As per Muslim HADITH;
Once god Allah was touring the desert and saw an extraordinarily
beautiful female camel, who was a wife of Mohammed the prophet and
fell
in Love!!
The god Allah was so desperate to love her that one day early in the
morning, when the prophet went to take a shit/piss in the oasis, he
(Allah) went to their house, disguising himself as her husband and
started having sex with her!!
While god Allah having sex, the prophet returned after
shitting /pissing and was furious to see Allah having sex with his
wife
and pushed him!!.
Enraged by the disturbance, god Allah started hitting the prophet by
his Lund(PENIS). To save his life, the poor prophet started to run and
the penis of Allah also started growing to hit the villain, the
prophet, wherever he ran!!.
The prophet ran whole Arabian Peninsula then ran to Africa and pleaded
Idi Amin, ruler of Uganda, to save his life from god Allah.
But Amin, explaining his helplessness advised him (the prophet) to go
to Saddam Hussein, another dictator. But Hussein advised him only
Musharraf, another dictator, can save him from the wrath of Allah,
whose penis is still following a hitting the prophet.
Musharraf felt pity at the prophet and to save him requested
Bhuttomati, wife of god Allah, to put the penis of Allah in her vagina
and Musharraf started anointing(massaging) the penis with camel piss,
pig shit etc.
Enjoyed by this god Allah spared the life of that poor prophet.
So the muslims started worshipping Allah-ki-Lund; (or penis of god
Allah). They named it "KAABA" and you can still see muslims kissing
Allah ki Lund when they visit Mecca and Medina.
WHAT A GREAT RELIGION!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm 'paki' + muslim, I guess I should be offended ;-)
"kick_pakis" <kick_...@volcanoMail.com> wrote in message
news:810102a7.02011...@posting.google.com...
According to some islamic scholars like our resident islamic scholar
'seeker', Allah was the pet pig of Mohammed and Mohammed sodomized Allah
everyday till it oinked oinked a sura of Koran. He also claims that there is
a sura (chapter) in Koran titled 'Al Bakri' meaning 'The Pig'. So, there you
have it.
Thanks bud.
Deb
And you in the name of Shiva asked to be my bride -- dulhan. The answer is
still no.
As to Hindus not eating cows - the leaders of hinduism decide that cows are
like our mothers since we drink theior milk and thusforth not eat them
the number of cows were very low in India before that and the price of milk
went way up due to the fact that hindus ate most of the cows - henceforth
this ruling to make cows milk more affordable) .
Farting Freddy <flatu...@about.com> wrote in message
news:a22omi$a18$1...@newsie.singa.pore.net...
no offeence meant - just wanted to let you know that whatever comews out of
your ass can be shoved back in there too ;))
kick_pakis <kick_...@volcanoMail.com> wrote in message
news:810102a7.02011...@posting.google.com...
"Anamika_1971" <Anamik...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<Fs918.29959$uA.3...@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>...
> As to Hindus not eating cows - the leaders of hinduism decide that cows
are
> like our mothers since we drink theior milk and thusforth not eat them
> the number of cows were very low in India before that and the price of
milk
> went way up due to the fact that hindus ate most of the cows - henceforth
> this ruling to make cows milk more affordable) .
I think Hindus started worshipping cows for similar reason but the objective
was to have enough milk to pour over various Shivalingams that had been
'''erected''' all over India. Indians are still erecting Shivalingums all
over the place.
You mentioned it now. You have been posting your desires to blow some Moslem
dicks for a while. Just remember if you work hard, truth will come in your
mouth. You can swallow it for added benefit to your pagan soul.
> Mushy massaged Allah's
> dick. Bhuttomati was the person who put allah's dick in her pussy.
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnn
> Anyways, explain your obsession with Mushy's dick please?
Mushy's dick is your obsession. I am sure since you can't find any
shivalingam here in the US, you go looking for the next best thing. Damn,
you sick perverted Sudra. Remember Manu?
May Allah have mercy on your heathen soul.
You are one sick son of a bitch. If you must, please take it to
alt.religion.islam.allafucked up or alt.bestiality.islam.
Deb
> You are one sick son of a bitch. If you must, please take it to
> alt.religion.islam.allafucked up or alt.bestiality.islam.
>
> Deb
Why don't you go suck a Paki-lingum. The difference is the white milk will
come inside your mouth and you wouldn't have to pour any milk on it.
Dumbass arab wannabe pakistani muslim scum, why all this rage? Cool down,
take it easy. Have piss, I mean camel piss.
Deb
Debbie darling, no rage. I am just making a revelation on you that if you
suck a Paki lingum, you will be rewarded with white milk.
> Debbie darling, no rage. I am just making a revelation on you that if you
> suck a Paki lingum, you will be rewarded with white milk.
Dumbass arab wannabe pakistani muslim scum, I hope you are in piss, I mean
camel piss.
Deb
Debbie darling if this is your pathetic way to ask people for their piss
sample, you will have to find other ways to quench your thirst. There are
some Amish villages in Pennsylvania where you can get some ORGANIC COW PISS.
I think the guru recommended the first morning piss for drinking and the
afternoon piss for message.
Deb
"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_to_spam_bots_121101> wrote in message
news:a26qdk$21u$1...@slb7.atl.mindspring.net...
"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_to_spam_bots_121101> wrote in message news:<a25clh$9lt$1...@slb4.atl.mindspring.net>...
Seeker
"Deb Shanker" <debsh...@india.com> wrote in message
news:a26s9o$v161b$2...@ID-119373.news.dfncis.de...
And, muslim scums drink pig piss from human sculls. Your religion's founder
pedophile criminal SOB Mohammed was to be a habitual drinker of pig piss.
Deb
And Hindus rub burnt shit over their bodies and drink water from Shiva's
piss the Ganges. The source of the Ganga the Shiva piss is Shivalingum. This
water is more dirty than Pakistani sewers. Of course if you start
worshipping Pakilingum, get it erected in temples, and work very hard, you
will be rewarded by hot warm white cream. This cream will set you free of
all Hindu mumbo-jumbo.
Good luck.
Deb
"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_to_spam_bots_121101> wrote in message
news:a283g6$iee$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net...
So what asshole?
> What do you know about
> truth anyway asshole?
I do know the truth that you are an asshole and a 'kuttay ka baccha.'
> Pakis like you cannot open their mouth (or
> asshole) without spewing blatant lies.
And you can't open your mouth without catching a few gallons of Pakistani
piss.
> You keep harping about "freedom
> fighters". Where is is freedom in pakiland asshole?
Freedom in Pakistan is to choke the living shit out of assholes like you.
> You can't find a
> single hindu left in pakiland. All the hindu men have disappeared
> (sodomized, murdered or converted).
Come on, everyone in Pakistan knows that Hindu men have very loose assholes.
Heck even Pathans don't sodomize them anymore. This is why the Pathans
tribesmen went into Kashmir in 1948 to look for some good looking Hindus.
> No woman can live after being raped
> everyday.
Then sweetheart, how come you are still alive after the daily Brahmin raping
of you Sudras.
> Why are there no democratic elections in "free" pakiland or
> in "azad" kashmir? answer sewer ki auladh.
Kuttay ki aulad here is the answer that you will have no problem
understanding "Wuff. wuff, wuff,wuff,wuff."
>You can throw a stone and
> hit a muslim anywhere in India.
No honest God loving Moslem in India can piss on the side of the street
without avoiding open mouths of Hindus.
> You do the same in pakiland and all
> you hit are dumbass arab wanabbe pakis. no hindus... all dead. Paki
> population had 30 percent hindus in 1947.
Yeah, and fifty years ago, 30% Indian population was Hindu. Now, they bread
like cats and dogs. Moslems should have converted every single pagan in
India to Islam. More importantly convert all temple to Mosques. 'Na rahay ga
bans, Na bajay gee bansuri.'
>Today they have been wiped
> out. Murdering muslim thugs. Freedom my ass.
A lowly sudra only needs to remember Manu Smriti which incidentally has been
re-heard by the Brahmins as Brahma Sutra. Go to the nearest Human society
and put yourself up for adoption.
"Deb Shanker" <debsh...@india.com> wrote in message
news:a283vm$v9fu4$1...@ID-119373.news.dfncis.de...
Deb
"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_to_spam_bots_121101> wrote in message
news:a2860m$ole$1...@slb7.atl.mindspring.net...
"Deb Shanker" <debsh...@india.com> wrote in message
news:a288tf$v6813$1...@ID-119373.news.dfncis.de...
Deb
"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_to_spam_bots_121101> wrote in message
news:a289ov$o4$1...@slb2.atl.mindspring.net...
I personally fuck alla the motherfucker 5 times a day, fucking her ass
and screwing her asshole and pushing my cock in till it comes out of
the mouth of alla and then alla "bluurps" (indistinctly, due to my
cock blocking the mouth of alla-the-cocksucker) a koran sura.
This is a challenge to alla the cocksucker whore son, if she exists,
let her stop me before I post the mext message, and if I post one word
after this, alla is a whore being fucked by me.
All muslims are motherfucker fatherfucker shit-eaters
ball-hole-sniffer ass-hole-blower whore-son father-cum-eater
son-of-bitches and I fuck their families including their mothers and
sisters while they suck their fathers who are pimping for their
mothers in the first place. This specifically includes but is not
limited to all muslims in this NG, including seeker the motherfucker
and Dicksucker Testicle-less Asshole (DTA).
> > Pakis like you cannot open their mouth (or
> > asshole) without spewing blatant lies.
>
> And you can't open your mouth without catching a few gallons of Pakistani
> piss.
I thought that piss is all the pakis have to drink... camel piss that
is
>
> > You keep harping about "freedom
> > fighters". Where is is freedom in pakiland asshole?
>
> Freedom in Pakistan is to choke the living shit out of assholes like you.
>
You have no idea what freedom means do you? not suprising you being a
paki pig
> > You can't find a
> > single hindu left in pakiland. All the hindu men have disappeared
> > (sodomized, murdered or converted).
>
> Come on, everyone in Pakistan knows that Hindu men have very loose assholes.
> Heck even Pathans don't sodomize them anymore. This is why the Pathans
> tribesmen went into Kashmir in 1948 to look for some good looking Hindus.
um.. I think you got that wrong.. I hear the same things about paki
faggots too
>
> > No woman can live after being raped
> > everyday.
>
> Then sweetheart, how come you are still alive after the daily Brahmin raping
> of you Sudras.
This sudra is doing fine.. you being a paki nigger you can't say the
same thing can you? How is your white "massa" treating ya?
>
> > Why are there no democratic elections in "free" pakiland or
> > in "azad" kashmir? answer sewer ki auladh.
>
> Kuttay ki aulad here is the answer that you will have no problem
> understanding "Wuff. wuff, wuff,wuff,wuff."
Oink oink oink oink is the answer you have no problem answering
>
> >You can throw a stone and
> > hit a muslim anywhere in India.
>
> No honest God loving Moslem in India can piss on the side of the street
> without avoiding open mouths of Hindus.
nope.. pakis usually pee into each other's assholes... so they don't
even need urinals.
>
> > You do the same in pakiland and all
> > you hit are dumbass arab wanabbe pakis. no hindus... all dead. Paki
> > population had 30 percent hindus in 1947.
>
> Yeah, and fifty years ago, 30% Indian population was Hindu. Now, they bread
> like cats and dogs. Moslems should have converted every single pagan in
> India to Islam. More importantly convert all temple to Mosques. 'Na rahay ga
> bans, Na bajay gee bansuri.'
Dream on paki pig dream on..
>
> >Today they have been wiped
> > out. Murdering muslim thugs. Freedom my ass.
>
> A lowly sudra only needs to remember Manu Smriti which incidentally has been
> re-heard by the Brahmins as Brahma Sutra. Go to the nearest Human society
> and put yourself up for adoption.
>
Me lowly? are you high on drugs seeker?
This what happens to Hindus who believe in the hermaphroditic Hindu gods who
show characteristics of both sexes and are a combination of disparate or
contradictory elements. This pathetic excuse of a human being does not know
the difference between masculine gender and the feminine gender. If someone
is a 'son,' how can he be a 'she'? Your Hindu gods are both males and
females at the same time, so you apply the same logic to others. You are one
confused person.
> This specifically includes but is not
> limited to all muslims in this NG, including seeker the motherfucker
> and Dicksucker Testicle-less Asshole (DTA).
Truth must really hurt you.
No, motherfucker whoreson ass-fucker SEEKER, this shows you that there
is NO ALLA!! I challenged the motherfucker whore-son shit-eater alla
and that fatherfucker alla could do doodly squat to me.
AND GUESS WHAT shiteater, I wrote the above before I was about to get
on a plane. And since there is NO ALLA, nothing happened.
If only fatherfucker motherfucker whore-son ball-hole-licking
mother-cunt-pimping shit-eater toilet-hounds like you, "anamika", and
Dicksucking Testicle-less Asshole (DTA) could understand this logic,
there would be no problem on this earth. After all, if there is no
alla, and that motherfucker nigger alla cannot respond to challenges,
**WHY WORSHIP HIM**? That is why alla becomes a 'she', as we
understand that alla is a woman and not to be challenged by a man.
>
> > This specifically includes but is not
> > limited to all muslims in this NG, including seeker the motherfucker
> > and Dicksucker Testicle-less Asshole (DTA).
>
> Truth must really hurt you.
The truth is, there is NO ALLA. I am convinced about it and I have
proved it. Does that hurt *YOU*, because that surely does not hurt
me!!
Maybe He did not accept a challenge from an insignificant twit.
>
> AND GUESS WHAT shiteater, I wrote the above before I was about to get
> on a plane. And since there is NO ALLA, nothing happened.
Wow! There are many stories like this, where people exposed themselves to
danger and challenged God to kill them to show that God does not exist, but
when they were at the safest place they could be and their number was up,
they died regardless. Since you are always wishing death on yourself, I
reckon there is a deep rooted psychological problem with you. Perhaps your
father beat you up bad when you were a child and your mother rejected you,
and perhaps you are a latent homosexual.
>
> If only fatherfucker motherfucker whore-son ball-hole-licking
> mother-cunt-pimping shit-eater toilet-hounds like you, "anamika", and
> Dicksucking Testicle-less Asshole (DTA) could understand this logic,
> there would be no problem on this earth. After all, if there is no
> alla, and that motherfucker nigger alla cannot respond to challenges,
Because He is forgiving and He only wants what's best for you. I can make a
similar challenge to you, and there isn't a darn thing you can do to me, so
does that mean you are a worthless piece of crap?
> **WHY WORSHIP HIM**? That is why alla becomes a 'she', as we
> understand that alla is a woman and not to be challenged by a man.
Who should people worship? Do Hindus understand that bhagwan "is a woman and
not to be challenged by a man."
>
> >
> > > This specifically includes but is not
> > > limited to all muslims in this NG, including seeker the motherfucker
> > > and Dicksucker Testicle-less Asshole (DTA).
> >
> > Truth must really hurt you.
>
> The truth is, there is NO ALLA.
What the truth is will not change based on what you say or I say.
> I am convinced about it and I have
> proved it.
Bullshit. This is annoying. You have proved nothing. You have merely stated
your convictions which are based in your own religious beliefs. Why is OK
for you to espouse fundamentalist ideals but not for others?
> Does that hurt *YOU*, because that surely does not hurt
> me!!
No. But something has hurt you bad.
I am not wishing that. I was here to show to you and other muslims
that we hate your religion, we believe that you have no God and that
calling other religions names is not your exclusive privilage. What I
have posted is to a reaction to what other ass-raising muslims have
written before.
I have a good life, thanks.
>
> Because He is forgiving and He only wants what's best for you. I can make a
> similar challenge to you, and there isn't a darn thing you can do to me, so
> does that mean you are a worthless piece of crap?
(a) GOD is forgiving, GOD is almighty and I am a servant of GOD. I
worship GOD everyday and I am in HIS refuge: I exist by HIS mercy.
alla is not GOD.
(b) I made the post first, so if your challenge were made before mine,
it would show some value. Now, if you do challenge anyone or anything,
*YOU* will come across as a loser. Of course, that would not be the
first time you lost. I tricked you into posting that alla was a
homosexual: remember?
>
> What the truth is will not change based on what you say or I say.
You are only partly right. We have to struggle for what we believe
right and leave the rest to God. After all, it is not in our hands, if
God wishes it, what we desire will happen. If He does not wish it, it
will never happen.
>
> > I am convinced about it and I have
> > proved it.
>
> Bullshit. This is annoying. You have proved nothing. You have merely stated
> your convictions which are based in your own religious beliefs. Why is OK
> for you to espouse fundamentalist ideals but not for others?
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? What I have posted and am posting is a *REACTION*
to fundamentalist muslim posting. Muslims always believe that theirs
is a superior religion and pretty much exclusively insulted all other
religions before. It is only now that some reaction is coming to that:
muslims are the fundamentalists, NOT me.
>
> > Does that hurt *YOU*, because that surely does not hurt
> > me!!
>
> No. But something has hurt you bad.
Wrong again! I will not give you any details, but you are El Wrongo!!
Then why are you always challenging ''alla'' to strike you dead? You could
always challange 'alla' for something else, but you always chose death. Do
you see my point?
> I was here to show to you and other muslims
> that we hate your religion, we believe that you have no God and that
> calling other religions names is not your exclusive privilage. What I
> have posted is to a reaction to what other ass-raising muslims have
> written before.
I already had a pretty good idea that you were posting all of this because
you are angry at some Moslems. However, it is still interesting that you
chose the same path that flamed you. By showing that you can out do any
ignorant Moslem out there when it comes to insulting other's religions,
where do you think that leaves you? And is that where you want to be in your
life? Worse than the worst?
> I have a good life, thanks.
How can it be good it it is consumed with the hatred of Allah, Mohammed,
Islam and Moslems?
>
> >
> > Because He is forgiving and He only wants what's best for you. I can
make a
> > similar challenge to you, and there isn't a darn thing you can do to me,
so
> > does that mean you are a worthless piece of crap?
>
> (a) GOD is forgiving, GOD is almighty and I am a servant of GOD. I
> worship GOD everyday and I am in HIS refuge: I exist by HIS mercy.
> alla is not GOD.
Good for you to have convictions in your belief, but how strong could your
convictions in your god be if you have to prove that "alla is not GOD?" to
feel committed to your god.
>
> (b) I made the post first, so if your challenge were made before mine,
> it would show some value. Now, if you do challenge anyone or anything,
> *YOU* will come across as a loser.
Not necessarily. Your childish reasoning did not say that you could not be
challenged until I challenged you. Now in retrospect you come back with even
more childish reasoning that you fall pray to yourself. Do you see now who
comes across as a loser?
> Of course, that would not be the
> first time you lost.
It would not be the last time I'll lose. I view losing as an opportunity to
improve. No big deal if I lose. Although I have never lost ;-)
> I tricked you into posting that alla was a
> homosexual: remember?
I don't remember it that way.
>
> >
> > What the truth is will not change based on what you say or I say.
>
> You are only partly right. We have to struggle for what we believe
> right and leave the rest to God. After all, it is not in our hands, if
> God wishes it, what we desire will happen. If He does not wish it, it
> will never happen.
Then explain this to me. If God already knows what He wishes and desires,
then why do you struggle for what you believe to be right.
>
> >
> > > I am convinced about it and I have
> > > proved it.
> >
> > Bullshit. This is annoying. You have proved nothing. You have merely
stated
> > your convictions which are based in your own religious beliefs. Why is
OK
> > for you to espouse fundamentalist ideals but not for others?
>
> ARE YOU KIDDING ME? What I have posted and am posting is a *REACTION*
> to fundamentalist muslim posting. Muslims always believe that theirs
> is a superior religion and pretty much exclusively insulted all other
> religions before. It is only now that some reaction is coming to that:
> muslims are the fundamentalists, NOT me.
But you did stoop to their level. Heck you actually surpassed them. You can
keep on posting what's on your mind, it does not bother me. In fact in the
previous post you pulled all stops to insult me, but I did not get insulted.
>
> >
> > > Does that hurt *YOU*, because that surely does not hurt
> > > me!!
> >
> > No. But something has hurt you bad.
>
> Wrong again! I will not give you any details, but you are El Wrongo!!
I think we have already established that you were hurt by the postings of
some Moslems. Very interesting. Don't you think?
What it is, is that you are mixing up cause and effect. I am sure in
my conviction, I am sure there is no alla, and therefore I have no
problems in proving that in many ways, including a communication of
this sort. I derive this sort of challenge from my conviction, my
convictions are not derived from this challenge.
>
> > I was here to show to you and other muslims
> > that we hate your religion, we believe that you have no God and that
> > calling other religions names is not your exclusive privilage. What I
> > have posted is to a reaction to what other ass-raising muslims have
> > written before.
>
> I already had a pretty good idea that you were posting all of this because
> you are angry at some Moslems. However, it is still interesting that you
> chose the same path that flamed you. By showing that you can out do any
> ignorant Moslem out there when it comes to insulting other's religions,
> where do you think that leaves you? And is that where you want to be in your
> life? Worse than the worst?
That is the typical catch 22 we all face, don't we, INCLUDING YOU?
When others, including Deb post against Islam, you are always quick to
respond: WHY? Where do you think that leaves *YOU*? And to make
matters worse, you *Know* that leaves you worse off, yet you do it.
*AND* you are advising me that responding to that leaves me worse
off..so if you respond while having full knowledge of the vicious
cycle, are'nt *you* the worst human being?
>
> > I have a good life, thanks.
>
> How can it be good it it is consumed with the hatred of Allah, Mohammed,
> Islam and Moslems?
Don't you have hatred of evil? Does not *any* religious person have
hatred of evil? I hate the abovementioned entities because they are
the seat of all evil and suffering in this world today.
>
> >
>
> Good for you to have convictions in your belief, but how strong could your
> convictions in your god be if you have to prove that "alla is not GOD?" to
> feel committed to your god.
Again, cause and effect mixup by you (perhaps deliberately). Since I
am firm in my convication, I know that alla is not God. I do not
derive my convictions by making that statement.
Incidentally, muslims derive their faith in whole from reciting a
negative statement, namely the 'shahadah' which they recite "I witness
there is no god but alla.." so what kind of a devilish religion is
islam?
>
> >
> > (b) I made the post first, so if your challenge were made before mine,
> > it would show some value. Now, if you do challenge anyone or anything,
> > *YOU* will come across as a loser.
>
> Not necessarily. Your childish reasoning did not say that you could not be
> challenged until I challenged you.
You are trying to find 'reson' after being beaten in the draw of
challenges. Whoever draws first, fires first and wins. I drew first,
challenged first, and thus won..I do not have to rationalize it with
reason..that is the truth!
>
> > Of course, that would not be the
> > first time you lost.
>
> It would not be the last time I'll lose. I view losing as an opportunity to
> improve. No big deal if I lose. Although I have never lost ;-)
Well, nice to see you have a constructive attitude. May I suggest you
take a close and open minded look at the evil cult called islam which
you belong to, and improve yourself from there by exercising this
'opportunity to improve' and convert from it.
>
> > I tricked you into posting that alla was a
> > homosexual: remember?
>
> I don't remember it that way.
One seldom remembers one's losses. You made a statement inquiring as
to whether alla fucked my ass, which proved my point that alla was a
homosexual. So *you* helped prove my point..that was really great.
>
> >
> > You are only partly right. We have to struggle for what we believe
> > right and leave the rest to God. After all, it is not in our hands, if
> > God wishes it, what we desire will happen. If He does not wish it, it
> > will never happen.
>
> Then explain this to me. If God already knows what He wishes and desires,
> then why do you struggle for what you believe to be right.
Very good question. The reason is, that we are all God's instruments
and He works through us. That is why we have to struggle for what we
believe is right, as we are acting on HIS behalf, not on OUR behalf.
So, if we struggle for what we believe is right, we are doing HIS
work. God does not come everyday to earth and feed you food..He
creates that circumstances in which *you* work and earn and eat..yet
do we not thank him for letting us have food?
>
> >
> >
> > ARE YOU KIDDING ME? What I have posted and am posting is a *REACTION*
> > to fundamentalist muslim posting. Muslims always believe that theirs
> > is a superior religion and pretty much exclusively insulted all other
> > religions before. It is only now that some reaction is coming to that:
> > muslims are the fundamentalists, NOT me.
>
> But you did stoop to their level. Heck you actually surpassed them. You can
> keep on posting what's on your mind, it does not bother me.
Look above: I proved that you too, stoop to 'their' level when you
respond to Deb Shanker.
>In fact in the
> previous post you pulled all stops to insult me, but I did not get insulted.
That is true. That is one time you showed maturity and which is why we
are having this meaningful conversation, and not responding to insane
posts only intended to offend. I lost my temper that one time..but did
you also not forge posts in the past: did that not deserve some
reprimand?
> >
> > Wrong again! I will not give you any details, but you are El Wrongo!!
>
> I think we have already established that you were hurt by the postings of
> some Moslems. Very interesting. Don't you think?
I am not *hurt*, I am responding. If I were hurt, I would not be in a
position to respond: in a battle, if you are hurt, you are down, but
if you are in a position to respond, then it means that wither (a) you
are not hurt, or, (b) you are hurt to such an insignificant extent
that it does not bother you. With me, it is (a).
"Seeker" <4not_listed_due_to_spam_bots_121101> wrote in message
news:a2o249$2ql$1...@slb1.atl.mindspring.net...
> > I already had a pretty good idea that you were posting all of this
because
> > you are angry at some Moslems. However, it is still interesting that you
> > chose the same path that flamed you. By showing that you can out do any
> > ignorant Moslem out there when it comes to insulting other's religions,
> > where do you think that leaves you? And is that where you want to be in
your
> > life? Worse than the worst?
>
> That is the typical catch 22 we all face, don't we, INCLUDING YOU?
> When others, including Deb post against Islam, you are always quick to
> respond:
Are you the same person who posts as Deb Shanker?
> WHY? Where do you think that leaves *YOU*? And to make
> matters worse, you *Know* that leaves you worse off, yet you do it.
I don't do it in the same manner as you do. I tried to learn about Hinduism
both good aspects and bad. That's the difference.
> *AND* you are advising me that responding to that leaves me worse
> off..so if you respond while having full knowledge of the vicious
> cycle, are'nt *you* the worst human being?
No I am not. I have claimed to have posted anything as a reaction to some
fundi Hindus hatred towards Islam or anything else for that matter. I am
merely having discussions with people without a prejudice to flame them. Do
you see the difference.
>
>
> >
> > > I have a good life, thanks.
> >
> > How can it be good it it is consumed with the hatred of Allah, Mohammed,
> > Islam and Moslems?
>
> Don't you have hatred of evil? Does not *any* religious person have
> hatred of evil? I hate the abovementioned entities because they are
> the seat of all evil and suffering in this world today.
So then it boils down to having a difference of opinion as to what and who
evil is. Should you not give a break to those Pakistanis who posted
anti-Hindu stuff. Don't misunderstand, I have no problem with you posting
anti-Islam or anti-me stuff. Some of it actually makes me laugh.
>
> >
> > >
> >
> > Good for you to have convictions in your belief, but how strong could
your
> > convictions in your god be if you have to prove that "alla is not GOD?"
to
> > feel committed to your god.
>
> Again, cause and effect mixup by you (perhaps deliberately). Since I
> am firm in my convication, I know that alla is not God. I do not
> derive my convictions by making that statement.
You derive the "holier than thou" attitude from that statement. And it is
this attitude that is in question. Then again the question is only being
asked for the hypocrisy and nothing else.
> Incidentally, muslims derive their faith in whole from reciting a
> negative statement, namely the 'shahadah' which they recite "I witness
> there is no god but alla.." so what kind of a devilish religion is
> islam?
It is not a negative statement if you understand the semantics. It is simply
an Arabic syntax for asserting something as strongly as possible.
> > > I tricked you into posting that alla was a
> > > homosexual: remember?
> >
> > I don't remember it that way.
>
> One seldom remembers one's losses. You made a statement inquiring as
> to whether alla fucked my ass, which proved my point that alla was a
> homosexual. So *you* helped prove my point..that was really great.
It was a rhetorical question that you failed to understand. Your reasoning
is circular. The only reason I withdrew from that argument with you is that
it is hard to keep up with your "nom-de-jour," and after I asked you the
question did I realize that you are just a screaming jerk and it was not
worth discussing that any further. However, during the course of this
discussion you have showed that you can hold sane discussions.
> > But you did stoop to their level. Heck you actually surpassed them. You
can
> > keep on posting what's on your mind, it does not bother me.
>
> Look above: I proved that you too, stoop to 'their' level when you
> respond to Deb Shanker.
Unless you are the same person as Deb Shanker, you'd know that I have always
refrained from stooping to his level. Besides the conversation I have with
him are to me are more humorous than a reaction to anything else.
>
> >In fact in the
> > previous post you pulled all stops to insult me, but I did not get
insulted.
>
> That is true. That is one time you showed maturity and which is why we
> are having this meaningful conversation, and not responding to insane
> posts only intended to offend. I lost my temper that one time..but did
> you also not forge posts in the past: did that not deserve some
> reprimand?
Why were you so angry with me? When did I forge a post as someone else?
>
> > >
> > > Wrong again! I will not give you any details, but you are El Wrongo!!
> >
> > I think we have already established that you were hurt by the postings
of
> > some Moslems. Very interesting. Don't you think?
>
> I am not *hurt*, I am responding. If I were hurt, I would not be in a
> position to respond: in a battle, if you are hurt, you are down, but
In a battle you can be hurt and fight back at the same time. In fact battles
are often fought because of someone being "hurt" in some way.
> if you are in a position to respond, then it means that wither (a) you
> are not hurt, or, (b) you are hurt to such an insignificant extent
> that it does not bother you. With me, it is (a).
Is this reasoning out of Mahabharata?
No.
And you know it too, our posting styles are different.
Someone said sometime ago that I was Satya. I am not.
>
> > WHY? Where do you think that leaves *YOU*? And to make
> > matters worse, you *Know* that leaves you worse off, yet you do it.
>
> I don't do it in the same manner as you do. I tried to learn about Hinduism
> both good aspects and bad. That's the difference.
I have tried to learn and have learned about Islam. I have read
through the Koran. I have delved into the depths of Hadiths in its
entirety inlcuding all the various sources. I tried to find out *ONE*,
just *one* good thing about it. I was unable to do that.
>
>
> No I am not. I have claimed to have posted anything as a reaction to some
> fundi Hindus hatred towards Islam or anything else for that matter. I am
> merely having discussions with people without a prejudice to flame them. Do
> you see the difference.
Really? Then why did you post as Deb Shanker and copied the style of
my posts to insult other religions? Your server name and the forged
"Deb Shanker" server name were identical in the two cases.
>
> So then it boils down to having a difference of opinion as to what and who
> evil is.
There is something known as absolute evil. For example, 9/11 is one
such act. Now if you are starting to trot out the old cliched
arguments about Osama defending Islam, Palestinians being hurt etc ad
infinitum, just remember, I would not have said it was absolute evil
if the terrorists chose as their target any US army installation. But
the fact that they killed innocent people who had nothing to do with
them, qualifies it as absolute evil *and* cowardice in the bargain.
Another example of absolute evil is one act **YOU** condemned, namely
rape of Minor children in B'desh. Alla and islam falls in that
category too.
> I have no problem with you posting
> anti-Islam or anti-me stuff. Some of it actually makes me laugh.
You are the second muslim person to say it out aloud, and I would like
to make the statement for all times to come that I *want* to make
people laugh, so I post some light stuff as 'headlines'.
>
> You derive the "holier than thou" attitude from that statement. And it is
> this attitude that is in question. Then again the question is only being
> asked for the hypocrisy and nothing else.
What are you talking about? I do not pretend to have a "holier than
thou" attitude! It is muslims who have it. Do you want to know the
usual flow chart of muslim behaviour? Here you go.
Muslims argue with others -> muslims are soundly thrashed in logic
(with their OWN hadith/koran records) -->muslims try to point out
deficiencies of other religions --> that is refuted too and islam is
again proved to be crap --> muslims start to insult the others in the
hope that the so-called discussion will end. It is muslims who have a
problem!
>
> > Incidentally, muslims derive their faith in whole from reciting a
> > negative statement, namely the 'shahadah' which they recite "I witness
> > there is no god but alla.." so what kind of a devilish religion is
> > islam?
>
> It is not a negative statement if you understand the semantics. It is simply
> an Arabic syntax for asserting something as strongly as possible.
Ok, are these negative passages in the Koran? Or this is also a
syntactical "mis-translation"? ( to save bandwidth, I am giving
indices: full forms are available upon interest). WAKE UP and smell
the shit that is islam.
*Torment to Non-believers->IV.56
*Only Islam Acceptable-> III.85
* No friends from outsiders->III.118
*No friends with Jews, christians->V. 51
* No friends with non believers->IV.144, III.28
* No friends with parents/siblings if not believers->IX.23
* Fight non-believers->IX.123
* Cast terror in the hearts, smite the neck and cut fingertips of
unbelievers->VIII.12
* Smite the neck of unbelievers->XLVII.4
* Severe Punishment for atheists->X.4 ; V.10 ; V.86
* Severe Punishment for non-believers->XXII.19-22 ; LXXII.23, XCVIII.6
*Punishing non-believers of Hereafter->XVII.10
* Punishing for rejecting faith->III.91
* Non believers go to hell->IV.140 ; VII.36
* Partial Believers go to hell too->IV.150-1
* Sadistic punishments->LVI.42-43
* Punishment for apostates->XVI.106 ; III.86-8 ; III.90 ; IV.137.
* Threat of punishement for not going to war->IX.38-39, XLVIII.16
* Kill non-believers->IV.89
>
> It was a rhetorical question that you failed to understand. Your reasoning
> is circular. The only reason I withdrew from that argument with you is that
> it is hard to keep up with your "nom-de-jour,"
You are a pretty erudite person, and I hate to correct one word, but
it is not a typo, but an error. It is actually non-du-jour (De+La
makes it Du). Anyhoo, you showed maturity in that exchange. But, your
rhetorical question presupposed alla's homosexuality and that is what
was the point at issue.
>
> Unless you are the same person as Deb Shanker, you'd know that I have always
> refrained from stooping to his level. Besides the conversation I have with
> him are to me are more humorous than a reaction to anything else.
That is true too, I sometimes find your exchanges funny.
>
> Why were you so angry with me? When did I forge a post as someone else?
Why did you post crap about other religions posing as "Deb Shanker"?
Also, your last post had some pretty bad stuff, when you were
responding to Deb.
>
> > if you are in a position to respond, then it means that wither (a) you
> > are not hurt, or, (b) you are hurt to such an insignificant extent
> > that it does not bother you. With me, it is (a).
>
> Is this reasoning out of Mahabharata?
Ha ha ha. Good one.
What I would not give to live in the age of epics and get one more
kernel of mercy of the Supreme Lord!!
I think he is a camel terd in the desert and the rock they pray on is
actually a camel terd which represents allah. as for the camel terds they
burn to cook on and to give food that special taste just proves that muslems
are two faced as usual.
"FUCK_MUSLIMS" <fuk_m...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c0b635c2.02012...@posting.google.com...
"farting freddy" <flatu...@about.com> wrote in message
news:a3661m$aupe$1...@evans.scvmaxonline.com.sg...