[slurm-users] Replacing MUNGE with SACK (auth/slurm)

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Daniel Letai via slurm-users

unread,
Jul 11, 2024, 2:10:59 PM (4 days ago) Jul 11
to slurm...@lists.schedmd.com
Does SACK replace MUNGE? As in - MUNGE is not required when building
Slurm or on compute?

If so, can the Requires and BuildRequires for munge be made optional on
bcond_without_munge in the spec file?

Or is there a reason MUNGE must remain a hard require for Slurm?


Thanks,

--Dani_L.


--
slurm-users mailing list -- slurm...@lists.schedmd.com
To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-us...@lists.schedmd.com
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages