>On 28 May 2002 07:30:19 -0700,
irc...@hotmail.com
(DarkLord) wrote: > >>Which part is true for other parties? Tax
increment?=20 >>It seems ludicrous to make that assumption when none of
the opposition > >Don't bother wasting your time telling the 'model
citizen of SCS' the trut= h. > >He is oblivious to the problems
that is facing this country because he doe= s >not have a brain to
register, much less ANALYZE it. > >It is clear that it _IS_
ludicrous and even comical to assume that the oth= er >parties would
have done the same when they are in power because there aren= 't >even
any historical records to back it up. > > >>parties has
actually the ability to do so. Perhaps you believe in tax >>increments.
Sure, it does have an aphrodisiac effect for those >>managing the
budget. But where is it going to end? We can't turn >>automatically to
ERP when there's congestion. Its an oxymoron to just >>setup ERP
wherever there are jams. Perhaps they can tear down all the >>gantries
and force all vehicles to pay for hourly road tax
instead. > >Brainless aka Mag touts the Tali-PAP party line so often
that makes me >wonder if he gets extra NSS for whatever he does here. Or
he has an accoun= t >in the Bahamas that gets extra bonus for each and
every single stupid >posting he puts up here on
SCS.=20 > >Personally, Yeow Cheow Tong probably thinks that solving
traffic problems = on >the CTE is as easy as popping a panadol when you
have a headache.. To him,=
>just like when one panadol doesn't solve
the problem, you pop another >panadol (ie. put up one more gantry) or you
go for the more powerful >painkillers (increase the ERP charges)...
hehehe.. > >It is also comical to look at the likes of sorry papayas
like Lim Hng >Khiang, on how he tried to weasel out of what he really
regrets, first the=
>$300K (which is what he REALLY regrets,
obviously) then all that grand >excuse about having overwritten the
hospital which is following the >ministry's directives (for damage control
because anyone who read his >earlier 'regret' would know him for the
heartless beast that he is). There=
>was clearly no regret as to why
such a silly regulation was in place in th= e >first place, not to
mention it is a regulation so stupid that it isn't >befitting of MILLION
DOLLAR MINI$TER$!! Someone should have resigned in >shame over the fact
that such a stupid regulation was even in place in the=
>first place.
But you can dream on that this will EVER happen in
Singapore.=
> >Then there's of course Mah Boh Tan, who can't
even think about other means=
>of cutting the costs to HDB car parks,
but knows only how to squeeze more >out of Singaporeans in the middle of a
recession. And to imagine he gets >paid a million buck$ for
it... > >There is also Baby Lee's ridiculous argument that raising
GST will help th= e >economy, which one of the more wicked has
commented that evenif half of >Suntec, Ngee Ann City and Marina close down
because of it, Baby Lee will >still insist that it will help the economy.
HIS pocket's economy, that is.=
> >And finally, not to forget
that there is this completely hopeless Lim Boon=
>Heng, who asked if
too much CPF is committed on property (when the real >question should be
about the pricing of the damned HDB flats, and how the >subsidies came
about if one can remember Lim Hng Khiang's economics 101) a= nd >also
to cut CPF of 40 years old (who are paying their necks off for their >HDB,
and trying to raise their kids) so that they can get a job. He
clearl= y >doesn't realize that what he has done is as silly as putting
the cart befo= re >the horse.=20 > >But since this is what
75% of Singaporeans have voted for, I am wondering = if >they are now
feeling exceedingly stupid for what they have done (our dear >brainless
excluded). I personally am getting all the kicks looking at all >this
stupidity. Frankly, Singapore deserved this. > >But still, even if I
rub it in again and again, many Singaporeans will sti= ck >their head
in the ground like an ostrich and think that there is nothing >wrong, and
then promptly forget about it when given some niceties around
t= he >next elections and vote the Tali-PAP again. And if anyone still
thinks the= re >is a reason to fight for this country, he can fight my
share of it as well=
> > >>The fundamental
problem of why people prefer to own a car has yet been >>resolved. The
public transport system, though admirable, is laughable >>when we
compared it with that of HK or Japan. Inconsistent arrival >>times,
obscenely packed during rush hours etc. It's extremely >>infuriating to
see 3 almost empty double deckers cruising by when you >>just squeezed
into one and had to tiptoe at the steps. We don't need >>mobile tv, we
don't need fancy GPS tracking system. We just need to >>get to our
destination in a comfortable and timely fashion. > >And brainless,
the model citizen will tell you that you shouldn't be >complaining because
the system in some other country is worse while boasti= ng >that he has
travelled far and wide. He is incapable of realizing that
eve= n >if we are made the 2nd worst nation in the world, we aren't
really doing >very well because there's always the 1st worst nation that
is worse off. > >Or else he will give you a piece of irrelevance
that makes you wonder if h= e >understood what you have written or he
is pulling a trick he learn from th= e >Tali-PAP, that to talk about
something entirely irrelevant to divert >attention from the main
issue. LOL > >What you have mentioned aside, it
obviously didn't matter to him that the >LRT can break down twice within a
week and it actually took 20 days for th= e >SMRT to put those faulty
trains back into operation while commuters had to=
>tolerate an extra
3 - 5 minutes of wait on the MRT's East-West line for >those 20 days,
weekends included. > >And after all this nonsense, some Tali-PAP
fellow was still saying in >Parliament that their service are still
acceptable and had once called it >WORLD CLASS. Just try and imagine the
amount of economic lost if you wait = an >extra 4 minutes
everyday.