On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 12:01:10 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
Emily Finley's conclusion is previous US leaders had been using the word "democracy" as justification
for what would otherwise be naked authoritarianism. But the situation is a lot worse per Michael Sandel's
"Democracy’s Discontent: A New Edition for Our Perilous Times." Namely, the US system still does not
have a philosophy concerning the public at large.
'In a new edition of Democracy’s Discontent, Sandel argues that procedural liberalism’s success in keeping
serious political discussion and debate out of the public realm for as long a time as it has is “at the heart
of democracy’s discontent.” Americans have lost faith in the possibility of self-government, and they are
frightened by the disintegration of community they see happening all around them. Twenty-six years since
Democracy’s Discontent was first published, Sandel writes that this way of thinking has brought us to a
political precipice—a moment when the combination of frayed social bonds and intense political polarization
calls into question the very future of the American experiment."
Emily Finley + Michael Sandel lead to the conclusion that US democracy, at present, is headless authoriatarianism.
Political leaders are often not in the loop of democratic political decision making regarding public values and
tangible public benefits.