Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) and Stealth Tortutures, EXPLAINED for DUMMIES IN THIS WORLD

[FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer]

Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) and STEALTH TORTURES EXPLAINED for
DUMMIES IN THIS WORLD, especially John Hall, Will Sutton, Robert
Henderson et al


US and UK Govts are PERSECUTING Julian Assange even though he DID NOT
COMMIT ANY CRIME and DID NOT VIOLATE "ANY US LAW" but YET Scott
Morrison, Bo Johnson, Biden n the entire Senate, Congress KEPT their
MOUTHS SHUT because of the FEAR they have of CIA NSA MI6 MI5, who are
actually RUNNING THE SHOW from behind.


But YET, ALL of you "dumb western CLOWNS" DELUDE yourselves that USA UK
Aus are GREAT DEMOCRACIES which RESPECT human rights.

Like I said many a time, WHITES DON'T UNDERSTAND their OWN DNA and MODUS
OPERANDI because WHITES have "ZERO SELF-REALIZATION", LITERALLY "ZERO".


Ffs, sit infront of a mirror and PSYCHOANALYZE yourself, your govts and
your fellow whites.


=======================================================================




http://www.slavery.org.uk/InnerVoiceTargTrackBehavInflu.htm




Inner Voice, Target Tracking, and Behavioral Influence Technologies

John J. McMurtrey, M. S.,a Copyright 2003, 6 Apr. 2005b

Co-authorship is negotiable towards professional publication in an NLM
indexed journal, Email- Johnm...@aol.com

Donations toward future research are gratefully appreciated at
http://www.slavery.org.uk/FutureResearch.htm



ABSTRACT


Inner voice transmission development by ultrasound and microwave
technique is reviewed as well as target tracking literature. References
recognizing behavioral influence technologies are surveyed along with
reported instances of the use of microwave and ultrasound energy forms
on people. Many aspects of the considered literature directly contradict
professional presumptions, particularly within the psychological and
psychiatric communities.



INTRODUCTION


People discerning remote manipulation corresponding to technology
capable of such influence have formed protest organizations across the
world. 1 2 3 4 Educated society is uninformed regarding authentic
documentation of the development and existence of these technologies,
and is without appreciation of the hazard. Complaint of ‘hearing voices’
and perception of other remote manipulation must receive appropriate
scientific and legal investigation with protection. Professional
awareness is virtually absent with eminent texts and opinion being
presumptive, without appraisal of the evidence.


Herein is substantiated:


The development of remote wireless ultrasound and microwave
internal voice transmission.

Human tracking technologies.

References recognizing behavioral influence capabilities and the
use of such technologies against humans.




ULTRASOUND VOICE TRANSMISSION


Because of conducting medium non-linearity, sound can be scattered by
sounds of different frequencies, which produces entirely new tones, and
this was originally observed in air as the Tartini tones during the
eighteenth century. 5 The same phenomenon occurs for ultrasound sonar
systems called parametric arrays in a manner that is highly directional.
Mathematical basis for such sonar effects were developed, which
predicted the generation of sound waves that are of audible low
frequencies. 6 7 8 A subsequent more general and complete analysis
predicted not only simple tones, but an ‘envelope’ of modulated low
frequency sound, which could encompass voice within the hearing range. 9
Despite rumors of failed classified air experiments, 10 abstract reports
of air generated acoustic tones by parametric array ultrasound beams
began appearing, 11 12 13 and then had more complete publication, 14
though unrecognized was an earlier, less extensive report. 15 This
ability to produce sound is utilized to construct loudspeakers for
directionally projecting audio sound, 16 which have further
characterization 17 with sound modulation improvement, 18 and
mathematical prediction compared to experimental results. 19 20 Basic
methods for such speakers are described in the Audio Engineering
Handbook. 21 The connotation of ‘loudspeaker’ is somewhat misleading as
a term for these speakers, since virtual point sources of sound are
generated within the ultrasound beams 22 without scattering outside the
beam intersection. 15 Recently parametric array emitter 23 and
directivity 24 improvement, as well as less cumbersome mathematical
descriptions for circular 25 or rectangular sources 26 are reported.
These sound projection techniques are internally perceived by a
recipient without directional orientation as described from
demonstrations, and patents for non-lethal weapon applications.

Lowrey patent # 6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible
sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” clearly focuses on non-lethal
weapon application against crowds or as directed at an individual. 27
Communication is understood as an inner voice with loss of the
directional quality of sound perception. “Since most cultures attribute
inner voices either as a sign of madness, or as messages from spirits or
demons, both of which . . . evoke powerful emotional reactions”, quotes
the effect on people. Replaying speech, with a delay impedes talking and
causes stuttering. Normal brain wave patterns can be changed (or
entrained), which “may cause temporary incapacitation, intense feelings
of discomfort.” Entrainment technique is detailed by Monroe Patent #
5356368 “Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of
consciousness”, as accomplished by an auditory replication of brainwave
patterns to entrain the EEG. 28 Interstate Industries licensed this patent.

The Norris patent # 5889870 “Acoustic heterodyne device and method”
produces sound particularly within cavities such as the ear canal. 29 An
individual readily understands communication across a noisy crowed room
without nearby discernment. Sound can also be produced from mid-air or
as reflecting from surfaces.

American Technology Corporation (ATC) licensed this latter patent, and
commercially sells their HyperSonic Sound® system, which has a technical
treatment available 10 and been presented at a professional meeting. 30
This company also has an acoustic non-lethal weapons system 31 called
the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRADTM). The LRAD is being integrated
into the Navy’s radar situational awareness surveillance systems,
accounts for 60% of military sales, 32 and has a reported 80 % efficacy
in deterring wayward Persian Gulf vessels. 33 Besides the Navy the
device is also deployed to the Army, Coast Guard, and Marine Corps 34 as
well as ground troops in Iraq 35 36 37 and Afghanistan. 38 39 The Miami
police used the LRAD for the free trade conference, 40 while the New
York Police obtained it for the Republican Convention. 33 41 The inner
nature of sound perception is described from demonstrations for the
Audio Engineering Society, 42 an engineering news article, 43 and
Popular Science. 44 Some description of more obnoxious sound effects is
available. 45 A similar ultrasound method capable of limiting sound to
one person, Audio Spotlight® has peer reviewed publication,46 and is
marketed. The Audio Spotlight has had exhibition at Boston’s Museum of
Science, 47 the General Motors display at Disney’s Epcot Center, 48 the
Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum, and other public venues. 49 The
American Technology Corporation and Audio Spotlight devices feature in
science news and technology articles. 50 51 52 53 A non-lethal weapons
program director confirms the lack of nearby discernment on ultrasound
voice transmission. 54 Other acoustic influence methods may utilize
ultrasound. 55 c



MICROWAVE HEARING


There are early references to “radiofrequency hallucination” 56 and of
reaction to radio wave energy 57 58 by Italian authors that may have
observed radio frequency hearing phenomena, but the observations were
poorly characterized, at least in available English publications.
However sound perception was known through radar technicians in World
War II 59 60 and the late 1940’s, 61 who had microwave hearing effect
anecdotes. Though most literature on the hearing effect refers to
microwave hearing, the phenomenon extends below microwave frequencies,
and radio frequency hearing is also an appropriate term. 60 Allan H.
Frey was the first to substantially characterize the microwave hearing
effect in a series of articles beginning in 1961. 62 63 Subjects can
hear appropriately pulsed microwaves at least up to thousands of feet
from the transmitter. 64 Transmitter parameters above those producing
the effect result in a severe buffeting of the head, while parameters
below the effect induce a pins and needles sensation. Peak power is the
major determinant of loudness, though there is some dependence on pulse
width. 63 Pulse modulation appears to influence pitch and timbre.
Microwave hearing is described as perceived within or near the head. 59
The hearing effect can be produced from radio frequency components of
magnetic resonance scanners. 65

Direct microwave hearing experience by many microwave workers, and the
phenomenon’s well replicated animal definition makes this the most
accepted of low power microwave effects. 61 Review of human and animal
microwave hearing confirmation by independent investigators establishes
validity. 58 59 60 66 67 68 69 Designs for scaring birds away from
aircraft or other hazards by microwave hearing 70 and induction of
vertigo 71 exist. 72

While working for the Advanced Research Projects Agency at Walter Reed
Army Institute of Research, Sharp and Grove discovered “receiverless”
and “wireless” voice transmission. 73 Their method was simple: the
negative deflections of voiceprints from recorded spoken numbers were
caused to trigger microwave pulses. Upon illumination by such verbally
modulated energy, the words were understood remotely. The discovery’s
applications are “obviously not limited to therapeutic medicine”
according to James C. Lin in Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications. 74

A Defense Intelligence Agency Communist literature review affirms
microwave sound and indicates voice transmission. The report states:
“Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating
intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at
very low average power densities.” 75 Among weapon implications are
“great potential for development into a system for disorientating or
disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel.”
An Army Mobility Equipment Research and Development Command report
affirms microwave speech transmission with applications of “camouflage,
decoy, and deception operations.” 76 “One decoy and deception concept
presently being considered is to remotely create noise in the heads of
personnel by exposing them to low power, pulsed microwaves . . . By
proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speech may be
created” quotes the report.

The Brunkan Patent # 4877027 “Hearing system” is a device for verbal
microwave hearing. 77 The invention converts speech with remote
introduction into the head by parabolic antenna. The microwave spectrum
granted by the patent is from 100 to 10,000 MHz (0.1-10 GHz) with pulse
width from 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond, and bursts of such pulses
lasting from 500 nanoseconds to 100 microseconds. Preferred operation is
at 1000 MHz, which is the frequency of optimal tissue penetration. 78
Bursts of narrowly grouped, evenly spaced pulses determine sound
intensity by their amount per unit time. A similar German patent for
remote antenna microwave voice transmission is also based on microwave
bursts. 79 A microwave voice transmission patent with a non-remote
transducer that is based on microwave bursts is “designed in such a way
that the burst frequencies are at least virtually equal to the sound
frequencies of the sounds picked up by the microphone.” 80

Microwave hearing literature confirms an ability to reproduce sound
characteristics, and aspects of these patents. Though loudness is
modulated by pulse power, 63 81 closely spaced pulses also increase
sound intensity, 82 83 or lower the perception threshold. 65 Pulse width
affects tonal quality with longer pulses producing lower frequency
sound. 59 Microwave pulse width differentially influences cat cochlear
nucleus auditory units that are responsive to different tones 84 over
sound frequencies from 931 Hz to 25.5 kHz. 85 The responses dependent on
the separation of twin pulses 85 have at least some analogy to the
parameters of human pitch discrimination. 86 Lin extends the range of
microwave hearing to frequencies into the ‘tens of gigahertz.’ 59

There are numerous patents for microwave voice transmission with
non-remote transducers 87 with one based on multiple microwave
frequencies. 88 The first inventor of non-remote radio frequency voice
transmission had a patent held up for five years by a Defense
Intelligence Agency secrecy order, 89 but the device is now for sale
over the internet as the Neurophone. 90 91 Two separate devices with
non-remote transducers show efficacy in peer reviewed publication either
by independent analysis of operation, 92 93 94 or the developers
demonstrating improved speech discrimination. 95 96 Although this latter
report’s title features electrotherapy, radio frequency hearing had just
previously been considered as electrophonic hearing, 97 with the report
stating a radio frequency method, while referring equipment description
to an Air Force Systems Command commissioned study. 98 This 1964 Air
Force study is the first report of radio frequency voice transmission
with improved word discrimination in 9 hearing impaired patients.

Descriptions in some of the patents attribute microwave hearing to
direct neural influence. However in review, the most accepted mechanism
is by thermoelastic expansion, which results in sound waves 67 that most
likely induces bone conducted hearing. The cochlea does appear to be
involved, but not the middle ear. 69

“Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect” is the title of a
small business contract for the Department of Defense. Communication
initial results are: “The feasibility of the concept has been
established” using both low and high power systems. 99 A Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request as to the project’s final outcome met
with denial on the part of the Air Force, on the grounds that disclosure
“could reasonably be expected to cause damage to national security.” 100
Though the Air Force denied this FOIA disclosure, such a contract’s
purpose is elaborated by the Air Force’s “New World Vistas” report: “It
would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human
body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological
direction . . . . If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to
create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is
audible. Thus it may be possible to ‘talk’ to selected adversaries in a
fashion that would be most disturbing to them.” 101 102 Means to
actualize such communication ‘possibility’ is evident in patents 103 104
assigned to the Air Force without royalty payment. These patents
describe demodulation of speech at the head of a recipient without a
proximate emitter, and no beneficial use presumed. The process involves
amplitude modulation where the carrier wave’s influence is fully
suppressed, high frequency speech components are filtered, and further
distortion preventing processing. The inventors are Air Force employees
who have received awards from the Directed Energy Directorate,
apparently both for assistance in developing the millimeter wave area
denial system later discussed. 105 106 Robert O. Becker, whose eminence
was enough to have been twice nominated for the Nobel Prize in
biological electromagnetic fields research, is explicit regarding
clandestine use of radio frequency voice transmission: “Such a device
has obvious applications in covert operations designed to drive a target
crazy with “voices” or deliver undetectable instructions to a programmed
assassin.” 107

For years the Center for Army Lessons Learned acknowledged microwave
hearing voice transmission as a non-lethal weapon in a 'voice to skull
devices' weapons thesaurus entry, but this entry was excluded subsequent
to request for congressional investigation of such development, and any
implementation or misuse thereof. 108 d An article from a magazine that
publishes notably non-mainstream views details microwave inner voice
device demonstration by Dr. Dave Morgan at a 1993 classified Johns
Hopkins sponsored non-lethal weapon conference, manufacture by
Lockheed-Sanders, and implies use by the CIA, who call the process
‘voice synthesis’ or ‘synthetic telepathy.’ 109

When electromagnetic signatures of spoken words are applied to the head
at very low field levels (1 microTorr), word choice is significantly
affected along the same emotional dimensions as the applied word. 110
Though inspired by microwave hearing, this report is not of direct
auditory perception. The author suggests that such an influence, even
though weak, could shift the direction of group decisions in large
populations, and has previously elaborated on the possibility of less
specific electromagnetic influence on populations. 111


TARGET TRACKING TECHNOLOGY


The maintenance of isolated hearing effects on people requires obstacle
penetration and target tracking. Internal voice capable energy forms
penetrate obstruction and can be localized. Sound transmission through
enclosures is a common experience. Human tracking ability is not nearly
as apparent for ultrasound as for microwave radar, but ultrasound is
being developed to discern movement through walls.112 113 114 Though
ultrasound is unnoticed even at high intensity and can pass through
walls, a significant portion of the encoded sound from ultrasound
speakers reflects audibly upon striking hard flat surfaces.

Common technology utilizes the radio frequency hearing spectrum, which
encompasses cell phone, 115 116 TV, and radar frequencies. 117 A variety
of antennae localize the structurally penetrating radiation with
collimation or focusing. 118 119 The Luneburg lens emits parallel rays
and has over 50 years utilization.120 Masers are another method of
collimation. 121

Military radar systems listing human tracking capability include:
Advanced Radar Surveillance System (ARSS-1) by Telephonics; 122 Beagle
Portable Ground Surveillance Radar by Pro Patria; 123 AN/PPS-5D
Man-Portable Battlefield Surveillance Radar by Syracuse Research Corp.;
124 Squire LPI Ground Surveillance Radar by MSSC Corp.; 125 and
Manportable Surveillance and Target Acquisition Radar (MSTAR) by Systems
& Electronics, Inc., 126 which have ranges from 7-12 km for personnel
tracking. Some of these internet examinable references extend their
capability from that listed in the 2000-2001 Jane’s Radar and Electronic
Warfare Systems, which lists 13 target acquisition or tracking systems
specifying such capability on personnel, purchased by militaries of some
27 countries. 127 Besides Russian manufacture there are also East
European producers of such systems. 127 128

The most widely deployed system is the Rasit ground surveillance radar
by Thomson CSF AIRSYS, which lists 20 km as 90% probability of detection
for humans.127 Earlier systems have been in use since the Vietnam War.
129 Basic operation of these systems involves a track initiation
processor acquiring a target, while a data association filter maintains
a tracking lock on the target. 130 The above designs feature infantry
portability or mobile forward deployment, and cannot be regarded as the
limit of capability, since larger radars have a range of 100 miles, 131
though lacking human tracking specification.

A quarter of a century ago, Jane’s Weapon Systems listed some 32 weapons
fire control designs whereby aiming was entirely determined by radar
tracking data with at least 10 systems primarily designed for control of
one weapon system. 132 Eight weapons guidance systems utilized microwave
target illumination by a dedicated surface beam (called semi-active
homing). 132 Sensors for more recent active guidance systems also
illuminate targets for both laser 133 microwave radar 134 135 units that
are compact enough to be onboard the missile, and so inexpensive as to
be disposable with the weapon. Target illumination tracking systems have
nanosecond to microsecond response times. Such responses do not require
a wide scan area to lock illumination upon a person at achievable
speeds. At 90 miles per hour an auto travels less than 1/100 of an inch
in a microsecond.

Rowan Patent # 4893815 “Interactive transector device commercial and
military grade” describes the acquisition, locking onto, and tracking of
human targets. 136 Stated therein: “Potentially dangerous individuals
can be efficiently subdued, apprehended and appropriately detained.” The
capability of “isolating suspected terrorists from their hostages . . .
or individuals within a group without affecting other members of the
group” is stated. Laser, radar, infrared, and acoustic sensor fusion is
utilized to identify, seek, and locate targets. Locking illumination
upon the target until weapons engagement accomplishes tracking. Among
available non-lethal weapons is an incapacitating electromagnetic
painful pulse. Tracking data automatically aims weapons, and the system
even provides remote physiological stress assessment during attack.

Microwave methods of assessing life by detecting breathing and heartbeat
rates had full description in 1967, 137 and are reviewed respecting
medical and possible rescue use. 138 The technique can differentiate
hypovolemic from normal rabbits. 139 The US Military has an interest in
a non-contact vital signs monitor. 140 The capacity is evaluated for
obtaining covert polygraph information for lie detection. 141 142 143

Hablov Patent # 5448501 “Electronic life detection system” describes
radar that detects vital organ motion, and distinguishes individuals
through obstruction. 144 Therein is stated: “the modulated component of
the reflected microwave signal . . . subjected to frequency analysis . .
. forms a type of “electronic fingerprint“ of the living being with
characteristic features, which . . . permits a distinction between
different living beings.” Though this patent applies to trapped victim
rescue, another Hablov et. al. Patent # 5530429 “Electronic surveillance
system” detects interlopers with security emphasis. 145 Individual
variance of human radar signatures is otherwise known 146 than these
patents, and gait 147 148 or heartbeat 149 150 have consideration as
biometric identifiers.

Battlefield human tracking specifications are not expected to consider
obstruction. Some indication of radar capability through obstruction can
be gleaned from the adaptation of military technology to through-wall
surveillance, 151 which has been spurred by declassifications of the
Clinton administration, and Homeland Security initiatives. Surveys or
overviews of through-the-wall radar open literature are available.152
153 154 Most materials negligibly attenuate radar at the lower microwave
frequencies. High frequencies in the millimeter wavelengths (95 GHz =3
mm) can provide detailed imaging of humans, but are not suitable for
brick and concrete. 152 Though without detail, some human image can be
obtained at frequencies as low as 10 GHz, which also has good building
material penetration. 152 Image resolution is enhanced by increased
antenna aperture, 155 which can be synthetic without dependence on a
single antenna’s size. 156 Humans are actually emissive of millimeter
wavelengths,157 and otherwise have good reflectance, 154 with a radar
cross section of one square meter, 158 which approximates the two
dimensional profile. Human emmissivity at millimeter wavelengths even
allows some measure of passive detection through walls, 152 though
weapons detection through clothing is most developed. 159 160

Many through-the-wall radars simply detect gross motion, a frequent
state of awake humans. Raytheon’s Enhanced Motion and Ranging System is
battery operated, briefcase sized, lists maximum range as 100 feet,
provides two dimensional tracking, and can report range to motion of up
to 16 targets. 161 162 163 Defense Research and Development Canada of
their Defense Department commissioned a consulting company to examine
the feasibility of constructing an Ultra Wide-Band (UWB)
through-the-wall radar from off the shelf components. 164 Subsequent
demonstrations show that such systems can locate a moving target within
a building from 60 meters away with methods being refined to provide
building layout, and denote non-moving targets. 165 UWB radars decrease
interference with commercial signals, 166 and makes radar utilization
more difficult to detect. A portable, battery operated radar can detect
an individual through 3 walls. 167 Another UWB radar detects personnel
through several intervening walls, and an extended range system can
track human targets in excess of 1000 feet, with tracking data used to
point a camera in the target direction. 168

Some through-the-wall surveillance (TWS) radars have considerable
commercial development. Fullerton et al. Patent # 6400307 “System and
method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array” 169 is
licensed to Time Domain, 170 which has Federal Communications Commission
approval for sale of 2,500 of it’s RadarVision units in the US. 171 172
RadarVision is marketed internationally, 173 has police or fire fighter
target markets, 174 and the company is developing a SoldierVision unit
for the US Army. 175 176 Georgia Tech is developing their Radar
Flashlight for security and rescue applications. 177 178 Both of these
TWS systems operate by detecting vital organ motion, being battery
operated, highly compact (10 pounds or less) models for the widest
commercial potential, thus limiting range. RadarVision detects within 30
feet, while Radar Flashlight has a 10 foot range.

Other commercial TWS system developers are Patriot Scientific
Corporation, 179 AKELA, Inc., 180 SRI International, 181 and Hughes
Missile Systems Co. 131 Radar detection software for personal computer
display is sold. 182 A Russian report describes an ability to record the
frequency spectrum of speech besides heartbeat and respiration.183 Since
through-wall surveillance systems evident in the open literature are
subject to commercial regulatory, pricing, portability, imaging, and
multiple subject observation constraints, they cannot be regarded as the
limit of capability especially regarding radars for less economically
constrained security markets or not featuring portable design.



RECOGNITION OF BEHAVIORAL INFLUENCE TECHNOLOGIES


Though not necessarily only involving voice transmission, references to
behavioral influence weapons by government bodies and international
organizations are numerous. Negotiation submissions to the United
Nations Committee on Disarmament affirm the reality of microwave weapon
nervous system effects. 184 European Parliament passage of resolutions
calling for conventions regulating non-lethal weapons and the banning of
“weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings”
185 includes neuro-influence capability. 186 A resolution relates to the
US High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP), which can
have environmental consequences, and although utilizing high frequency,
ionospheric extra low frequency (ELF) emanation results. Since ELF is
within brain wave frequencies the project has capacity to influence
whole populations. 111 187 President Carter’s National Security Advisor,
Zbigniew Brzezinski, predicted development of such capacity. 188 A US
draft law prohibiting land, sea, or space-based weapons using
electromagnetic, psychotronic (behavioral influence), and sound
technologies “directed at individual persons or targeted populations for
the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control” has
not yet passed. 189 Use of electromagnetic devices against people or
electronics in Michigan is a serious felony. 190 Russian electromagnetic
standards are nearly 1000 times lower than the West, so their weapon law
forbidding electromagnetic weapons exceeding Health Department
parameters is strict. 191 A Russian draft law explicitly references
behavioral influence non-lethal weapons, and development in several
countries. 192 Resolutions by the International Union of Radio Science
recognize criminal use of electromagnetic technology, particularly
against infrastructure. 193

An Israeli general in charge of military research and development
acknowledged investment in “mind control” technology by Israel. 194 CNN
has also reported regular use of microwaves against Palestinians as
sourced form a medical engineer, and that the US Defense Department has
contingency plans to use electromagnetic weapons against terrorists. 195
The same reference quotes an ex-intelligence agent as stating “The US
Government has an electronic device which could implant thoughts in
people” in a different program interview. Electromagnetic behavioral
manipulation effects have had report on various Discovery cable channel
programs, and suspicion of such technology use on then President Nixon
was expressed on Larry King Live, which reiterated congressional
testimony. 196 A statement by General John Jumpers about making enemies
hear and believe things that don’t exist would include inner voice
technology. 197

The US Department of Defense has declassified a millimeter wavelength
area denial weapon. 198 The prototype weapon is vehicle mounted, and
considered a non-lethal weapon. 102 199 The device produces a beam that
causes a burning sensation, that is stopped by switching off the
transmitter, or escape from the beam. 200 Development of this device is
in the advanced stages, and deployment to Iraq is reported expected in
2005. 201

Besides confirming ultrasound internal voice capability, 54 non-lethal
weapons treatments note high powered microwave impulse disruption of
brain waves with functional alteration 202 including unconsciousness,
203 204 205 which is confirmed in experimental animals. 206 Non-lethal
weapon reviews also mention ‘mind control’ development and testing. 207
208 Terms utilized in the latter references indicate subliminal
messaging, particularly a Russian developed technique called
psycho-correction, 209 the utilization of which was considered against
David Koresh of the Waco, Texas Branch Davidian incident. 210 211 212 An
American system in the previous Army thesaurus reference called Silent
Sounds 73 213 e also utilizes subliminal messaging, and was utilized in
the 1991 Iraq War according to the company founder, 214 and British news
reports. 215 A system based on the same technology is for sale on the
Internet. 92 Silent Sounds also has sophisticated brainwave entrainment
by “emotional clustering” capability. 214 216 Subliminal messaging is
utilized in retail stores for theft prevention. 217 218 Although the
Federal Communications Commission reports few complaints of subliminal
messaging in broadcasts, 217 the technique was most recently utilized in
a 2000 US presidential political advertisement, 219 and is reportedly
rampant within Russian television. 220


MICROWAVE AND ULTRASOUND USE AGAINST HUMANS


The microwave irradiation of the American Embassy in Moscow received
little publicity until the winter of 1976 instillation of protective
screening, but irradiation was known since 1953. 221 The irradiation was
directional from nearby buildings with pulsation detected. Complaint to
the Soviets had no avail, but the signals disappeared in January 1979
“reportedly as a result of a fire in one or more of the buildings,” 222
though there was recurrence in 1988. 223 Psychiatric cases occurred
during the exposure period, but no epidemiologic relationship was
revealed with fully a quarter of the medical records unavailable, and
comparison with other Soviet Bloc posts. 222 Although significant
results matched the Soviet recognized neurotic syndrome, 224 these were
dismissed as subjective symptoms. Professional publications further
detail some of these flaws, 225 along with charges of government
cover-up, particularly respecting cancer cases. 226 The CIA had Dr.
Milton Zaret review Soviet medical microwave literature to determine the
purpose of the irradiation. He concluded the Russians “believed the beam
would modify the behavior of the personnel.” 227 In 1976 the post was
declared unhealthful and pay raised 20%. 228

The most documented citizen microwave irradiation was of peace
protesters at Greenham Common American Air Force Base in Berkshire
England, who prompted investigation of unusual symptoms. 229 Radiation
measurements exhibited microwaves with symptom experience up to a
hundred times the background level, and rose sharply on protests nearer
the base. 223 Symptoms became pronounced on cruise missile transport, a
protest focus. 223 Recorded were wide ranging complaints: skin burns;
‘severe’ headaches; drowsiness; temporary paralysis; incoordinated
speech; two late (5 mos.) spontaneous abortions; an apparent circulatory
failure; and unlike usual menstrual synchronization, irregular or
postmenopausal menstruation. The symptom complex fits well with
electromagnetic exposure syndrome. 223 It is also reported that some of
the women ‘heard voices.’ 230 The base closed finally in 1991.

Measurement of non-ionizing radiation fields in the vicinity of an
Australian victim is described. 231 The intensity ranged from 7 mV in an
adjacent room to 35 mV next to the head. Criminal microwave directed
energy weapon use is reported in Germany 232 having similarity of
circumstances, complaints, and symptoms in a number of cases, with
microwave field measurement excluding the usual sources (cell phone
towers, etc.) in at least one case. 233 Other anecdotal cases affirm
microwave field measurement without strength publication. 196 234 235 A
security company advertises investigations of electromagnetic harassment
including microwave voice transmission with field measurement. 236
Victims have asserted an ability to record harassment effects. Though
the evidence for recording microwave harassment effects is inconclusive
and only slightly more than anecdotal, condenser microphones are
responsive to the thermo-acoustic mechanism, and other microphone design
types have elements that are similar to thermo-acoustic responsive
situations. 237

Ultrasound behavioral influence technology use in Northern Ireland is
cited. 204 The device could focus on one person and utilized ultrasound
like the previous discussed patents, though voice transmission is
unconfirmed. It was employed in Vietnam by the Americans, and is known
as the squawk box. Psychological effects are summarized as ‘spooky.’
More detail by a defense journalist is quoted: “When the two frequencies
mix in the human ear they become intolerable. Some people exposed to the
device are said to feel giddy or nauseous and in extreme cases they
faint. Most people are intensely annoyed by the device and have a
compelling wish to be somewhere else.” 238 British police inventories
list the specific device, though a spokesman denied use. 223

Sophisticated behavioral influence capability is confirmed by
ex-intelligence officers. Julianne McKinney, Director of The National
Security Alumni Electronic Surveillance Project has conducted a study of
victim cases. This is a largely classified employee victim study with
internal voice transmission avowal. 239



DISCUSSION


Ultrasound voice transmission technology is well confirmed by peer
reviewed literature, deployed in military 35 36 37 38 or police
situations, 33 40 41 publicly demonstrated in museum exhibits, 47 48 49
and for sale to the public. 240 241 Microwave internal voice
transmission citations rest on a solid foundation of microwave hearing
literature, with confirmation in peer reviewed literature as well as a
government report for non-remote transducer systems, 95 97 99 and a
further such device for sale. 92 There are four patents for remote radio
frequency voice transmission, 78 80 two of which were developed by the
US Defense Department 104 105 as well as additional references affirming
successful development. 74 77 100 Though there is only some publication
of microwave field strength around victims 223 231 or measurement
anecdotes, 196 234 235 with such publication to remote radio frequency
voice transmission use being in media of less respected reliability,
such reports are supported by descriptions of non-lethal weapon
applications 76 103 and references indicating weapons. 73 109 The
existence of numerous systems capable of tracking humans, has long
demonstrated the feasibility of constructing devices capable of
producing internal voice continuously in isolated individuals. To deny
such technological capability in the face of extensive complaint is
willfully to ignore documented development of the relevant technologies
and engineering competence for complete integration. It must be
appreciated that engineering development is often proprietary and less
published than open science, especially in areas with covert
application. Even the most prejudiced skeptic, who would honestly
consider the relevant literature, would have to concede that such
capacity has had development. The fact is that such complaints have had
no adequate investigation.

The logic in the prediction by Brzezinski f of the appearance of a more
controlled and directed society dominated by a power elite willing to
use the latest modern techniques for influencing behavior without
hindrance by liberal democratic values is compelling. 188 Since those
supposedly expert regard a victim’s perceptions as psychotic, all
complaints are disregarded, much less capability to bear witness.
Potential targets are multiple, and may include anyone worth
neutralization: domestic adversaries; security risks, which may only
comprise classified disclosures; witnesses of improprieties; those prone
to committing advantageous felonies; and even those psychologically
similar to target groups for development purposes. Internal voice
technology is most applicable within the same language and culture.
Security agencies have little legal accountability, particularly with
utilization of unrecognized technology. Legality is readily circumvented
by executive orders, (particularly declaration of a crisis or emergency
situation), which can be sealed, and this prerogative is only
accountable to co-equal branches of government.

Most complainants allege public sector involvement or sub-contracted
private companies. 242 Remote behavioral influence research has long
been funded by the US, 108 with evidence of inner voice transmission
development 31 74 77 78 80 100 104 105 and weapons,34 35 36 37 54 73 109
though denying on national security grounds project results 101 and even
foreign literature analyses. 243 Some 30 countries evidence active
behavioral influence weapon research. 244

Leaders of victim movements for investigation and protest have written
presentable treatments from the East European 234 235 245 and victim 196
perspectives, but while there has been some psychoanalytical
acknowledgement, 246 no concise treatment is published in mainstream
media. Current medical awareness ensures effective neutralization of the
afflicted, though not all those affected are stigmatized. However
phenomena of ‘hearing voices’, or perception of remote manipulation,
when recounted to health professionals results in various prejudicial
diagnoses, 247 248 totally without investigation. The longstanding
disregard for people with such symptoms that give presumed rationale for
civil rights abrogation must be justified by adequate investigation,
which is not apparent in medical scholarship. Mandatory is determination
of relevant fields around complainants. Professional opinions formed
without excluding these technologies are negligent. Such diagnosis must
be regarded as presumptive.

Longstanding complaints by numerous victims about remote voice
transmission to the medical community 249 are too correspondent to the
technologic development herein documented to further ignore. The fact
that microwave bioeffects have extensive correlation with reported
symptoms of major psychosis other than ’voices,’ 250 further
substantiates the ambiguity of diagnostic supposition. All of society
should be disturbed at the prospect of remote inner voice induction,
since the unaware subject would perceive such voices as his own natural
thought, without complaint provoking assault. Even complaints of ‘mind
reading’ by some victims perceiving such intrusion has basis in that
recent EEG analysis studies confirm and extend the feasibility of
thought reading, which was reported initially by a 1975 Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency study, and there are references to ‘remote EEG’
microwave methods. 251


Acknowledgements: Thanks are given to God for inspiration, and a
benefactor of Christians Against Mental Slavery for financial support
(website http://www.slavery.org.uk .) There is gratitude also to Dr.
Paul Canner, and Dr. Allen Barker for their suggestions. Excellent
compilation of research sources by Eleanor White is also acknowledged,
though her site is no longer publically available.

All patents are freely printable from the U. S. Patent Office website or
at esp@cenet.

Designated internet urls are not restricted as to database.


REFERENCES

a Address: 903 N. Calvert St., Baltimore MD 21202. Email-
Johnm...@aol.com Phone- 410-539-5140.

b Financial contribution to this article was made by fellow members of
Christians Against Mental Slavery with website http://www.slavery.org.uk/ .

c Loos Patent # 6017302 “Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous
system” can “cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement,
depending on the precise acoustic frequency near ½ Hz used. The effects
of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes,
sleepiness, and disorientation.”

d Vide infra for discussion of the analogously listed “Silent Sound”
device in this reference.

e Also called S-quad, Silent Sounds, Inc. licensed Lowery Patent
#5159703 “Silent subliminal presentation system”, also has advanced
brain wave entrainment technology with several classified patents. (See
http://www.megabrain.com/eeg.htm and http://www.megabrain.com/patent.htm
accessed 8/4/04) Unessential is individual direction, but possible by
ultrasound.

f National Security Advisor to President Carter.

1 Mind Justice (formerly Citizens Against Human Rights Abuse). Director;
Cheryl Welsh, 915 Zaragoza Street, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Website
accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.mindjustice.org/ Email is
we...@mindjustice.org

2 Christians Against Mental Slavery. Secretary; John Allman, 98 High
Street, Knaresbourough, N. Yorks HG5 0HN, United Kingdom. Website
accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.slavery.org.uk Email is in...@slavery.org.uk

3 Moscow Committee for the Ecology of Dwellings. Chairman; Emile
Sergeevne Chirkovoi, Korpus 1006, Kvrtira 363, Moscow Zelenograd, Russia
103575. Website accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.moskomekologia.narod.ru
Email is moskome...@narod.ru

4 International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of the Human
Nervous System by Technologic Means. Founder; Mojmir Babacek, P. O. Box
52, 51101 Turnov, Czech Republic, Europe. Website accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm Email is
mbab...@iol.cz

5 Weiguo D and Qunli W. “Audio Sound Reproduction Based on Nonlinear
Interaction of Acoustic Waves” J Audio Eng Soc 47(7/8): 602-6, 1999.
Abstract 2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

6 Westervelt PJ. “Scattering of Sound by Sound” J Acoust Soc Am 29(2):
199-203, 1957. Abstract 2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

7 Westervelt PJ. “Scattering of Sound by Sound” J Acoust Soc Am 29(8):
934-5, 1957.

8 Westervelt PJ. “Parametric Acoustic Array” J Acoust Soc Am 35(4):
535-37, 1963.

9 Berktay HO. “Possible Exploitation of Non-linear Acoustics in
Underwater Transmitting Applications” J Sound Vib 2(4): 435-61, 1965.

10 Croft JJ and Norris JO. “Theory, History, and the Advancement of
Parametric Loudspeakers: A Technology Overview” American Technology
Corporation, Part # 98-10006-1100 Rev. E, 2001-2003. Paper accessed
3/8/05 at http://www.atcsd.com/pdf/HSSWHTPAPERRevE.pdf

11 Shealy WP and Eller AJ. “Design and Preliminary Results of an
Acoustic Parametric Source in Air” J Acoust Soc Am 54: 297A, 1973.

12 Bennett MB and Blackstock DT. “Experimental Verification of the
Parametric Array in Air” J Acoustic Soc Am 54: 297A, 1973.

13 Widener MW and Muir TG. “Experiments in Parametric Arrays in Air” J
Acoust Soc Am 55(2): 428-9A, 1974.

14 Bennett MB and Blackstock DT. “Parametric array in air” J Acoust Soc
Am 57(3): 562-8, 1975.

15 Bellin JLS and Beyer RT. “Experimental Investigation of an End-Fire
Array” J Acoust Soc Am 34(8): 1051-4, 1962. Abstract 2/14/05 Compendex
accessible.

16 Yoneyama M, Fujimoto J-I, Kawamo Y, and Sasabe S. “The audio
spotlight: An application of non-linear interaction of sound waves to a
new type of loudspeaker design” J Acoust Soc Am 73(5): 1532-6, 1983.
Abstract 2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

17 Aoki K, Kamakura T, and Kumamoto Y. “Parametric
Loudspeakers—Characteristics of Acoustic Field and Suitable Modulation
of Carrier Ultrasound” Electronics and Communications in Japan 74(Part
3, #9): 76-81, 1991.

18 Kamakura T, Aoki K, and Kumamoto Y. “Suitable Modulation of the
Carrier Ultrasound for a Parametric Loudspeaker” Acustica 73: 215-17,
1991. Abstract 2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

19 Yang J, Sha K, Gan W-S, and Tian J. “Nonlinear Wave Propagation for a
Parametric Loudspeaker” IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals E87-A(9):
2395-2400, 2004. Abstract Compendex accessed 12/15/04, and article
available from first author at email - EJY...@ntu.edu.sg

20 Kamakura T, Tani M, and Kumamoto Y. “Parametric Sound Radiation from
a Rectangular Aperture Source” Acustica 80: 332-38, 1994. Abstract
2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

21 Satoh K. “Sound Reproduction Devices and Systems: Parametric Speaker”
In: Benson BK (ed.) Audio Engineering Handbook McGraw-Hill, New York, p
7.61-7.66, 1988.

22 Havelock DI and Brammer AJ. “Directional Loudspeakers Using Sound
Beams” J Audio Engineering Society 48(10): 908-16, 2000. Abstract
Compendex accessible 12/15/04.

23 Moon B-C, Kim M-J, Ha K-L, and Kim C-D. “Radiation Characteristics
Improvement of Flexural Type Vibrator for Parametric Sound Source in
Air” Japan Journal of Applied Physics 41: 3458-9, 2002. Full text
Compendex accessed 1/5/05.

24 Tan KS, Gan WS, Yang J, and Er MH. “Constant Beamwidth Beamformer for
Difference Frequency in Parametric Array” Proceedings of the ICASSP,
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal
Processing 5: 361-4, 2003. Full text Compendex accessed 1/5/05.

25 Kamakura T. “Two Model Equations for Describing Nonlinear Sound
Beams” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 43(5B): 2808-12, 2004. Full
text Compendex accessed 12/30/04.

26 Yang J, Sha K, Gan W-S, and Tian J. “A Fast Field Scheme for the
Parametric Sound Radiation from Rectangular Aperture Source” Chinese
Physics Letters 21(1): 110-13, 2004. Full text Compendex accessed 12/30/04.

27 Lowrey A. Patent # 6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting
audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” USPTO granted 4/18/00.

28 Monroe RA. Patent # 5356368 “Method of and apparatus for inducing
desired states of conscisousness” USPTO granted 10/18/94.

29 Norris EG. Patent # 5889870 “Acoustic Heterodyne device and method”
USPTO granted 3/20/99.

30 Norris EG. “The Creation of Audible Sound from Ultrasonic Energy – A
Fundamental Paradigm Shift” J Acoust Soc Am 101: 3072, 1997.

31 American Technology Corporation. “American Technology Corporation
Announces Acoustic Non-Lethal Weapon Technology for Military and Law
Enforcement” press release of 30 Oct 2001.

32 American Technology Corporation. “American Technology Corporation
Awarded Key Military Contract to Deliver Modified Long Range Acoustic
Devices (LRADtm)” press release of 21 Oct 2003. Accessed on 3/8/05 at
http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/10_21_03.html

33 Schollmeyer J. “Pumping up the volume” Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists 60(6): 8-9, November/December, 2004. General Science Full
Text Wilson Web 2/14/05 accessible.

34 American Technology Corporation. “American Technology Corporation
Reports Highlights of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders” press release
of 28 May 2004. Accessed on 3/8/05 at
http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/05_28_04.html

35 Staff. “American Technology Corporation Awarded $ 485,000 Contract to
Deliver Long Range Acoustic Devices-LRAD- to U.S. Army Units; LRADs
Deployed in Iraq for Force Protection” Business Wire, p 5156, May 13,
2004. Article accessed from Infotec 10/13/04.

36 Staff. “Army chooses American Technology Corp. for nonlethal weapon”
Military & Aerospace Electronics 15: 34, July 2004. Article accessed
from Infotec 10/13/04.

37 American Technology Corporation. “American Technology Corporation
Awarded 1.088 Million Contract to Deliver Long Range Acoustic Devices
(LRADTM) to US Marine Corps Units: LRADs Deployed to Iraq for Force
Protection” press release of 26 Feb 2004. Accessed on 3/8/05 at
http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/02_26_04.html

38 Davidson N and Lewer N. “Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project
(BNLWRP), Research Report No. 5” Centre for Conflict Resolution,
Department of Peace Studies, p 3 & 20, May 2004. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.bradford.ac.uk/acad/nlw/research_reports/docs/BNLWRPResearchReportNo5_May04.pdf

39 Miller C. “Can a Crying Baby Stop a Riot?” Law Enforcement
Technology, May, 31(3): 8, 2004. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2004/06/804061.shtml

40 Karp J. “Hey, You! How About Lunch? New Laserlike Sound Beams
Messages to Shoppers, Aid Military in Iraq” Wall Street Journal, p B1,
April 1, 2004. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://mgtclass.mgt.unm.edu/Rogers/322/READINGS_322/13.8.%20Hey,%20You!%20%20How%20About%20Lunch.doc

41 Onion A. “Listen Up: Unusual Forms of Sound to Emanate From RNC”
ABCNEWS.com, Wed 25 Aug 2004. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_082704C.shtml

42 Bush E and Lambert M. “October 29, 2002 meeting: Alternative
Loudspeaker Transducer Technologies” Los Angeles Section Meeting of the
Audio Engineering Society Oct. 29, 2002. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.aes.org/sections/la/PastMeetings/2002-10-29.html

43 Webb W. “Directional Beams Refocus Sound Science” EDN May 15, p
30-34, 2003. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.edn.com/contents/images/296500.pdf

44 Sparrow D. “Best of What’s New Grand Award Winner: Hypersonic Sound”
Popular Science, Dec, p 94, 2002. Accessed on 3/8/05 at
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/bown/article/0,16106,388134,00.html

45 Sella M. “The Sound of Things to Come” New York Times, Late Edition
Final, Section 6, p 34-9, Mar 23, 2003. Excerpts accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.raven1.net/hssweapon.htm

46 Pompei FJ. “The Use of Airborne Ultrasonics for Generating Audible
Sound Beams” J Audio Eng Soc 47(9): 726-31, 1999. Abstract Compendex
accessible 12/15/04.

47 Holosonics Research Labs. “Holosonics announces Audio Spotlight®
Exhibit at Boston’s Museum of Science” Press Release of Oct 6, 2003.
Accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.holosonics.com/PR_MOS.html

48 Holosonics Research Labs. “Audio Spotlight Sound Beam Systems
Installed in General Motors Display at Walt Disney’s Epcot” Press
Release of Jun 30, 2004. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.holosonics.com/PR_Epcot.html

49 Holosonics Research Labs. “Holosonics’ Audio Spotlight Technology
Installed at the Smithsonian” Press Release of Nov 6, 2003. Accessed
3/8/05 at http://www.holosonics.com/PR_Smithsonian.html

50 Schneider D. “In the Audio Spotlight” Scientific American 279(4):
40-1, October 1998.

51 Lawton G. “They are playing my tune” New Scientist, 9 Sept, p 38-42,
2000.

52 Schwartz EI. “The Sound War” Technology Review 107(4): 50-4, May 2004.

53 Lee JS. “An Audio Spotlight Creates a Personal Wall of Sound” New
York Times, p F4, May 15, 2001.

54 Alexander JB. Future War: Non-Lethal Weapons in Twenty-First-Century
Warfare St. Martin’s Press, New York, p 101, 1999.

55 Loos HG. Patent # 6017302 “Subliminal acoustic manipulation of
nervous systems” USPTO granted 1/25/00.

56 Presman AS. Electromagnetic Fields and Life Plenum Press, New
York-London, p 266, 1970. Presman refers to Cazzimalli’s radiofrequency
hallucination observations citing: Cazzamalli F. “Di novo appararto
radio-electro rivelatore del fenomeni electromagnetici radianto del
cervello umano” L’Energio Electrica 18: 28, 1941. Another English
reference to this Italian work accessed 3/8/05 is at
http://www.datafilter.com/mc/jaski.html p 2.

57 Nrunori N and Torrisi SS. “Ultra-High Frequency Electro-Magnetic
Vibrations, Their Effect Upon Living Organisms” American Journal of
Physical Therapy 11: 102-4, 1930.

58 Michaelson SM. “Sensation and Perception of Microwave Energy” In:
Michaelson SM, Miller MW, Magin R, and Carstensen EL (eds.) Fundamental
and Applied Aspects of Nonionizing Radiation Plenum Press, New York, p
213-29, 1975.

59 Lin JC. “Auditory Perception of Pulsed Microwave Radiation” In:
Gandhi OP (ed.) Biological Effects and Medical Applications of
Electromagnetic Energy Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Chapter 12,
p 278-318, 1990.

60 Chou C-K, Guy AW, and Galambos R. “Auditory perception of
radio-frequency electromagnetic fields” J Acoust Soc Am 71(6): 1321-34,
1982.

61 Postow E and Swicord ML. “Modulated Fields and “Window” Effects” In:
Polk C and Postow E (eds.) CRC Handbook of Biological Effects of
Electromagnetic Fields CRC Press, Boca Raton, Ann Arbor, p 425-60, 1986.

62 Frey AH. “Auditory System Response to Radio Frequency Energy” Aerosp
Med 32: 1140-2, 1961.

63 Frey AH and Messenger R. “Human Perception of Illumination with
Pulsed Ultrahigh-Frequency Electromagnetic Energy” Science 181: 356-8, 1973.

64 Frey AH. “Human Auditory System response to modulated electromagnetic
energy” J Applied Physiol 17 (4): 689-92, 1962. Also accessed 4/8/05 at
http://www.raven1.net/frey.htm

65 Roschmann P. “Human Auditory System Response to Pulsed Radiofrequency
Energy in RF Coils for Magnetic Resonance at 2.4 to 170 MHz” Magn Reson
Med 21: 197-215, 1991. Abstract Pubmed available.

66 Puranen L and Jokela K. “Radiation Hazards Assessment of Pulsed
Microwave Radars” J Microwave Power Electromagn Energy 31(3): 165-77,
1996. Abstract Pubmed available.

67 Hermann DM and Hossmann K-A. “Neurological effects of microwave
exposure related to mobile communication” J Neurol Sci 152: 1-14, 1997.
Abstract Pubmed available.

68 Lai H. “Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic
Radiation” In: Lin JC (ed.) Advances in Electromagnetic Fields in Living
Systems vol 1, Plenum Press, New York & London, p 27-80, 1994.

69 Elder JA and Chou CK. “Auditory Responses to Pulsed Radiofrequency
Energy” Bioelectromagnetics Suppl 8: S162-73, 2003. Abstract accessed
4/8/05 at
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/106565261/PDFSTART
and pre-publication draft at
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc28/sc4/Human%20Perception%20FINAL.pdf
Abstract Pubmed available.

70 Kreithen ML. Patent # 5774088 “Method and system for warning birds of
hazards” USPTO granted 6/30/98.

71 Lenhardt ML and Ochs AL. Patent # 6250255 “Methods and apparatus for
alerting and/or repelling birds and other animals” USPTO granted 6/26/01.

72 Nordwall BD. “Radar Warns Birds of Impending Aircraft” Aviation Wk
Space Technol, March 10, p 65-6, 1997.

73 Justesen DR. Microwaves and behavior. Am Psychologist 30(3,
Mar):391-401, 1975. Accessed 3/22/12 at
http://sm4csi.home.xs4all.nl/nwo/MindControl/Microwaves_and_Behavior.htm

Relevant excerpts photocopied at
http://slavery.org.uk/MicrowavesAndBehavior_excerpts.pdf

Excerpted reference accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm

74 Lin JC. Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications Thomas,
Springfield Ill, p 176, 1978.

75 United States Senate. “Surveillance Technology, 1976: policy and
implications, an analysis and compendium of materials: a staff report of
the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee of the
Judiciary” Ninety-fourth Congress, second session, p 1280, US GOV DOC Y
4.J 882:SU 7/6/976.

76 Oskar KJ. “Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral
blood flow of conscious rats” Army Mobility Equipment Command Report, #
AD-A090426, 1980. Available form NASA Technical Reports. Abstract
accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htm and
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/lowpower.html

77 Brunkan WB. Patent # 4877027 “Hearing system” USPTO granted 10/31/89.

78 Frey AH. “Behavioral Biophysics” Psychol Bull 63(5): 322-37, 1965.

79 Leyser R. Patent # DE10222439 “Microwave hearing device uses
modulated microwave pulses for providing induced sound warning directly
within head of deaf person” Federal Republic of Germany Patent and
Trademark Office published 12/11/03. Abstract accessed 3/8/05 at
http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=DE10222439&F=0 Original
German Document accessed 3/8/05 at
http://v3.espacenet.com/pdfdocnav?DB=EPODOC&IDX=DE10222439&F=128&QPN=DE10222439
English translation available at http://www.sysos.co.uk/GermanV2K.doc
English translation is also available from the author, and Walter
Madlinger the translator at email wmad...@yahoo.de

80 Thijs VMJ, Thijs-Jamin A, and Thijis AV. Patent # WO 93/10730
“Hearing Aid Based on Microwaves” World Intellectual Property
Organization granted 6/10/93. Summary accessed 3/8/05 at
http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=WO9310730&F=0

81 Lebovitz RM and Seaman RL. “Single auditory unit responses to weak
pulsed microwave radiation” Brain Res 126: 370-75, 1977.

82 Olsen RG and Hammer WC. “Evidence for Microwave-Induced Acoustical
Resonances in Biological Materials” J Microw Power 16(3 & 4): 264-9,
1981. Abstract Pubmed available.

83 Olsen RG and Lin JC. “Microwave Pulse-Induced Acoustic Resonances in
Spherical Head Models” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and
Technique, MTT-29(10): 1114-17, 1981.

84 Lebovitz RM and Seaman RL. “Microwave hearing: The response of single
auditory neurons in the cat to pulsed microwave radiation” Radio Science
12(Suppl.): 229-36, 1977.

85 Seaman RL and Lebovitz RM. “Auditory unit responses to single-pulse
and twin-pulse microwave stimuli” Hear Res 26: 105-16, 1987. Abstract
Pubmed available.

86 Bilsen FA and Ritsma RJ. “Some Parameters Influencing the Perception
of Pitch” J Acoust Soc Am 47(2): 469-75, 1970.

87 Zink HR. Patent # GB1402508 “System for Conveying Sound Information
to the Brain” Great Britain Patent granted 8/13/75.

88 Stocklin PL. Patent # 4858612 “Hearing device” USPTO granted 8/22/89.

89 Ridder C. “The Amazing Neurophone” The Anchorage Press, vol V, no 36,
Sept 5-11, 1996. Full article 3/26/05 accessible at
http://www.cridder.com/morgue/press/news/neurophone.html

90 Flanagan GP. Patent # 3393279 “Nervous System Excitation Device”
USPTO granted 7/16/68.

91 Future Horizons, Inc. P.O. Box 125, Marquette, MI, 49855. Accessed on
3/8/05 within http://www.futurehorizons.net/psi.htm

92 Schafer CR. Patent # 4220830 “Hearing aid with modulated suppressed
carrier signal” USPTO granted 9/2/80.

93 Schafer CR. Patent # 4711243 “Cortical hearing aid” USPTO granted
12/8/87.

94 Bennett WR. “Radio frequency hearing: Electrostrictive detection and
bone conduction” J Acoust Soc Am 103(4): 2111-16, 1998. Abstract Pubmed
available.

95 Puharich HK and Lawrence JL. Patent # 3629521 “Hearing systems” USPTO
granted 12/21/71.

96 Puharich HK and Lawrence JL. “Hearing Rehabilitation by Means of
Transdermal Electrotherapy in Human Hearing Loss of Sensineural Origin”
Acta Otolaryngol 67: 69-83, 1969.

97 Sommer HC and von Gierke HE. “Hearing Sensations in Electric Fields”
Aerosp Med 35: 834-9, 1964.

98 Puharich HK and Lawrence JL. “”Electro-stimulation Techniques”
Defense Documentation Report # AD459956, 1964. Available from National
Technical Information Service (cost $42).

99 Kohn B. “Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect” Defense
Department Awarded SBIR Contract # F41624-95-C9007, 1993. Project
description accessed 3/8/05 at
http://es.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/sbir/other/monana/kohn.html &
http://www.raven1.net/v2s-kohn.htm

100 Margo P. Cherney. Freedom of Information Act Memorandum accessed
3/8/05 at http://www.raven1.net/usafletr.jpg

101 Castelli CJ. “Questions Linger about Health Effects of DOD’s
‘Non-Lethal Ray’” Inside the Navy 14(12): 1-6, 2001. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://globalsecurity.org/org/news/2001/e20010327questions.htm

102 Department of the Army, USAF Scientific Advisory Board. “New World
Vistas: air and space power for the 21st century” 14 vol. (Ancillary
Volume) p 89-90, 1996. Section containing quote accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.envirosagainstwar.org/edit/index.php?op=view&itemid=943

103 O’Loughlin JP and Loree DL. Patent # 6470214 “Method and device for
implementing the radio frequency hearing effect” USPTO granted 10/22/02.

104 O’Loughlin JP and Loree DL. Patent # 6587729 “Apparatus for audibly
communicating speech using the radio frequency hearing effect” USPTO
granted 7/1/03.

105 Office of Public Affairs, Air Force Research Laboratory. Kirtland
AFB, NM. “Directed Energy Engineers Win Air Force Awards” News Release,
Sept 27, 2004, DE Release #2004-44. Accessed 11/3/04 at
http://www.de.afrl.af.mil/News/2004/04-44.html

106 Office of Public Affairs, Air Force Research Laboratory. Kirtland
AFB, NM. “Directed Energy People Receive Awards” News Release, April 25,
2002, DE Release #2002-17. Accessed 11/3/04 at
http://www.de.afrl.af.mil/News/2002/02-17.html

107 Becker RO and Selden G. The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the
Foundation of Life Quill William Morrow, New York, p 319-20, 1985.

108 Voice to skull devices. Weapons thesaurus (previous editions).
Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL). The Federation of American
Scientists Project on Government Secrecy provides copy of the entry at
URL:http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/dod/vts.html from when the CALL made
the page unprintable as noted in Aftergood S. Voice to skull: More army
web shenanigans. Secrecy News, vol 2004, issue 64, July 12, 2004
[Online] [Cited 25 Sept 2005} the last item available from:
URL:http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/2004/07/071204.html Notation of
exclusion of the entry is by Weinberger S. Army yanks ‘voice-to-skull
devices’ site. Wired Blog Network 9 May 2008. [Online] [Cited 2008 May
17] URL: http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/army-removes-pa.html
Request for congressional investigation by McMurtrey J. Letter to
Representative Elijah E. Cummings. 8 Jan 2008 with a similar article to
the present in substantiation. Subsequently the request was concerted by
10 other interested parties in states with representation on a
congressional committee with relevant investigative jurisdiction, who
were sent this article for substantiating investigation request.

109 Krawczyk G. "CIA Using Old Tricks Again" Nexus Magazine, Oct/Nov,
2(22): 9, 1994.

110 Healey F, Persinger MA, and Koren SA. “Control of “Choice” by
Application of the Electromagnetic Field Equivalents of Spoken Words.
Mediation by the Emotional Meaning Rather Than Linguistic Dimension”
Percept Motor Skills 85: 1411-18, 1997. Abstract Pubmed available.

111 Persinger MA. “On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human
Brain By Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithms” Percept
Motor Skills 80: 791-9, 1995. Abstract Pubmed available.

Full article accessed 3/8/05 at (after website preamble)
http://www.bariumblues.com/persinger.htm

112 Hunt A, Tillery C, and Wild N. “Through-the-Wall Surveillance
Technologies” Corrections Today 63(4): 132-3, 2001. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.ojp.gov/nij/sciencetech/aca/07_01.pdf

113 Wild N. “Hand-held Ultrasonic Through-the-wall Monitoring of
Stationary and Moving People” Government Technical Report # A857814, Nov
2003. (Available from Storming Media for $22.00.) Abstract accessed on
3/8/05 at http://www.stormingmedia.us/85/8579/A857914.html

114 Wild N, Doft F, Wondra J, Niederhaus S, and Lam H. “Ultrasonic
through-the-wall surveillance system” Proceedings of SPIE 4708: 106-13,
2002. Abstract accessed 3/8/05 at
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?2002SPIE.4708..106W Full
text 2/23/05 SPIE Digital Library accessible.

115 Frey AH. “Headaches from Cellular Telephones: Are They Real and What
Are the Implications” Environ Health Perspect 106(3): 101-3, 1998.
Abstract Pubmed available. Full article accessed on 3/8/05 at
http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/1998/106p101-103frey/frey-full.html

116 Lin JC. “Cellular Telephones and Their Effect on the Human Brain”
Mob Comput and Comm Review 3(3): 34-5, July, 1999. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.datafilter.com/mc/c_linAcm99.htm

117 Nolan PJ. Fundaments of College Physics Wm. C. Brown: Dubuque, Iowa,
Melbourne, Australia, Oxford England, p 716, 1993.

118 Reits BJ. Patent # 5736966 “Adjustable microwave antenna” USPTO
granted 4/7/98.

119 Maier G and Harrison D. Patent # 5825554 “Lenses with a variable
refraction index” USPTO granted 10/20/98.

120 Jasper LJ. Patent # 6407708 “Microwave generator/radiator using
photoconductive switching and dielectric lense” USPTO granted 6/18/02.

121 Bertolotti M. Masers and Lasers: An Historical Approach Adam Hilger,
Bristol, 1983.

122 Telephonics Corporation. 815 Broad Hollow Road, Farmingdale, New
York 11735 “Advanced Radar Surveillance Systems (ARSS-1)” Accessed
3/8/05 at
https://peoiewswebinfo.monmouth.army.mil/portal_sites/IEWS_Public/rus/sensorcat/PDF/ARSS1-telephonics1.PDF
Company website at http://www.telephonics.com/

123 Pro Patria PLC. H-1045 Budapest Ersebet u. 2-4. “Beagle Portable
Ground Surveillance Radar” Accessed 3/8/05 at
https://peoiewswebinfo.monmouth.army.mil/portal_sites/IEWS_Public/rus/sensorcat/PDF/BEAGLE-ADI2.pdf

124 Syracuse Research Corporation. Syracuse University, New York.
“AN/PPS-5D Man-Portable Battlefield Surveillance Radar” Accessed 3/8/05
at http://www.syrres.com/stc/products_anPPS-5d.htm Company website at
http://www.syrres.com/default.htm

125 MSSC – a partnership of Thales and DRS Technologies. Parsippany, New
Jersey. “Squire LPI Ground Surveillance Radar” Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.drs.com/products/index.cfm?gID=18&productID=211 DRS
Technologies website at http://www.drs.com/

126 Systems & Electronics, Inc. 201 Evans Ave, St. Louis MO 63121
“Manportable Surveillance and Target Acquisition Radar” accessed 3/8/05
at http://www.seistl.com/pdf/MSTAR%20military%20handout.pdf Company
website is at http://www.seistl.com/

127 Streetly M (ed.) Jane’s Radar and Electronic Warfare Systems 12th
ed, 2000-2001, Jane’s Information Group Ltd, Alexandria, VA, p 67-118, 2000.

128 Tekes. “Portable Ground Surveillance Radar” accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.tekes.fi/partner/fin/search/nayta_haku.asp?hakuid=16598

129 1st Batallion, 50th Infantry Association. “Ground Surveillance Radar
(GSR) in Vietnam” accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.ichiban1.org/html/cs_radar.htm

130 Brookner E. Tracking and Kalman Filtering Made Easy Wiley, New York,
1998.

131 Frazier LM. “Surveillance Through Walls and Other Opaque Materials”
IEEE National Radar Conference, p 27-31, 1996. Full text 2/14/05 IEEE
Xplore accessible.

132 Petty RT. Jane’s Weapon Systems Jane’s Information Group Ltd,
Alexandria, VA, p 211-79, 1979.

133 Tisdale GE and Lindemann HB. Patent # 4497065 “Target recognition
system enhanced by active signature measurements” USPTO granted 1/29/85.

134 Peralta EA and Reitz KM. Patent # 4562439 “Imaging radar seeker”
USPTO granted 12/31/85.

135 Ahlstrom LGW. Patent # 4796834 “Method for combating of targets and
projectile or missile for carrying out the method” USPTO granted 1/10/89.

136 Rowan L. Patent # 4893815 “Interactive transector device commercial
and military grade” USPTO granted 1/16/90.

137 Giori FA and Winterberger AR. “Remote Physiological Monitoring Using
a Microwave Interferometer” Biomed Sci Instr 3: 291-307, 1967.

138 Lin JC. “Microwave Sensing of Physiological Movement and Volume
Change: A Review” Bioelectromagnetics 13: 557-65, 1992. Abstract Pubmed
available.

139 Matsui T, Ishizuka T, Takase B, Ishihara M, and Kikuchi M.
“Non-contact determination of vital sign alterations in hypovolaemic
states induced by massive haemorrhage: an experimental attempt to
monitor the condition of injured persons behind barriers or under
disaster rubble” Med Biol Eng Comput 42(6): 807-11, 2004. Abstract
Pubmed available.

140 Sharpe SM, Seale J, MacDonald AH, and Crowgey SR. Patent # 4958638
“Non-contact vital signs monitor” USPTO granted 9/25/90.

141 Geisheimer J and Greneker EF. “A Non-Contact Lie Detector using
Radar Vital Signs Monitor (RVSM) Technology” IEEE Aerospace and
Electronic Systems Magazine 16(8): 10-14, 2001. IEEE Xplore 2/25/05
accessible.

142 Kues HA, Nelson CV, and Bevan MG. “Remote Sensing of Physiological
Indices” Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory Research and
Development Symposium 5, Nov 2-3, 1999.

143 Staderini E.M. "An UWB radar based stealthy 'Lie Detector'" In:
Mokole et al. (eds.) Ultra-Wideband Short-Pulse Electromagnetics 6
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2003. Paper revision prior to
publication accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.hrvcongress.org/second/first/placed_3/Staderini_Art_Eng.pdf

144 Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA, and
Schimko R. Patent # 5448501 ”Electronic life detection system” USPTO
granted 9/5/95.

145 Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA, and
Schimko R. Patent # 5530429 “Electronic surveillance system” USPTO
granted 6/25/96.

146 Hunt AR and Hogg RD. “Stepped-Frequency, CW Radar for Concealed
Weapon Detection and Through the Wall Surveillance” Proceedings of SPIE
4708: 99-105, 2002. Abstract accessed 3/8/05 at
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?2002SPIE.4708...99H Full
text 2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

147 Geisheimer JL, Marshall WS, and Greneker EF. “A Continuous-Wave (CW)
Radar for Gait Analysis” Conference Record of the IEEE Asilomar
Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers 1: 834-8, 2001. Full
article 2/2/05 IEEE Xplore accessible.

148 Geisheimer JL, Greneker EF, and Marshall WS. “A High Resolution
Doppler Model of Human Gait” Proceedings of SPIE 4744: 8-18, 2002.
Abstract accessed 3/8/05 at
http://spiedl.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PSISDG004744000001000008000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
Full text 2/14/04 Compendex accessible.

149 Grenecker EF. “Radar sensing of heartbeat and respiration at a
distance with security applications” Proceedings of SPIE 3066: 22-7,
1997. Third abstract accessed 3/8/05 within
http://www.spie.org/web/abstracts/3000/3066.html Full text 2/14/05 SPIE
Digital Library accessible.

150 Geisheimer J and Greneker G. “Applications of Neural Networks to the
Radarcardiogram (RCG)” Proceedings of SPIE 3722: 368-77, 1999. Full text
2/24/05 SPIE Digital Library accessible.

151 McMillan RW, Currie NC, Ferris DD, and Wicks MC. “Concealed Weapon
Detection Using Microwave and Millimeter Wave Sensors” Proceedings of
the IEEE International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave
Technology, p 1-4, 1998. Full article 2/2/05 IEEE Xplore accessible.

152 Ferris DD. "Microwave and millimeter-wave systems for wall
penetration" Proceedings of SPIE 3375: 269-79, 1998. Abstract #29
accessed 3/8/05 within http://www.spie.org/web/abstracts/3300/3375.html
Full text 2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

153 Ferris DD and Currie NC. “A Survey of current technologies for
through-the-wall surveillance (TWS)” Proceedings of SPIE 3577: 62-72,
1998. Abstract accessed 3/8/05 at
http://spiedl.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PSISDG003577000001000062000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes&jsessionid=170181091673548080
Full text 2/14/05 SPIE Digital Library accessible.

154 Frazier LM. “Radar Surveillance through Solid Materials” Proceedings
of SPIE 2938: 139-46, 1997. Abstract accessed 3/8/05 at
http://spiedl.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PSISDG002938000001000139000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
Full text 2/14/05 SPIE Digital Library accessible.

155 Gauthier S. “Surveillance Through Concrete Walls” Proceedings of
SPIE 5403: 597-608, 2004. Full article Compendex accessible 1/25/05.

156 Ahmad F, Amin MG, and Kassam SA. “Through-the-Wall Wideband
Synthetic Aperture Beamformer” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society
Symposium 3: 3059-62, 2004. Full article 1/31/05 IEEE Xplore accessible.

157 Huguenin GR. “Millimeter Wave Concealed Weapon Detection and
Through-the-Wall Imaging Systems” Proceedings of SPIE 2938: 152-9, 1997.
Full text 2/14/05 SPIE Digital Library accessible.

158 The New Encyclopedia Britannica “Radar” Encyclopedia Britannica,
Inc, vol 26, p 466, 2002.

159 Clark SE, Lovberg JA, Martin CA, and Kolinko V. “Passive
millimeter-wave imaging for airborne and security applications”
Proceedings of SPIE 5077: 16-21, 2003. Abstract accessed 3/8/05 at
http://spiedl.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PSISDG005077000001000016000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
Full text 2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

160 Huguenin GR. “Millimeter-Wave Video Rate Imagers” Proceedings of
SPIE 3064: 34-45, 1997. Abstract accessed 3/8/05 at
http://spiedl.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PSISDG003064000001000034000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
Full text 2/14/05 SPIE Digital Library accessible.

161 Raytheon Company. Corporate Communications, 870 Winter Street,
Waltham, MA 02451-1449 Accessed 3/8/05 at
https://peoiewswebinfo.monmouth.army.mil/portal_sites/IEWS_Public/RUS/sensorcat/PDF/EMARS-Raytheon1.PDF

162 Black JD. “Motion and ranging sensor system for through-the-wall
surveillance system” Proceedings of SPIE 4078: 114-21, 2002. Abstract
accessed 3/8/05
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?2002SPIE.4708..114B Full
text 2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

163 National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center. “Looking
Through Walls” Tech Beat, p 1-2, Summer, 2000. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.nlectc.org/techbeat/summer2000/LookWallsSum2000.pdf

164 Robinson R. “Through the Wall Ultra Wideband Radar: An Investigation
into the Feasibility of Building and In-House UWB Radar Hardware
Capability” RWR Consulting Contract for Defence R&D Canada, Ottawa CR
2003-923, Mar 2003. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc17/p520580.pdf

165 Defence Research and Development Canada of the Department of
National Defence Fact Sheet Library accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.dreo.dnd.ca/publications/factsheets/tws_e.asp

166 Siwiak K, Withington P, and Phelan S. “Ultra-Wide Band Radio: The
Emergence of an Important New Technology” Vehicular Technology
Conference, 2001, VTC 2001 Spring, IEEE 53rd 2: 1169-72, 2001. Full text
2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

167 Hunt AR. “A wideband imaging radar for through-the-wall
surveillance” Proceedings of SPIE 5403: 590-6, 2004. Full article 2/6/05
Compendex accessible.

168 Fontana RJ. “Recent Applications of Ultra Wideband Radar and
Communications Systems” In: Ultra-Wideband Short-Pulse Electromagnetics
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, in press, 2004. Accessed on 3/31/05 at
http://www.multispectral.com/pdf/UWBApplications.pdf

169 Fullerton LW and Richards JI. Patent # 6400307 “System and method
for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array” USPTO granted
6/4/02.

170 Time Domain Corporation. Cummings Research Park, 7057 Old Madison
Pike, Suite 250, Huntsville, AL 35806 accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.radarvision.com/ , and company website is at
http://www.timedomain.com/

171 Mannion P. “Ultrawideband watches over firefighters” EE Times, April
20, 2001. Accessed on 3/8/05 at
http://www.eetimes.com/sys/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=12805512 &
http://www.commsdesign.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=12805512

172 Nag S, Fluhler H, and Barnes M. “Preliminary Interferometric Images
of Moving Targets Obtained Using a Time Modulated Ultra-Wide Band
Through-Wall Penetration Radar” Proceedings of the IEEE Radar
Conference, May 1-3, p 64-9, 2001. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://166.111.64.217/radar2001/html/papers/session%202/session2-b-Nag.pdf
Full text IEEE Xplore accessible.

173 Time Domain Corporation. “Time Domain Selects Armor Holdings to
Distribute RadarVision Products Internationally” press release of 9 Sept
1994. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.timedomain.com/Files/HTML/pressreleases/ArmorHoldings.htm

174 Barnes MA, Nag S, and Payment T. “Covert Situational Awareness With
Handheld Ultra-Wideband Short Pulse Radar” Proceedings of SPIE 4374:
66-77, 2001. Full text 2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

175 Port O. “X-Ray Vision for G. I. Joe” Business Week Online, Oct 17,
2002. Accessed on 3/8/05 at
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2002/tc20021017_4359.htm

176 Nag S, Barnes MA, Payment T, and Holladay GW. “An Ultra-Wideband
Through-Wall Radar for Detecting the Motion of People in Real Time”
Proceedings of SPIE 4744: 48-57, 2002. Full text 2/14/05 Compendex
accessible.

177 Greneker EF. “Radar flashlight for through-the-wall detection of
humans” Proceedings of SPIE 3375: 280-85, 1998. Abstract accessed 3/8/05
at
http://spiedl.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PSISDG003375000001000280000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
Full text 2/14/05 Compendex accessible.

178 Staff. “Hand-held radar device detects breathing, heartbeats” Design
News, Jan 19, 1998. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.designnews.com/article/CA110182?stt=001&text=hand%2Dheld+radar

179 Burton GJ and Ohlke GP. “Exploitation of Millimeter Waves for
Through-Wall Surveillance During Military Operations in Urban Terrain”
Land Force Technical Staff Programme V, Department of Applied Military
Science, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, 24 May
2000. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.rmc.ca/academic/gradrech/millimeter-e.pdf

180 Hunt AR. “Image Formation Through Walls Using a Distributed Radar
Sensor Array” Proceedings of the IEEE 32nd Applied Imagery Pattern
Recognition Workshop, p 232-7, 2003. Abstract accessed on 3/8/05 at
http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/aipr/2003/2029/00/20290232abs.htm
Full article 2/14/05 IEEE Xplore accessible.

181 Falconer DG, Steadman KN, and Watters DG. “Through-the-Wall
Differential Radar” Proceedings of SPIE 2938: 147-51, 1997. Abstract
accessed 3/8/05 at
http://spiedl.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PSISDG002938000001000147000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
Full text 2/14/05 SPIE Digital Library accessible.

182 Radar PC accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.si-tex.com/html/radar_pc.html

183 Ivashov SI, Razevic VV, Sheyko AP, and Vasilyev IA. “Detection of
Human Breathing and Heartbeat by Remote Radar” Progress in
Electromagnetic Research Symposium, Pisa, Italy, Mar 28-31, 2004.
Accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.rslab.ru/english/downloads/piers2004_68_03.pdf

184 Soviet Union Draft Agreement on the Prohibition of the Development
and Manufacture of New Types of Weapons of Mass Destruction and New
Systems of Such Weapons. UN Committee on Disarmament, CCD/511/Rev.1, Aug
1977. Accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.mindjustice.org/9.htm

185 European Parliament, 28.1.99 Environment, security, and foreign
affairs, A4-0005/99 EP1159, resolutions 23, 24, & 27, January 28, 1999.
Limited excerpts accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.raven1.net/europar.htm

186 Wright S. “Future Sub-lethal, Incapacitating & Paralyzing
Technologies—Their Coming Role in the Mass Production of Torture, Cruel,
Inhumane & Degrading Treatment. Presented to The Expert Seminar On
Security Equipment & The Prevention of Torture 25-26 October 2002
London, UK and The 16th ISODARCO Winter Course On "The Surge in
Non-State Violence: Roots Impacts & Countermeasures" 9 - 16 February,
2003, Andalo, Trento, Italy. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2002/nov/torture.pdf

187 Begich N and Manning J. Angels Don’t Play This HAARP: Advances in
Telsa Technology Earthpulse Press, Anchorage Alaska, p 176-8, 1995.

188 Brzezinski Z. Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic
Era Viking Press, New York, p 57 & 252, 1970.

189 Space Preservation Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House) HR 2977 IH,
107th Congress 1st Session Introduced by Hon. Dennis J. Kucinich.
Excerpts accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.raven1.net/govptron.htm

190 Michigan Penal Code Act 328 of 1931, Chapter XXXIII Explosives Bombs
and Harmful Devices, § 750.200h Definitions, § 750.200i Unlawful acts:
penalties, § 750.200l Act causing false belief of exposure: violation:
penalty (West’s 2004 Supplement) (Amended by P.A. 2003 Nos. 256 & 257,
Eff. Jan. 1, 2004). Text is LexisNexis accessible.

191 Federal Law “About Weapons” Federal Laws of the Russian Federation
from 21.07.98 [1998] No. 117-F3, from 31.07.98 [‘98] No. 156-F3, from
17.12.98 [‘98] No. 187-F3, from 19.11.99 [‘99] No. 194-F3, from
10.04.2000 [’00] No. 52-F3, from 26.07.01 [‘01] ISBN 5-86894-393-7.
Translation accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.raven1.net/1-02-5.htm

192 Gurov AI. Federal Assembly—Parliament of the Russian Assembly,
Governmental Duma, Committee on Safety, “Resolution: Regarding the Draft
of the Federal Law ‘About the Submission of Addendum to Article 6 of the
Federal Law ‘About Weapons’” No 28/3, Nov. 30, 2000. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.raven1.net/1-02-6.htm

193 General Assembly. International Union of Radio Science “USRI
Resolution on Criminal Activities Using Electromagnetic Tools” In:
Records of the USRI General Assembly, Toronto, 25: 178-9, 1999. Excerpt
accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.metatechcorp.com/EMIthr1/slide2.htm

194 Opall B. “Israel Fields Means to Suppress Palestinian Violence”
Defense News, Dec 17-23, p 8, 2001.

195 Guyatt DG. “Some Aspects of Anti-Personnel Electromagnetic Weapons”
International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium: The Medical
Profession and the Effects of Weapons, ICRC publication ref. 06681996
(the paper is available from the Health Division of the ICRC). Accessed
on 3/8/05 at Some Aspects of Anti Personnel Electromagnetic Weapons

196 Welsh C. “U.S. Human Rights Abuse Report” Jan 1998. Accessed on
3/8/05 at http://www.mindjustice.org/7.htm

197 Hughes D (ed.) “Washington Outlook” Aviation Week & Space
Technology, Mar 21, p 21, 1998.

198 United States Air Force. “Active Denial System Advanced Concept
Design Demonstration” Fact Sheet accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.de.afrl.af.mil/factsheets/activedenial.html

199 Hecht J. “Microwave beam weapon to disperse crowds” New Scientist,
27 Oct, p 26, 2001. Accessed on 3/8/05 at
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991470

200 Sirak M. “US DoD considers testing non-lethal energy” Janes Defence
Weekly, 2 March, 2001. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.janes.com/defence/news/jdw/jdw010302_1_n.shtml

201 Freinberg T and Rayment S. “Microwave gun to be used by US on Iraq
rioters” Telegraph (UK), filed 19 Sept 2004 accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/09/19/wirq319.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/09/19/ixworld.html

202 Morehouse DA. Nonlethal Weapons: War without Death Praeger, p 20, 1996.

203 Dando M. A New Form of Warfare: The Rise of Non-Lethal Weapons
Brassey’s, London & Washington, p 22, 1996.

204 Lewer N and Schofield S. Non-Lethal Weapons: A Fatal Attraction?:
Military Strategies and Technologies for 21st-Century Conflict Zed
Books, London & New Jersey, p 11 & 62, 1997.

205 Becker RO. Cross Currents Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc, Los Angeles, St
Martin’s Press, p 297-304, 1990.

206 Modak AT, Stavinoha WB, and Deam AP. “Effect of Short
Electromagnetic Pulses on Brain Acetylcholine Content and Spontaneous
Motor Activity of Mice” Bioelectromagnetics 2: 89-92, 1981. Abstract
Pubmed available.

207 Duncan JC. “A Primer on the Employment of Non-Lethal Weapons” Naval
Law Review 45: 1-56, 1998. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/law/nonlet2.pdf

208 Lewer N. “Non-Lethal Weapons” Medicine and War 11: 78-90, 1995.

209 Smirnov IV, Director. Psychotechnology Research Institute website
accessed 3/8/05 at http://int.psycor.ru/

210 Tapscott M. “DoD, Intel Agencies Look at Mind Control Technology,
Claims FBI Considered Testing on Koresh” Defense Electronics, July, p
17, 1993. Accessed 3/8/05 at http://int.psycor.ru/main.php?pubp01 and
http://www.waco93.com/defenseelectronics.htm

211 Opall B. “US Explores Russian Mind-control Technology” Defense News,
Jan 11-17, p 29, 1993. Accessed 3/8/05 after preamble at
http://www.mindjustice.org/factsht.htm

212 Opall B. “U.S., Russia Hope to Safeguard Mind Control Techniques”
Defense News, January 11-17, p 4, 1993. Accessed 3/8/05 after 1st
article at http://www.mindjustice.org/factsht.htm

213 Lowery OM. Patent # 5159703 “Silent subliminal presentation system”
USPTO granted 10/27/92.

214 Wall J. “Military Use of Mind Control Weapons” Nexus Magazine,
Oct/Nov, 5(6): 13-18, 1998. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/ssss.htm

215 ITV News Bureau. “High Tech Psychological Warfare Arrives in the
Middle East” and “Riyadh, Saudi Arabia” March 23 & 26 respectively,
1991. Accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.raven1.net/silsound.htm

216 Silent Sounds. P. O. Box 2021, Norcross, GA 30091 accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.megabrain.com/eeg.htm

217 U S House of Representatives. “Subliminal communication technology:
hearing before the Subcommittee on Transportation, Aviation, and
Materials of the Committee on Science and Technology, Ninety-eighth
Congress, second session, Aug. 6, 1984, p 90-104, Microfiche US GOV DOC
Y 4.SCI 2:98/105.

218 Lorelei Communications Group, Inc. 2420 South 177th Street, Omaha NE
68130 “Subliminal Message Encoders, Consider This! ‘Positive
Reinforcement”, Subliminal Communication “ accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.lorelei.com/articles-consider-this-positive-reinforcement-subliminal-communication.html
&
http://www.lorelei.com/articles-consider-this-positive-reinforcement-subliminal-communication-part-2.html

219 Berke RL. “Democrats See, and Smell, ‘Rats’ in G.O.P. Ad” New York
Times, Sept 12, p 1 & 22, 2000. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=003nJE

220 Dixon R. “Abusing the Power of Suggestion in Russian TV Ads” Los
Angles Times, Aug 25, p A5, 2002. Excerpted article accessed 3/8/05,
though misattributed as to date and misleading as to title is at
http://www.rense.com/general29/sdeew.htm

221 Steneck NH. The Microwave Debate MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, London
Eng, p 93, 181-9, 1984.

222 United States, Congress, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and
Transportation. “Microwave irradiation of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow:
review of its history and studies to determine whether or not related
health defects were experienced by employees assigned in the period
1953-1977.” US GOV. DOC. Y 4.C 73/7: IR 7.

223 Smith CW and Best S. Electromagnetic Man J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.,
London, p 211, 233, & 235, 1989.

224 Johnson Liakouris AG. “Radiofrequency (RF) Sickness in the
Lillenfeld Study: An Effect of Modulated Microwaves?” Arch Enviorn
Health 53(3): 236-38, 1998. Abstract Pubmed available.

225 Goldsmith JR. “Epidemiological Evidence of Radiofrequency Radiation
(Microwave) Effects on Health in Military, Broadcasting, and
Occupational Studies” Int J Occup Environ Health 1: 47-57, 1995.
Abstract Pubmed available.

226 Goldsmith JR. “Where the trail leads . . . Ethical problems arising
when the trail of professional work leads to evidence of cover-up of
serious risk and mis-representation of scientific judgment concerning
human exposures to radar” Eubios Journal of Asian and International
Bioethics 5: 92-4, 1995.

227 Schiefelbein S. “The Invisible Threat: The Stifled Story of Electric
Waves” Saturday Review, Sept, 15: 16-20, p 17, 1979.

228 Brodeur, P. The Zapping of America Norton, New York, p 299 & 105, 1977.

229 Parry G. “Doctors investigating claims of Greenham radiation cases:
Peace women fear electronic zapping at base” (Manchester) Guardian, Mar,
10: 3, 1986.

230 Ramsay R. “ELF: from Mind Control to Mind Wars” Lobster Magazine 19:
23, 1990.

231 Gillin LM and Gillin L. “Subtle Energies, Intentionality and the
Healing of Traumatically Abused Persons” International Conference on
Trauma, Attachment and Dissociation, Melborne, Australia, Sept 12-14,
2003. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.delphicentre.com.au/conference/2003papers/Gillin.pdf Victim
field measurements are also in “Submission to Coroner: Additional
Information on Possible Cause of Death of Ms. Deva Denise Paul on 10th
September 2000, Case Reference 2958/00.” accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.globaltwa.com/SUBMISSION%20TO%20CORONER.pdf

232 Munzert R. “High-Tech Waffe Mikrowelle - Kriminelle Anwendungen von
Mikrowellen” Aufklärungsarbeit, Heft 9, April, S. 25-31, 2003. English
treatment “Targeting of the Human with Directed Energy Weapons” accessed
3/8/05 at http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/munzert6902.doc

233 Munzert R. Personal communication in 2003.

234 Babacek M. “Are There Secret Weapons of Mass Destruction?” Second
article (p 9 of a printout) accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm

235 Babacek M. “Electromagnetic and Information Weapons: The Remote
Manipulation of the Human Brain” New Dawn, March-April, p 51-6, 2005.

236 Advanced Electronic Security. 6646 Hollywood Blvd, #212, Los
Angeles, CA 90028 accessed on 3/8/05 at
http://www.bugsweeps.com/info/electronic_harassment.html

237 McMurtrey JJ. “Review of Literature Related to Recording Microwave
Hearing Effects: Literature Review and Case Report of an Affiant to
Recording Remote Harassment” Accessed 10/27/04 at
http://www.slavery.org.uk/RecordingMicrowaveHearingEffects.doc

238 Rodwell R. Defense correspondent report “Army tests new riot weapon”
New Scientist, Sept 20, p 684, 1973.

239 McKinney J. “Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation”
Unclassified, June-July, 1992 4(3): 1-20. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.webcom.com/~pinknoiz/coldwar/microwave.html

240 Audio Spotlight, Holosonic Research Labs. 51 Water Street Watertown,
MA 02472 accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.holosonics.com/

241 Multi-Media Solutions. Knoxville/Alcoa Corporate Offices, PO Box
113, Alcoa, TN 37701. This company handles American Technology products.
Accessed 3/8/05 at http://www.m-media.com/Audio-Displays/hss/index.php

242 McKinney J. Letter to President Clinton at
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/mckinney.htm

243 Cheryl Welsh Freedom of Information Act request reply for review of
Soviet literature, March 19, 1997. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.raven1.net/nsa1.gif

244 Lopatin VN and Tsygankov VD. Psychotronic War and the Security of
Russia Moscow, 1999. See research abroad section in translation accessed
3/8/05 at http://www.raven1.net/russtran.htm

245 Babacek M. “Is That Feasible to Manipulate Human Brain at Distance?”
First paper accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm

246 Smith C. “On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in
the Light of Mind Invasive Technology” J Psycho-Social Studies 2(2) #3,
2003. Article accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.btinternet.com/~psycho_social/Vol3/JPSS-CS2.html

247 American Psychiatric Association DSM-IV Task Force. Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV-TRTM)
American Psychiatric Association, p 297-343, 2000.

248 Flaum M and Schultz SK. “The Core Symptoms of Schizophrenia” Ann Med
28(6): 525-31, 1996. Abstract Pubmed available.

249 Isselbacher, KJ, Adams RD, Brunwald E, Petersdorf RG, and Wilson JD
(eds.) Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine Ninth Ed.,
McGraw-Hill, New York, p 150, 1980.

250 McMurtrey JJ. “Microwave Bioeffect Congruence with Schizophrenia” In
press, 2005. Accessed 3/8/05 at
http://www.slavery.org.uk/MicrowaveCongruenceSchiz.doc &
http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/microwav.rtf

251 McMurtrey JJ. “Thought Reading Capacity” In press 2005. Accessed
3/8/05 at http://www.slavery.org.uk/ThoughtReadingCapacity.htm