true, but it sorta makes words like heterosexual and homosexual
completely inapplicable. one of my own problems with the word
"bisexual" is that it necessitates only 2 genders. i kinda like the
theory that, parallel to and crossing an infinite number of times the
sexuality continuum, there is also a gender continuum. (biological sex
being completely distinct from gender, which is a societal construct)
i would think(correct me if im wrong, please), that x-gendered people
would be more aware of fluidity of gender and place less importance
on gender and more on the person.....god(dess) that was a horrible
generalization, please forgive me.
sorry that this is kinda confusing....
sarah, thinking that we should all just love _people_ anyway.
I'm curious, has anyone here read Gender Outlaw? It talks about the
articiciality of gender. I would definitely recommend it to anyone
here. Oh, and the author includes her e-mail address in the book.
--
........
; :
/ / / ; / Franzi
/ / \ _ /
/ (_______
| ||| |||
|___|||__|||
(____________)
( ``` ``` ( Childhood Ends
) O | O )
( \ ( when the parents run out of money.
) . . )
( \___/ (
Franzi Dickson <fdic...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in article
<324474...@ix.netcom.com>...
> sarah wrote:
> > true, but it sorta makes words like heterosexual and homosexual
> > completely inapplicable. one of my own problems with the word
> > "bisexual" is that it necessitates only 2 genders. i kinda like the
> > theory that, parallel to and crossing an infinite number of times the
> > sexuality continuum, there is also a gender continuum. (biological sex
> > being completely distinct from gender, which is a societal construct)
> <snip>
>
> I'm curious, has anyone here read Gender Outlaw? It talks about the
> articiciality of gender. I would definitely recommend it to anyone
> here. Oh, and the author includes her e-mail address in the book.
Another book that might be of interest in this respect is Martine
Rothblatt's
_Apartheid of Sex_. In it she argues for their being as many genders and
sexual identities as there are individuals - each being a unique
combination
of traits all too readily (conventionally) distinguished into exclusive
'male'
and 'female' categories.
Nadja