Gambozo
In this short essay, I argue that U.S.
“independence” anniversaries remain incomplete without naming the Atlantic
system that financed influence and diplomacy. Specifically: the Treaty of Paris
(1783) was negotiated in Europe, but it was underwritten by rice wealth, credit
networks, and the forced capture of Africans—linked to Bunce Island (Bance
Island) off Sierra Leone and to Lowcountry plantation economies.]
Core
claims (for discussion):
- Richard Oswald, Britain’s lead negotiator, was
also tied to Bunce Island’s slave-trading economy.
- Henry Laurens’ political stature cannot be
separated from his role as a major slave trader and rice planter.
- “America at 250” should be treated as a
historiographical moment: expanding the circle of witnesses (Sierra Leone,
Gullah Geechee communities, and the wider African diaspora) clarifies the cost
of freedom rather than diminishing it.
Questions
for you:
- What are the strongest primary-source pathways for
linking treaty-era diplomatic power to specific slave-trade assets and
plantation finance?
- How should public history mark 1776/1783 in a way that
is accurate, teachable, and ethically serious—without collapsing into
performance?
Regards,