Day 11/28 — The Quiet War & The Loud War
Amadu Massally
Resistance Was Not an Event. It Was a Practice
Compatriots,
Resistance in the Lowcountry is often narrated as episodic: an uprising, a conspiracy, a flight, a battle. Those moments matter. But the documentary record also points to something more structurally important: resistance as a continuous condition of plantation society, expressed through both visible rupture and quieter forms of planning, movement, and cultural protection.
Today’s receipt comes from an editorial documentary note preserved in The Papers of Henry Laurens (pp. 228–229). The note summarizes South Carolina Council Journal evidence from January 1749 regarding an alleged plot associated with plantations along the Cooper River. The reported objectives are striking in their scope: to seize Charleston’s powder magazine, to strike white authority, and to flee by water toward St. Augustine.
Whether the plot was fully realized, partially formed, or strategically reframed by informants and authorities, the evidentiary value is still substantial. The record makes two things legible: first, that enslaved people were understood (by themselves and by the state) as capable of coordinated action across plantation space; second, that colonial governance treated this possibility as persistent, requiring surveillance, militia readiness, and narrative control.
The Receipt
The documentary note preserves the outline of the accusation and the official response: depositions, militia mobilization, investigation, punishment, and removal. The governor later attempted to dismiss the affair as a “forgery.” But that dismissal does not neutralize the episode. Instead, it reveals the state’s need to manage both security and interpretation—to contain a perceived threat and to discipline the story about it.
For forensic reading, the most consequential details are not only the accusation itself, but the logic of movement embedded within it: the powder magazine as a strategic target, and Florida as an exit corridor. Those details align with a broader pattern in which freedom was imagined not only as moral aspiration, but as geography: routes, watercraft, tide knowledge, timing, and destination.
Two Fronts, One Resistance Ecology
This record allows us to describe resistance as operating on two interdependent fronts.
The “loud” front includes episodic ruptures that become visible to the state: planned seizures, coordinated flight, armed possibilities, and threats to urban infrastructure. These incidents enter the record because they interrupt governance.
The “quiet” front is the enabling infrastructure: networks of information, shared route knowledge, coded communication, and the disciplined social capacity to plan under surveillance. In the Lowcountry, waterways were not merely commercial channels. They were also mobility systems. To flee by pettiauger is not simply to run; it is to mobilize ecological knowledge: tides, channels, distances, concealment, and points of contact.
From a preservation standpoint, this is crucial. It means resistance is not only something to locate in a rare “event site.” It is also something to interpret across landscapes: river corridors, landing points, work yards, and spaces of gathering where planning, intelligence, and cultural cohesion were sustained.
What the Note Proves
The significance of this 1749 record is not that it offers a complete narrative of one conspiracy. It is that it demonstrates the colony’s expectation of recurrence. The state behaves as if resistance may reappear because it has learned that resistance does reappear: sometimes as flight, sometimes as plot, sometimes as slowed compliance, sometimes as cultural protection. The archival posture is one of continual readiness.
In short: resistance was not a single eruption. It was an ongoing condition of power relations, shaped by precariousness, opportunity, and the constant search for leverage.
The Human Remainder
The governor’s language (especially the attempt to dismiss the affair as fabrication) should not reassure us. It alerts us to the mechanics of erasure and scapegoating: when fear rises, authorities decide who is punished, who is expelled, and which version of the story becomes “official.” Even a dismissal can preserve the outlines of coercion: surveillance, accusation, removal, and the narrowing of possible movement.
Beneath the state’s narrative control, however, the documentary residue remains: a community imagining coordinated break, naming Florida as destination, and treating the colonial landscape not only as a place of extraction, but as a contested field of possibility.
One Question
If the documentary record shows that resistance was continuous, adaptive, and strategic (even under extreme constraint), how should that alter the way we interpret Lowcountry landscapes and the archival silences that still shape public history?
Case file: Scan + transcription are preserved in the Diaspora Scavenger research archive.
------
“The idea that some lives matter less is the root of all that's wrong with the world.”
—Dr. Paul Farmer
Chief Strategist & Co-founder