Dunno. I'm O Rh positive, myself.
Arwel
--
Arwel Parry apa...@cix.compulink.co.uk
ar...@cartref.demon.co.uk 10033...@compuserve.com
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/arwel/
Sorry if its a FAQ here.
Gavin Peebles, formerly of Liverpool, Wales, Glasgow, Hong Kong,
Australia and now in Singapore.
On 28 Jul 1996, Garry Lee wrote:
> Certainly, O is the dominant Celtic blood group, whereas in Saxons it is
> A.
>
Are you sure of this? Although my parents have a little celtic blood
they are predominantly English and German with O + being dominant. Seems
like I have read something other than your information elsewhere also.
This is strange-- Who am I really now? Anyone got any solid sources for
this information?> >
My father's family, being composed of O'Carolans and Corcorans, and
hailing from County Mayo, have the very rare AB- blood group throughout
the family. Any idea how this fits into the gene pool?
i myself has O blood type...i am not sure about being positive or
negative....but i am far from being a celt.
cecilia
Interestingly, AB- is most commonly found among the oriental gene pools.
No matter. My ex-wife (a firey red-head whose appearance shouted of
celtic heritage) matched the anthropologists classic bone structure for
Native American. So far she has been unable to prove any Native American
blood in her line, but forensic scientists would certainly classify her
skeleton as such.
O is the most common blood group everywhere on the planet. A and B are
found in various concentrations in various small gene pools, and AB
occurs when you get an A from one parent and a B from the other.
Negative is somewhat less common than Positive (in part because Negative
is a recessive gene).
I think the truth is that blood types (and bone structure) have less to
do with celtic heritage than cultural ties do. All that I have read on
the Celts is that we were never racially homogenous, but rather were a
culture that encompassed a wide variety of European tribal stocks (and
perhaps some Non-European groups as well).
Willy Carroll
Private E-Mail to: oll...@juno.com
On 31 Jul 1996, David Bower wrote:
>
> Interestingly, AB- is most commonly found among the oriental gene pools.
> No matter. My ex-wife (a firey red-head whose appearance shouted of
> celtic heritage) matched the anthropologists classic bone structure for
> Native American. So far she has been unable to prove any Native American
> blood in her line, but forensic scientists would certainly classify her
> skeleton as such.
A lot of those techniques are really considered outmoded now. In fact,
now nobody can even define the word "race". This is
another reason I wouldn't take too seriously these "finds" of human bones
supposed to be millions of years old. These idiots don't know WHAT
they're reconstructing!
>
> O is the most common blood group everywhere on the planet.
Now this one I believe.
>A and B are found in various concentrations in various small gene pools, and AB
> occurs when you get an A from one parent and a B from the other.
My half-aunt is Irish and German. Her blood type is something crazy like
B-.
>> I think the truth is that blood types (and bone structure) have less to
> do with celtic heritage than cultural ties do.
This point makes a lot of sense. Language and culture certainly do
bind. I still think gene pool DOES count. I just can't tell how much.
I found a book on the Caucasian Race one time (sorry I can't remember the
name). But the author noted certain types of Caucasian that were
supposed to be characteristic of different countries. Wouldn't you know
it though, he had a picture of a Frenchman with facial characteristics
supposed to belong to an Irishman. And he had Englishmen with traces
of Mediterranean traits. This is quite common. However, he
did note the predicability of certain kinds of characteristics along sea
coasts as opposed to inland areas. And he made a good case for the
blending of different people groups within regions of countries supposed
to be homogeneous.
>All that I have read on
> the Celts is that we were never racially homogenous, but rather were a
> culture that encompassed a wide variety of European tribal stocks (and
> perhaps some Non-European groups as well).
So perhaps we all make a little sense when you look at it that way.
Kat
>
I'm O- if that's of any help. I got a card when I was in England from
the English blood transfusion service to say it was an unusual group but
haven't had the same from the Scottish blood transfusion service so
maybe it's less common in England.
--
Craig Cockburn ("coburn"), Du\n E/ideann, Alba. (Edinburgh, Scotland)
http://www.smo.uhi.ac.uk/~craig/
Sgri\obh thugam 'sa Gha\idhlig ma 'se do thoil e.
But any ways.... re: Celts' dominant blood group, there are so many
TYPES of Celts, it would be hard to label them with a dominant blood
type, IMHO.
I'm O- also but I think that 10% of people are (or maybe of males). Blood
transfusion services like O- people because almost anyone can accept
O- blood (or so I've heard). O- is universal donor, AB+ (I think) is
universal acceptor.
As for O- being rare among Celts.. I don't know. I do know that people
from the Aran Islands were discovered to have an unusual blood type not
found elsewhere in Europe. Presumably this typing is at a more sophisticated
level than A,B,O,+,- etc.
Aye, but depends on which parts of Scotland. The big round heids, I grant
you...
John Lovie
lov...@pc.jaring.my
Helen,
Your humble opinion is on the money.
If you are looking for genetic identifiers in blood type, there are
much more precise mothods than the A-B-O typing system, which really
isn't the right tool for that job. Biological anthropologists use the
M-N system, and others, to answer more specific questions.
It would be today almost impossible to isolate a "Celtic gene" since
the diaspora is so widespread; and since there is more genetic variation
*within* a so-called "race" than *between* "races" it may be a wild
goose chase to begin with.
-maggie council di pietra, program assistant
graduate programs in applied anthropology
university of south florida
cou...@luna.cas.usf.edu
More a self-fulfilling prophecy than I anticipated. ;)
I apologise for the double post. My program refused steadfastly to send
one, so I wrote another, then it sent both. Go figure...
Lynda
--
WPCs
Trying one more time on this question about genetics/bloodlines; has
anyone heard of the schizophrenia frequency studies that indicate
Scotland has the highest rate of schizophrenia in the world and that a
statistically significant number of patients are born in November?
One possible explanation may be diagnostic criteria?
Sorry for the deja vu experience, if any.
Lynda
> >
> > Sorry for the deja vu experience, if any.
> More a self-fulfilling prophecy than I anticipated. ;)
> I apologise for the double post. My program refused steadfastly to send
> one, so I wrote another, then it sent both. Go figure...
Such persistance is commendable.
--
Chic McGregor Semiconductor Engineer / //
Email chi...@zetnet.co.uk ////
"Don't vote Labour because of your parents, ///
vote SNP because of your children. Alba gu brath!" ///
Hallo, Helen--close, but no cigar.
The blood protiens are of three thypes, labeled arbitrarily as "A", "B", and
the "rhesus factor". If you have none of the protiens, you have neither "A"
nor "B" protiens, which makes you one of the many of the "O" blood
group--meaning you have neither of the potential MAIN blood protiens. If you
lack the "rhesus factor" protien, you are labeled as being "Rh-" (or Rh
negative). If you have all the protiens that it is possible to have in one's
blood, you are "AB+" (such as myself) meaning that you have the "A" protien,
the "B" protien, and the "Rhesus factor" protien.
The body's immune system responds to the PRESENCE of foreign protien chains,
and infusion of a blood which has more protiens than the recipient is
genetically "programmed" to recognize causes "immune reactions" that endanger
one's life. Consequently, people such as myself, who have ALL of the possible
blood protiens (A, B AND the presence of the "rhesus factor protien" = AB+
blood type) can receive, without risk of immunity reactions, anyone's blood.
Those who are of the blood type "O-" have none of these three possible blood
protiens and, consequently, they can donate to any other blood type (as well
as to their own) without risk of provoking an immune reaction in the
recipient. Ergo, "O-" is the universal donor and "AB+" is the universal
recipient.
Hope that clarifies things to some degree....
Yours,
~ Cailin*
- Douglas
>- Douglas
Weeellll, you know if it works for them, why not?
Janet
>I don't know about schizophrenia, but I have read that Scots in the Outer
>Islands have a higher rate of epilepsy than would be expected in a
>population that small -- and consequently have/had some rather bizarre
>practices for curing themselves: drinking well water from the skull of a
>person who had killed themselves...
be kinda hard on 'em if everyone starts blowing their brains out - hopefully
they encourage hanging as a means...
-gary
--
gary cooper (not the dead one)
mailto:mo...@kesmai.com
Kesmai Corp. Air Warrior/Harpoon Product Support
http://www.cris.com/~cooper
Where did you hear about this practice? Lynda