Attn: Unicode Inc worker Chridtopher Fynn

[Tulasi]

Attn: Unicode Inc worker Chridtopher Fynn
C/o Magda Danish
Sr Administrative Director
Unicode Inc
<chris.fynn @ gmail.com>,
<v-ma...@microsoft.com>,


None from Assam Government as well as Assam Literary Society has asked
Unicode Inc to encode Assamese stuff.

Can you reply back with detailed information on what prompt Unicode
Inc to encode Assamese stuff as "Bengali"?

Thank you in advance for providing this information,

Tulasi
PS: Your email thread appended herewith as reference


From: Chridtopher Fynn <chris...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: Continue:Glaring mistake in the code list for South Asian
Script
To: uni...@unicode.org


On 10/09/2011 04:53, delex r wrote:

I figure out that Unicode has not addressed the sovereignty issues
of a language while trying to devise an ASCII like encoding system for
almost all the characters and symbols used on earth.

.....

The Unicode encodes writing systems not languages - it certainly has
nothing to do with "the sovereignty issues of a language" - nor should
it.

There are many characters encoded in the "Latin" blocks that were
never used for writing the Latin Language and similarly there are
characters encoded in the Arabic block only used for writing Persian
not Arabic.

Characters only used for writing Assamese in the "Bengali" block is
similar. As long as you can type all the characters necessary for
writing your language, don't worry about names.