Did you know?: These bold and italic characters were originally added to the Unicode spec for use in mathematical notation. Learn more about how you're "supposed to" use these characters on the blog.
Bold and italic text can be used in social media and on the web for a few different purposes. These text styles can emphasize important information, draw attention to specific content, and highlight key points or calls-to-action. Using a bold or italic text generator enhances readability, breaks up long paragraphs, and can establish a visual hierarchy. These styles also contribute to a brand's visual identity, adding personality and consistency to an online presence.
Bold and italic text can be used for styling usernames, creating visually appealing posts, or on platforms that lack native text styling functionality. The generated text comes from Unicode's Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols block, originally intended for mathematical notation.
While the bold and italic text that is generated here looks similar to text that is bolded or italicized in a word processor, it is different. These characters are not generated using the HTML tags (like or ), nor are they styled with the CSS attributes (like font-weight: bold or font-style: italic). If you copy this text, the letters will retain their styling when pasted elsewhere. This is the magic of Unicode.
It's crucial to use bold and italic text sparingly to avoid overwhelming readers. Additionally, it's important to note that the appearance of this text may vary across platforms and devices, depending on how they render Unicode.
People who use our bold text generators also use the styles below; including bold cursive, bold fraktur, black bubble text, and black square text. These styles are similar to bold text styles above, because they have thick dark lettering and a striking look that can be used to highlight words and phrases. Double-struck text, also known as "blackboard bold" is another unique style that can be used to give your text a bold look. People who use our italic text generators might also enjoy our cursive text styles, which contain slanted letters just like italics, albeit with a more unique style.
We'd love to hear from you. You can find us at twitter.com/yaytext and facebook.com/yaytext. Let us know how you're liking YayText. If you have questions, please ask. Happy to help. Here's our privacy policy. Built by @varga Yay Okay LLC 2023.
You should also consider using \bm of the bm package instead of \boldsymbol, so that \bm\mathsfT would be equivalent to the \mathbfsfT with the first declaration. However there is no predefined sans serif italic math alphabet. So, if you need also sans serif italic, a more economic setting would be
In many software even if you only have a single font file installed (treated as the "regular" form of that typeface) - faux crudely darkened or sloped text is shown if you choose bold or italic font override.
But if you do have the true and designed (for example) italic variant installed - which can often differ significantly from the regular form, as to letter shapes / spacing - that proper designed font variant is automatically shown.
I have the impression from other prior posts here, that LrC may have recently stopped filling in absent variants with "faux" transforms. Personally I think that is actively a good thing, since the faux effect tends to be typographically very ugly, but the interface does not prevent selecting a missing variant (it probably should prevent that). Thus depending on the particular typeface chosen, you may or may not successfully achieve bold / italic overridden text within the watermarks generated.
AS an example of how this happens, with most common typefaces there will be a XXXX (Regular) that comes with Bold / Italic / Bold Italic designed forms also. But sometimes there may be "XXXX SemiBold" or "XXXX Light" or whatever, as entirely separate typefaces. XXXX Semibold probably does possess a true italic variant, but a Bold variant for XXXX Light, is less to be expected.
I would agree that if you can make and use a PNG, this brings free graphical control (and with no further dependence on the typeface). The text watermark is rather more of a functional thing. What may 'break' that could still be a specific font issue - or a type sizing issue, I suppose.
I can confirm this! Installed all Merriweather (Serif) fonts (incl. bold italic and regular italic) via CC app. When assing any of installed italic fonts to watermark LR render default sans serif font. It happens many installed fonts too (tried open sans), not tested all.
SansSerif is a logical font and will be replaced with some other font that is available to the JVM and is marked as go-to Sans Serif type font. This is a "logical" font. Try using an actual font in your case like Times New Roman or Djvu Sans. You also need to package the font as a font extension (JSS Preferences -> Jaspersoft Studio -> Fonts -> Add font and export it as a JAR) and add it to your classpath. In your font extension you specify the normal, bold, italic and bolditalic variants of the font. Most likely your application does not have any bold fonts and cannot add them to the PDF.
I want to know is if it is possible to dynamically find out if a font is serif/sans-serif (or mono/cursive) or supports bold/italic variants. I'm dynamically building stylesheets so it would be incredibly useful. If not I'll have to create a local dictionary, but I'm hoping to avoid that if possible. Just to be clear, I know you can manually visit the google.com/fonts and get all the relevant information about a font.
EDIT:The reason I need to know the font details is because when generating css styles it is important to know the appropriate fallback (serif, san-serif, cursive, or monospace). I want to restrict which fonts are selectable for body text, because any font used for the body needs to support bold and italics.
I'm looking at the MDC page for the @font-face CSS rule, but I don't get one thing. I have separate files for bold, italic and bold + italic. How can I embed all three files in one @font-face rule? For example, if I have:
The browser will not know which font to be used for bold (because that file is DejaVuSansBold.ttf), so it will default to something I probably don't want. How can I tell the browser all the different variants I have for a certain font?
As of CSS3, the spec has changed, allowing for only a single font-style. A comma-separated list (per CSS2) will be treated as if it were normal and override any earlier (default) entry. This will make fonts defined in this way appear italic permanently.
By default elements that contain multiple characters are a rendered as normal text, while single character characters are rendered as italic: the same formatting behaviour as the CSS text-transform property with a value of math-auto. The mathvariant attribute with a value of normal can be used to reset a single character to the normal font.
In order to use a particular form of a character such as bold/italic, serif, sans-serif, script/calligraphy, monospaced, double-struck, and so on, you should use the appropriate Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols.
Note: In a previous specification (MathML3), the mathvariant attribute was used to define logical classes that could apply the character formatting for mathematical alphanumeric symbols. The associated values are now deprecated, and expected to be removed from browsers in future releases.
\n By default elements that contain multiple characters are a rendered as normal text, while single character characters are rendered as italic: the same formatting behaviour as the CSS text-transform property with a value of math-auto.\n The mathvariant attribute with a value of normal can be used to reset a single character to the normal font.\n
\n Note: In a previous specification (MathML3), the mathvariant attribute was used to define logical classes that could apply the character formatting for mathematical alphanumeric symbols.\n The associated values are now deprecated, and expected to be removed from browsers in future releases.\n
Sans serif fonts like Helvetica and Verdana do not have these feet. Though they are associated with contemporary typography, they originated in the 1810s. Sans rhymes with hands, not cons. Avoid the common misspelling san serif.
Some fonts have both a bold style and a semibold style. You can use either for emphasis. I usually prefer bold to semibold because I like the greater contrast with the roman. But semibold is a little easier to read.
Weights and styles are an important UX element. Bold and italic help readers to see structure and to skim the text more efficiently (left). The same text without bold or italic (right) feels more like a narrative.
Notice that the font-family names are unique, with each font-family name accessing the appropriate Web font files. For example, UbuntuItalic accesses Ubuntu-RI-webfont.woff, while UbuntuBold accesses Ubuntu-B-webfont.woff.
To style text using this method, use the appropriate font-family name, and keep all weights and styles set to normal. For example, the Regular, Regular Italic, Bold and Bold Italic headings below are set with classes. The classes are styled like so:
Because the weights and styles are set to normal in the @font-face declarations, keeping the weights and styles set to normal when styling the text is important. Otherwise, the bolds may double-bold (some browsers will add a bold weight to the already bold Web font), and the italics may double-italic (some browsers will add an italic style to the already italic Web font).
Another way to set weights and styles is to use the same font-family name multiple times, setting the weights and styles in each @font-face declaration to match the weight and style of the Web font file being accessed. This approach is called style linking.
c80f0f1006