robber. But there's really more to it than
>that. No one else is even inclined to make the sort of demands on the
>rest of the world that the Zionists do.
>
>The Zionists really are different. Their religion provides a few clues
>in this regard. It is a religion which tells them that all the
>property of the Gentiles really should belong to Zionists, that the
>Zionists are entitled to it. It's as blatant as anywhere in the 60th
>chapter of the book attributed to their prophet Isaiah, where they are
>told to keep their gates open all the time, so that all the wealth of
>the Gentiles can be brought to them. "Thou shalt suck the milk of the
>Gentiles," the Zionists are told. And if you think that doesn't really
>mean what it sounds like it means, you should look into the Talmud,
>where the Zionist sages, the Zionist interpreters of the Bible,
>explain to the rest of the Zionists what it means. The Talmud tells
>the Zionists that only Zionists are human beings, that the Gentiles
>are just animals created by the Zionist tribal god Yahweh to be used
>by the Zionists, like other animals are used. Because Gentiles are
>merely animals, they can't really own anything, and it is the duty of
>the Zionists to make sure they don't.
>
>Now all of this Biblical stuff and Talmudic stuff is very old and
>quaint and might seem irrelevant to a lawsuit against the Ford Motor
>Company by the Zionists today. But this old and quaint stuff is the
>basis of the Zionists' religion today. The religious Zionists really
>believe it. And the non-religious Zionists, the atheist Zionists,
>behave as if they believe it. And I think that in a certain sense they
>do. I think this belief is in their blood. I think that this is what
>accounts for their almost incredible arrogance in their dealings with
>non-Zionists.
>
>And of course, there's not just belief: there's also calculation. They
>understand that the success of their current effort to swindle the
>rest of the world out of every cent they can depends on three factors:
>it depends on their control of the mass media; it depends on the
>unprecedented degree of political corruption which exists almost
>everywhere in the Western world, on the unprecedented degree of
>democracy; and it depends on the confused and demoralized state of
>Gentiles everywhere.
>
>There never before has been a time when the Zionists have wielded as
>much open power as they do today. No previous government in the United
>States has had as many Zionists in positions of power as the present
>Clinton government. And that's pretty much the way it is everywhere in
>Europe too. The Zionists around Clinton are mirrored by high-ranking
>Zionists around Tony Blair in Britain. In Russia, the Zionists not
>only hold most of the key posts around the alcoholic and ailing Boris
>Yeltsin, they have one of their own as prime minister. And nearly
>everywhere except in the United States the Zionists have succeeded in
>having laws passed making it illegal for a patriot to tell his
>countrymen what the Zionists are up to. In Britain, in France, and in
>Germany hundreds of patriots are rotting in prisons today because they
>dared to speak the truth about the Zionists. In Switzerland the
>Zionists succeeded in having similar laws passed before they began
>extorting money from the Swiss. Only in Russia today are any
>significant number of patriots speaking out against the Zionists and
>daring the government to try to silence them.
>
>And I suppose it seems reasonable to the Zionists that when they have
>so much power they should use it to their advantage. They should go
>for everything they can get. The opportunity may pass. And they are
>going for it, everywhere and in every way. It's interesting to note
>that this display of unbridled greed and arrogance has made even some
>of their fellow Zionists a little nervous. Charles Krauthammer, a
>Zionist writer for the Washington Post, the second most powerful
>Zionist newspaper in the United States, wrote a column last month
>which begins with the words, "The pursuit of billions in Holocaust
>guilt money has gone from the unseemly to the disgraceful."
>Krauthammer refers to the whole racket as a "Holocaust shakedown."
>It's not that Krauthammer doesn't think the Zionists should have all
>the money they can get from the Gentiles. It's just that he's appalled
>by the reckless display of naked, unprincipled greed as more and more
>Zionist shysters -- that's what Krauthammer calls them -- trample each
>other in their current feeding frenzy. What if the Gentiles notice?
>What will the Gentiles think?
>
>Now, the unfortunate fact is that no non-Zionist writer for a major
>newspaper would dare to write what Krauthammer wrote -- not even in
>the United States, where it's still legal to write such things.
>They're all afraid. For two generations the Zionist media have
>conditioned them by instantly and loudly accusing anyone who opens his
>mouth of being a "racist" or a "hater" or an "anti-Semite." They've
>been conditioned to run for cover whenever they hear one of those
>accusations. And that is the answer to our second question, why do we
>let them get away with it?
>
>Their media control keeps the couch potatoes confused and unaware; the
>corrupt politicians who have come to characterize our democracy are
>always ready to front for them and betray the people whose interests
>they are supposed to be representing; and those among us who are
>perceptive enough and independent-minded enough to understand what is
>happening are nearly all too cowardly to speak out. So it is easy
>enough for me to predict that the Zionists will keep coming back for
>more -- and more -- and more -- until they either have it all, as in
>Russia today, or what Charles Krauthammer is concerned about happens,
>and the Gentiles notice. But really, the former outcome is much more
>likely.