In Cullen Murphy’s 2007 book U Are We Rome?, Murphy states that
Rome, as a powerful force in history, is important in understanding
America today, and as a result, will help America avoid Rome’s doom.
Many of Murphy’s core reasons can be found in his Six Parallels,
which
state that in understanding today’s culture, Rome and America share
the same views of society and the same inflated views of themselves:
that both societies have the same problems with their respective
militaries; that both countries are becoming corrupt through
“privatization,” that the outside world is viewed in a negative
light,
and that both nations have the same issues with borders and
complexity
because of their interaction with other nations. While Murphy’s
argument is persuasive, it ignores the complexity and interaction
among many nations and societies, wrongly assuming that Rome holds
all
the keys to bettering America. Although there are many similarities
between Rome and America, these similarities are not enough to
constitute a reason to foretell America’s doom in relation to Rome’s;
rather, America itself must be evaluated in order to
ensure it’s fate is not similar to Rome’s.
Murphy’s argument is flawed because its concentration on the
failings
of Rome as America’s sole hope for empowerment and survival. Murphy’s
first point, that Rome “encompasses the whole of the human condition,
every motivation, every behavior, every virtue, every vice, every
outcome, every moral” (Murphy, 2007) presents an overwhelming bias in
favor of Rome, assuming that his audience would believe Rome is the
most important nation. However, many authors could say the same for
many other nations. Many could argue that England shares many
American
values; in fact, England birthed America. Many could also say that
any
other influential nation could have had an affect on America. The
flaw
in Murphy’s argument lies in the fact that his audience must take for
granted that Rome is all important, a chance that is too risky to
leave to assumption. Another flaw lies in a lack of developed reasons
for his opinion of non importance to America’s future. For example,
on
page 19, Murphy states that America’s “privatization” is ruining
America, just as it ruined Rome, because “all
manner of activities” (Murphy, 2007) such as collecting taxes and
protecting
society, are being done by government instead of the people. However,
Murphy does not realize that a nation like America democratically
chose its nations leaders to run their country. As Murphy has said
himself, America is a complex country; therefore it needs to be run
by
leaders qualified for the job. The average everyday citizen does not
know how the tax system works, and cannot completely decide how to
control taxes. Granted, it may seem as though America’s leaders do
use
privatization as Murphy claims; however, Murphy ignores the simple
truth that all U.S. citizens are able to vote on bills put forth by
America’s well prepared leaders, while only Rome’s powerful elite men
were able to vote. Another point Murphy makes concerning America’s
views of the outside world is not entirely true. Murphy claims that
like Rome, America has “an exaggerated sense of its importance in the
eyes of others” (Murphy, 2007) well meaning,
ultimately
ignorant of the world around them. America has been involved in many
wars, but as a powerful nation, America must be wary and has too many
worries to constantly watch over other nations. Many other well-
developed countries have the same problem as well, such as Japan.
I believe that in order to ensure that doom does not fall
upon
America; we should consider America from what it has been and what it