FIELD MARSHAL SAM MANEKSHAW’S LECTURE
Defence Services College, Wellington, 11th
November, 1998.
ON LEADERSHIP AND DISCIPLINE
Commandant, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am
fully conscious of the privilege, which is mine, to have been invited here to
address the college. A while ago, I was invited to a seminar where the
subject was youth, and people said that the youth of this country was not
pulling its weight, that society generally was not satisfied with how the young
were functioning. When I was asked what I thought about it, I said that
the youngsters of this country are disappointed, disturbed and confused.
They cannot understand why all these untoward things are happening in this
country. They want to know who is to blame. Not them. If they
want to study at night and there is no power, they want to know who is to
blame. Not them. If they want to have a bath, there is no water;
they want to know who is to blame. Not them. They want to go to
college and university and they are told there are not any vacancies; they want
to know who is to blame. Not them. They say – here is a country
which was considered the brightest jewel in the British Crown. What has
happened to this Bright Jewel?
No longer are there excuses with the old
political masters saying that the reason why we are in this state is because we
were under colonial rule for 250 years. They turn around and say that the
British left us almost 50 years ago. What have you done? They point
to Singapore, they point to Malaysia, they point to Indonesia, and they point
to Hong Kong. They say that they were also under colonial rule and look
at the progress those countries have made.
They point to Germany and to Japan who
fought a war for 4½ years – whose youth was decimated and industry was
destroyed. They were occupied, and they had to pay reparations; Look at
the progress those countries have made. The youngsters want an
answer. So, Ladies and Gentlemen, I thought I should give you the answer.
The problem with us is the lack of
leadership.
Commandant, Ladies
and Gentlemen, do not misunderstand me, when I say lack of
leadership. I do not mean just political leadership. Of course,
there is lack of political leadership, but also there is lack of
leadership in every walk of life, whether it is political, administrative, in
our educational institutions, or whether it is our sports organizations.
Wherever you look, there is lack of leadership. I do not know whether
leaders are born or made. There is a school of thought that thinks that
leaders are born. Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a population of 960
million people and we procreate at the rate of 17 million – equalling the
total population of Australia – each year, and yet there is a dearth of
leadership. So, those of you who still contribute to the fact that
leaders are born, may I suggest you throw away your family planning, throw away
the pill, throw away any inhibiting factor and make it free for all. Then
perhaps someday a leader may be born.
So, if leaders are not born, can leaders
be made? My answer is yes. Give me a man or a woman with common
sense and decency, and I can make a leader out of him or her. That is the
subject which I am going to discuss with you this morning.
What are the attributes of
leadership? The first, the primary, indeed the cardinal attribute of
leadership is professional knowledge and professional competence.
Now you will agree with me that you cannot be born with professional knowledge
and professional competence even if you are a child of Prime Minister, or the
son of an industrialist, or the progeny of a Field Marshal. Professional
knowledge and professional competence have to be acquired by hard work and by
constant study. In this fast-moving technologically developing world, you
can never acquire sufficient professional knowledge.
You have to keep at it, and at it, and
at it. Can those of our political masters who are responsible for the
security and defence of this country cross their hearts and say they have ever
read a book on military history, on strategy, on weapons developments.
Can they distinguish a mortar from a motor, a gun from a howitzer, a guerrilla
from a gorilla, though a vast majority of them resemble the latter.
Ladies and Gentlemen, professional
knowledge and professional competence are a sine qua non of leadership.
Unless you know what you are talking about, unless you understand your
profession, you can never be a leader. Now some of you must be wondering
why the Field Marshal is saying this, every time you go round somewhere, you
see one of our leaders walking around, roads being blocked, transport being
provided for them. Those, ladies and gentlemen, are not leaders.
They are just men and women going about disguised as leaders – and they ought
to be ashamed of themselves!
What is the next thing you need for
leadership? It is the ability to make up your mind to make a decision and
accept full responsibility for that decision. Have you ever wondered why
people do not make a decision? The answer is quite simple. It is
because they lack professional competence, or they are worried that their
decision may be wrong and they will have to carry the can. Ladies and Gentlemen, according
to the law of averages, if you take ten decisions, five ought to be
right. If you have professional knowledge and professional competence,
nine will be right, and the one that might not be correct will probably be put
right by a subordinate officer or a colleague. But if you do not take a
decision, you are doing something wrong. An act of omission is much
worse than an act of commission. An act of commission can be put
right. An act of omission cannot. Take the example of the time
when the Babri Masjid was about to be destroyed. If the Prime
Minister, at that stage, had taken a decision to stop it, a whole
community – 180 million would not have been harmed. But, because he did
not take a decision, you have at least 180 million people in this country alone
who do not like us.
When I was the Army Chief, I would go
along to a formation, ask the fellow what have you done about this and I
normally got an answer, “Sir, I have been thinking … I have not yet made up my
mind”, and I coined a Manekshawism. If the girls will excuse my language,
it was ‘if you must be a bloody fool – be one quickly’. So remember that
you are the ones who are going to be the future senior staff officers, the
future commanders. Make a decision and having made it, accept full
responsibility for it. Do not pass it on to a colleague or subordinate.
So, what comes next for leadership?
Absolute Honesty, fairness and justice – we are dealing with people.
Those of us who have had the good fortune of commanding hundreds and thousands
of men know this. No man likes to be punished, and yet a man will accept
punishment stoically if he knows that the punishment meted out to him will be
identical to the punishment meted out to another person who has some Godfather
somewhere. This is very, very important. No man likes to be
superceded, and yet men will accept supercession if they know that they are
being superceded, under the rules, by somebody who is better then they are but
not just somebody who happens to be related to the Commandant of the staff
college or to a Cabinet Minister or by the Field Marshal’s wife’s current
boyfriend. This is extremely important, Ladies and Gentlemen.
We in India have tremendous pressures –
pressures from the Government, pressures from superior officers, pressures from
families, pressures from wives, uncles, aunts, nieces, nephews and girlfriends,
and we lack the courage to withstand those pressures. That takes me to
the next attribute of Leadership – Moral and Physical Courage.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I do not know
which of these is more important. When I am talking to young officers and
young soldiers, I should place emphasis on physical courage. But since I
am talking to this gathering, I will lay emphasis on Moral Courage. What
is moral courage? Moral courage is the ability to distinguish right from
wrong and having done so, say so when asked, irrespective of what your
superiors might think or what your colleagues or your subordinates might
want. A ‘yes man’ is a dangerous man. He may rise very high, he
might even become the Managing Director of a company. He may do anything
but he can never make a leader because he will be used by his superiors,
disliked by his colleagues and despised by his subordinates. So shallow – the
‘yes man’.
I am going to illustrate from my own
life an example of moral courage. In 1971, when Pakistan clamped down on
its province, East Pakistan, hundreds and thousands of refugees started pouring
into India. The Prime Minister, Mrs. Gandhi had a cabinet meeting at ten
o’clock in the morning. The following attended: the Foreign Minister,
Sardar Swaran Singh, the Defence Minister, Mr. Jagjivan Ram, the Agriculture
Minister, Mr. Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, the Finance Minister, Mr. Yashwant Rao, and
I was also ordered to be present.
Ladies and Gentlemen, there is a
very thin line between becoming a Field Marshal and being dismissed. A
very angry Prime Minister read out messages from Chief Ministers of West
Bengal, Assam and Tripura. All of them saying that hundreds of thousands
of refugees had poured into their states and they did not know what to
do. So the Prime Minister turned round to me and said: “I want you
to do something”.
I said, “What do you want me to do?”
She said, “I want you to enter East
Pakistan”.
I said, “Do you know that that means
War?”
She said, “I do not mind if it is war”.
I, in my usual stupid way said, “Prime
Minister, have you read the Bible?” And the Foreign Minister, Sardar Swaran
Singh (a Punjabi Sikh), in his Punjabi accent said, “What has Bible
got to do with this?”, and I said, ”the first book, the first chapter, the
first paragraph, the first sentence, God said, ‘let there be light’ and
there was light. You turn this round and say ‘let there be war’ and there
will be war. What do you think? Are you ready for a war? Let
me tell you – “it’s 28th April, the Himalayan passes are
opening now, and if the Chinese gave us an ultimatum, I will have to fight on
two fronts”.
