Graph of the movement of centre of mass with time, in a new class of motor, the Internal Force Engine

[Arindam Banerjee]

Hmm, no reaction at all, in this free-for-all open medium that is sci.physics from the learned asses, apes, roaches, etc. lording or crawling in the establishments, let alone any alpha-ape!
Truth is hard to defeat except by indifference and gross lies; they take the former approach for now. Gotta think about CAREER, what.
I suppose I should be glad that they have not killed me yet!
Thanks.

On Saturday, 28 October 2023 at 17:26:43 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> This graph shows what is impossible by classical and modern physics - the movement of matter by internal force, thus violating the principle of inertia, the bedrock of classical and modern physics. The conservation of energy laws, the notion of entropy, the big bang theory, relativiity theories with the law of conservation of mass and energy, quantum theories - these are all upset by this simple 2 second experiment. But what is the centre of mass?
>
> Take two balls of 1 Kg each and place them 1 m apart. The centre of mass is midway as they are of same mass. Now take one ball and move it away by 1 m. The centre of mass is still halfway, but it has moved by 50cm. Point is, that and external force is needed to change the centre of mass. When we walk, we press upon the ground to move forward, and the force from ground is the external force. On slippery ice, say, where we cannot move, our centre of mass remains unchanged. Internal force simply cannot change the centre of mass - even when a missile explodes. Then the constituent parts go off in different directions, but the centre of mass follows the earlier trajectory as per physics texts. All correct so far.
>
> In this experiement the armature weighs 2.98 Kg and the gun weighs 8.72Kg. At the start, with respect to the scale on the ground, their respective centres of masses are at 67 cm and 75 cm. (The pointer shows 80 cm, and that is used to track the movement of the gun, not the centre of mass.) Thus knowing the masses and positions, the initial centre of mass is about 73 cm, Now no matter what happens, as per theory, this has to remain constant when internal force is applied to the motor via the electric current from the supercapacitors.
>
> The graph and video show that to happen for the first 300 milliseconds - when no current is applied, and when the armature accelerates upon the rails, pushing the gun back. But as the armature continues to accelerate, the pushback upon the gun gets less so the centre of mass moves forward. That is, there is an acceleration acting upon the centre of mass! This stops when the armature hits the stops, then the movement of the armature, gun and centre of mass naturally follow the same way. But after the moving armature hits the stops at the end, the momentum is transferred and the whole system gets an acceleration. When the momentum transfier is completed, from the armature to the whole system, the entire system keeps on moving forward steadily! Yes it does get slowed with friction and finally with the part of the stop that had been knocked over. Had there be no friction invovled, nor the external interference it would have continued to move for ever.
>
> Now why is this the first graph of its kind... ? Well, this has been possible because a new equipment - supecapacitors - have been used that generate in this case 4000 amperes of current with little mass or volume involved. This new item causes the discovery that under certain engineering situations, like this rail gun assembly, where a conductor moves and can pass its momentum to the whole system, there is violation of the inertia principle. Then this is a new invention - a very powerful rail gun, at least ten times more efficient as seen from the data of existing military rail guns - of mine, the earliest model which I created back in 2015, for my PhD work. Finally, such is the human condition (when not spiritually inclined we are apes are we not so as apes must ape the alpha apes) that no one dares to question what the great people in great institutions all over the world say with all the money and power and inffluence behind them.
>
> So, this graph can never be published in any scientific journal as it violates the most fundemental principle, that of inertia, most sacred! And indeed this principle is generally valid. But hanging on to it will confine us to Earth, never take us to the stars. And before that, we cannot have extremly fast and safe travel on Earth, cheap energy available to all, and a far better understanding of the ways of the Universe, with all forces unified as electric and electromagnetic, involving protons, electrons and aether... From this experiment, the universe itself gets straightened out, made infinite, with no beginning nor end. Well, it may take decades or centuries for these new ideas to take hold. Hopefully, much sooner, thanks to Facebook, Usenet, and Youtube. Bypassing journals and learned people ensconced there, may be the best hope for humanity.
>
> https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7526174314076967&set=pcb.7526275530733512