NDH borders, Stevan Moljevic - Homogena Srbija.
Dubravko Kakarigi
borders. Any progress?
Also, any brave, intelligent Serbs (from Serbia/Yugoslavia) to refute
"Homogena Srbija??" See, if you do not refute it we could assume that you
accept this ideology.
---dubravko
Damir Matanic
Listen, I've lectured about Croatian history countless times on the net
for the past year or 2, and I'm not about to repeat it just for you. If you're
Cro, then pick up a history book that has not been written by Jugoslavs,
communists, or Serbs, and educate yourself. That's exactly what I've done
for the past 5 years. They're alot of anti-Croat, pro-Chetnik, pro-Jugoslav
propaganda bullshit out there, which apparently you've picked up pretty well
(i.e. not knowing where our historic borders our). Start reading Croatian
history, written by fellow Croats for a change.
damir
--
e-mail: da...@genesis.mcs.com (or) akcs....@vpnet.chi.il.us
******************************************************
* ! Za Dom Spremni ! *
******************************************************
Milan Stojanovic
There is nothing to refute. Interesting historical
document, no more. It was not accepted on Ba congress,
January 1944, where Moljevic fraction lost to Topalovic&
company. Simple as that. BTW, whole Moljevic family
was killed by friendly Muslims in Banja Luka.
Best Regards,
Milan N. Stojanovic
Dubravko Kakarigi
>In article <CCyGs...@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> dubr...@nu.cs.fsu.edu writes:
>>I am still curiously awaiting Damir's reasoning behind the "whole Croatia"
>>borders. Any progress?
...
>
>Listen, I've lectured about Croatian history countless times on the net
>for the past year or 2, and I'm not about to repeat it just for you. If you're
>Cro, then pick up a history book that has not been written by Jugoslavs,
>communists, or Serbs, and educate yourself. That's exactly what I've done
>for the past 5 years. They're alot of anti-Croat, pro-Chetnik, pro-Jugoslav
>propaganda bullshit out there, which apparently you've picked up pretty well
>(i.e. not knowing where our historic borders our). Start reading Croatian
>history, written by fellow Croats for a change.
>
>damir
>
>--
>e-mail: da...@genesis.mcs.com (or) akcs....@vpnet.chi.il.us
> ******************************************************
> * ! Za Dom Spremni ! *
> ******************************************************
I do not mean to dominate with this subject but am honestly curious. For
example, how would you characterise Dr. Ivo Banac's "The National Question
in Yugoslavia: Origins, History, Politics?" From this work, I could not
detect that the historical borders of Croatia are on Drina river. Would you
consider Dr. Banac to be "anti-Croat, pro-Chetnik, pro-Jugoslav" and should
therefore not be trusted?
Again, what is the general argument? Is it the historical political
borders, is it that majority of population between Drina, Sava, and Una are
Croats, or what is it that you base your conclusion about "whole Croatia" on?
If your argument is valid you might convert me, you never know :-)
Nikolas S. Jovanovic
>In article <26grsb$6...@genesis.MCS.COM> da...@genesis.MCS.COM (Damir Matanic) writes:
>>for the past 5 years. They're alot of anti-Croat, pro-Chetnik, pro-Jugoslav
>>propaganda bullshit out there, which apparently you've picked up pretty well
>>(i.e. not knowing where our historic borders our). Start reading Croatian
>>history, written by fellow Croats for a change.
>I do not mean to dominate with this subject but am honestly curious. For
>example, how would you characterise Dr. Ivo Banac's "The National Question
>in Yugoslavia: Origins, History, Politics?" From this work, I could not
>detect that the historical borders of Croatia are on Drina river. Would you
>consider Dr. Banac to be "anti-Croat, pro-Chetnik, pro-Jugoslav" and should
>therefore not be trusted?
Professor Banac is here at Yale and I have had the pleasure of meeting
him on several occasions at various campus lectures, discussions, etc.
We have talked several times and I have read several of his works. I
can report with certainty that Professor Banac is not "anti-Croat,
pro-Chetnik, or pro-Jugoslav." It is, however, to be noted that
Professor Banac does not favor the current Tudjman regime in Zagreb.
This seems due, primarily, to the lack of intellectual freedom in
Tudjman's Croatia.
-Nick
Davorin Dujmovic
>damir
Listen TambUUra, what exactly you are teaching, about great battle
of Jasenovac of your hero Pavelic.
You somehow got idea that the noise of that banditism you represent
is gonna make decent Croats scared to the point that they are going
to listen your lecture. You better join Vitaca couse there is nobody
else here to enroll your course "101 fascism". For that you have
to find bigger idiot than you are and that is going to be impossible
unless you try with Vitaca and "concepts".
For a change notice that there are people here whose Croatia is not
your Endehazia, but if you are up to prove your heroism why don't
you fight for that old Croatian town Novi Pazar from your map.
Too many decent young guys died for our freedom in this war for me
to listen your idiotic computer banditism here. So far you proved
yourself ready only for nonsense.
Milan Stojanovic
I heard his lecture once, and could hardly define it
as pleasure:). I do not think that his real interest
is intelectual freedom in Croatia. More likely, he
thinks that Tudjman failed in keeping Serbia within
pre-1912 borders, as it was planned through strong
international pressure.
>-Nick
>
Milan
Davorin Dujmovic
> document, no more. It was not accepted on Ba congress,
> January 1944, where Moljevic fraction lost to Topalovic&
> company. Simple as that. BTW, whole Moljevic family
> was killed by friendly Muslims in Banja Luka.
One more for your crap collection, it will help you to increase
"friendship" with Muslims. Send some overseas in that bottle you
used last time.
Davorin Dujmovic
Perhaps it can help you in your autosodomy analisys.