C-162 High Altitude Test

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Terry Savage

unread,
Apr 3, 2012, 8:24:48 AM4/3/12
to skycatc...@googlegroups.com, John B. Brown

Did any of you see the movie The Perfect Storm? After being battered by endless storms and waves, there was a brief moment of calm, where the crew got a glimpse of blue sky and sunshine. Then, the darkness closed back down on them.

 

Yesterday was that moment of sun up here, and I snagged it to go flying! Almost 2 hours in the air with my little Yankee Girl, and she flies better every time! Flying where we do, I figured it was time to do a real world high altitude test, so after some pattern work at Carson City, I flew over Spooner Pass into the Lake Tahoe basin, and landed at South Lake Tahoe airport (TVL). Full stop, and then taxi back to Rwy 36 for the test.

 

Conditions: Field elevation 6264’ MSL, temp approx 56º, runway length 8544’, with a displaced threshold on rwy 36 of 2037’. T/O weight 1240 lbs. Wind calm. It was actually an awesomely beautiful flying day, after all of the mucky weather we’ve had to deal with for the last month.

 

I decided to do a standard take-off rather than short field, so there was no running up to full power with brakes on. Flaps set to 10º, which is standard for takeoff in the C-162. The engine was leaned properly for the altitude.

 

When I pushed the throttle forward, it was obvious that I was a lot higher than when I had taken off from Reno at 4400’ MSL, but the acceleration built up faster than I expected. I was above the proverbial 50’ obstacle before I even got to the end of the displaced threshold! After establishing best rate climb with the flaps back up, I was seeing 700 fpm passing through 7500. That was better than I expected, so I kept pushing on upward.

 

I’m flying under sport pilot rules, so I took her right on up to 9,999’ MSL. Before leveling off, I was still seeing an honest 500 fpm climb rate. Trimmed for straight and level at 9980’, leaned for the altitude, 2500 rpm, I was getting a solid 105 kts TAS…burning under 5 gph.

 

So, the verdict is clear on the high altitude performance of the C-162: Awesome!

 

J

J

 

Terry C Savage

General Manager, Light Sport Training

Flying Start Aero, Reno, Nevada

http://www.flyingstartaero.com/

 

Science Fiction Author

Amazon book listing: http://tinyurl.com/4og9uch

Blog: (http://jacksonsuniverse.blogspot.com/)

Twitter: (@Chaosrider2808)

Facebook: (Terry Savage, Incline Village)

 

 

John Arnold

unread,
Apr 3, 2012, 12:04:42 PM4/3/12
to skycatc...@googlegroups.com
Great share!  The 162 really does have some great performance.  I took the 162 for the first time into a famer's grass strip last Thursday and was very suprised on how well it handled it.  The wheels are small but the gear took the bumps extremely well and landing/TO was a pure joy.  I was there to pick up a friend but I ended up doing some pattern work because it was just one of those beautiful days. 
 
Fly Safe!

--
Best,

John Arnold
Sales Representative

Terry Savage

unread,
Apr 6, 2012, 3:00:54 PM4/6/12
to skycatc...@googlegroups.com

If you don’t have the wheel pants (we decided against them), you could probably put some balloon tires on it if you wanted to operate off-pavement regularly.

 

I think winter may finally have broken. Only one day of snow in the forecast for the next week. I’m planning to go up tomorrow!

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages