OT: If you have a netbook running hacked OS X, don't update the OS!

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Scot Murphy

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 2:13:03 PM11/10/09
to SmokeR...@googlegroups.com
(I'm only sending this here because there was some chatter about buying a new netbook and installing Mac OS X on it. Bill had said that the newest update, 10.6.2, was going to block Atom processors, but then there were rumors it wasn't. Well...it did.)


http://blogs.forbes.com/velocity/2009/11/10/apple-drops-atom-bomb-on-netbooks/

Apple Drops Atom Bomb On Netbooks

November 10th, 2009
Let's be clear. Apple never encouraged the installation of its operating system on netbooks. Chief Operating Officer Tim Cook, among other Apple managers, has always belittled the $300 machines built around cheap Intel Atom processors, cramped keyboards, small screens, and -- usually -- Windows XP.

So it should come as no great surprise that the small community of hobbyists who have been installing Apple's operating system on their netbooks suddenly found Monday's update to OS X, version 10.6.2, is no longer cooperating. The real question: why now?

It could be nothing, of course. Or Apple could be about to strike out in a radically different direction than the one that has guided the rest of the computer industry towards cheaper, less capable versions of the notebook computers.

Making it more difficult to get an Atom-powered machine running OS X might be a sign Apple is preparing to introduce its own mobile processors, built around the technology it acquired from P.A. Semi in 2008. A powerful, power-sipping processor could be ideal for the long-rumored Apple tablet computer. Such a device could explore new possibilities for fusing music and video, applications such as those built for the iPhone, and the web in novel ways.

At this point, however, that's must speculation. What is clear, however, is Apple doesn't seem too keen on exploring those possibilities with Intel. Or the hackers, hobbyists, and small-time entrepreneurs who are -- no doubt -- already close to finding a way to make Apple's latest software work on all those netbooks, again. -- Brian Caulfield

--
"You were sick, but now you're well again, and there's work to do."
--Kilgore Trout

Garry Howard

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 2:24:51 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
So much for "do anything you want" with your computer. LOL I don't know why
Apple insists on fighting the hobbyists. After all, the company started as a
hobby in a garage by a couple of hackers.

Garry

Kevin Cleek

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 2:30:46 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
A special for buzz and the other bikers!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaWoo82zNUA

Kevin

Bill Martin

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 2:31:22 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
You obviously didn't really read or function on the article.

Apple bought their own chip maker: PA. That's the one they plan to use. Not the Atom.

Why support a chip they don't use in the computer or any of their other products?

Would you? Would you support someone else's horse, or only those in your own stable??

Do you pay the bills for your neighbors car repairs?

Apple isn't beholden to hardware they don't use or support. Duh!

Bill


On Nov 10, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

> So much for "do anything you want" with your computer. LOL I don't know why
> Apple insists on fighting the hobbyists. After all, the company started as a
> hobby in a garage by a couple of hackers.
>
> Garry

Radix lecti.
Couch potato.

Scot Murphy

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 2:33:57 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com

On Nov 10, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

>
> So much for "do anything you want" with your computer. LOL I don't know why
> Apple insists on fighting the hobbyists. After all, the company started as a
> hobby in a garage by a couple of hackers.

When you think about all the vulnerabilities and problems Windows PCs have, many of them generated by hackers, it's easy to understand Apple's tight control over their environment. It may be closed to hobbyists, but it's also far less vulnerable to worms, viruses, et al. There was a story the other day about how a worm has appeared in the wild that targets jailbroken iPhones. Something about how the jailbroken phones have to break certain required security measures and use default permissions that make it easy to hack. The first worm known for the iPhone did nothing but "rickroll" the owner (if you're a fuddy-duddy who doesn't know what that means, Google it). But it showed that far worse can be done.

THAT'S why Apple exerts the control it does. It wants the most trouble-free operating experience its customers can have, and in order to gain that, it has to prevent a lot of fooling around inside it.


Scot "I like not having to worry about viruses" Murphy

jwhi...@comcast.net

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 2:40:59 PM11/10/09
to Smoke Ring
But if Microsoft tries to control things it is called a monopoly and the courts make them open up there code so others can play.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Scot Murphy <deppi...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:33:57
To: <smoker...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [BBQ] Re: OT: If you have a netbook running hacked OS X, don't update
the OS!



Garry Howard

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 2:47:47 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
If I buy a copy of Windows 7 I can install it on any computer I want. I
don't need them to protect me from myself.

Apple exerts the control they do so they can sell you their overpriced,
proprietary hardware. That's their business model. It really has nothing to
do with your well being.

Garry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: smoker...@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:smoker...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Scot Murphy
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:34 PM
> To: smoker...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [BBQ] Re: OT: If you have a netbook running hacked
> OS X, don't update the OS!
>
>
>

Scot Murphy

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 2:50:44 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com

On Nov 10, 2009, at 2:40 PM, jwhi...@comcast.net wrote:

> But if Microsoft tries to control things it is called a monopoly and the courts make them open up there code so others can play.

Microsoft has engaged in other anti-competitive practices: breaking business deals after obtaining a company's trade secrets, introducing "vaporware" to depress the stocks of innovative companies and drive them out of business, buying up companies and then killing off their products, sometimes just out-and-out stealing their technologies, stuff like that. Engaging strict control over 90% of the world's computers is just one of the many things they've done. When they engage in such practices, they set themselves up to be sanctioned by governments here and abroad.


Scot "if they produced their own hardware, it'd be a different story" Murphy

Scot Murphy

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 2:57:46 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com

On Nov 10, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

>
> If I buy a copy of Windows 7 I can install it on any computer I want. I
> don't need them to protect me from myself.
>
> Apple exerts the control they do so they can sell you their overpriced,
> proprietary hardware. That's their business model. It really has nothing to
> do with your well being.

Complete misconception. Win 7 is already vulnerable to viruses. OS X: None. It's all about the OS.

Speaking of prices, though...have you checked out the cost of a 27" monitor--JUST the monitor--which has the specs of Apple's new iMac? About $1600. Buy an iMac, though, and you get that same quality, plus a high-end computer stuck to the back. PCs spec'd out to match Macs are about the same in cost. Then there's the total cost of ownership: sure, you might save a few hundred dollars by buying a cheaper PC, but what about that antivirus subscription you have to pay? Or, for non-technically savvy people, all the money they have to pay to the tech to clear out their registries, get rid of malware, and so on? And what about the loss of productivity whenever a whole company has to scrub every one of their computers because a virus goes wild? The eventual cost of your PC is going to match or exceed the cost of a Mac and it'll give you a LOT more headaches.

Scot "if you want Lexus quality, you don't trick out a Ford Focus" Murphy

Garry Howard

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 3:11:03 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
The complete misconception is that OS X is invulnerable to attack. I could
post numerous links to support that statement but I won't. Of course, if you
install the latest release you stand to risk losing all your data.
http://www.pcr-online.biz/news/32516/Grave-Snow-Leopard-flaw-killing-Mac-dat
a

"Security Update 2009-006 describes fixes for Mac OS X 10.6.2 and for
earlier Apple operating system versions. It includes 58 Common
Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) entries, 18 of which don't affect Snow
Leopard." The latest patch fixed 58 vulnerabilities that don't exist.

The other misconception is that similarly configured PCs are as expensive as
Macs. I've done that analysis numerous times and it just isn't true. You can
get a similarly configured PC for hundres less than a Mac. I don't know what
the specs are for an Apple $1600 monitor, but I am using an HP desktop with
4GB of memory, a duo-core processor and a 22" wide screen monitor that is
more than adequate for my needs and it cost $650.

Garry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: smoker...@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:smoker...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Scot Murphy
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:58 PM
> To: smoker...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [BBQ] Re: OT: If you have a netbook running hacked
> OS X, don't update the OS!
>
>
>

Scot Murphy

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 3:36:49 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com

On Nov 10, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

>
> The complete misconception is that OS X is invulnerable to attack.


