Mighty Morphing Obama
ltlee1
"How long does it take a mild-mannered, anti-war, black professor of
constitutional law, trained as a community organiser on the South Side
of Chicago, to become an enthusiastic sponsor of targeted
assassinations, 'decapitation' strategies and remote-control bombing
of mud houses at the far end of the globe?
There's nothing surprising here. As far back as President Woodrow
Wilson, in the early 20th century, American liberalism has been swift
to flex its imperial muscle and whistle up the Marines. High-explosive
has always been in the hormone shot.
The nearest parallel to Obama in eager deference to the bloodthirsty
counsels of his counter-insurgency advisors is John F. Kennedy. It is
not surprising that bright young presidents relish quick-fix, 'outside
the box' scenarios for victory. "
Yes, democracy works. It is like Cheney is having a thrid term.
rst9...@yahoo.com
So far, I think he has done a wonderful job as president.
On May 21, 6:16 am, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/47696,opinion,barack-obama-from-anti-wa...
ltlee1
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Watching-Obama-Morph-Into-by-Paul-Craig-Roberts-090520-663.html
-------------------------
by Paul Craig Roberts, May 21, 2009
America has lost her soul, and so has her president.
A despairing country elected a president who promised change.
Americans arrived from every state to witness in bitter cold Obama’s
swearing-in ceremony. The mall was packed in a way that it has never
been for any other president.
The people’s good will toward Obama and the expectations they had for
him were sufficient for Obama to end the gratuitous wars and enact
major reforms. But Obama has deserted the people for the interests. He
is relying on his non-threatening demeanor and rhetoric to convince
the people that change is underway.
The change that we are witnessing is in Obama, not in policies. Obama
is morphing into Dick Cheney.
Obama has not been in office four months and already a book could be
written about his broken promises.
Obama said he would close the torture prison, Guantanamo, and abolish
the kangaroo courts known as military tribunals. But now he says he is
going to reform the tribunals and continue the process, but without
confessions obtained with torture. Getting behind Obama’s validation
of the Bush/Cheney policy, House Democrats pulled the budget funding
that was to be used for closing Guantanamo.
The policy of kidnapping people (usually on the basis of
disinformation supplied by their enemies) and whisking them off to
Third World prisons to be interrogated is to be continued. Again,
Obama has substituted a "reform" for his promise to abolish an illegal
policy. Rendition, Obama says, has also been reformed and will no
longer involve torture. How would anyone know? Is Obama going to
assign a U.S. government agent to watch over the treatment given to
disappeared people by Third World thugs? Given the proclivity of
American police to brutalize U.S. citizens, nothing can save the
victims of rendition from torture.
Obama has defended the Bush/Cheney warrantless wiretapping program run
by the National Security Agency and broadened the government’s legal
argument that "sovereign immunity" protects government officials from
prosecution and civil suits when they violate U.S. law and
constitutional protections of citizens. Obama’s Justice Department has
taken up the defense of Donald Rumsfeld against a case brought by
detainees whose rights Rumsfeld violated.
In a signing statement this month, Obama abandoned his promise to
protect whistleblowers who give information of executive branch
illegality to Congress.
Obama is making even more expansive claims of executive power than
Bush. As Bruce Fein puts it: "In principle, President Obama is
maintaining that victims of constitutional wrongdoing by the U.S.
government should be denied a remedy in order to prevent the American
people and the world at large from learning of the lawlessness
perpetrated in the name of national security and exacting political
and legal accountability."
Obama, in other words, is committed to covering up the Bush regime’s
crimes and to ensuring that his own regime can continue to operate in
the same illegal and unconstitutional ways.
Obama is fighting the release of the latest batch of horrific torture
photos that have come to light. Obama claims that release of the
photos would anger insurgents and cause them to kill our troops. That,
of course, is nonsense. Those resisting occupation of their land by
U.S. troops and NATO mercenaries are already dedicated to killing our
troops, and they know that Americans torture whomever they capture.
Obama is fighting the release of the photos because he knows the
barbaric image that the photos present of the U.S. military will
undermine the public’s support for the wars that enrich the military/
security complex, appease the Israel Lobby, and repay the campaign
contributions that elect the U.S. government.
As for bringing the troops home from Iraq, this promise, too, has been
reformed. To the consternation of his supporters, Obama is leaving
50,000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq. The others are being sent to Afghanistan
and to Pakistan, where on Obama’s watch war has broken out big time
with already one million refugees from the indiscriminate bombing of
civilians.
Meanwhile, war with Iran remains a possibility, and at Washington’s
insistence, NATO is conducting war games on former Soviet territory,
thus laying the groundwork for future enrichment of the U.S. military/
security complex. The steeply rising U.S. unemployment rate will
provide the needed troops for Obama’s expanding wars.
Obama can give a great speech without mangling the language. He can
smile and make people believe his rhetoric. The world, or much of it,
seems to be content with the soft words that now drape Dick Cheney’s
policies in pursuit of executive supremacy and U.S. hegemony.
---------------------------
On May 21, 9:16 am, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/47696,opinion,barack-obama-from-anti-wa...
>
rst9...@yahoo.com
should be.
On May 21, 10:31 am, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "America has lost her soul, and so has her president."
>
> http://www.opednews.com/articles/Watching-Obama-Morph-Into-by-Paul-Cr...
> > Yes, democracy works. It is like Cheney is having a thrid term.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
wakal...@yahoo.com.sg
> http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/47696,opinion,barack-obama-from-anti-wa...
>
> constitutional law, trained as a community organiser on the South Side
> of Chicago, to become an enthusiastic sponsor of targeted
> assassinations, 'decapitation' strategies and remote-control bombing
> of mud houses at the far end of the globe?
>
> There's nothing surprising here. As far back as President Woodrow
> Wilson, in the early 20th century, American liberalism has been swift
> to flex its imperial muscle and whistle up the Marines. High-explosive
> has always been in the hormone shot.
>
> The nearest parallel to Obama in eager deference to the bloodthirsty
> counsels of his counter-insurgency advisors is John F. Kennedy. It is
> not surprising that bright young presidents relish quick-fix, 'outside
> the box' scenarios for victory. "
>
> Yes, democracy works. It is like Cheney is having a thrid term.
But Cheney is not a closet Muslim, which you claim or imply Obama is.
Wakalukong
ltlee1
May be you misunderstand some of my previous posts. I had read two of
his
books and three by his distractors. I am sure that he does not see
himself as
any kind of muslim and he does not practice muslim. I am intrigued by
his
refusal to disclose his birth certificate. To be sure, some of the
accusations
against him are just nonsense. Nevertheless, his making his birth
certificate
some kind of state secret is also a fact.
>
> Wakalukong- Hide quoted text -
rst9...@yahoo.com
This is the United States of America. In the United States, Obama
doesn't have to proof anything, you must proof that he is born outside
the United States.
Obama doesn't need to show his birth certificate. Now, LT Lee, prove
that he was born outside the U.S.
wakal...@yahoo.com.sg
-----------
It was not a state secret; candidate Obama could not have controlled
the state. In any case, equating Obama with Cheney is one of those
nonsense that you mentioned. Cheney stoutly defended invading Iraq on
the basis of a lie; he also defended torture. Obama opposed the
invasion right from the beginning, and he opposed torture.
Wakalukong
ltlee1
Obama morphing into Cheney is the opinion of American commentator:
"The change that we are witnessing is in Obama, not in policies.
Obama
is morphing into Dick Cheney."
"Cheney Grabs a Third Term" is the title of an opinion piece
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/opinion/20dowd.html?_r=1
penned by
NY Times' Maureen Dowd. The following is part of a mock conversation
between Rumsfeld and Cheney celebrating because Obama is now
doing their dirty job.
"“I can’t believe how easy it was to bring Obama into line,” Rummy
says,
gnawing on Gorgonzola. “We wouldn’t have needed waterboarding if every
body cracked like a peanut. It was even easier than getting the bit
into
Junior’s mouth. Way simpler than if we’d had to contend with McCain.
In the end, the right guy won.”Dick is surprised, too, but who can
tell?
“You’re running national security now and everyone knows it,” Rummy
says. “You got Obama to do an about-face on the torture photos. He’s
using our old line about how it would endanger the troops. He’s
keeping
our military tribunals. His Justice Department invoked our state
secrets
privilege to try to get that lawsuit on torture and rendition
dismissed.
He’s trying to stop any sort of truth commission, thank goodness.
He’s
got his own surge going in Afghanistan. He’s withdrawing from Iraq
more
slowly. He’s extended our secret incursions over the Afghan border
into
Pakistan.”
Dick smiles on one side of his face."
Of course, morphing is rhetorical. But Obama the president is indeed
not
Obama the candidate.
He opposed war while campaigning for the presidency. How about now?
According to another commentator, he is now "an enthusiastic sponsor
of targeted assassinations, 'decapitation' strategies and remote-
control
bombing of mud houses at the far end of the globe..."
Other illegalities? The following are from two different commentators.
"Obama, in other words, is committed to covering up the Bush regime’s
crimes and to ensuring that his own regime can continue to operate in
the same illegal and unconstitutional ways."
"The mild-mannered professor is bidding to be as sure-footed as Bush
and Cheney in trampling on constitutional rights. He's planning to
restore
Bush's kangaroo courts for prisoners at Guantanamo who've never even
been formally charged with a crime! He's threatening to hold some
prisoners indefinitely in the US without trial."
abian...@yahoo.com
guy from Taiwan, using photos of a beautiful innocent Thai girl
“Meichi” to attack me only shows how pathetic you are! Why don’t you
stay on the topic or apologize for your false claim [BS].
Rusty Old Fool, I only ask you to back up your false claim [BS] that
Confucius teachings (impotence of education, family value, discipline,
etc) brought the downfall of China, Singapore. Japan, Korea, HK,
Taiwan... but you could not because you have never read Analects of
Confucius and you have no idea what Confucianism is...so you got mad,
you curse, talk dirty, isn't it sad?
Rusty Old Fool, you also defended Nazi's Holocaust. BillMoore said he
thinks you are more crazy than he had previously thought, then you
cursed that him too. I think he was right!
> that he was born outside the U.S.- Hide quoted text -
wakal...@yahoo.com.sg
Neither Obama the candidate nor Obama the president is Dick Cheney,
which is what you're (or had been) talking about.
W
------
>
> He opposed war while campaigning for the presidency. How about now?
>
> According to another commentator, he is now "an enthusiastic sponsor
> of targeted assassinations, 'decapitation' strategies and remote-
> control
> bombing of mud houses at the far end of the globe..."
>
> Other illegalities? The following are from two different commentators.
>
> "Obama, in other words, is committed to covering up the Bush regime’s
> crimes and to ensuring that his own regime can continue to operate in
> the same illegal and unconstitutional ways."
>
> "The mild-mannered professor is bidding to be as sure-footed as Bush
> and Cheney in trampling on constitutional rights. He's planning to
> restore
> Bush's kangaroo courts for prisoners at Guantanamo who've never even
> been formally charged with a crime! He's threatening to hold some
> prisoners indefinitely in the US without trial."
-------
What has definitely not changed are the ways of his critics. Before,
they lashed out at candidate Obama for being a terrorist mole. Now,
they lash out at president Obama for not being a terrorist mole.
Wakalukong
abia...@homosexual.net
America. So shut the fuck up!!
> Wakalukong- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
abia...@my-deja.com
click “view profile”, you can tell if you are dealing with fake
abianchen, actually psycho “Tienxia”.
*** Who’s poster “Tienxia” (aka Xangdi, Tienshen) and why is he
harassing poster “abianchen”? ***
Initially, Tienxia (aka Xangdi) posted as “Chairman Mao”, he also used
another alias to pretend as a black guy to fan racial hatred against
other black people but got caught by poster “abianchen”, so his alias
“Chairman Mao” vanished. Later he signed up as “Xangdi” (also many
other aliases) to retaliate against “abianchen”. His retaliation has
been on- going over a year and seems no end.
On May 22, 1:31 am, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@homosexual.net>
wrote:
wakal...@yahoo.com.sg
wrote:
That's about as poor a reply as anyone can give.
Wakalukong
abia...@homosexual.net
wakal...@yahoo.com.sg
wrote:
Here's the proof: You're More More Moski. You have your name
translated into Chinese, so Moski becomes Xangdi. QED.
Wakalukong
abia...@my-deja.com
has faked as "Dr. Ira", "Roland Moshki"... now my account. He is
really a mental ill case.
abia...@homosexual.net
abia...@my-deja.com
as "Roland Moshki" and you still don't give up to harass him. You are
really something. Have you thought to see a shrink?
On May 22, 6:48 am, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@homosexual.net>
wrote:
Tienxia
Hey, abiabchen/Meichi! You have repeatedly made these two claims:
1. You can speak, read, and write Chinese
2. You have been posting in scc for over 10 years
Show us the link to the post in which you wrote within the last 10
years where you actually discussed and wrote a topic yourself in
Chinese. So far all you have written is "You really don't want face"
in Chinese, and even then, it was copied from an Internet translator.
Surely you can find one post out of your 46,929 that you wrote in
Chinese by yourself. What? You can't, Cunt?
For nearly a decade, this poster calling herself "abianchen" has
successfully deceived posters in SCC and related groups, that she is a
"guy from Taiwan", provoking posters with her uneducated antics about
Taiwan and Confucius. It is now established that she is not only a
liar, but also a failed model thrown out of Taiwan for prostitution,
and hiding as an illegal immigrant in NYC, working as a chambermaid in
the daytime in a sleazy hotel that doesn't require any proper IDs, and
moon-shining as a prostitute at night at www.thailovelinks.com.
Pictures of this "abianchen", real name Meichi:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/64156901@N00/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/meichi_cunt_aka_abianchen_filthy_smelly_...
On 5月18日, 下午6時43分, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@my-deja.com>
wrote:
> Psycho Xangdi (Tienxia), like I said, skygod and myself can speak/read Chinese. You can NOT!!!
> Haha!
On May 22, 7:36 am, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@my-deja.com>
wrote:
> Ha, psycho Tienshen (Xangdi, Tienxia), I have been wondering when this
> type of your silly fake posts will appear? why does it take you so
> long? Haha!
On May 22, 6:54 pm, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@my-deja.com>
wrote:
abia...@my-deja.com
can recognized who you are and recognized you once faked as "More More
Moshki" ("Roland Moshki"). I thought I am the only one remember that.
Looks like you Xangdi GOT CAUGHT PANTS DOWN AGAIN today. Haha!
Remember who said you got caught pants down last time? When you faked
as a black guy to flame other black people, one netter said that.
Remember? Haha!
Today is my day!!! hehe!
> ...
>
> read more >>- Hide quoted text -
Tienwang
accused me of being "CCP thugs", Bryson, WanLF, Butcher Kang, etc.,
etc., and now Moshki. Pretty good, for a retard with the mentality of
a 5th grader. Can you make up your mind? I have - you are the ugly
Thai whore Meichi, and that's all there is to it.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/64156901@N00/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/meichi_cunt_aka_abianchen_filthy_smelly_...
On May 22, 1:17 pm, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@my-deja.com>
Gary Renzetti
> Don't cut and paste from someone else's writing. Write your own as it
> should be.
>
article he shared below echoes my reservations about POTUS #44 almost
exactly. Despite his sweet words, the "renditions"� continue, GITMO
stays open, the unconstitutional military tribunals proceed and none of
the Bushoids get prosecuted for violating the Constitution they swore an
oath to defend. Where's the "change"�?
>
> On May 21, 10:31 am, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> "America has lost her soul, and so has her president."
>>
>> http://www.opednews.com/articles/Watching-Obama-Morph-Into-by-Paul-Cr...
>> -------------------------
>> by Paul Craig Roberts, May 21, 2009
>>
>> America has lost her soul, and so has her president.
>>
>> A despairing country elected a president who promised change.
>> Americans arrived from every state to witness in bitter cold Obama�s
>> swearing-in ceremony. The mall was packed in a way that it has never
>> been for any other president.
>>
>> The people�s good will toward Obama and the expectations they had for
>> him were sufficient for Obama to end the gratuitous wars and enact
>> major reforms. But Obama has deserted the people for the interests. He
>> is relying on his non-threatening demeanor and rhetoric to convince
>> the people that change is underway.
>>
>> The change that we are witnessing is in Obama, not in policies. Obama
>> is morphing into Dick Cheney.
>>
>> Obama has not been in office four months and already a book could be
>> written about his broken promises.
>>
>> Obama said he would close the torture prison, Guantanamo, and abolish
>> the kangaroo courts known as military tribunals. But now he says he is
>> going to reform the tribunals and continue the process, but without
>> confessions obtained with torture. Getting behind Obama�s validation
>> of the Bush/Cheney policy, House Democrats pulled the budget funding
>> that was to be used for closing Guantanamo.
>>
>> The policy of kidnapping people (usually on the basis of
>> disinformation supplied by their enemies) and whisking them off to
>> Third World prisons to be interrogated is to be continued. Again,
>> Obama has substituted a "reform" for his promise to abolish an illegal
>> policy. Rendition, Obama says, has also been reformed and will no
>> longer involve torture. How would anyone know? Is Obama going to
>> assign a U.S. government agent to watch over the treatment given to
>> disappeared people by Third World thugs? Given the proclivity of
>> American police to brutalize U.S. citizens, nothing can save the
>> victims of rendition from torture.
>>
>> Obama has defended the Bush/Cheney warrantless wiretapping program run
>> by the National Security Agency and broadened the government�s legal
>> argument that "sovereign immunity" protects government officials from
>> prosecution and civil suits when they violate U.S. law and
>> constitutional protections of citizens. Obama�s Justice Department has
>> taken up the defense of Donald Rumsfeld against a case brought by
>> detainees whose rights Rumsfeld violated.
>>
>> In a signing statement this month, Obama abandoned his promise to
>> protect whistleblowers who give information of executive branch
>> illegality to Congress.
>>
>> Obama is making even more expansive claims of executive power than
>> Bush. As Bruce Fein puts it: "In principle, President Obama is
>> maintaining that victims of constitutional wrongdoing by the U.S.
>> government should be denied a remedy in order to prevent the American
>> people and the world at large from learning of the lawlessness
>> perpetrated in the name of national security and exacting political
>> and legal accountability."
>>
>> Obama, in other words, is committed to covering up the Bush regime�s
>> crimes and to ensuring that his own regime can continue to operate in
>> the same illegal and unconstitutional ways.
>>
>> Obama is fighting the release of the latest batch of horrific torture
>> photos that have come to light. Obama claims that release of the
>> photos would anger insurgents and cause them to kill our troops. That,
>> of course, is nonsense. Those resisting occupation of their land by
>> U.S. troops and NATO mercenaries are already dedicated to killing our
>> troops, and they know that Americans torture whomever they capture.
>> Obama is fighting the release of the photos because he knows the
>> barbaric image that the photos present of the U.S. military will
>> undermine the public�s support for the wars that enrich the military/
>> security complex, appease the Israel Lobby, and repay the campaign
>> contributions that elect the U.S. government.
>>
>> As for bringing the troops home from Iraq, this promise, too, has been
>> reformed. To the consternation of his supporters, Obama is leaving
>> 50,000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq. The others are being sent to Afghanistan
>> and to Pakistan, where on Obama�s watch war has broken out big time
>> with already one million refugees from the indiscriminate bombing of
>> civilians.
>>
>> Meanwhile, war with Iran remains a possibility, and at Washington�s
>> insistence, NATO is conducting war games on former Soviet territory,
>> thus laying the groundwork for future enrichment of the U.S. military/
>> security complex. The steeply rising U.S. unemployment rate will
>> provide the needed troops for Obama�s expanding wars.
>>
>> Obama can give a great speech without mangling the language. He can
>> smile and make people believe his rhetoric. The world, or much of it,
>> seems to be content with the soft words that now drape Dick Cheney�s
rst0wxyz
> rst9w...@yahoo.com top-posted:> Don't cut and paste from someone else's writing. Write your own as it
> > should be.
>
> Why not, Rusty? It is rare for me to agree with an LT post, but the
> article he shared below echoes my reservations about POTUS #44 almost
> stays open, the unconstitutional military tribunals proceed and none of
> the Bushoids get prosecuted for violating the Constitution they swore an
It takes time to correct past mistakes, and Obama said he will close
the prison in Cuba. The rendition program has not continue, but with
the outcry from the countries where it happens or where the planes fly
through, those countries have said they will not allow it to happen.
Where do we begin, and where do we end in prosecuting past mistakes?
The low ranking ones said they only take order from above. Do we or
should we prosecute G. Bush? or Dick Cheney? They were the biggest
instigators of those past mistakes.
wakal...@yahoo.com.sg
wrote:
> I bet you are really RAK's alter ego. Like playing with yourself, huh?
----------
You bet wrong. I got it right.
Wakalukong
abia...@my-deja.com
and what you did in the past, e.g, faked Roland Moshki's account to
harass netters, so you have to be so sour?
Xangdi = Tienwang = Tienshen = Tienxia = Chairman Mao Says = ... =
fake Moshki = fake abianchen = fake Dr. Ira... -> actually just one
mentally ill troll,像一個變態的神經病人, 瘋人院里爬出來的
On May 22, 6:48 am, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@homosexual.net>
wrote:
Xangdi
more you show everyone that you are an uneducated, stupid, and
shameless whore. Show everyone that there was such a poster called
"Roland Moshki", and then show that you can prove I posted using his
name, or that he posted using my name - URL, ID, and ISP.
You can't write Chinese other than cut-and-paste childish insult
phrases from the net. You have the mentality of a pre-teen school
girl, and an ugly one at that.
Here is the irrefutable proof:
You posted this link: http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread/17a7f8fb49c46100?hl=en#
at 3:36 am EST on May 23rd, 2009. A Chinese poster replied at 7:25 am
EST on the same day.
On your own thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread/f560c0e84f691c7c/ba52f1744d302dd5?hl=en&lnk=raot#ba52f1744d302dd5
, posted at 4:22 am EST, May 21st, 2009, two Chinese posters have
each written a reply, at 7:37 am and 8:13 am EST on May 23rd, 2009,
respectively, but you never replied, nor commented.
One might say that you were probably not even awake yet, or hadn't
seen the above-said replies, but you did post a message on:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread/567407db52583e55?hl=en#
, at 9:52 am EST on May the 23rd, 2009.
At 11.39 pm EST on May the 23rd, 2009, you posted:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread/90d74323d98c3eec?hl=en#
.
At 11.50 pm EST on May the 23rd, 2009, you posted:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread/23ddc394dc29b6a0?hl=en#
.
The ONLY reason you didn't write anything on the earlier two threads
was that they were written in Chinese, and even though you may be able
to read a little Chinese, you can't write proper Chinese other than a
few insult phrases cut and pasted from the Internet.
You have once again been conclusively proven to be a LIAR!
On May 25, 3:51 pm, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@my-deja.com>
wrote:
ltlee1
> rst9w...@yahoo.com top-posted:> Don't cut and paste from someone else's writing. Write your own as it
> > should be.
>
> Why not, Rusty? It is rare for me to agree with an LT post, but the
> article he shared below echoes my reservations about POTUS #44 almost
> stays open, the unconstitutional military tribunals proceed and none of
> the Bushoids get prosecuted for violating the Constitution they swore an
As a young black president, Obama has only one thing to sell. His
popularity. So, he will try not to offend any entrenched power unless
he is sure that such action will not negatively impact his
popularlity. So he will talk about changes. But he will only do the
minimal.
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 21, 10:31 am, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> "America has lost her soul, and so has her president."
>
> >>http://www.opednews.com/articles/Watching-Obama-Morph-Into-by-Paul-Cr...
> >> -------------------------
> >> by Paul Craig Roberts, May 21, 2009
>
> >> America has lost her soul, and so has her president.
>
> >> A despairing country elected a president who promised change.
> >> Americans arrived from every state to witness in bitter coldObama’s
> >> swearing-in ceremony. The mall was packed in a way that it has never
> >> been for any other president.
>
> >> The people’s good will towardObamaand the expectations they had for
> >> him were sufficient forObamato end the gratuitous wars and enact
> >> major reforms. ButObamahas deserted the people for the interests. He
> >> is relying on his non-threatening demeanor and rhetoric to convince
> >> the people that change is underway.
>
> >> The change that we are witnessing is inObama, not in policies.Obama
> >> ismorphinginto Dick Cheney.
>
> >>Obamahas not been in office four months and already a book could be
> >> written about his broken promises.
>
> >>Obamasaid he would close the torture prison, Guantanamo, and abolish
> >> the kangaroo courts known as military tribunals. But now he says he is
> >> going to reform the tribunals and continue the process, but without
> >> confessions obtained with torture. Getting behindObama’svalidation
> >> of the Bush/Cheney policy, House Democrats pulled the budget funding
> >> that was to be used for closing Guantanamo.
>
> >> The policy of kidnapping people (usually on the basis of
> >> disinformation supplied by their enemies) and whisking them off to
> >> Third World prisons to be interrogated is to be continued. Again,
> >>Obamahas substituted a "reform" for his promise to abolish an illegal
> >> policy. Rendition,Obamasays, has also been reformed and will no
> >> longer involve torture. How would anyone know? IsObamagoing to
> >> assign a U.S. government agent to watch over the treatment given to
> >> disappeared people by Third World thugs? Given the proclivity of
> >> American police to brutalize U.S. citizens, nothing can save the
> >> victims of rendition from torture.
>
> >>Obamahas defended the Bush/Cheney warrantless wiretapping program run
> >> by the National Security Agency and broadened the government’s legal
> >> argument that "sovereign immunity" protects government officials from
> >> prosecution and civil suits when they violate U.S. law and
> >> constitutional protections of citizens.Obama’sJustice Department has
> >> taken up the defense of Donald Rumsfeld against a case brought by
> >> detainees whose rights Rumsfeld violated.
>
> >> In a signing statement this month,Obamaabandoned his promise to
> >> protect whistleblowers who give information of executive branch
> >> illegality to Congress.
>
> >>Obamais making even more expansive claims of executive power than
> >> Bush. As Bruce Fein puts it: "In principle, PresidentObamais
> >> maintaining that victims of constitutional wrongdoing by the U.S.
> >> government should be denied a remedy in order to prevent the American
> >> people and the world at large from learning of the lawlessness
> >> perpetrated in the name of national security and exacting political
> >> and legal accountability."
>
> >>Obama, in other words, is committed to covering up the Bush regime’s
> >> crimes and to ensuring that his own regime can continue to operate in
> >> the same illegal and unconstitutional ways.
>
> >>Obamais fighting the release of the latest batch of horrific torture
> >> photos that have come to light.Obamaclaims that release of the
> >> photos would anger insurgents and cause them to kill our troops. That,
> >> of course, is nonsense. Those resisting occupation of their land by
> >> U.S. troops and NATO mercenaries are already dedicated to killing our
> >> troops, and they know that Americans torture whomever they capture.
> >>Obamais fighting the release of the photos because he knows the
> >> barbaric image that the photos present of the U.S. military will
> >> undermine the public’s support for the wars that enrich the military/
> >> security complex, appease the Israel Lobby, and repay the campaign
> >> contributions that elect the U.S. government.
>
> >> As for bringing the troops home from Iraq, this promise, too, has been
> >> reformed. To the consternation of his supporters,Obamais leaving
> >> 50,000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq. The others are being sent to Afghanistan
> >> and to Pakistan, where onObama’swatch war has broken out big time
> >> with already one million refugees from the indiscriminate bombing of
> >> civilians.
>
> >> Meanwhile, war with Iran remains a possibility, and at Washington’s
> >> insistence, NATO is conducting war games on former Soviet territory,
> >> thus laying the groundwork for future enrichment of the U.S. military/
> >> security complex. The steeply rising U.S. unemployment rate will
> >> provide the needed troops forObama’sexpanding wars.
>
> >>Obamacan give a great speech without mangling the language. He can
> >> smile and make people believe his rhetoric. The world, or much of it,
> >> seems to be content with the soft words that now drape Dick Cheney’s
> >> policies in pursuit of executive supremacy and U.S. hegemony.
>
> >> ---------------------------
>
> >> On May 21, 9:16 am, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/47696,opinion,barack-obama-from-anti-wa...
> >>> "How long does it take a mild-mannered, anti-war, black professor of
> >>> constitutional law, trained as a community organiser on the South Side
> >>> of Chicago, to become an enthusiastic sponsor of targeted
> >>> assassinations, 'decapitation' strategies and remote-control bombing
> >>> of mud houses at the far end of the globe?
> >>> There's nothing surprising here. As far back as President Woodrow
> >>> Wilson, in the early 20th century, American liberalism has been swift
> >>> to flex its imperial muscle and whistle up the Marines. High-explosive
> >>> has always been in the hormone shot.
> >>> The nearest parallel toObamain eager deference to the bloodthirsty
> >>> counsels of his counter-insurgency advisors is John F. Kennedy. It is
> >>> not surprising that bright young presidents relish quick-fix, 'outside
> >>> the box' scenarios for victory. "
> >>> Yes, democracy works. It is like Cheney is having a thrid term.- Hide quoted text -
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
abia...@my-deja.com
soc.culture.china when we discussed aliases you have used in the past
including infamous "Chairman Mao Says". I guess you do NOT want people
know your ugly past?
Restore all newsgroups...
Xangdi = Tienwang = Tienshen = Tienxia = Chairman Mao Says = ... =
fake Moshki = fake abianchen = fake Dr. Ira... -> actually just one
mentally ill troll,像一個變態的神經病人, 瘋人院里爬出來的
On May 25, 4:07 am, Xangdi <xan...@email.com> wrote:
> Have you noticed that no one speaks to you? The more you post, the
> more you show everyone that you are an uneducated, stupid, and
> shameless whore. Show everyone that there was such a poster called
> "Roland Moshki", and then show that you can prove I posted using his
> name, or that he posted using my name - URL, ID, and ISP.
>
> You can't write Chinese other than cut-and-paste childish insult
> phrases from the net. You have the mentality of a pre-teen school
> girl, and an ugly one at that.
>
> Here is the irrefutable proof:
>
> You posted this link:http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread...
> at 3:36 am EST on May 23rd, 2009. A Chinese poster replied at 7:25 am
> EST on the same day.
>
> On your own thread:http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread...
> , posted at 4:22 am EST, May 21st, 2009, two Chinese posters have
> each written a reply, at 7:37 am and 8:13 am EST on May 23rd, 2009,
> respectively, but you never replied, nor commented.
>
> One might say that you were probably not even awake yet, or hadn't
> seen the above-said replies, but you did post a message on:http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread...
> , at 9:52 am EST on May the 23rd, 2009.
> At 11.39 pm EST on May the 23rd, 2009, you posted:http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread...
> .
> At 11.50 pm EST on May the 23rd, 2009, you posted:http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread...
> ...
>
> read more >>- Hide quoted text -
Tienxia
Have you noticed that no one speaks to you? The more you post, the
more you show everyone that you are an uneducated, stupid, and
shameless whore. Show everyone that there was such a poster called
"Roland Moshki", and then show that you can prove I posted using his
name, or that he posted using my name - URL, ID, and ISP.
You can't write Chinese other than cut-and-paste childish insult
phrases from the net. You have the mentality of a pre-teen school
girl, and an ugly one at that.
Here is the irrefutable proof:
You posted this link: http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread/17a7f8fb49c46100?hl=en#
at 3:36 am EST on May 23rd, 2009. A Chinese poster replied at 7:25 am
EST on the same day.
On your own thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread/f560c0e84f691c7c/ba52f1744d302dd5?hl=en&lnk=raot#ba52f1744d302dd5
, posted at 4:22 am EST, May 21st, 2009, two Chinese posters have
each written a reply, at 7:37 am and 8:13 am EST on May 23rd, 2009,
respectively, but you never replied, nor commented.
One might say that you were probably not even awake yet, or hadn't
seen the above-said replies, but you did post a message on:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread/567407db52583e55?hl=en#
, at 9:52 am EST on May the 23rd, 2009.
At 11.39 pm EST on May the 23rd, 2009, you posted:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread/90d74323d98c3eec?hl=en#
.
At 11.50 pm EST on May the 23rd, 2009, you posted:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread/23ddc394dc29b6a0?hl=en#
.
The ONLY reason you didn't write anything on the earlier two threads
was that they were written in Chinese, and even though you may be able
to read a little Chinese, you can't write proper Chinese other than a
few insult phrases cut and pasted from the Internet.
You have once again been conclusively proven to be a LIAR!
On May 26, 10:22 am, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@my-deja.com>
wrote:
rst9...@yahoo.com
You are caught lying again! You said you know Chinese, but you really
don't. All you can do is cut-and-paste! Bwahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!
abian...@yahoo.com
same poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
everyone that you told me so. I guess you are really crazy! And you
can kiss my big brown ass!
rst9...@yahoo.com
abian...@yahoo.com
poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
gf doesn't want your little prick anymore. Haha! You are so weird.
rst9...@yahoo.com
lying bitch is a pathological liar
abia...@mail.com
poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
everyone that you told me so. I guess you are really crazy! Maybe your
rst0wxyz
abian...@yahoo.com
poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
everyone that you told me so. I guess you are really crazy! Maybe your
gf doesn't want your little prick anymore. Haha! You are so pathetic.
rst9...@yahoo.com
You can speak, read, and write Chinese 2. You have been posting in scc
abia...@mail.com
abian...@yahoo.com
Hey Rusty Old Fool you said a long time ago that Chairman Mao is same
poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
everyone that you told me so. I guess you are really crazy! Maybe your
gf doesn't want your little prick anymore. Haha! You are so pathetic.
On May 28, 12:51 am, rst9w...@yahoo.com wrote:
rst0wxyz
I piss like you, abianchen cunt. I sit down to do it.
abian...@yahoo.com
Hey Rusty Old Fool you said a long time ago that Chairman Mao is same
poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
everyone that you told me so. I guess you are really crazy! Maybe your
gf doesn't want your little prick anymore. Haha! You are so weird.
rst0wxyz
abian...@yahoo.com
Hey Rusty Old Fool you said a long time ago that Chairman Mao is same
poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
everyone that you told me so. I guess you are really crazy! Maybe your
gf doesn't want your little prick anymore. Haha! You are so weird. You
should go to a shrink. I mean it.
abia...@weirdness.com
Hey Rusty Old Fool you said a long time ago that Chairman Mao is same
poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
everyone that you told me so. I guess you are really crazy! Maybe your
gf doesn't want your little prick anymore. Haha! You are so weird. You
should go to a shrink. I mean it. You are 一個變態的神經病人, 瘋人院里爬出來的.
On May 30, 12:06 am, rst0wxyz <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
abian...@yahoo.com
Hey Rusty Old Fool you said a long time ago that Chairman Mao is same
poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
everyone that you told me so. I guess you are really crazy! Maybe your
gf doesn't want your little prick anymore. Haha! You are so weird. You
should go to a shrink. I mean it. You are 一個變態的神經病人, 瘋人院里爬出來的.
On May 30, 12:06 am, rst0wxyz <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
abian...@yahoo.com
Hey Rusty Old Fool you said a long time ago that Chairman Mao is same
poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
everyone that you told me so. I guess you are really crazy! Maybe your
gf doesn't want your little prick anymore. Haha! You are so weird. You
should go to a shrink. I mean it. You are 一個變態的神經病人, 瘋人院里爬出來的.
On May 30, 12:06 am, rst0wxyz <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
abianchen@my deja.com
Hey Rusty Old Fool you said a long time ago that Chairman Mao is same
poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
everyone that you told me so. I guess you are really crazy! Maybe your
gf doesn't want your little prick anymore. Haha! You are so weird. You
should go to a shrink. I mean it. You are 一個變態的神經病人, 瘋人院里爬出來的.
On May 30, 12:06 am, rst0wxyz <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
abian...@yahoo.com
Hey Rusty Old Fool, you and Psycho Xangdi can't read and write
Chinese! I can speak/read/write perfect Chinese! You said a long time
ago that Chairman Mao is same poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is
not, after I have told everyone that you told me so. Why have you
changed your mind? I guess you are really crazy! Maybe your gf just
doesn't want your little prick anymore. Haha! You are so weird. You
and Psycho Xangdi should go to a shrink. I mean it. You are 一個變態的神經病人,
瘋人院里爬出來的.
On May 30, 12:06 am, rst0wxyz <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote: