First thing first , this article was solely aimed at me :P .. i know
the pain in chinamy'z @** , well if Oracle had sued MS over sme FS and
court favoured them then that means MS was at fault and was looser and
yeah regarding google wen u try to copy the stuff of any bdy , it
surely going to be a pain in their sitting machine :-P , And ur ""
WinFS orignially intended to do, you will understand that.. it is
happening under some other banner but it is happening."" stuff means
that MS lost another front by using sme orginal ideas by sme other
co.
So tell me who is looser who lost all the battles in court and in
public or the pple who won ???
and regarding ur stuff that i havnt used VIsta i wanna say that , who
the hell in userz world is interested to see the architetcure of
Vista , wen all just u wanna do is decent computing and a good looking
interface . that architecture gonna make difference to sme pple like u
and me whio going to work on APIz and frameworks, and reagrding other
stuff they r also avalable by third party software vendors for Windows
XP , so may i know where r the new ideas by MICROSOFT , they jst copy
the stuff and push their bloody @****s where their is money , and that
doznt bother them wether they r using other pple ideas or not ,, they
have no consious ... ( bit hard word )
and yeah to tell u yahoo just rejected the MS offer ,,, :-)
This post had to be a bit hard bcoz it was solely aimed at me ;-)
bubyee , tc