Re: Digest for skos-dev@googlegroups.com - 1 Message in 1 Topic

[David Chasteen]

Yay, and thank you.  I will try it tomorrow and exercise it to its limits.  Do you have (or need help to) document it?

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:23 PM, <skos-dev...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

  Today's Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/skos-dev/topics

• SKOSEd for Protege 4.1 [1 Update]

 Topic: SKOSEd for Protege 4.1

Simon Jupp <simon...@gmail.com> Aug 22 05:31PM +0100 ^

 
There is a new version of SKOSEd for Protege 4.1 available on the
google code website
http://code.google.com/p/skoseditor/downloads/list. There are bound to
be some bugs, so post any problem to this list. This version still
treats SKOS labels as data properties, these need to be changed to
annotation properties and I will put some tooling in the next release
to help users update their SKOS files accordingly.
Cheers
Simon


 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "skos-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to skos...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to skos-dev+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/skos-dev?hl=en.

[David Chasteen]

Question:  should we simply use the "Label" annotation of Protege and ignore the data property for label?  Or will that break anything?  Reasoning?

[Simon Jupp]

Hi David, 

Yes, all labels should be used as annotation properties. I would remove any data property labels. If you see the new version of SKOSEd that I uploaded last night you will see that all SKOS specific labels, like preferred label, alt label and hidden label are treated as annotations now. If you have any old SKOS files that use label data properties, you can simply convert these to annotation using the "convert labels to annotations" option in the SKOSEd menu.

Cheers

Simon

Simon Jupp

simon...@manchester.ac.uk

http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~sjupp/