Of course none of the things mentioned above have
anything to do with the breakup of the Czecho-Slovak
state in 1993. The reasons for the breakup were strictly
economic. Slovakia benefited greatly during 40 years
of common communist political rule for reasons that
are basically the same as those that are now causing
capitalism and free market take a back seat in the go-
vernment-led effort to pull the U.S. (and the world)
economies from the brink of a 30's-style economic dis-
aster. During the 40 years of centrally-planned socialist
economy Slovakia received disproportionate amounts
of resources and investments relative to the size of
its contribution to the overall economy These decisions
were made for purely ideological reasons set in the
same ideas which underlie many of Barack Obama's
current economic measures, ideas which spring from
the Marxist concept of "economic justice". In real world
economic justice can only be provided by the govern-
ment taking control of allocating economic resources
away from the free market. The so-called economic
justice can only be achieved when resources are div-
vied up on basis of need, rather than productivity.
After WW2 Slovakia was a backward, impoverished
region, which would have taken many decades to de-
velop economically on its own - time the communist
ideologues, the people in charge of building a socialist
utopia, a Soviet-style Five Year Plan at a time, simply
did not have. So much for an introduction to economic
philosophy ;-) After 1993 this economic inequity could
not, of course, continue, and Slovakia had to assume
most of the internal, and external debt for its commu-
nist-era monetary infusions, which would have plunged
it into guaranteed economic misery. Under the presum-
ption Slovaks would be in better economic position
under their own monetary control, a deal was struck
between two post-communist leaders (Meciar and
Klaus) to dissolve the union of Czechs and Slovaks
completely, including the heretofore common econo-
mic and monetary system. As a result Slovaks ended
up with a substantial debt to the Czech treasury, which
was the cause of a lackluster economic growth for more
than a decade following the breakup.
The reason Slovakia benefited economically from
40 years of centrally planned economy
Lot of this is nonsense just warmed up a bit. Comparing the current
economic situation in the US with the breakup of a tiny central European
country some 20 years is pure bullshit. There are no comparisons here,
none, zilch, zero. But if you really want to use the phrase "economic
justice" which has nothing to do with the price of fish, yes I guess a
forced comparison is the way to go.
Lame! As is the original post which had no focus either. And nothing to
say. Oh God, don't you recognize crap when you see it?
K
K
¿Que pasa, Carlito? Mucho tiempo sin escuchar. ¿Cómo
estás? Espero mui bien ;-) Anyhoo, where am I comparing
the *breakup* of Czecho-Slovakia (or whatever else it called
itself at the end) with the current economic situation? As usual,
no counter arguments. Only opinions. The content of the ori-
ginal post is irrelevant. Only the writer's befuddlement over the
cause of the breakup. Would you care to contribute something
material on this point? But of course not. As usual ;-)
> �Que pasa, Carlito? Mucho tiempo sin escuchar. �C�mo
> est�s? Espero mui bien ;-) Anyhoo, where am I comparing
> the *breakup* of Czecho-Slovakia (or whatever else it called
> itself at the end) with the current economic situation? As usual,
> no counter arguments. Only opinions. The content of the ori-
> ginal post is irrelevant. Only the writer's befuddlement over the
> cause of the breakup. Would you care to contribute something
> material on this point? But of course not. As usual ;-)
It's like GIGO (Garbage In - Garbage Out) There's not much to get
material about. Anyway, thanks for asking. Feeling good, washing with
Zest, bowel movement regular, erectile dysfunction in remission. Is that
too much information? Maybe...Life is good, but no stimulus cash for me
yet. I just never qualify for any handouts...So personal stimulus has to
come from other sources - but that would be telling.
K
I wouldn't count on any "stimulus cash" :-)
Medicare won't even pay for hearing aid.
Seriously.
>
> I wouldn't count on any "stimulus cash" :-)
> Medicare won't even pay for hearing aid.
> Seriously.
>
>
Hey - someone in the Fed sent me two hundred and fifty
bucks late last month.
I thought everybody who filed a tax return was supposed to
get a kick back.
D
Not this time. Giving back taxes to those who pay them to stimu-
late the economy is not in vogue any more. Your 250 bucks was
Obama's Social Security stimulus handout. In lieu of your annual
raise. Looks like you've been had too :-)
Nothing new.
We all recognize the sensation.
> Of course none of the things mentioned above have
> anything to do with the breakup of the Czecho-Slovak
> state in 1993. The reasons for the breakup were strictly
> economic.
Neni to paradoxni, ze tento ekonomismus je tim samym, na cem selhaval onen
opovrhovany marxismus... ?
-pk-