Re US support to ISnotreal
Afghanaria
Because it is the US base from where to intimidate all Arabs and to
continue controlling world energy resources.And the Jews pay big moneys to
support their allies..ie Feinstein...etc. They bribe american policy
makers like no one else knows how, and thereby directly and indirectly run
governmental affairs more or less. But they do know it is vital to their
business interests to control the media and through it the public mind.
Subject: WHY the U.S. pours so much support to Israel
From: Han...@ix.netcom.com
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 22:11:00 -0700
Message-ID: <326DA8...@ix.netcom.com>
Do you know WHY the U.S. pours so much support to Israel? Do you think
it's just that Jewish-owned companies, like many other U.S. companies,
contribute to election campaigns (it would be illegal, so it wouldn't
be in the public records you claim as sources, for them to be getting
money from the _Israeli government_)? Do you think it's just the Jewish
voters in New York? Or because America feels guilty about the
Holocaust?
No. It's something else, not the combination of all these.
Israel is built on land stolen from the Palestinians. Well, America is
built on land stolen from the Indians.
What's the excuse of the Americans? That Indians (in some tribes - each
tribe is a separate nationality, which is the hole in their excuse)
killed women and children, or took women for sexual use when fighting
wars against the white man, before he became an invader. One does not
surrender to this sort of force. One brings to bear more and more force
and armies against it, until it is defeated. And if at the end of the
day that means the defeated enemy has no home left, well, it has
forefeited its land by condoning savage behavior.
The Israelis claim that before the Zionists set foot in Palestine,
every so often an Arab man might feel like raping a Jewish girl. And
because the Jews were of _dhimmi_ status, no Jew could testify in court
against a Muslim and be heard. So they got away with it; the society
condoned it. If this claim is a lie, refute it.
Of course, it was not so long ago (1950) that the testimony of anyone
with black skin could not be heard against that of a white man in
certain states in the good old U.S.A.. And some white men took
advantage of that law in abusing black women (and some of their black
brothers don't care, if Susan Brownmiller is telling the truth...). The
U.S.A. is lucky that no black country had the guns and the ships to do
something about that.
John Savard
the sole author of this post, for which no one else is responsible