Did coronavirus originate in Chinese government laboratory? Scientists believe killer disease may have begun in research facility 300 yards from Wuhan wet fish market

[Jade Helm]

Of course, this is what the sites that were ridiculed by "Mighty
Wannabe" and banned from Facebook and Twitter and deplatformed and
demonetized had been saying from the get go.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8009669/Did-coronavirus-originate-Chinese-government-laboratory.html

Beijing-sponsored South China University of Technology concludes that
'the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan'
It points to research on bats and respiratory diseases carried by the
animals at the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and the Wuhan Institute
of Virology
WCDC is just 300 yards from the seafood market and is adjacent to the
hospital
--
"Whoever said the the pen is mightier than the sword never met a man
with an automatic weapon." General Douglas MacArthur.


www.globalgulag.us

http://globalgulag.us/globalgulag/index.html

[pONN3⚛← ╬ 𝑴𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕𝒚 𝑾𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒂𝒃𝒆 ╬ →⚛DCRJz]

Jade Helm wrote on 2/16/2020 6:00 PM:

Of course, this is what the sites that were ridiculed by "Mighty Wannabe" and banned from Facebook and Twitter and deplatformed and demonetized had been saying from the get go.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8009669/Did-coronavirus-originate-Chinese-government-laboratory.html

Beijing-sponsored South China University of Technology concludes that 'the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan'
It points to research on bats and respiratory diseases carried by the animals at  the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and the Wuhan Institute of Virology
WCDC is just 300 yards from the seafood market and is adjacent to the hospital

It's all conjecture, wishful thinking, dramatization, exaggeration and speculation.

These "journalists" cannot be trusted in this field. They will write anything, even nonsense, because they are paid by the number of words in an article.

[fLJRs⚛← ╬ 𝑴𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕𝒚 𝑾𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒂𝒃𝒆 ╬ →⚛kz2Sn]

Winston_Smith wrote on 2/16/2020 6:29 PM:

> On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 16:00:09 -0700, Jade Helm wrote:
>
>> Of course, this is what the sites that were ridiculed by "Mighty
>> Wannabe" and banned from Facebook and Twitter and deplatformed and
>> demonetized had been saying from the get go.
>>
>> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8009669/Did-coronavirus-originate-Chinese-government-laboratory.html
>> Beijing-sponsored South China University of Technology concludes that
>> 'the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan'
>> It points to research on bats and respiratory diseases carried by the
>> animals at the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and the Wuhan Institute
>> of Virology
>> WCDC is just 300 yards from the seafood market and is adjacent to the
>> hospital

> Meaning someone from the lab had lunch at the market or picked up
> something to take home for supper and passed the virus on to the
> workers there.
>
>
> Speaking of "Mighty Wannabe" unapproved sources. Yet another
> "exercise" that exactly presages the real event. How many so far?


If you keep saying shit, ultimately someday by luck you will be close to
be correct.


> http://themostimportantnews.com/archives/a-high-level-pandemic-exercise-conducted-3-months-ago-showed-that-a-coronavirus-pandemic-could-kill-65-million-people
> "A 'High-Level Pandemic Exercise' Conducted 3 Months Ago Showed That A
> Coronavirus Pandemic Could Kill 65 Million People
>
> "Just over three months ago, a "high-level pandemic exercise" entitled
> "Event 201" was held in New York City. On October 18th the Johns
> Hopkins Center for Health Security, in conjunction with the World
> Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, brought
> together "15 leaders of business, government, and public health" to
> simulate a scenario in which a coronavirus pandemic was ravaging the
> planet.
>
> "The current coronavirus outbreak that originated in China did not
> begin until December, and so at that time it was supposedly just a
> hypothetical exercise.
> ...
> "I find it quite interesting that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
> was involved, because they are also financial backers of the institute
> that was granted a U.S. patent for "an attenuated coronavirus" in
> November 2018."
> ...
>
>

[Jade Helm]

"Beijing-sponsored South China University of Technology" is not == to
"these 'journalists'".

[MnflE⚛← ╬ 𝑴𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕𝒚 𝑾𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒂𝒃𝒆 ╬ →⚛PsLr9]

Jade Helm wrote on 2/16/2020 7:31 PM:

On 2/16/20 4:20 PM, pONN3⚛← ╬ 𝑴𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕𝒚 𝑾𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒂𝒃𝒆 ╬ →⚛DCRJz wrote:

Jade Helm wrote on 2/16/2020 6:00 PM:

Of course, this is what the sites that were ridiculed by "Mighty Wannabe" and banned from Facebook and Twitter and deplatformed and demonetized had been saying from the get go.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8009669/Did-coronavirus-originate-Chinese-government-laboratory.html

Beijing-sponsored South China University of Technology concludes that 'the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan'
It points to research on bats and respiratory diseases carried by the animals at  the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and the Wuhan Institute of Virology
WCDC is just 300 yards from the seafood market and is adjacent to the hospital

It's all conjecture, wishful thinking, dramatization, exaggeration and speculation.

These "journalists" cannot be trusted in this field. They will write anything, even nonsense, because they are paid by the number of words in an article.

"Beijing-sponsored South China University of Technology" is not == to "these 'journalists'".

This "journalist" could have repeated a bullshit from another "jouralist".

I put "South China University of Technology" into the Google search engine:

https://www.google.com/search?q=South+China+University+of+Technology

I get 3 hits reporting similar event. One hit is this Daily Mail,  another hit is "The Inquisitr", another hit is "Geelong Advertiser".

I checked out "The Inquistr". It is almost as trust-worthy as "National Enquirer".

I checked out "Geelong Advertiser". It looks descent.

I believe both "Daily Mail" and "Geelong Advertiser" were relaying the fakenews created by "The Inquistr".