Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Japan PM Abe warns China of force over islands landing

2 views
Skip to first unread message

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,
Apr 23, 2013, 4:06:47 PM4/23/13
to
Japan PM Abe warns China of force over islands landing

Chinese and Japanese surveillance ships are monitoring
each other closely

BBC
Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Japan would respond with force if any attempt is made to
land on disputed islands, PM Shinzo Abe has warned.

His comments came as eight Chinese government ships
sailed near East China Sea islands that both nations
claim.

A flotilla of 10 fishing boats carrying Japanese
activists was also reported to be in the area, as well as
the Japanese coastguard.

Mr Abe was speaking in parliament hours after dozens of
lawmakers visited a controversial war-linked shrine.

A total of 168 lawmakers paid their respects at the
Yasukuni Shrine, which commemorates Japan's war dead,
including war criminals, in a move likely to anger
regional neighbours who say the shrine is a reminder of
Japan's military past.

'Deal strongly'

The warning from the J

apanese prime minister was the most explicit to China
since Mr Abe took power in December, the BBC's Rupert
Wingfield-Hayes reports from Tokyo.

Asked in parliament what he would do if Chinese ships
tried to land on the disputed islands, Mr Abe said they
would be expelled by force.

Analysis

By Rupert Wingfield-Hayes
BBC News, Tokyo

The video pictures coming in from the islands today are
quite dramatic.

There are more ships than I have ever seen before during
one of these encounters - at least eight Chinese ships
and an equal number of Japanese coastguard cutters.

Sailing alongside, dwarfed by the larger ships, are 10
fishing boats flying the Japanese flag and carrying
right-wing Japanese nationalists from a group called
Gambare Nippon.

It is the sort of situation that could quite easily get
out of hand if, for example, the Japanese nationalists
try to land on the islands, or if the Chinese ships try
to board one of the Japanese fishing vessels.

China is now taking the position that its ships are there
protecting "Chinese" territory, and consequently have the
right to board any "foreign" vessels.

That may be why Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has
decided to be more emphatic in his warning to China,
making it explicit that if any of the Chinese vessels
attempt to land on Japanese soil, they will be repelled
with force.

He is laying down a clear line over which he hopes the
Chinese know they would be unwise to cross.

"Since it has become the Abe government, we have made
sure that if there is an instance where there is an
intrusion into our territory or it seems that there could
be landing on the islands then we will deal will it
strongly," he said.

The warning came as eight Chinese ships sailed around the
islands - called Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China.

The Japanese coast guard said it was the highest number
of Chinese boats in the area since Tokyo nationalised
part of the island chain in September 2012.

China said its ships had been monitoring Japanese
vessels. The State Oceanic Administration issued a
statement saying three of its ships had "found" several
Japanese ships around the islands and "immediately
ordered another five ships in the East China Sea to meet
the three ships".

Ten Japanese boats carrying around 80 activists arrived
in the area early on Tuesday, Reuters news agency
reported, monitored by Japanese Coast Guard vessels.
Public broadcaster NHK said the boats were carrying
"regional lawmakers and members of the foreign media".

Japan's top government spokesman said the "intrusion into
territorial waters" was "extremely regrettable". Japan
also summoned the Chinese ambassador to protest, reports
said.

The territorial row has been rumbling for years but was
reignited last year when Japan bought three of the
islands from their private Japanese owner.

China claims the island chain, which is controlled by
Japan. Taiwan also claims the islands, which offer rich
fishing grounds and lie in a strategically important
area.

Visits to Yasukuni Shrine by lawmakers anger Japan's
neighbours

The dispute has led to serious diplomatic tension between
China and Japan, most recently in January when Japan said
a Chinese frigate locked weapons-controlling radar on one
of its navy ships near the islands - something China
disputes.

'Backlash'

The visit to the Yasukuni Shrine on Tuesday by lawmakers
marking the spring festival is also likely to hit ties
between Beijing and Tokyo.

Two cabinet ministers, including Deputy Prime Minister
Taro Aso, visited the shrine on Sunday. Prime Minister
Shinzo Abe did not visit but made a ritual offering.

South Korea subsequently cancelled a proposed visit by
its foreign minister, while China lodged "solemn
representations" in response to the ministers' visit.

"Only when Japan faces up to its aggressive past can it
embrace the future and develop friendly relations with
its Asian neighbours," Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua
Chunying said on Monday.

But Japanese lawmaker Hidehisa Otsujji said it was
"natural" for "lawmakers to worship at a shrine for
people who died for the nation".

"Every nation does this. I don't understand why we get a
backlash," he said.

Yasukuni Shrine

Built in 1869 under the Emperor Meiji
Venerates the souls of Japan's war dead
Those enshrined include convicted war criminals
Japan's neighbours say it represents the country's past militarism
Japan's Yasukuni Shrine

More at:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-22260140

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj

o o o

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used
for the educational purposes of research and open
discussion. The contents of this post may not have been
authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion
of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright
law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely
not be read, considered or answered if it does not
contain your full legal name, current e-mail and postal
addresses, and live-voice telephone number.

o Posted for information and discussion. Views
expressed by others are not necessarily those of the
poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted
material the use of which may or may not have been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This
material is being made available in efforts to advance
the understanding of environmental, political, human
rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social, and
cultural, etc., issues. It is believed that this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the
material on this site is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research, comment,
discussion and educational purposes by subscribing to
USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article
for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed by forgery by one
or more net terrorists, this post may be reposted several
times.

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,
Apr 24, 2013, 12:16:02 AM4/24/13
to
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
Forwarded post:

People nowadays seem to forget or they apparently never
knew that during World War Two, Imperial Japan’s armed
services were the al Qaeda of that era.

They though it was the greatest thing in the world to die
for their Emperor. We finally found that we had to fight
them to win and did so when we showed them that if they
all wanted to die for their Emperor, we would accommodate
them with atomic weapons.

To defeat al Qaeda and the growing world of Islamic
terrorists dead set on killing all of us as a religiously
necessary Jihad, we need to fight them the same way and
if necessary, use nuclear weapons before they use nuclear
weapons on us.

Go Japan, show Red China how the cow chews the curd—
Heavens knows our current resident in the White House
won’t.

- Bender2

End of forwarded post.

CPC , Chinese Imperialist Communist Party of CHINA , the New Imperialist Force in ASEAN

unread,
Apr 24, 2013, 12:38:11 AM4/24/13
to
EMPTY tankers make the MOST NOISE





EMPTY tankers make very LOUD NOISE





On Apr 24, 3:06 am, use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr.

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,
Apr 24, 2013, 12:48:00 AM4/24/13
to
Forwarded post:

China is cruising for a bloody nose with most of it
neighbors.

I still say we should stop trade with it dead in it’s
tracks.

We’ll see just how successful China is with no traders
from around the planet.

- DoughtyOne

rst0

unread,
Apr 24, 2013, 12:55:46 AM4/24/13
to
On Apr 23, 9:38 pm, "CPC , Chinese Imperialist Communist Party of
CHINA , the New Imperialist Force in ASEAN"
<communistpartyofchin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> EMPTY  tankers  make  the  MOST  NOISE
>
> EMPTY  tankers  make  very LOUD   NOISE

Yes, yes, and empty brain is the worst kind to have.

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,
Apr 24, 2013, 1:16:49 AM4/24/13
to
Forwarded post:

If Japan's gonna go head-to-head with China I think that
economic warfare would be more effective than
military.Bar Chinese goods from Japanese shores.THAT will
get the attention of the Butchers of Bejing.

- Gay State Conservative

rst9

unread,
Apr 24, 2013, 1:24:06 AM4/24/13
to
On Apr 23, 10:16 pm, use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr.
Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> If Japan's gonna go head-to-head with China I think that
> economic warfare would be more effective than
> military.Bar Chinese goods from Japanese shores.THAT will

The Chinese boycotted Japanese products, and Japan's economy down
hill.

> get the attention of the Butchers of Bejing.

You mean the Butchers of Tokyo.
Japanese butchery was well-known during WWII.
0 new messages