What we are witnessing in Delhi today is
historic – for the first time since Independence a legitimate political party
has refused to play by the rules that all political parties in India have
battened on for sixty-five years; for the first time a State Government has
taken on the Central Government at its own doorstep; for the first time a Chief
Minister and his entire Cabinet are sitting in protest in their own capital; for
the first time their own police force is ranged against them in their
thousands.
The immediate reason for this may be the demand
for the suspension of five police officials, but the actual reason is more
basic, and fundamental to any democracy — accountability of the rulers to the
ruled.
The rulers are not just the politicians and the
bureaucrats – they are also the larger constituency that benefits from the
present status quo: the industrialists, the TV and news organisations, the
“cognoscenti”, the “glitterati”, the South Delhi socialites, the
“intelligentsia” that makes a nice living by appearing nightly on TV panel
discussions: in short, all those who are comfortable with the status quo.
They have, with the assistance of disgruntled
elements like Kiran Bedi and Captain Gopinath, unleashed a veritable barrage of
abuse and condemnation against Kejriwal and his party over the last week,
terming him a Dictator, Anarchist, Chief Protestor, Law-breaker and so on.
It is because they feel genuinely threatened by
the forces that the AAP has unleashed, the ethical standards that it has
prescribed and demonstrated, the personal examples that its leaders have shown.
Because they know that if these paradigms become the norm of a new India then
the sand castles that these privileged reside in shall come crumbling down in no
time.
And so they accuse Kejriwal of not following
prescribed conventions, protocol or procedure and thus encouraging anarchy. Let
us look at just three of these alleged transgressions:
1. Law Minister Somnath Bharti asking for a meeting of judicial officers
of Delhi. What is improper about this? Isn’t the judiciary a part of the
government – funded, staffed, appointed by the state.
Yes, it is
operationally independent of the government (as it should be) but it is
certainly not a holy cow whose performance cannot be questioned, or monitored,
by the people of this country through their elected representatives.
The
judiciary is meant to serve the people, just as the bureaucracy is, and it
cannot have internal accountability only. An elected government has to have the
right to review its performance, especially given the pathetic state of the
disposal of cases in courts.
In my view Mr. Bharti was within his rights to take a meeting of
judicial officers to assess the shortcomings of the system (which is the first
step to removing these shortcomings). Yes, he could have routed the request
through the High Court, but this was a trivial error and certainly not the
grievous violation that the media made it out to be.
To the contrary,
the Law Minister should be lauded for his initiative in seeking to address the
issue instead of washing his hands of it as ALL LAW MINISTERS OF THIS COUNTRY
HAVE DONE SO FAR, as if the collapse of the judicial redressal system was no
concern of the government!
——-
2. Subsidies on water and power to
small consumers in Delhi (something for which Kejriwal has been contemptuously
branded a populist). Really?
The Central Government dishes out more than
160000 crores worth of subsidy every year on just three schemes (Mid-day Meals,
MNREGA and Sarv Shiksha Abhiyan). Just about every state gives subsidies on
water and power.
Here’s something Mr. Arnab Goswami and his kind should consider: the
Golf Club in New Delhi which has about 4000 privileged members (all of whom are
now arraigned against Kejriwal) has been given 250 acres of the most expensive
real estate in the country worth 60000 crores for a paltry lease of about Rs. 15
lakhs per annum.
The annual return on Rs. 60000 crores should be at
the very least Rs. 6000 crores: in effect, what this means is that every member
of the Golf Club is being given a subsidy of Rs. 1.50 crores every year! The
same is the case with the Gymkhana Club, another watering hole for the rich, the
famous, and the now scared.
According to the latest report of the RBI, the total non-performing assets
(NPA) of the Banks in India is more than Rs. 1.60 lakh crores.
NPA is just a
euphemism for what the Vijay Mallyas and the Captain Gopinaths of the world owe
to the aam aadmi (and refuse to pay) while flying all over the world in their
private jets and pontificating in TV studios on the correct form of governance.
Is it “populism” if indulged in by Kejriwal, and “entitlement” and “economic
surge” when practiced by others ?
——-
3. Somnath Bharti’s (Kejriwal’s
Law Minister) mid-night visit to Khirkee village has generated so much
misinformation, ignorance of the law, reverse racism and hypocritical harangues
that it is sickening.
Shorne of all this, what does the entire incident
amount to? Merely this: a Minister, in response to complaints by residents
(which are on record, as is the police inaction on them for months) of a
locality personally visits the spot and asks the police to take immediate action
by raiding the building where illegal activities are taking place.
The police refuse and insult the Minister. This is the essence of
the matter.
All the rest – search warrants, lack of female police, racism, urinating in
public, cavity search(!) [the latest addition to the shrinking vocabulary of Ms.
Meenakshi Lekhi] etc.- are red herrings and a smoke screen which no doubt the
judicial Inquiry Commission shall see through.
How was the Minister wrong in
asking the police to take action? Is it a Minister’s job to simply sit in an
air-conditioned office and write on files? (a question which Kejriwal has asked
and to which we are still waiting for an enlightened response from Ms. Barkha
Dutt and gang).
Does the police require a search warrant to enter a place where they
have reason to believe that illegal activities are going on? Really, Mr. Salve?
If so, then how do you explain their barging into the house in
the Batla House encounter and shooting three people, WITHOUT A SEARCH WARRANT?
Or their constant nocturnal forays into the poor whore-houses of GB Road
whenever they are short of spending money?
——-
No, sir, the opposition to Kejriwal from the
BJP and the Congress, from the Arnab Goswamis, Rajdeep Sardesais, the Barkha
Dutts, the Kiran Bedis, from the Editors of English dailies, from the captains
of industry, from the Single Malts and Bloody Marys of Gymkhana and Golf Clubs,
does not stem from any illegality or impropriety on his part, or from any
ideological differences between them.
It stems from their complete and total failure
to comprehend what Kejriwal is and what he stands for. It stems also from the
deep social divide between the upper crust of society( who are happy with the
status quo where their money, power and contacts can ensure them a comfortable
life) and the masses below them who have to daily bear the brunt of the system
inspired corruption, harassment, inconvenience and indignity that the present
dispensation guarantees them.
This (hitherto unacknowledged and invisible)
divide becomes clear when we compare the editorial slants of the English and
Hindi channels in the coverage of the ongoing protests: the former are
virulently anti AAP and only pop up panelists who support that view, while the
latter appear to be more understanding of what AAP is trying to do.
Those who are denouncing Kejriwal for being
an autocrat, anarchist, activist and for protesting at Raisina Road are
missing the most obvious point of his movement – THAT KEJRIWAL WILL NOT PLAY
BY THEIR RULES ANY MORE.
As they say in Las Vegas – you can’t beat the
house, because the dice are loaded against you. Everyone wants him to play with
their set of dice which they mysteriously call the Constitution and the
CRPC!) but Kejriwal wants to play with his own dice, hence the
confrontation.
They want him to pass a joint resolution of the
Assembly for bringing the police under the Delhi govt.-he’s smart enough to see
that the resolution will be thrown into the same waste paper basket where
presumably the Ordinance on protecting convicted MPs was consigned by Rahul
Gandhi.
They want him to be a good boy and take his
dharna to Jantar Mantar where all civilised protests begin and inevitably end,
while the govt. of the day can get on with its gerrymandering uninterrupted-he
knows that unless he disrupts the comfortable existence of the bourgeois he may
as well relieve himself in the Yamuna for all the difference he will make.
They want him to sit in the Secretariat and
be guided by his bureaucrats and lose all touch with reality- he won’t fall
for this Pavlovian routine. They desperately want him to become one of them,
red light, siren, gun-toting commandos, Lutyen’s bungalow and all- he knows
that if he falls for this he loses his USP and becomes just an intern in this
hoary club of gnarled sinners.
They want him to follow the script co-authored
by all the political parties of the day, not one excluded, because this script
contains an agreed-upon plot, wherein politicians make noises but don’t act
against each other, wherein corruption is just a sound-bite, where dynastic
succession is a silently accepted sine qua non, where no one is interested in
finding out whether the hundreds of proved Swiss bank accounts contain anything
other than Swiss chocolates – Kejriwal, however, wants to write his own script
with substantial inputs from the aam aadmi, not from the Ambanis or the Radias
or the Shobhna Bhartias.
They want him to talk about corruption but not
do anything about it, something Manish Tewari’s poetic flair would term “willing
to wound but afraid to strike”, an attitude as old as Chanakya and Kautilya
which offers all of us a catharsis via the good offices of Arnab Goswami and
little else- but Kejriwal is no respecter of Machiavelli or Chanakya, his
vocabulary is limited because he can only call a spade a spade, he is colour
blind because he can only see in black and white (the shades of greys can be
left for the likes of Manu Singhvi), and therefore he insists on striking, not
just talking.
Is there any cause for surprise, therefore, at why the present
dispensation, both in and out of government, is rattled by this five foot four
inch “insect” from Ghaziabad? He is neither fish nor fowl, he defies
understanding.
The establishment has made the supreme mistake
of trying to counter him by quoting the rules of the game (loaded in the
former’s favour, naturally!) they are past masters of- but Kejriwal has changed
the rules, and now they don’t know how to control him or neutralise him.
For the time being only Kejriwal knows the
new rules, and he is springing them on the carpet baggers one by one, catching
them by surprise all the time.
Forget the English TV channels-they rarely get
anything right. Forget the Manish Tewaris, the Kiran Bedis, the FICCI
spokespersons, the Minakshi Lekhis- they are either scared witless or rank
opportunists. What they all do have in common, however, is that they have failed
to see how the common man-the aam aadmi-are gathering behind this dimunitive man
with the perpetual cough.
The sincerity, integrity and commitment of this
man is phenomenal, his capacity to harness the anger and frustration of the
people is limitless. His defiance of accepted conventions and interpretations is
not anarchy – it is nothing short of a revolution. When the people have had
enough of injustice, callousness and indignity, they will not play by the rules
of the rulers-they will make new rules.
The French Revolution would not have happened if the existing
rules had been followed. Tehrir Square would not have happened if everyone
swore by the old rules. Changing the rules, Mr. Home Minister, is not anarchy
– it is the beginning of a people’s revolution.
The sooner we realise this the less pain in the
transition, the less violence. No matter how the stand-off in Delhi ends –
capitulation by the Home Minister and the Police, withdrawal of support by the
Congress, imposition of President’s Rule, police violence on the protesters and
their eviction – one thing is certain: Kejriwal is going nowhere.
He, and his paradigms, are here to stay and
haunt our rulers. With his uncanny understanding of the pulse of the people he
has re-written the rules of politics and governance.
There are now only two options Kejriwal
has left the ruling class – either they change, or the people will change
them.
Avay Shukla retired from the Indian Administrative Service in December
2010. He is a keen environmentalist and loves the mountains- he has made them
his home.