First of all I would like to mention that I neither made this group
visible to the public nor that I changed it now to be private.
It was Daniel who created this group. He made it public and that's
good in my view (see my previous message). Btw. Daniel addressed the
open vs closed issue of the group already twice. None of you replied.
So it should be Daniel's decision to keep tis group open or private.
I don't know who changed the status from public to private now because
everyone in the group has admin rights and is able to change the
status, respectively.
As I told perveously to have tis group visible to the public is a
chance rather than a treat ...
What are you afraid of? Someones stealing our ideas? You all know that
having ideas is nothing, without having the people who implement them
in an effective and efficient way. You all know that openness is a
prerequisite of effective collaboration and networking, so if this
group is closed ... Further, just rememer one of the norm of our
readers that we committed to follow:
"Collaboration: Smart People magazine has been developed in
collaboration with social networkers in an open, online worksite. Our
prosumers continue to be our ‘board of directors’." (http://
tinyurl.com/qexfs5)
You all may have talked about these issues in the past, now it is the
time to apply them in practice.
Boris
PS: If this group will continue to be closed this is the last time I
contribute here. I will continue to use the mixxt platform for my
ideas and all kind of stuff I need to explain to you guys (about the
website, network, etc.). If you want to keep track on that you need to
follow what's going on there (as I explained in my latter messsage
here).
On 20 Mai, 19:46,
b_...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I would strongly suggest to use this mailing list in order to discuss
> Smart People issues within the team. Try to prevent using the backdoor ...