It's not invulnerable to attack, but it does seem to be invulnerable to viruses. Trojans and browser exploits can still exist, and of course, running Javascript opens you up to potential problems.


> I could
> post numerous links to support that statement but I won't. Of course, if you
> install the latest release you stand to risk losing all your data.
> http://www.pcr-online.biz/news/32516/Grave-Snow-Leopard-flaw-killing-Mac-dat
> a
>
> "Security Update 2009-006 describes fixes for Mac OS X 10.6.2 and for
> earlier Apple operating system versions. It includes 58 Common
> Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) entries, 18 of which don't affect Snow
> Leopard." The latest patch fixed 58 vulnerabilities that don't exist.

I don't know where they come up with that. But the data loss issue--which only affected you IF you happened to reboot after installing SL into a guest account rather than your own--has been resolved in 10.6.2. The total number of people affected by this flaw were in the hundreds, a miniscule percentage of SL users.


>
> The other misconception is that similarly configured PCs are as expensive as
> Macs. I've done that analysis numerous times and it just isn't true. You can
> get a similarly configured PC for hundres less than a Mac. I don't know what
> the specs are for an Apple $1600 monitor, but I am using an HP desktop with
> 4GB of memory, a duo-core processor and a 22" wide screen monitor that is
> more than adequate for my needs and it cost $650.

Just because it's a comparable size doesn't mean it's comparable quality. Is it backlit LED? Is it mercury-free? What are its pixel stats? The new iMac has a pixel range that is higher than 1080p. A similar monitor from Dell costs $1600 or thereabouts. This one just happens to have a computer attached to it running the world's best OS.


Scot "perfect for large pictures of BBQ ribs" Murphy

Garry Howard

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 3:47:30 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: smoker...@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:smoker...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Scot Murphy
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:37 PM
> To: smoker...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [BBQ] Re: OT: If you have a netbook running hacked
> OS X, don't update the OS!
>
>

> Just because it's a comparable size doesn't mean it's
> comparable quality. Is it backlit LED? Is it mercury-free?
> What are its pixel stats? The new iMac has a pixel range that
> is higher than 1080p. A similar monitor from Dell costs $1600
> or thereabouts. This one just happens to have a computer
> attached to it running the world's best OS.
>
>

All of that is irrelevant. The 22" monitor that came with my computer
displays everything beautifully and more than meets my needs at a cost of
hundreds of dollars less. There are plenty of more expensive PCs that cost
much more than I paid for this one, but again, this one more than meets my
needs so why would I want to pay more?

Garry

John Douglas

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:11:08 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Scott, Bill, etc.
 
Any suggestions about what to do with a 24 inch iMac that seems to have lost control of itself. It will not accept zapping the P-ram, etc. Off list would be fine.............
 
TIA,
 
John
 

Scot Murphy

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:19:21 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com

On Nov 10, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

>
> All of that is irrelevant. The 22" monitor that came with my computer
> displays everything beautifully and more than meets my needs at a cost of
> hundreds of dollars less. There are plenty of more expensive PCs that cost
> much more than I paid for this one, but again, this one more than meets my
> needs so why would I want to pay more?

Well, that was really my point. If you find something cheaper, good on you. But if you look for something with similar specs to the iMac, you're going to spend just as much for just the monitor. Me, I'd love one, but then I don't know what I'd balance on mah belleh. :)


Scot "maybe a cup of coffee" Murphy

Bill Martin

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:20:54 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Because they don't make hardware. They license their software to mfgrs.... and promptly lose control. When they try to exercise control over something that isn't in their stable.... then they get into trouble. Not only with the DOJ, but also the European Union and individual countries that don't put up with the bullshit.

Bill


On Nov 10, 2009, at 1:40 PM, jwhi...@comcast.net wrote:

> But if Microsoft tries to control things it is called a monopoly and the courts make them open up there code so others can play.

Never let a computer know you’re in a hurry. -- Unknown


Garry Howard

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:23:05 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Is this a joke? Everybody knows that Macs never have a problem. :-)
 
Garry


From: smoker...@googlegroups.com [mailto:smoker...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Douglas
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:11 PM

To: smoker...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BBQ] Re: OT: If you have a netbook running hacked OS X, don't update the OS!

Bill Martin

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:31:07 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Bwahahahaha.

Garry, you aren't an "average" user. I have two friends, right now, with brand new, but dead computers because they haven't a clue whats under the hood, or what "they did wrong.". And they are just as proud as you are of being "a PC". And Windows 7 was THEIR idea. My GAWD.... it is so funny.

And I don't want to be hearing all the "positive" Windows baloney from all the geeks in this crowd. I'd rather hear the problems the non-geeks run into. They are the majority. And that is why I'm a Mac user, with 25+ years of Apple products under my belt and NEVER, even in my earliest days, EVER had a problem I couldn't figure out on my own and fix within a couple/few minutes or hours. Really! And I bought my first 128K Mac because I wanted a TYPEWRITER to compose documents I could edit and change before printing them out! (I didn't even know the software was called a Word Processor.)

Bill
Noli me vocare, ego te vocabo.
Don't call me, I'll call you.

Jack Wimberly

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:34:30 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
So you had the "Thin" Mac, eh?

Jack Wimberly

Bill Martin

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:34:51 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com

On Nov 10, 2009, at 2:11 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

> but I am using an HP desktop with
> 4GB of memory, a duo-core processor and a 22" wide screen monitor that is
> more than adequate for my needs and it cost $650.

Hmmm How long do you spose that's gunna last before Windows 8 comes out and makes it obsolete??

Bill

Is it 5 yet??

Bill Martin

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:45:39 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Most problems with Macs are self-inflicted. Just like with PC's.

With Macs however, the problems are usually easily fixed, even by non-Geeks, and without calling IT.

That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it.

Bill


On Nov 10, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

> Is this a joke? Everybody knows that Macs never have a problem. :-)
>
> Garry
>
> From: smoker...@googlegroups.com [mailto:smoker...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Douglas
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:11 PM
> To: smoker...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [BBQ] Re: OT: If you have a netbook running hacked OS X, don't update the OS!
>
> Scott, Bill, etc.
>
> Any suggestions about what to do with a 24 inch iMac that seems to have lost control of itself. It will not accept zapping the P-ram, etc. Off list would be fine.............
>
> TIA,
>
> John
>
>
>
> >

Si hoc signum legere potes, operis boni in rebus Latinus alacribus et fructuosis potiri potes!
If you can read this sign, you can get a good job in the fast-paced, high-paying world of Latin!

Jack Wimberly

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:47:28 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
I would say 99% of the problems I have seen while using PC's and Macs
have been induced by me. Unless you have a hardware problem the machine
will do what the software tells it to.

Jack Wimberly

Bill Martin

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:48:00 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Huh? That was obviously too subtle even for me.

What do you mean: "thin"?

Bill
"If your words are soft and sweet, they won't be as hard to swallow if you
have to eat them."
....anon.

Jack Wimberly

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:49:35 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
They made the 128K (Thin) and then later came out with the 512K (Fat)
Mac.

Bill Martin

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 5:14:38 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Aha!!!  Got it.  Yes... I had both at one time.  Bought a 20MB! external Serial, (later converted to SCSI), hard drive and figured that would be the most I'd ever need.  HA!!

Bill

Crash programs fail because they are based on theory that, with nine
women pregnant, you can get a baby a month.
Wernher von Braun
(1912-1977) German-USA engineer. He pioneered all aspects of rocketry
and space exploration, first in Germany and, after World War II, in the
U.S.

Gerry Curry

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 5:23:32 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
I have a Lisa 1 with twin Twiggy drives. It was just laying around in pieces in a lab at Apple Canada when I was there in 1983, working on a contract. They gave it to me. Still worked last time I plugged it in.

On 2009-11-10, at 6:14 PM, Bill Martin wrote:

Aha!!!  Got it.  Yes... I had both at one time.  Bought a 20MB! external Serial, (later converted to SCSI), hard drive and figured that would be the most I'd ever need.  HA!!

Garry Howard

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 5:37:01 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
I don't know, but Apple is the only computer manufacturer I'm aware of that
made a whole product line obsolete. It isn't necessary to upgrade. Our 10
year old PCs in Puerto Rico are still running XP just fine and will continue
to do so until they are retired. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for
Windows 8 to come out.

Garry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: smoker...@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:smoker...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bill Martin
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:35 PM
> To: smoker...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [BBQ] Re: OT: If you have a netbook running hacked
> OS X, don't update the OS!
>
>
>

Garry Howard

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 5:37:55 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Install OS X on it!
 
Garry


From: smoker...@googlegroups.com [mailto:smoker...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gerry Curry
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:24 PM

To: smoker...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BBQ] Re: OT: If you have a netbook running hacked OS X, don't update the OS!

Garry Howard

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 5:38:30 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Wow, in your lifetime you've owned way more of those reliable, last forever Macs than I have PCs.
 
Garry


From: smoker...@googlegroups.com [mailto:smoker...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bill Martin
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:15 PM

Jack Wimberly

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 5:45:02 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
I need to find a long allen wrench so I can open up my SE and figure out
what's wrong with it. Love that little machine.

Jack in jackson

Scot Murphy

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 5:48:17 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com

On Nov 10, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

>
> I don't know, but Apple is the only computer manufacturer I'm aware of that
> made a whole product line obsolete.

Since when? You can still run Leopard on PPC Macs. I've heard of Leopard being run on Cubes, even. Besides which, you have to clear out the deadwood eventually. One of Windows's biggest problems is trying to maintain every single app ever written, going back as far as Win 95. Just try to imagine if Apple was trying to make Macs that supported OS X and the original ClarisWorks. Having to support every single driver in existence is what makes Windows spaghetti code. Apple limits its hardware suppliers so it doesn't have to provide support for Bob's Lo-Cost Video Cards of Yuba City.


Scot "Leopard even runs on original DV iMacs and makes them faster" Murphy

Gerry Curry

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 6:01:08 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Right after you install Windows 7 on a TRS-80. (grin)

On 2009-11-10, at 6:37 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

Install OS X on it!

Robert King

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 6:10:00 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
I actually have one somewhere. Used it for the same thing.

Robert King

Garry Howard

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 6:13:32 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
A TRS-80 isn't a PC. That was pre-Microsoft.
 
Garry


From: smoker...@googlegroups.com [mailto:smoker...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gerry Curry
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 4:01 PM

To: smoker...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BBQ] Re: OT: If you have a netbook running hacked OS X, don't update the OS!

Garry Howard

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 6:14:11 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
I did own a TRS-80 Color Computer, though. That was my first computer.
 
Garry


From: smoker...@googlegroups.com [mailto:smoker...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gerry Curry
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 4:01 PM

To: smoker...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BBQ] Re: OT: If you have a netbook running hacked OS X, don't update the OS!

spe...@knology.net

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 6:17:36 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
I had a Morrow running CPM with 2 floppy disk drives!!!
 
and a RS-232 CRT with keyboard for access!
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 6:14 PM
Subject: [BBQ] Re: OT: If you have a netbook running hacked OS X, don't update the OS!

Gerry Curry

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 6:27:56 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
The Lisa wasn't a Mac.

On 2009-11-10, at 7:13 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

A TRS-80 isn't a PC. That was pre-Microsoft.

Gerry Curry

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 6:35:48 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
My first was an Altair 8800. Didn't keep it long. We had a very active ham radio club with a bunch of young geeks like me, many of whom worked for Northern Telecom at the time. We used to swap hardware and ideas. I sold my Altair to another member of the group and bought an Apple 1. They were both kits. Being a ham really helped. I've been with Apple ever since, although I've fooled around with everything else over the years.

On 2009-11-10, at 7:14 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

I did own a TRS-80 Color Computer, though. That was my first computer.

Jack Wimberly

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 6:35:54 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
I had one at one time but can't find it anywhere. I got it when I added
a processor upgrade card. Went from 68000 8MHz to a 68030 25MHz.

Jack in Jackson

Bill Martin

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 7:39:29 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com

On Nov 10, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

>
> I don't know, but Apple is the only computer manufacturer I'm aware of that
> made a whole product line obsolete. It isn't necessary to upgrade. Our 10
> year old PCs in Puerto Rico are still running XP just fine and will continue
> to do so until they are retired. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for
> Windows 8 to come out.


Yeah, it does seem to take a long time, doesn't it.

Which product line was that that Apple obsoleted? Oh, you mean the Clones.

Never should've happened. Oh, you mean the old OS 7, 8 and 9 machines. They're still around. Lots of people are using those computers as servers and phone distro units.

Bill


> -~--~---

Bill Martin

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 7:49:26 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
They are STILL in use, just not by me. Since I functioned as a Sys Admin and a support person for Graphic Artists.... I needed to keep abreast of the newest, fastest Macs available. Needed to be able to PROFESSIONALLY edit video at "30" fps, and edit music and voice tracks.

So they got sold to 2-3 people in Honolulu that are still using the machines. Only two that I know of are in a private museum, but they get turned on and operated usually at least once or twice a week.

They didn't wear out.

Just because you didn't keep abreast with the need for speed, doesn't take away from Mac's mastery in printing, graphics, video, sound.... while PC's major usage was word processing and Excel spreadsheets. Exciting stuff!!!

Windows machines still can't match fonts, color or printing registration properly.

In the big, professional printing companies.... those that do shrink wrap, mylar, plastic, and see-through package labels; all files turned in in a PC format of Illustrator or Photoshop are immediately converted to Mac files,..... because they just work. And the companies that don't know any better and who turn in PC files get charged an extra fee for the conversion.

MS never has figured out how to master those three crucial issues.

Bill


On Nov 10, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Garry Howard wrote:

> Wow, in your lifetime you've owned way more of those reliable, last forever Macs than I have PCs.
>
> Garry
>
Dyslexic, Agnostic, Insomniac...
Lying awake at night, wondering if there is a Dog.

Bill Martin

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 7:50:17 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Is there a buzzing coming from the left side??

Bill
Outside of a dog, a book is mans best friend.
......Inside of a dog, its too dark to read.
.....Groucho

Jack Wimberly

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 8:38:30 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
No, no buzzing...I think the CPU upgrade I put in has come unseated. I
just need to get it open and see.

Jack in jackson

Bill Martin

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 9:22:58 PM11/10/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
OK... a lot of those early all-in-ones had a problem with the power supply and the buzzing came from the analog board and the connector to the CRT.

There was also a problem with conductive paint and some non-conductive "grease" used around the case and the internal "rack".... something about the ground for the components in the case

Bill
Bill Martin's Creative Services
Mac OS X Consulting Services and Support
Affordable Websites & Maintenance
Audio, Video Support
Digital Commercial Still, Location Photography
Copywriting, Production services
bma...@island-styles.com
830-998-1418



Jim McCabe

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 12:09:52 PM11/11/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Hey Jack,

Sears sells a Torx T-15" wrench that works like a charm. I got one a
couple of years ago for under $10.

Jim
--
http://www.videovault.com/
Guaranteed WORST Movies in Town!
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT RETAIL

Jack Wimberly

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 2:45:26 PM11/11/09
to smoker...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for the info...I may have to get one. Nothing like two bit color
on a 9" monitor.

Jack Wimberly
-----Original Message-----
From: smoker...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:smoker...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim McCabe
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 11:10 AM
To: smoker...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BBQ] OT: If you have a netbook running hacked OS X, don't
update the OS!


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages