Today's SMART: Roberto Navigli [A structural approach to the automatic adjudication of disagreed word senses]

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Giorgio Zanin

unread,
May 15, 2006, 3:12:16 AM5/15/06
to smar...@googlegroups.com, asseg...@dsi.uniroma1.it, doc...@dsi.uniroma1.it, dotto...@dsi.uniroma1.it, secu...@inroma.roma.it, informat...@yahoogroups.com, dis-s...@dis.uniroma1.it
Title           : A structural approach to the automatic adjudication of disagreed word senses
 
Speaker         : Roberto Navigli
 
Date            : Monday, May 15, 2006
 
Venue & Time    : Aula Alfa, 113 Via Salaria. 3:00 PM
 
Abstract        : The annotation of texts with senses from a
                  dictionary is a complex and often subjective task,
                  especially if the reference dictionary encodes
                  subtle sense distinctions (e.g. race as a
                  competition and as a contest of speed).  If a text
                  is semantically tagged by more than one annotator,
                  an issue arises: how do we adjudicate the disagreed
                  words? A judge is expected to choose among the
                  distinct senses provided by different annotators for
                  the same word. Unfortunately, it is difficult to
                  understand why a judge should prefer a choice over
                  the others.  In this talk, we propose the use of
                  lexical chains (i.e. sequences of related words,
                  like race -> compete -> competition) to
                  automatically support judges in the difficult task
                  of validating sense annotations.  The interesting
                  aspect of the approach lies in the fact that each
                  choice, i.e. each solution of a disagreement, is
                  justified in terms of graphs that support that
                  choice.  We provide a two-fold experimental
                  evaluation of our approach applied to the validation
                  of manual and automatic sense annotations from
                  standard test sets.  Finally, we present an online
                  implementation of the approach, Valido
                  (http://lcl.di.uniroma1.it/valido), and discuss some
                  real-world cases of disagreement.
 
http://www.dsi.uniroma1.it/smart/
 
Please feel free to extend this invitation to other interested people.

 

 

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages