Use "Skia" in wrapper library

[Daniel Kuschny]

Hey there. 

TL;DR: Is it allowed to use "Skia" in an own wrapper library name like "alphaSkia" considering condition 3 of the BSD-3-Clause license or do I need to find another name? 

Long Version: 

I am currently working on a wrapper of skia as rendering backend for my open source library "alphaTab" with the name "alphaSkia". The wrapper is then provided for .net (C pinvoke) via NuGet, Java (JNI) via Maven and NodeJS(Node Addon using Node-API) via NPM.

alphaSkia is just a thin wrapper above some skia classes providing a HTML5 Canvas inspired API exposing only the features I need for my other library.

I plan to release the alphaSkia also under BSD-3-Clause but alphaTab is MPL1.1.

Now to my question: Am I even allowed to name my library alphaSkia (similar to SkiaSharp) or is the condition 3 of BSD-3-Clause conflicting here?  

I would be fine with renaming it but if there is no conflict of course I'd like to keep it "alphaSkia" to indicate clearly the Skia wrapping nature of this library. It could attract other developers as I see potential for it to evolve into a "canvaskit" for many platforms.

Greetings

Daniel