Welcome back to Six on History.
PS: If you like what you find on the "Six on History" blog, please share w/your contacts.
Click here for Detailed Search Help Thanks John Elfrank
Leading up to the June 22nd primary, our One Issue Explainer series is breaking down where mayoral candidates stand on a variety of issues concerning New Yorkers.
This week, the Politics Brief spoke with reporter Gwynne Hogan, who's been covering the city's increasing activism against racist policing, this year's comparative spike in crime, and where the mayoral candidates stand on the future of policing in New York City. Here's that conversation:
JR: With so many Democrats running for mayor, there are plenty of points where the candidates more or less agree with each other. On policing, what are some major ideas where we do see diverging opinions?
GH: Many of the candidates on the Democratic side are talking about police reform and improving accountability and transparency. But they fall along a spectrum of whether they’d keep the police budget and head count the same, or if they’d divert NYPD resources to other city agencies.
Candidates running for election in city elections are eligible, as long as they qualify and agree to the spending limits. Almost everyone who runs for office participates. Of the winners of the 2009 City Council race, only one person abstained from the program. Not all the winners used the funds—some found that it was more lucrative for them to forego the matching funds and be free of the spending limits, but many did.
Can't Participants Game the System?There are a number of provisions in place to try to prevent candidates from abusing the system. For starters, candidates can use the public funds they receive to pay their campaign staff, and campaign staff can donate to that candidates campaign, but there are strict guidelines on whether that donation would receive matching funds. For another example, City Councilmembers have been criticized in the past for directing discretionary funding to non-profits, whose directors and board then donated back to that candidate's campaign in the next election. Now a law prohibits matching funds from vendors doing business with the city. ... "