[opensource-dev] data_online's new requirements

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Adeon Writer

unread,
Feb 25, 2012, 3:21:04 PM2/25/12
to opensou...@lists.secondlife.com
I've heard DATA_ONLINE will now only work for "the owner or the creator" of the script. Shouldn't that be instead "owner or compiler" of the script? Any full permission script already written could be used and recoded as a status finder, and I have a feeling this will be what people move to for stalking if it goes by script creator.

Erin Mallory

unread,
Feb 25, 2012, 4:41:05 PM2/25/12
to adeon...@live.com, opensou...@lists.secondlife.com
100% agreed!


From: adeon...@live.com
To: opensou...@lists.secondlife.com
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:21:04 -0500
Subject: [opensource-dev] data_online's new requirements


I've heard DATA_ONLINE will now only work for "the owner or the creator" of the script. Shouldn't that be instead "owner or compiler" of the script? Any full permission script already written could be used and recoded as a status finder, and I have a feeling this will be what people move to for stalking if it goes by script creator.

_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Ima Mechanique

unread,
Feb 25, 2012, 7:35:50 PM2/25/12
to opensou...@lists.secondlife.com
>
> I've heard DATA_ONLINE will now only work for "the owner or the creator" of the script. Shouldn't that be instead "owner or compiler" of the script? Any full permission script already written could be used and recoded as a status finder, and I have a feeling this will be what people move to for stalking if it goes by script creator.

I share this concern whole heartedly. The idea of compiler instead of
creator is a good one, I think.

--
Ima Mechanique
ima.mechanique(at)blueyonder.co.uk

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages