Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Like I said before, Yeah, I know. It's all from the same crazy evil lying kook by the name of ugly filthy uneducated ignorant turkey fool abianchen/report2009/meichi slut cunt chattering parrot-bird-brain monkey.

6 views
Skip to first unread message

rst0wxyz

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 7:43:47 PM1/2/10
to
Like I said before, Yeah, I know. It's all from the same crazy evil
lying kook by the name of ugly filthy uneducated ignorant turkey fool
abianchen/report2009/meichi slut cunt chattering parrot-bird-brain
monkey.

report2009

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 11:38:27 PM1/2/10
to
Why once Mao dropped dead, China started to be prosperous? Because DXP
knew China had to stop mad Maoism and adopted market economy to save
China that Mao had ruined for 30 years!!! Oh, I see, you Rusty are too
stupid to understand it, right?

ltlee1

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 8:30:56 AM1/3/10
to
On Jan 2, 11:38 pm, report2009 <repost2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Why once Mao dropped dead, China started to be prosperous? Because DXP
> knew China had to stop mad Maoism and adopted market economy to save
> China that Mao had ruined for 30 years!!! Oh, I see, you Rusty are too
> stupid to understand it, right?

You are reasoning like a 5 years old. Let us apply your logic and see
where it leads.
"Abianchen's parents died, Abianchen suddenly became wealthy." Does it
prove that Abianchen's parents were monsters?


>
> On Jan 2, 7:43 pm, rst0wxyz <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Like I said before, Yeah, I know.  It's all from the same crazy evil
> > lying kook by the name of ugly filthy uneducated ignorant turkey fool
> > abianchen/report2009/meichi slut cunt chattering parrot-bird-brain

> > monkey.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

abia...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 8:44:24 AM1/3/10
to
Nah, let’s use LT Lee’s parents as an example. Did LT Lee’s parents
teach him to beat them up or beat up his teachers as Mao taught
Chinese during Cultural Revolution? If yes, LT Lee’s parents were
monster just like Mao.

Did LT Lee’s parents tell him to build backyard furnace and break his
wok etc to make “steel” as Mao did in China. If yes, LT Lee’s parents
were mad stupid just like Mao.

One day, LT Lee’s abusive parents dropped dead, LT Lee’s uncle, Lee
Xiao-ping came and brought LT Lee back to his place. With his uncle’s
help, LT Lee goes to school and learn to respect teachers and people,
now LT Lee can find a job to support himself and no longer under
nightmare of his parents.

Happy ending!!!

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

Anti-DabianchenVirus

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 9:39:54 AM1/3/10
to
I accused her of having the mental intellect of a 5th grader, but you
put her even lower - a 5 year-old. Hmmm ... others treat her simply
like a moron.

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

abia...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 9:44:20 AM1/3/10
to
LT Lee wrote this regarding Rusty’s stealing “Filipino” girl’s photos
to frame Chinese guy abianchen: “You have also dragged in an innocient
girl by using her pictures. You are lucky so far and no one has sued
you or your organization for libel.” But shameless Psycho Xangdi (now
Dabian eater) and Rusty Old Fool (rst0wxyz/rst9) keep using stolen
“Filipino” girl’s photos to harrass abianchen. What a shame!

LT Lee’s post:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/4db406cb29338ae8?hl=en

LT Lee wrote to Rusty (rst0wxyz/rst9):

“Is abianchen is really a "guy from Taiwan"? I don't know. But it does
not matter. As far as I can tell, his posts and his claimed identy
have no contradiction. For all practical purpose, he is a guy from
Taiwan.

All netters who had frequented the Chinese culture forum had endured
your nonsense for a long time. But enoough is enough. You had posted
thousands of psots attacking him. But you had accomplished nothing. He
is still around and he is not likely to disappear anytime soon.

You have also dragged in an innocient girl by using her pictures. You
are lucky so far and no one has sued you or your organization for
libel. “

On Jan 3, 9:39 am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wuso...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:

Anti-DabianchenVirus

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 9:51:34 AM1/3/10
to
Ha-ha! You are an ugly Philippino dyke with the mentality of a 5th
grader!


On Jan 3, 8:44 am, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@my-deja.com>
wrote:


> LT Lee wrote this regarding Rusty’s stealing “Filipino” girl’s photos
> to frame Chinese guy abianchen: “You have also dragged in an innocient
> girl by using her pictures. You are lucky so far and no one has sued
> you or your organization for libel.” But shameless Psycho Xangdi (now
> Dabian eater) and Rusty Old Fool (rst0wxyz/rst9) keep using stolen
> “Filipino” girl’s photos to harrass abianchen. What a shame!
>

> LT Lee’s post:http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/4db406cb29338ae8...

report2009

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 10:09:31 AM1/3/10
to
LT Lee wrote this regarding Rusty’s stealing “Filipino” girl’s photos
to frame Chinese guy abianchen: “You have also dragged in an innocient
girl by using her pictures. You are lucky so far and no one has sued
you or your organization for libel.” But shameless Psycho Xangdi (now
Dabian eater) and Rusty Old Fool (rst0wxyz/rst9) keep using stolen
“Filipino” girl’s photos to harrass abianchen. What a shame!

LT Lee’s post:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/4db406cb29338ae8?hl=en

LT Lee wrote to Rusty (rst0wxyz/rst9):

“Is abianchen is really a "guy from Taiwan"? I don't know. But it does
not matter. As far as I can tell, his posts and his claimed identy
have no contradiction. For all practical purpose, he is a guy from
Taiwan.

All netters who had frequented the Chinese culture forum had endured
your nonsense for a long time. But enoough is enough. You had posted
thousands of psots attacking him. But you had accomplished nothing. He
is still around and he is not likely to disappear anytime soon.

You have also dragged in an innocient girl by using her pictures. You
are lucky so far and no one has sued you or your organization for
libel. “

On Jan 3, 9:51 am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wuso...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:

ltlee1

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 5:45:28 PM1/3/10
to
Some bloggers had written "中华儿女多奇志,敢叫日月换新天" in his blog.
He had garbled up Mao's writing. The two parts were actually from two
peoms.
But I like his version.

"为有牺牲多壮志,敢教日月换新天" is a very suitable slogan for a revolution.
party, "中华儿女多奇志,敢叫日月换新天" is more suitable for a governing.

One of Mao's major contribution is "敢." In today's English, it is "Yes
We
Can." Mao had provided the "Yes We Can" spirit. He dared the Chinese
people to go where no Chinese had gone before. Well, backyard
furnance
did not work. He had made a grave mistake. In addition, his mistake
was
followed several years of great famine. Great tragedy indeed.

Nevertheless, 敢叫日月换新天, or the spirit of "yes we can" was still the
foundation of Deng's success especially after the TAM incident when
China was isolated. During Deng's trip to the South, he had to
persuade,
to dare the Chinese people to go where no Chinese had gone before.
China was once more, on the cusp of going forward of falling back.
Once
again, "中华儿女多奇志,敢叫日月换新天" was a necessity. Without Deng's
dare and the numerous officials' witholding their disbelief and
answering the
"中华儿女多奇志,敢叫日月换新天" call, China would not be today's China.

If a man become rich after his parents were dead, it certainly did not
mean
his parents were bad persons. Rather, he has inherented great wealth
from
his parents or he has grown wiser with time. Or both.

"Ten years to grow a tree, one hundred years to develop a man."
It certainly takes longer to develop a big coutnry like China which
had been
weak for more than a century and facing hostile environment. The trick
was
to find the balance between "Crossing the river by touching the stone"
and
the "Yes We Can" spirit. Deng's success certainly did not prove Mao's
"Yes We Can" spirit wrong. Both spirits were needed. It is a matter of
right
timing and right balance. With time, China had grown wiser on right
timing
and the right mix..


On Jan 3, 9:39 am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wuso...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:

report2009

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 10:11:21 PM1/3/10
to
LT Lee, you are right, Mao had guts for his mad acts to starve 9
million Chinese to death in 1959 alone, lucky you, you did not die so
you have chance to admire Mao's "guts" here. "Yes, we can"... "Yes, we
can kill our Chinese people as we wish"... Salute to Mao and his
admirer LT Lee, Haha!

ltlee1

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 12:32:24 AM1/4/10
to
On Jan 3, 10:11 pm, report2009 <repost2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> LT Lee, you are right, Mao had guts for his mad acts to starve 9
> million Chinese to death in 1959 alone, lucky you, you did not die so
> you have chance to admire Mao's "guts" here. "Yes, we can"... "Yes, we
> can kill our Chinese people as we wish"... Salute to Mao and his
> admirer LT Lee, Haha!

May be you havd missed the point. Please don't laugh.
Call it karma or whatever. Mao's China is still with us. One day,
people
in Taiwan will have to choose between Mao's 为有牺牲多壮志 and 中华
儿女多奇志 in order to complete the yet unfinished job of 敢叫日月换新天.

I certainly hope the road is one of "中华儿女多奇志". Backyard
furnance may offend your sensibility and it may not work as before.
But
the first choice ...

report2009

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 2:32:33 AM1/4/10
to
In case you did not know... According to a recent poll in Taiwan, 88% of
Taiwanese chose status-quo, i.e., we do not want Chinese unification.
We have democracy, much higher GDP per capita, civility, self-rule so
who wants to be ruled by less civilized and bloody CCP. I don't! And
Taiwan is not HK!!!

That's why our ROC President Ma Ying-joeu said no unification talk
during his term and he does not expect to see unification in his
lifetime.

Make sense?

0 new messages