Again Sardar Swaran Singh turned round
and in his Punjabi English said, “Will China give ultimatum?”
I said, “You are the Foreign
Minister. You tell me”.
Then I turned to the Prime Minister and
said, “Prime Minister, last year you wanted elections in West Bengal and you
did not want the communists to win, so you asked me to deploy my soldiers in
penny pockets in every village, in every little township in West Bengal.
I have two divisions thus deployed in sections and platoons without their heavy
weapons. It will take me at least a month to get them back to their units
and to their formations. Further, I have a division in the Assam area,
another division in Andhra Pradesh and the Armoured Division in the
Jhansi-Babina area. It will take me at least a month to get them back and
put them in their correct positions. I will require every road, every
railway train, every truck, every wagon to move them. We are harvesting
in the Punjab, and we are harvesting in Haryana; we are also harvesting in
Uttar Pradesh. And you will not be able to move your harvest.
I turned to the Agriculture Minister,
Mr. Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, “If there is a famine in the country afterwards, it
will be you to blame, not me”. Then I said, “My Armoured Division has
only got 13 tanks which are functioning”.
The Finance Minister, Mr. Chavan, a
friend of mine, said, “Sam, why only thirteen?”
“Because you are the Finance
Minister. I have been asking for money for the last year and a half, and
you keep saying there is no money. That is why”.
Then I turned to the Prime Minister and
said, “Prime Minister, it is the end of April. By the time I am ready to
operate, the monsoon will have broken in that East Pakistan area. When it
rains, it does not just rain, it pours. Rivers become like oceans.
If you stand on one bank, you cannot see the other and the whole countryside is
flooded. My movement will be confined to roads, the Air Force will not be
able to support me, and, if you wish me to enter East Pakistan, I
guarantee you a hundred percent defeat”.
“You are the Government”, I said turning
to the Prime Minister, “Now will you give me your orders?”
Ladies and Gentlemen, I have seldom seen
a woman so angry, and I am including my wife in that. She was red in the
face and I said, “Let us see what happens”. She turned round and said,
“The cabinet will meet four o’clock in the evening”.
Everyone walked out. I being the
junior-most man was the last to leave. As I was leaving, she said,
“Chief, please will you stay behind?” I looked at her. I said, “Prime
Minister, before you open your mouth, would you like me to send in my
resignation on grounds of health, mental or physical?”
“No, sit down, Sam. Was everything you
told me the truth?”
“Yes, it is my job to tell you the
truth. It is my job to fight and win, not to lose”.
She smiled at me and said, “All
right, Sam. You know what I want. When will you be ready?”
“I cannot tell you now, Prime Minister”,
I said, but let me guarantee you this that if you leave me alone, allow me to
plan, make my arrangements, and fix a date, I guarantee you a hundred percent
victory”.
So, Ladies and Gentlemen, as I told you,
there is a very thin line between becoming a Field Marshal and being
dismissed. Just an example of moral courage. Now, those of you who
remembered what happened in 1962, when the Chinese occupied the Thag-la ridge
and Mr. Nehru, the Prime Minister, sent for the Army Chief, in the month of
December and said, “I want you to throw the Chinese out”. That Army Chief
did not have the Moral courage to stand up to him and say, “I am not ready, my
troops are not acclimatized, I haven’t the ammunition, or indeed
anything”. But he accepted the Prime Minister’s instructions, with the
result that the Army was beaten and the country humiliated.
Remember, moral courage. You, the
future senior staff officers and commanders will be faced with many
problems. People will want all sorts of things. You have got to
have the moral courage to stand up and tell them the facts. Again, as I
told you before, a ‘yes man’ is a despicable man.
This takes me to the next
attribute: Physical courage. Fear, like hunger and sex, is a natural
phenomenon. Any man who says he is not frightened is a liar or a
Gorkha. It is one thing to be frightened. It is quite another to
show fear. If you once show fear in front of your men, you will never be
able to command. It is when your teeth are chattering, your knees are
knocking and you are about to make your own geography – that is when the true
leader comes out!
I am sorry but I am going to illustrate
this with another example from my own life. I am not a brave man.
In fact, I am a terribly frightened man. My wife and I do not share the
same bedroom. “Why?” you will ask. Because she says I snore.
Although I have told her, No, I don’t. No other woman has ever
complained”.
I am not a brave man. If I am
frightened, I am frightened of wild animals, I am frightened of ghosts and
spirits and so on. If my wife tells me a ghost story after dinner, I
cannot sleep in my room, and I have to go to her room. I have often
wondered why she tells me these ghost stories periodically.
In World War II, my battalion,
which is now in Pakistan, was fighting the Japanese. We had a great
many casualties. I was commanding Charlie Company, which was a
Sikh Company. The Frontier Force Regiment in those days had
Pathan companies. I was commanding the Sikh Company, young
Major Manekshaw. As we were having too many casualties, we had pulled
back to reorganize, re-group, make up our casualties and promotions.
The Commanding Officer had a promotion
conference. He turned to me and said, “Sam, we have to make lots of
promotions. In your Sikh company, you have had a lot of casualties.
Surat Singh is a senior man. Should we promote him to the rank of
Naik?” Now, Surat Singh was the biggest Badmaash in my
company. He had been promoted twice or three times and each time he had
to be marched up in front of the Colonel for his stripes to be taken off.
So I said, “No use, Sir, promoting Surat Singh. You promote him today and
the day after tomorrow, I will have to march him in front of you to take his
stripes off”. So, Surat Singh was passed over. The promotion
conference was over, I had lunch in the Mess and I came back to my company lines.
Now, those of you who have served with Sikhs will know that they are very
cheerful lot – always laughing, joking and doing something. When I
arrived at my company lines that day, it was quite different, everybody was
quiet. When my second-in-command, Subedar Balwant Singh, met me I asked
him, “What has happened, Subedar Sahib?” He said, “Sahib, something
terrible has happened. Surat Singh felt slighted and has told everybody
that he is going to shoot you today”.
Surat Singh was a light machine gunner,
and was armed with a pistol. His pistol had been taken away, and Surat
Singh has been put under close arrest. I said, “All right, Sahib.
Put up a table, a soap box, march Surat Singh in front of me”. So he was
marched up. The charge was read out – ‘threatening to shoot his
Commanding officer whilst on active service in the theatre of war’. That
carries the death penalty. The witnesses gave their evidence. I
asked for Surat Singh’s pistol which was handed to me. I loaded it, rose
from my soap box, walked up to Surat Singh, handed the pistol to him then
turned round and told him, “You said you will shoot me”. I spoke to him
in Punjabi naturally. I told him, “Have you got the guts to shoot me? Here,
shoot me”. He looked at me stupidly and said, ”Nahin, Sahib, galtee
ho gayaa”. I gave him a tight slap and said, “Go out, case dismissed”.
I went around the company lines, the
whole company watching what was happening. I walked around, chatted to
the people, went to the Mess in the evening to have a drink, and have my
dinner, but when I came back again Sardar Balwant Singh said, “Nahin Sahib, you
have made a great mistake. Surat Singh will shoot you tonight”.
I said, ”Bulao Surat Singh ko”.
He came along. I said, “Surat
Singh, aj rat ko mere tambu par tu pehra dega, or kal subah 6 bujay, mere
liye aik mug chai aur aik mug shaving water lana”. Then I walked into my
little tent.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I did not sleep
the whole night. Next morning, at six o’clock, Surat Singh brought
me a mug of tea and a mug of shaving water, thereafter, throughout the war,
Surat Singh followed me like a puppy. If I had shown fear in front of my
men, I should never have been able to command. I was frightened, terribly
frightened, but I dared not show fear in front of them. Those of you, who
are going to command soldiers, remember that. You must never show
fear. So much for physical courage, but, please believe me, I
am still a very frightened man. I am not a brave man.
What comes next? The next
attribute of leadership is loyalty. Ladies and Gentlemen, you all expect
loyalty. Do we give loyalty? Do we give loyalty to our
subordinates, to our colleagues? Loyalty is a three way thing. You
expect loyalty, you must therefore, give loyalty to your colleagues and to your
subordinates. Men and women in large numbers can be very difficult, they
can cause many problems and a leader must deal with them immediately and
firmly. Do not allow any nonsense, but remember that men and women have
many problems. They get easily despondent, they have problems of debt,
they have problems of infidelity – wives have run away or somebody has an
affair with somebody. They get easily crestfallen, and a leader must have
the gift of the gab with a sense of humor to shake them out of their
despondence. Our leaders, unfortunately, our “so-called” leaders,
definitely have the gift of the gab, but they have no sense of humour.
So, remember that.
Finally, for leadership; men and
women like their leader to be a man, with all the manly qualities or
virtues. The man who says, “I do not smoke, I do not drink, I do not (No,
I will not say it)’, does not make a leader. Let me illustrate this from
examples from the past. You will agree that Julius Caesar was a great
leader – he had his Calphurnia, he had his Antonia, he also had an affair with
Cleopatra and, when Caesar used to come to Rome, the Senators locked up their
wives. And you will agree that he was a great leader. He was known
in Rome as every woman’s husband and he was a great leader. Take
Napoleon, he had his Josephine, he had his Marie Walewska, he had his
Antoinette and Georgettes and Paulettes. And you will agree he was a
great leader. Take the Duke of Wellington – do you know that the night
before the battle of Waterloo, there were more Countesses, Marchionesses and
other women in his ante-chamber than staff officers and Commanders. And
you will agree he was a great leader. Do you know, Ladies and Gentlemen,
a thought has just struck me. All these leaders – Caesar, Napoleon and
the Duke of Wellington – they had one facial feature in common, all had long
noses. [Sid’s comment: This is a reference to Sam himself who was possessed
of a long nose and caricatured J.].
So much, Ladies and Gentlemen, for
leadership, but no amount of leadership will do this country much good.
Yes, it will improve things, but what this country needs
is discipline. We are the most ill-disciplined people in the
world. You see what is happening – you go down the road, and you see
people relieving themselves by the roadside. You go into town, and people
are walking up and down the highway, while vehicles are discharging all sorts
of muck. Every time you pick up a newspaper, you read of a scam or you
read of some other silly thing. As we are the most ill-disciplined people
in the world, we must do something about discipline.
What is discipline? Please, when I
talk of discipline, do not think of military discipline. That is quite
different. Discipline can be defined as conduct and behaviour for living
decently with one another in society. Who lays down the code of conduct
for that? Not the Prime Minister, not the Cabinet, nor superior
officers. It is enshrined in our holy books; it is in the Bible, the
Torah and in the Vedas, it is in the teachings of Nanak and Mohammad. It
has come down to us from time immemorial, from father to son, from mother to
child. Nowhere is it laid down, except in the Armed Forces, that lack of
punctuality is conduct prejudicial to discipline and decent living.
I will again tell you a little story
about that. Some years ago, my wife and I were invited to convocation at a
university. I was asked to be there at 4 o’clock. I got into the
staff car with my wife, having chased her from about eleven o’clock in the
morning. Don’t forget, darling, you have got to be on time. Get
properly dressed; you have to leave at such and such time’. Eventually, I
got her into the car. I told the driver, “Thoda aayisthe, thoda jaldi”, but
we got to the university and the convocation address place at 4 o’clock.
We were received by the Vice Chancellor and his Lady. We were taken into
the convocation hall, and the Vice Chancellor asked me to get on the
platform, asking my wife to do so, too. She gracefully declined, and said
she much rather sit down below as she seldom had an opportunity of looking up
to her husband. Anyway, on the platform, the Vice Chancellor sang my
praises. As usual there were 2,000 boys and girls who had come for the
convocation. There were deans of university, and professors and
lecturers. Then he asked me to go to the lectern and address the
gathering. I rose to do so and he said (sotto voce), Field Marshal, a
fortnight ago we invited a VIP from Delhi for the same function. He was
allowed to stand on the same lectern for exactly twenty seconds. I wish
you luck. “I said to myself, had the Vice Chancellor mentioned this in
his letter of invitation, I wonder, if I should have accepted.
Anyway, I reached the lectern, and I
addressed the gathering for my allotted time of forty minutes. I was
heard in pin drop silence, and at the end of my talk, was given terrific
ovation. The Vice Chancellor and his lady, the Dean, the professors and
lecturers, the boys and girls, and even my own wife, standing up and giving me
an ovation. After the convocation was over, we walked into the gardens to have
refreshments. And I, having an eye for pretty girls, walked up to a pert
little thing wearing a pair of tight fitting jeans and a body hugging blouse,
and I started a conversation with her. I said, “My dear, why were you so kind
to me, I not being an orator nor having the looks of Amitabh
Bachhan, when only the other day you treated a VIP from Delhi so
shamefully”. This pert little thing had no inhibitions. She turned
round and said, and I quote, “Oh, that a dreadful man! We asked him to
come at four o’clock. He came much later and that too accompanied with a
boy and a girl, probably his grand children. He was received by the Vice
Chancellor and his lady and taken to the platform. He was garlanded by
the Student Union President, and he demanded garlands for those brats too. So,
the Union President diverged with the garland that was meant for the Vice
Chancellor and gave it to the brats. Then the Vice Chancellor started
singing the worthy’s praises. Whilst he was doing so, this man
hitched up his dhoti, exposing his dirty thighs, and scratched
away. Then the Vice Chancellor said, “This man has done so much for the
country, he has even been to jail”. And I nearly shouted out, ‘He should
be there now’. Anyway, when the Vice Chancellor asked him to come to the
lectern and address the convocation, he got up, walked to the lectern and
addressed us thus, ‘Boys and girls, I am a very busy man. I have not had
time to prepare my speech but, I will now read out the speech my secretary has
written’. We did not let him stand there. Without exception, the
whole lot of us stood and booed him off the stage”.
Now, you see, Ladies and Gentleman, what
I mean by discipline. Had this man as his position warranted, come on
time at four o’clock, fully prepared and properly turned out, can you imagine
the good it would have done to these 2000 young girls and boys? Instead
of that, his act of indiscipline engendered further indiscipline. I
thanked my lucky stars, having been in the Army for so many years, that I
arrived there on time, that I had come properly dressed, that I didn’t wear a
dhoti to show my lovely legs, that I didn’t exacerbate an itch or eczema,
to hurt the susceptibilities of my audience, by indulging in the scratching of
the unmentionables.
Now, Ladies and Gentleman, you
understand what I mean by discipline. We are the most ill-disciplined
people in the world. So far, all of you have been very, very
disciplined. Will you bear with me for another 2 minutes? Having
talked about leadership, having talked about discipline, I want to mention
something about Character. We Indians also lack character. Do not
misunderstand me, when I talk of character. I don’t mean just being
honest, truthful, and religious, I mean something more – Knowing yourself,
knowing your own faults, knowing your own weaknesses and what little character
that we have, our friends, our fans, the ‘yes-men’ around us and the
sycophants, help us reduce that character as well. Let me illustrate this
by an example:
Some years ago, Hollywood decided to put
up the picture of great violinist and composer, Paganini. The part of
Paganini was given to a young actor who was conversant, somewhat, with the
violin. He was drilled and tutored to such an extent that when the little
piece, the Cadenza, was filmed, it was perfect. When the film was shown,
the papers raved about it, and the critics raved about it. And this man’s
fans, ‘yes-men’, sycophants, kept on telling him that he was as good a
violinist as Heifetz or Menuhin. And do you know that I took eight months in a
psychiatric home to rid him of his delusion?
Do you know, Commandant, that the same
thing happened to me? After the 1971 conflict with Pakistan, which ended
in thirteen days and I took 93000 prisoners, my fans, the ‘yes-men’ around me,
the sycophants, kept on comparing me to Rommel, to Field Marshal Alexander, to
Field Marshal Auchinleck, and just as I was beginning to believe it, the Prime
Minister created me a Field Marshal and sent me packing to the Nilgiris.
A hard-headed, no-nonsense wife deprived a psychiatric home (what we in India
call a lunatic asylum), of one more inmate.
I thank you very much
indeed. Thank you.
Question: In 1962 war, what was
your appointment, were you in a position to do something about the situation?
In the 1962 war, I was in
disgrace. I was a Commandant of this Institution. Mr. Krishna
Menon, the Defence Minister, disliked me intensely. General Kaul, who was
Chief of General Staff at the time, and the budding man for the next higher
appointment, disliked me intensely. So, I was in disgrace at the Staff
College. There were charges against me – I will enumerate some of them –
all engineered by Mr. Krishna Menon. I do not know if you remember that
in 1961 or 1960, General Thimayya was the Army Chief. He had fallen out
with Mr. Krishna Menon and had sent him his resignation. The Prime
Minister, Mr. Nehru, persuaded General Thimayya to withdraw his
resignation. The members of Parliament also disliked Mr. Krishna Menon,
and they went hammer and tongs for the Prime Minister in Parliament. The
Prime Minister made the following statement, “I cannot understand why General
Thimayya is saying that the Defence Ministry interferes with the working of the
Army. Take the case of General Manekshaw. The Selection Board has
approved his promotion to Lieutenant General, over the heads of 23 other
officers. The Government has accepted that”.
I was the Commandant of the Staff
College. I had been approved for promotion to Lieutenant General.
Instead of making me the Lieutenant General, Mr. Krishna Menon levied charges
against me. There were 10 charges, I will enumerate only one or two of
them – that I am more loyal to the Queen of England than to the President of
India, that I am more British than Indian. That I have been alleged to have
said that I will have no instructor in the Staff College whose wife looks like
an ayah. These were the sort of charges against me.
For 18 months my promotion was held
back. An enquiry was made. Three Lieutenant Generals, including an
Army Commander, sat at the enquiry. I was exonerated on every
charge. The file went up to the Prime Minister who sent it up to the
Cabinet Secretary, who wrote on the file, ‘if anything happens to General
Manekshaw, this case will go will down as the Dreyfus case’. So the file came
back to the Prime Minister. He wrote on it, “Orders may now issue”,
meaning I will now become a Lieutenant General.
Instead of that, Ladies and Gentleman, I
received a letter from the Adjutant General saying that the Defence Minister,
Mr. Krishna Menon, has sent his severe displeasure to General Manekshaw, to be
recorded. I had it in the office where the Commandant now sits. I
sent that letter back to the Adjutant General saying what Mr. Krishna Menon
could do with his displeasure, very vulgarly stated. It is still in my
dossier.
Then the Chinese came to my help.
Krishna Menon was sacked, Kaul was sacked and Nehru sent for me. He said,
“General, I have a vigorous enemy. I find out that you are a vigorous
General. Will you go and take over?”
I said, “I have been waiting 18 months
for this opportunity”, and I went and took over. So, your question was
1962, and what part did I play, none whatsoever, none whatsoever.
I was here for eighteen months,
persecuted, inquisitions against me but we survive … I rather like the Chinese J.
Question: The Army has changed and
progressed. Do you find any difference in the mental makeup of the young
officers compared to your time?
Over the years, things have changed …
there is a lot of difference, dear. In my time, my father used to support
me until I became a Lieutenant Colonel. I used to get an allowance to be
able to live. Today, the young officer has not only to keep himself but
has to send money home.
In my time, we did not have all these courses.
The only course I ever did, (of course, we had the four rounds of courses that
every officer had to do), but we had mules there so I had to do a course in
training mountain mules. Today the young officer hardly stays in his
regiment. He is sent from one place to another to do this course and that
course, and he does not get a chance of knowing his men. We knew our
men. Also there wasn’t so much work in those days. We got up in the
mornings, did PT for half an hour , came back ,dressed, had breakfast , then
went to our company lines and spent all our time avoiding the Commanding
Officer.
Those Commanding Officers were nasty
chaps. They did not give a damn for anybody. I will give an example
of the Commanding Officer. I was made quartermaster of my
battalion. The Commanding Officer sent for the Adjutant and myself.
He said, I want to take the battalion out tomorrow morning for an
exercise. “We did not have motor cars, we had to indent for mules, so, I
as quartermaster indented for a company of mules. He said we were going
to leave for the exercise at 6:30, so I ordered the company of mules to arrive
at six. At eleven o’clock at night, the commanding officer changed his
mind. He said, “I will not go at 6:30, we will go at nine o’clock.
“There was nothing I could do. I got on my bicycle, went off to the
lines, where the mules had arrived. I told them to unsaddle, and go into
the shade, when who should arrive on a horse but the Cavalry Officer with his
daughter!
I touched my hat. He said, “What
are those animals doing here, young man?” I said that we were going out
on an exercise.
“When are you going?”
“Nine o’clock”.
He tore strips off me – “going at nine
o’clock and you have the animals waiting here at six o’clock”. He was
riding with his daughter on a horse. What could I say to a General
officer, I had two pips on my shoulder. Suddenly, who should be coming on
a bicycle, but the Commanding Officer! He touched his hat, said, “Morning, General”.
Turning to me, he said, “What is the
matter, Sam?”
I said, “Sir, the General is angry with
me because we are going out at nine o’clock and the mules are here at six”.
He turned round to face the General, and
said, I will thank you General to know who commands this regiment. Me,
and not this young man. I will not have you ticketing him off in front of
your daughter”.
He turned back to me and said, “Have you
had your breakfast, Sam?”
“No”.
“Go along. Have your breakfast”.
I was delighted to go off. But
when we came back from the exercise, at about eight o’clock in the evening, in
my letter rack, was a letter from the General’s wife, inviting me to tea the
next day. Now, I did not want to have tea with the General’s wife!
But that’s the sort of thing that happens.
When I became the Field Marshal, I was
the guest of Her Majesty in England. I had given a reception at India
House, where the Commanding Officer with his wife were also invited. He
came in, shook hands with my wife, shook hands with me, and walked off.
Everybody was drinking. After about half an hour, when everybody had
arrived, I walked up to him with a glass of whisky in my hand, and he turned
round to me, “May I call you Sam?”
“Please do, Sir. You used to call
me ‘bloody fool’ before. I thought that was my Christian name!”
The difference between the officer now
and then – my first confidential report written by him. Before you went
in to sign your confidential report, you had to go in front of the Adjutant,
beautifully turned out. We did not have any medals in those days.
We had to have a sword to go into the CO’s office then. I walked in
there, saluted the Adjutant, he looked me up and down and said, “You are going
to see the Colonel, now? Look at you! Your bloody strap is filthy
dirty, look at your belt, it is disgusting. Go on, go and get
dressed”. I walked out, waited for five minutes and came back.
He looked me up and down, “Much better”.
Then he said, “You are going in
there. Do you have a fountain pen?”
I said, “Yes”.
“The CO will read your report. You
will initial on the left hand corner. Is that understood?”
“Yes”.
I walked in there, saluted the Colonel,
“Mr. Manekshaw reporting, Sir”.
He looked me up and down, thrust the
report on me – Online: “This officer, I beg his pardon, this man, may someday
become an officer”.
I initialled it and walked out.
Khalid Sheikh, another officer from my
regiment, who became the Foreign Minister of Pakistan and a Governor there,
came out. “Khalid, what report have you got?” I said. He said “Online:
this officer tends to be irresponsible”. I said, “That’s a bad report,
Khalid”. He said, Uh! Last year the bugger said I
was irresponsible”.
But we did not mind. Today, if the
commanding Officer writes and says this officer is irresponsible, the officer
wants to appeal to the President of India saying he is more responsible than
the Commanding Officer.
That was the difference, dear. We simply
did not give a cuss.
Anything else? Thank you
Gentlemen, thank you for your kindness. Thank you for your patience and your
discipline. I am delighted to see you all here.